How to get 200 upvotes on Reddit.
Step 1) Post an 800-word rant on the Red Pill subreddit starting with the sentence “Women are shit.”
Step 2) There is no step 2.
TRUE STORY.
I’ve seen the rant, and now you can see it too. If you’re not masochistic enough to click on that link, I’m not going to subject you to the whole thing. It contains so much pure misogyny per square inch that reading it wore me out. So I’m just going to post some giant chunks of it, make a few jokes, and then take the rest of the day off.
Ok, let’s go:
Women are shit. AWALT. Fuckoff snowflakes, nobody cares you think you’re different. Every woman thinks she’s special and different and expects to be treated as such. It’s all bullshit. Women are remarkably similar to each other across the board and HATE being generalised because of their narcissism. They’re so similar psychologically that we can make a fucking subreddit [The Red Pill] that generalises just over half the human race with an incredible degree of accuracy and use that knowledge as a proficient weapon in helping men get the upperhand in a social system where they’re systemically beaten down.
Dude, I don’t want to nitpick but “upper hand” is two words, not one. “Uppercut” is one word. “Upper hand,” two. Continue.
The upperhand is something a man needs if he ever wants to come out unscathed with any kind of social contract with a woman.
Dude, what did I just say? It’s two words. TWO WORDS.
Hypergamy necessitates it. She requires your superiority to be attracted to you, that’s probably the biggest joke about “equality.”
No, here’s the biggest joke about equality:
Have you heard about the constipated mathematician?
He had to work it out with a pencil
Sorry, that wasn’t about equality. But I thought it was pretty good for a poop joke.
Not all women are born equal, but all have a capacity for insanity and machiavellianism. … Never met a bitch who wasn’t crazy or manipulative. [U]nderneath that exterior of upward inflexion, smilies and a face full of chemicals their lurks something far darker and more destructive.
That they have to work out with a pencil? Ba-dum-tish!
Did you see what I did there? In comedy that’s known as a “callback.”
Men need to start living in bachelor pads together, library, gym, pool table. Swimming pool. No bitches living in the house.
Yeah, I think you’ve just invented the frat house. (Well, a frat house with a pool.)
It’s an effective way to avoid this clusterfuck of affairs we call women/marriage/divorce/hypergamy without being lonely/sacrificing a sex life.
I don’t think anyone calls it “ women/marriage/divorce/hypergamy.” That’s kind of a mouthful.
Jealous bitches will accuse you of being gay as an effort to shame you/your friends into adhering to the traditional narrative and wifing up her or one of her friends, laugh in their faces and shame them right back for being homophobic. Lay into them for hating gays and watch them shut the fuck up as you flip their own bullshit back at them.
Yeah, show those shitty bitches who the real hater is … wait, what?
Live your life on your own terms men don’t feel like you have some fucking duty to society and these ungrateful harpies who’ll never appreciate all the sweat and toil you put into making ends meat. Fuck ’em all. Society never gave a fuck about you so don’t feel some disjointed loyalty to it.
Disjointed loyalty? I’m beginning to think this guy doesn’t know how words work.
If you’re not already lumbered with a woman, a woman’s problems, and a kid, sit back, sip a JD & Coke from a cocktail straw and let it all fucking burn.
If it’s all burning, maybe you should jump in that pool of yours to stay safe.
We can literally redefine transactional sex from “shit woman does to control you” to “something women are paid to do and then quickly leave because you don’t want the crazy parasite trying to dig her claws into your life”
Wow. First you invented the frat house, now you’ve invented prostitution. Congratulation.
Wanna know something else pretty? Older women who are single tend to go even crazier. They’re not fucking built to do this alone, yet they’re designed in a way that makes you not want to put up with them.
Wait, single older women are designed to make you sick of them? Who exactly designed them like this? Evolutionary psychology just gets weirder and weirder.
Hahahaha. Couldn’t give a shit about woman’s struggles, everyone’s running around after them, men are the ones in most urgent need of help – mostly emotional support. I get too many messages from guys who want to kill themselves. It’s fucked up. Thanks women/feminism.
In all seriousness, I hope you tell these guys to call their therapist, or a hotline, because they’re not going to get the help they need from you, that’s for sure.
Some guys are desperate for something more meaningful with a woman, love, a proper relationship and blah blah. Fair enough, I understand that desire, but all this shit still applies. You will get fucked. It’s not a question of if, but when. Most people who make it work met very young, you were her first alpha or some shit. A lot of this shit still applies you just have far better odds at working through it.
