If you’re a straight guy looking for “fapping” material, the internet is your friend. It’s awash in freely available pictures of naked women of every size, shape, color, age, or hairstyle you prefer. And if you want more than pictures, the internet is happy to oblige, offering up videos featuring women of every description engaging in every sex act you can imagine, and then some.
You might think this would be enough.
But for some straight dudes, it evidently isn’t. They don’t just want to look at the mind-bogglingly enormous selection of women out there who have agreed to pose naked, or even perform explicit sex acts, on camera.
No, they also want to look at women who haven’t agreed to have their nude photos put on the internet. Hence the popularity of “ex-girlfriend” or “revenge porn” sites, filled with pictures that are (or at least purport to be) of ex-girlfriends who never wanted the pictures they shared with their then-boyfriends posted for the world to see.
Hence the popularity of “leaked” celebrity nudes.
The latest celebrity nudes scandal revolves around a gigantic collection of personal pictures stolen from the supposedly secure online accounts of an assortment of female celebs (and a couple of guys).
The most famous of the celebs in this current batch are Jennifer Lawrence – Jlaw – and Kate Upton; there are many others, including alleged pics of comedian Aubrey Plaza and gymnast McKayla Maroney, which internet “detectives” are scurrying to prove are real. Maroney is only 18; if the alleged pics of her are real, and weren’t taken very recently, they’re arguably child porn.
The pics were first released by an anon on internet cesspool 4chan, and they have found a welcome home on the slightly more respectable internet cesspool Reddit, where they have been posted and reposted, sometimes retouched and color-corrected, and celebrated with enthusiasm by hundreds of thousands of Redditors.
Indeed, the leaks have inspired a new subreddit, TheFappening, which has managed to gain 100,000 subscribers in a day. Evidently Reddit’s admins have no problem with a subreddit distributing stolen celebrity pics, including some that may well be child porn.
Naturally, Reddit being Reddit, some of new members of TheFappening are trying to distract from their odiousness by suggesting that those downloading Jlaw’s stolen pics also … donate to a charity fighting prostate cancer. Either that or start up their own prostate cancer fund – to make sure they get credit for their donations.
Sorry, guys, that doesn’t make what you’ve done ok. And if you’re truly concerned about prostate cancer, why on earth did you wait until you needed some good PR to launch a fundraising effort?
Over on the Men’s Rights subreddit, meanwhile, one concerned fellow attempts to stand up for the hidden victims in the scandal: men. No, really.
Even some of the commenters feel obliged to point out that, er, the hacker almost certainly is a dude — not just because the leak originated at 4chan, or because the overwhelming majority of the pics are of women, but also because, you know, women can’t STEM.
The strangest reaction to the scandal from an MRA that I’ve run across so far comes from the new Twitter account of A Voice for Men’s PR gal Janet Bloomfied (the one she created, in violation of Twitter’s rules, to get around her recent ban). After mocking celebs for taking private selfies or posing for their partners, Bloomfield posted a topless, headless picture of, presumably, herself, commenting “Is this me? Maybe. I text nothing I don’t want shared. #DontBeDumb.”
Apparently Bloomfield doesn’t quite understand the difference between posting nude photos of yourself and posting pictures of other people that have been obtained and posted without their consent. This isn’t particularly surprising, as MRAs in general seem to have trouble understanding the finer points (and the blindingly obvious points) of consent.
The enthusiasm with which so many male Redditors – and skeezy dudes in general – have greeted this latest leak of celebrity pics makes one wonder if it is not the celebrity of the women in question that is the draw but the lack of consent. After all, there are plenty of other celebrity nudes out there that the celebrities in question consented to have taken and published.
For a lot of those downloading and/or posting the pics of JLaw and Kate Upton and the rest, I suspect the real thrill comes not from seeing the nude bodies of these particular celebs – which, after all, are pretty similar to the nude bodies of porn actresses that can be found everywhere online – but from the violation of privacy that these pictures represent.
There is a real sadism here, driven in part, I suspect, by resentment that many female celebrities don’t agree to appear nude in their movies or to pose nude or topless for magazines. Sharing these stolen nudes is a way to punish JLaw and other female celebs who have so far refused to share every inch of their bodies with their male, er, fans.
It’s a toxic stew of entitlement, resentment, and misogyny. And no amount of donations to prostate cancer research will make up for it.
Super bit of irony: these “don’t give her orgasm” morons are so ignorant, there were Catholic theologians four hundred years ago who knew more about women’s sexual responses and capabilities than they do. To wit: if a woman didn’t orgasm during sex, she was quite justified in dealing with the matter herself. Granted this was because they believed orgasm meant a better chance of conception, so there was a whole lot of Wrong! going on, but they still sound less clueless and outright horrible than these imbeciles.
