If you’re a straight guy looking for “fapping” material, the internet is your friend. It’s awash in freely available pictures of naked women of every size, shape, color, age, or hairstyle you prefer. And if you want more than pictures, the internet is happy to oblige, offering up videos featuring women of every description engaging in every sex act you can imagine, and then some.
You might think this would be enough.
But for some straight dudes, it evidently isn’t. They don’t just want to look at the mind-bogglingly enormous selection of women out there who have agreed to pose naked, or even perform explicit sex acts, on camera.
No, they also want to look at women who haven’t agreed to have their nude photos put on the internet. Hence the popularity of “ex-girlfriend” or “revenge porn” sites, filled with pictures that are (or at least purport to be) of ex-girlfriends who never wanted the pictures they shared with their then-boyfriends posted for the world to see.
Hence the popularity of “leaked” celebrity nudes.
The latest celebrity nudes scandal revolves around a gigantic collection of personal pictures stolen from the supposedly secure online accounts of an assortment of female celebs (and a couple of guys).
The most famous of the celebs in this current batch are Jennifer Lawrence – Jlaw – and Kate Upton; there are many others, including alleged pics of comedian Aubrey Plaza and gymnast McKayla Maroney, which internet “detectives” are scurrying to prove are real. Maroney is only 18; if the alleged pics of her are real, and weren’t taken very recently, they’re arguably child porn.
The pics were first released by an anon on internet cesspool 4chan, and they have found a welcome home on the slightly more respectable internet cesspool Reddit, where they have been posted and reposted, sometimes retouched and color-corrected, and celebrated with enthusiasm by hundreds of thousands of Redditors.
Indeed, the leaks have inspired a new subreddit, TheFappening, which has managed to gain 100,000 subscribers in a day. Evidently Reddit’s admins have no problem with a subreddit distributing stolen celebrity pics, including some that may well be child porn.
Naturally, Reddit being Reddit, some of new members of TheFappening are trying to distract from their odiousness by suggesting that those downloading Jlaw’s stolen pics also … donate to a charity fighting prostate cancer. Either that or start up their own prostate cancer fund – to make sure they get credit for their donations.
Sorry, guys, that doesn’t make what you’ve done ok. And if you’re truly concerned about prostate cancer, why on earth did you wait until you needed some good PR to launch a fundraising effort?
Over on the Men’s Rights subreddit, meanwhile, one concerned fellow attempts to stand up for the hidden victims in the scandal: men. No, really.
Even some of the commenters feel obliged to point out that, er, the hacker almost certainly is a dude — not just because the leak originated at 4chan, or because the overwhelming majority of the pics are of women, but also because, you know, women can’t STEM.
The strangest reaction to the scandal from an MRA that I’ve run across so far comes from the new Twitter account of A Voice for Men’s PR gal Janet Bloomfied (the one she created, in violation of Twitter’s rules, to get around her recent ban). After mocking celebs for taking private selfies or posing for their partners, Bloomfield posted a topless, headless picture of, presumably, herself, commenting “Is this me? Maybe. I text nothing I don’t want shared. #DontBeDumb.”
Apparently Bloomfield doesn’t quite understand the difference between posting nude photos of yourself and posting pictures of other people that have been obtained and posted without their consent. This isn’t particularly surprising, as MRAs in general seem to have trouble understanding the finer points (and the blindingly obvious points) of consent.
The enthusiasm with which so many male Redditors – and skeezy dudes in general – have greeted this latest leak of celebrity pics makes one wonder if it is not the celebrity of the women in question that is the draw but the lack of consent. After all, there are plenty of other celebrity nudes out there that the celebrities in question consented to have taken and published.
For a lot of those downloading and/or posting the pics of JLaw and Kate Upton and the rest, I suspect the real thrill comes not from seeing the nude bodies of these particular celebs – which, after all, are pretty similar to the nude bodies of porn actresses that can be found everywhere online – but from the violation of privacy that these pictures represent.
There is a real sadism here, driven in part, I suspect, by resentment that many female celebrities don’t agree to appear nude in their movies or to pose nude or topless for magazines. Sharing these stolen nudes is a way to punish JLaw and other female celebs who have so far refused to share every inch of their bodies with their male, er, fans.
It’s a toxic stew of entitlement, resentment, and misogyny. And no amount of donations to prostate cancer research will make up for it.
redpoppy – not to mention that I strongly doubt that Ferengi culture has much in the way of support for those who fail to acquire wealth. So the benefits that they love to complain about that help support the poor would not exist for them when they themselves needed it.
Right, bad stuff happens to other people because they’re stupid or weak or whatever. None of that will ever happen to me because I’m smart and strong and stuff. I feel so comforted, and relieved of the burden of caring about other people’s problems or feeling the need to improve the world!
I just glanced through JB’s new twitter. Holy cow, she does nothing but think about feminism 24/7.
Because consent is sooooo haaaaaard! And having to get it makes Misogynus Boner sad.
@cloudiah
Good point. Salon sums it up pretty well here: http://www.salon.com/2014/03/02/doxxing_victim_this_isn’t_about_porn_this_is_about_humiliation/
None of this is about porn. Like David said, if it were about porn, hackers would never go after private photos. There are plenty of women taking off their clothes and having sex in front of the camera with the full knowledge that anyone can see the pictures and/or the videos. Hell, there are plenty of celebrities who pose nude or have topless and/or naked scenes in their movies. It’s not even really about the celebrity at this point. If they want naked celebrities that badly, there are still plenty of naked pictures of celebrities out there that the celebrities in question willingly shared.