Well, no, actually people who get married when they’re very young divorce at much higher rates than those who get married later. It’s almost as if people learn and grow from experience and can make better choices when they’re a bit older. The more experience a woman has with men, the less likely she’ll be willing to settle with a wannabe “alpha” asshole like you.
Oh yeah, another thing, any unfavourable opinion of women no matter how rooted in reality makes you a bitter misogynist, might as well embrace the label until it loses any meaning. Much how women call each other sluts and bitches to be cute. Oh you bitter misogynist you, have a soft punch in the arm.
If you think any of these ridiculous opinions of yours are rooted in reality, you’re not only a misogynist, you’re kind of an idiot, too. And possibly 14 yeard old.
NOTE: Thanks to the Red-Pill-watchers in the Blue Pill subreddit for pointing me to this, er, gem.
@MenOnStrike:
Alright.
Yeah, how could we be so cruel to mock this slight mistrustful statement?
@MenOnStrike, I think you misread me. I am totally writing him off. For being a misogynist, for being mentally and emotionally lazy, for not taking responsibility for his own life.
And frankly, I am tempted to write you off, too. Every woman he has ever come in contact with has literally made his life worse? Really? His mom? His grandma? The sweet checkout lady at the market? The school librarian? The bus driver? The waitress at the cafe? Every woman? Ever?
If that’s the case either he’s a raging jackass to everyone he meets or he’s itching for a fight and seeing enemies where there are none. Either way, I got no time for him or those who defend him.
And if you are upset about the use of the term “these men” look no further than your own keyboard. I was quoting you. I never said you were a redpiller or a MGTOW or any other arbitrary group. I was responding to the words you wrote. Nothing more.
Translation: I don’t know what feminism is.
Coddling woman = not sending rape or death threats.
How do you know he does? And what constitutes a good reason to hate all women? (And he does: AWALT.)
Probably because he started of with “All women are shit” and didn’t get better from there.
Translation: I still don’t know what feminism is.
He’s just getting worse and worse with these arguments. Baby Groot could dismantle this asswipe.
Okay, I feel like I’ve said this already. But once more, maybe I wasn’t clear. There isn’t a good reason for hating all women. Or all men. Or all of anyone who was born into a particular category. Because that assumes they are all the same, and that they aren’t people in their own right. And this guy hates all women, when he doesn’t know all women, but assume they all have the ability to be ‘insane’ or cruel or are just evil. It’s hate, being directed at women for being women. There is no good reason for that.
*high fives bbeaty again*
Feminists don’t raise girls to hate men. They raise men to respect women, because they’re people, and they raise women to not expect a lower level of respect just because they’re women, also because they’re people.
If you can’t grok the difference between “setting slightly higher standards” and “hatred”, I’m taking away your Allowed To Talk About Feminism Card. The Feminist High Council deputised me to do so in recognition of years of service to misandry.
It’s amazing how these MRA types have latched onto Sarkeesian as the end-all, be-all of feminist thought. There’s like a century’s worth of modern and Western feminist thought to dissect, and they choose someone with among the least-challenging, least-controversial views of the bunch to crucify.
I guess that’s what happens when you just assume that all dem wimminz hate men, though – attack the latest messenger, message be damned.
RE: jared
I spilled water on my keyboard the other day and I have to get it fixed and I know it will probably will be expensive.
*confused face* I busted my keyboard and just replaced it with an old $5 from Goodwill. Do these new computers not allow for that? Seriously, it’s not too bad.]
RE: MenOnStrike
Feminism is teaching more and more women, especially the younger generation, to hate and mistrust men.
I’m a gay male feminist. I guess I must hate and mistrust myself AND my husband! You’ve totally got me there, dude, I weep tears of ideological agony every time I bang my husband. But please, continue prattling on about subjects you know nothing about. I’ll be here, pointing and laughing.
Right back at ya, J.J.!
@MenOnStrike:
“@aunt edna – not. Angry feminist rhetoric, maybe. But, I don’t use hate so willy-nilly.”
In the manuresphere, the fact that women have a say in their choice of sexual partners / activity is considered misandry (men hate) — heck, scented candles are misandry — so I don’t buy your pretense at noble discernment here (nor does anyone else).
“Does that mean the reason why he’s saying these things is /completely unworthy/ of an honest discussion and he simply deserves to be mocked?”
Yes, actually. Anyone who launches into “Women are shit. AWALT” rants deserves to be mocked. A person interested in an honest discussion would not say anything of the sort.
And you know it, so please drop the disingenuous act. You’re not that naive, but pretending to be so shows that you too do not desire to be taken seriously.