The cynic in me thinks any attempt from these assholes to “ration orgasms” is doomed to failure because any women unfortunate enough to end up in bed with one of them is going to be so unfulfilled she’ll fake one just to get him to stop.
@Alais
Did you just do a gravatar? I like it.
strivingally – and it’ll be the first and last time he gets anywhere near her.
Kim, seconding that!
Alais, who’s the person in your avatar?
I particularly like the prostate cancer bit. Make sure to donate to a cause that can’t possibly directly help the women in the pictures!
Oh fuck I hate huge slabs of humanity sometimes.
4chan trolling to get women to post topless pix in “JLaw Solidarity” hoax.
I try not to throw around words like “evil” very often, but I’m struggling to come up with a better way of describing people who would turn a violation of women’s privacy into an opportunity to exploit more women.
Kim, Kitteh,
It’s Juan de Flandes’ painting of one of the daughters of Ferdinand and Isabella. It’s probably Juana, who succeeded her mother as queen of Castile in 1504 but spent most of her life after that locked up, first by her father and then by her son, on accusations of madness. I’ve also seen the sitter identified as a young Katherine of Aragon (she and Juana were sisters, so there’s definitely a resemblance), but either way, I’ve always thought that it was a cool painting.
Also, strivingally, I didn’t think that they could top “Donate to prostate cancer if you look at Jennifer Lawrence’s pictures” for awfulness, but apparently, they can.
Or if the key was given to the neighbour with the purpose of them feeding the dog and instead of feeding the dog they completely filled the house with pineapples.
Consent for one purpose immediately transfers to consent for a different purpose. sarcasm
On a more sensible note, my work will only publish photos on their website where all the participants and the photographer have given their permission. In addition, photos should not contain copyrighted materials. Yanno … my work website has lots and lots of really nice photos on it.
I just feel sorry for the small number of women who honestly fell for it. It’s like a troll-mobbing equivalent of Lewis’ Law – “Troll campaigns to discredit feminism justify feminism”.
@belladonna
Yes, it’s zir as well; eg zie saw zir.
(That was hard to type on a tablet. Stupid patriarchal autocorrect.)
Shit, strivingally, people are fell for it? That’s horrible.
I dunno if this is going to make anyone feel better because I dunno if it even makes ME feel better. But 4channers will literally troll anyone. Misogyny is not their only dysfunction. I really hate them.
Sure redpoppy, but do all the trolls take this shit as seriously as the “anti-SJW” types? With the quasi-military sounding “Operations” and the network of sockpuppets and the attempts to manipulate the media perception of groups they disagree with? They seem like particularly invested trolls…
Very true, strivingally. I really hate them all around but I guess I was trying to somehow…comfort myself? Lol It’s hard to take much comfort in anything related to 4chan shitheads.
There was that whole “anti-father’s day” debacle they started. Trying to frame feminists for it. God that pissed me off. Feminists can smell your bullshit, dudes. Because that is NOT our ideology. Not by a long shot.
@redpoppy:
It’s usually their dedication to playing Oppression Olympics that gives them away. When they’re impersonating a PoC and try to pivot to racism as soon as someone questions them, for instance, as if being The Most Oppressed is a competition and being utterly immune from criticism is the prize.
It’s almost as if they don’t understand there’s a difference between things that actually affect the lives of vulnerable people, and using any axis of vulnerability as a Get Out Of Jail Free card.
Alais, how cool! I’ve not seen many portraits of Isabella and Ferdinand’s family, and most of the ones I’ve seen of Katherine are the much later English pics by nowhere-near-as-skilled painters.
Trivia: Juana is my Mr K’s great-great grandmother.
Trivia #2: all Henry VIII’s wives were descendants of Edward III of England.
@aitch
Thank you!
And thank you for persevering through autocorrect! 🙂
@wordsp1nner lololololol It’s not like the “catching fire” metaphor is explicitly linked to changing political moods and revolution or anything. Hunger Games is obviously super, super subtle, which is why it never appealed to young people or spawned a line of action figures.
Not that I’m not all for more menstrual metaphors.
@redpoppy But I’d be interested to see the breakdown of how often they troll for behavior/principles (some of those could maaaaaaaaaaaybe have been at least theoretically justified, like vs. Scientology) and how often they just harrass people for some immutable part of their identity because it’s “funny.”
So half the time on this blog, I just want to quote people and then applaud them. But that seems kind of silly. So just, thanks to all of you!
Wow. Stay classy, 4chan, stay classy.
Kitteh,
Ooh! You’re right. I’d never realized that genealogical connection was there. But then I always forget that Marie de Medici’s mother was an Austrian archduchess.
That I did know! I love the Tudors, and the stories of Henry VIII’s wives were some of the first historical tales that I really got into, and a couple history bloggers have traced all of their English royal. pedigrees. http://tudorqueen6.wordpress.com/2012/09/22/english-ancestry-of-the-six-wives-descent-from-edward-i/