@Alais, I was just going to post that same article.
I’ve been getting into fights over this bullshit all day. This is the result:
http://damsel-in-de-tech.blogspot.com/2014/09/stolen-nudes-and-new-peeping-toms.html
Jenny, yeah. Their society is VERY Ayn Randian. If you can’t do it yourself, too bad. And I’m guessing they can’t. Boy would they whine about it.
I think that it’s even worse than that in this case. The consent isn’t hard here, and they know that the woman consented to having her picture. They specifically want the lack of consent, and they’re mad that she agreed to let her boyfriend take the photo because already having gotten consent gives their boners a sad.
Should say “They can’t claim that the consent is hard here because they know that the woman consented to having her picture taken.”
Is there anything we could do to stop “ex girlfriend” “revenge porn” and other disgusting sites?
@tesformes
Looks like your thread was deleted because freedom of speech or something.
Fruitloopsie, activists have gotten some major revenge porn sites taken down before.
http://jezebel.com/one-womans-dangerous-war-against-the-most-hated-man-on-1469240835
fruitloopsie: A few places already have laws against that sort of thing, though the exact wording varies.
Good article on this by John Birmingham in the Brisbane Times:
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/comment/blunt-instrument/jennifer-lawrence-nude-photos-sharing-not-a-scandal-its-a-crime-20140901-10b089.html
@redpoppy Aaaaaaand now I’m going to be having terrible nightmares of fedora wearing ferengi’s trying to explain why human trafficking laws actually victimize men. 😛
@zoon echon: yes this is an excuse for apathy I’ve seen in every forum about anything bad ever happening to anyone, anywhere in the world. It’s some people’s default position in order to feel good about themselves, I guess. The whole idea being bc they’re law-abiding, they will never be shot by the police. Bc they’re not dumb, no one will ever leak their private information on the internet. Bc they’re not weak, they’ll never be sexually assaulted.
No bad thing in the world will ever happen to them bc they’re the pinnacle of human evolution. (An interesting note is that these are the exact same people who believe in some form of apocalypse and that they will be one of the tough and intelligent survivors who rebuild civilization out of the rubble. This mainly seems to involve rebuilding the race through the sexual assault of whatever women are left alive. Just a side-note.)
An addendum to this “philosophy” is the idea that bad things have always happened to people and will always happen so why try to do anything about it.
@ pendraegon well obviously *human* trafficking laws victimize men, and also women but Ferengi care about neither. They’d probably be a bit miffed about Ferengi trafficking laws though.
@chaltab lol Unfortunately I recently had to listen to a “libertarian” vomit his ideas at me about how human trafficking laws really just victimize men who can be prosecuted more harshly based on the distance the “product” had traveled. And then I had to spend about an hour playing with my guinea pigs to drown out the despair.
Ugh I can’t say I like JLaw as a person but no one deserves this. People getting off to this are gross and already have a rapist’s mentality – the violation is what they want. I am very glad I don’t use soundcloud though heesh. My nudes stay between me and my two best friends, thanks. Stuff like this makes me super paranoid and upset.
Alias, lee and Kittenserf
Thanks, it’s nice to know there are brave and good people out there making the world just a little bit better.
I had Twitter conversations with two people who basically said “if she didn’t want the photos getting out, she shouldn’t have kept them on an online/connected device”. With both of them I brought up the issue of online banking for comparison. One of them seemed to think that “online banking” means banks using the Internet to do financial transactions with other banks and credit card processors and such, and seemed completely unaware that people will use their home computers to do banking; I’m still unsure if he was actually that clueless, or if he was being disingenuous. The other replied that keeping nude selfies on a device is a lot less common than online banking, so I asked him if storing nude selfies on a device makes the device more likely to be hacked, since otherwise his statement was a non-sequitur; he has yet to reply to my question.
@Pendragon
Ugh. Libertarians, people aren’t products. I’d expect y’all to know this, what with your emphasis on muh freedums and all. But then I suppose that the really extreme libertarians see sexual slavery as a profitable business that should not be curtailed, especially not businesses that might someday keep their boners from getting a sad.
@Fruitloopsie,
Agreed. It’s always refreshing when someone’s persistence and activism accomplishes something.
It seems like if there is any risk of a man choosing to do something bad to a woman (rape, hacking/releasing nudes, sexual harassment) we cannot condemn the man unless the woman never did anything that might have made it possible, no matter how ordinary a behavior it is (walking down the street, having alcohol at a party, having nekkid pictures of yourself on your phone.)
Funny, I don’t see this kind of advice being given to victims of ungendered crimes, like the common mass credit-card hackings or to victims of break ins. “Oh, you should pay for everything in cash and not live in that (wealthy/poor/urban/rural) neighborhood.”
It’s like people have suddenly taken a time warp back to 1995, where everyone still does everything important offline, and no one in their right mind would trust anything to those rapscallions on that there Interweb! Just…have they been living under a rock the past 20 years?
@Matthew Cline
If nothing else, I can’t figure why people aren’t freaking the fuck out over the idea that someone might get their credit card and banking info. It’s amazing just how important victim-blaming is to them.