@LBT:
LOL @ tears of ideological agony
Hey, I don’t want this guy shot, I just want him to Go His Own Way and live in his super secret no-girls-allowed house and stop interacting with women, like he keeps saying he wants to. He’ll be happier! Women everywhere will be happier! It’s win-win!
@fruitloopsie. I’m not an MRA either. It’s so funny how you’ve pigeonholed your opposition. I’m not a feminist, ‘equalist’, or really want to have anything to do with “equality of the sexes.” I am a humanist, but only in that every human is (and should forever be) born with the same opportunities. With that said, men and women are different. Not lesser/more, equal/unequal… but a completely different sex and gender. To say anything otherwise is to promote androgyny and such a waste of humanity.
I am sorry for the way you grew up, and the trials of your mother. Does this mean you hate all men now? If not, why so quick to jump at the idea that I don’t think men should support their children. I am against the draconian measure of “child support” simply b/c monetizing children is ‘evil’ as you might put it. I’m in favor of enforcing visitation, not monetary support. Force the fathers 50% custody, enforce living standards via in-home visits if there is a concern there, but turning children into something that incentivizes women into parental alienation? Nah, no thanks.
@jj Ah, but isn’t labeling him a misogynist just about the same? I mean every time I see it thrown at someone it is with such vehemence that “go kill yourself” is always implied.
Every woman this dude meets, or as implied every woman he has a romantic relationship with? There is a difference, but again it very well might be his reality, are you just simply denying it?
Projecting like IMAX, this one is.
Sarkeeeeeeesian!
I’m sure someone’s gotten a bingo from TrollONStrike by now.
Nice bit of dancing goalposts, too.
So tell me, MenOnStrike, how exactly is being oppose to Anita Sarkeesian getting death and rape threats “coddling” her?
“…I’m taking away your Allowed To Talk About Feminism Card. The Feminist High Council deputised me to do so in recognition of years of service to misandry.”
This reminds me of a drunken discussion a group of us (women and men) were having about various things feminism-related and oh, who can remember probably politics and religion and Battlestar Galtica knowing us, and someone said something that (maybe mockingly? who can remember) offended someone else. The offended person said “Gloria Steinem will rise from her grave and beat you to death with Bella Abzug’s thigh bones.”
Which turned into a drunken argument about which of those women was dead or alive.
I will frequently say I am going to get Gloria Steinem to tear my daughter’s feminism membership card and throw the pieces in her face.
@sparky
“Do men have problems? Sure. Are we required to coddle guys like this because they have decided to hate all women for no good reason, when many of us have reasons in our past where we could hate/mistrust all men, but somehow don’t? HELL NO.” -JJ
“Do women have problems? Sure. Are we required to coddle guys like [Sarkeesian] because they have decided to hate all men for no good reason, when many of us have reasons in our past where we could hate/mistrust all women, but somehow don’t? HELL NO” – my point. The death and rape threat bs aside, I don’t hate women, so why should I have to coddle her?
Hah. Excuse the mistake on not replacing ‘guys’ with ‘girls.’ I don’t think Sarkeesian is a guy…
Mos
I don’t hate men and I didn’t say that I did. I forgive my father for all those things he did to me and my mother.
And there are men who get custody and visitation rights, All they have to do is ask. The family courts do what is best for the child.
Sarkeesian hasn’t decided to hate all men. Everything you say is wrong. You are fractally wrong; wrong at every conceivable level. I award you no points, and may god have mercy on your soul.
You didn’t answer the question. How is being opposed to sending rape and death threats to Anita Sarkeesian “coddling” her? How are feminists “coddling Anita Sarkeesian? And how the hell is Anita Sarkeesian “hating all men?”
In what video or written communication have you seen Sarkeesian state that she hates all men? Please provide a link.
Why are we pretending MenOnStrike is here for anything but idiocy?
Here
@MenOnStrike:
You’re wrong, and not very entertaining about it. Dance monkey, dance.
I will also accept evidence that she declared “All men are shit” as evidence of hate. But I doubt you can link to anything where she says that, either.
@Menonstrike
you claim your not a misogynist or a bigot, well just you handle “menonstrike” implies hate.I know their is a book by conservative Dr. Helen Smith”Men on strike”. She allies herself with A Voice for Men a hateful website. What the heck are on strike from then? I presume based on what I know about Smith’s book it is striking from dating women and marriage. Just your handle implies you are an mgtow and those dudes are definitely gender separatists. So if you claim your not mgtow which obviously you are change your handle. But really just gyoẃ already and watch that the door does not hit you on the way out. Get out of here and stop your tedious trolling.