Over in the Men’s Right’s subreddit, one new Social Injustice Warrior is weary, worn down by fighting the Bad Fight against the “Sarkeesian feminists” on Twitter. And what better way to convey one’s weariness than with a melodramatic monologue?
So he posted this:
In the AgainstMensRights subreddit, one of the regulars felt that Maring_’s existential lament was good enough to deserve a dramatic reading. Two AMRistas responded to the challenge. Here’s one of their readings, complete with swelling music at the end:
Stirring indeed!
I went back over Maring_’s Reddit history to see what kind of heroic work he has been doing to fight the Sarkeesian feminists of the world. I would report on some of that, but I found his insights into sexuality to be far more interesting.
For example, he shared these thoughts about his sexual prowess with the regulars in r/celebs:
And these thoughts about his multicultural sexual preferences:
As well as these observations about the redoubtable Marlene Dietrich:
![Maring_ 2 points 4 days ago what a colossal babe. I'd bring the ruckus to that bitch's pussy. permalink save report give gold reply [–]rpilek [S] 2 points 4 days ago I agree, I also find her very sexy. permalink save parent report give gold reply [–]Maring_ 2 points 4 days ago I'd run that bitch's ass into the ground](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/maring4.png?resize=426%2C265&ssl=1)
Meanwhile, in a thread in r/movies on the death of Richard Attenborough, he left these kind words:
Rest up, weary Redditor! It can be difficult to bring so much ruckus to the world.
Maybe he thinks that the more raw the woman is after sex, the bigger it means that his dick is. Not actually how it works, but he’s clearly not an expert.
It could also be his personal experience with being asked to stop because his partner is not comfortable. What he’s not getting is that bad sexual technique and lack of arousal is responsible for that and it’s not a good thing for a woman to be ready to give up that quickly.
”Social Injustice Warrior”? I’m gonna start using this term!
skagboy,
Makes you kind want to carry a battle ax, doesn’t it?
The way I view it, he is having great sex. For him and him only. And he only cares about that and all the kudos he’s going to get from his like-minded buddies. The woman is merely a means to an end. Him feeling good. And if she’s raw, uncomfortable and hurting? That just makes it even better.
Sadly, his tiny faction are the only people who view that as good sex. Everyone else just thinks what an awful, selfish loser he is who sucks in bed.
Yeah, me too. Funny how they view social justice as a Bad Thing.
@ Lea and maistrechat
Potential parody titles:
“Uncle Ruckus: His Songs and His Sayings”
“Nights with Uncle Ruckus”
“Uncle Ruckus and His Friends”
“The Tar-Baby* and other Rhymes of Uncle Ruckus”
“Told by Uncle Ruckus: New Stories of the Old Plantation**”
“Uncle Ruckus and Brer Rabbit***”
“Uncle Ruckus and the Little Boy”
“Uncle Ruckus Returns”
“Seven Tales of Uncle Ruckus”
*insert absurd alternative at will
**likewise
***likewise
It’s all going begging, folks. I don’t know exactly how the copyright situation stands with all of these but even if only two or three of them are freed-up there’s a deep mine of material there available to anyone who wishes to make use of it. Just saying.
The original Uncle Remus books, BTW, were by a guy who also wrote a book titled The Bishop and the Boogerman. For real — so they might be harder to parody than they at first appear. You’ve gotta admit that just as a title that one’s hard to top.
Oh my, MRA’s are just as good at dramatic readings as they are at graphic design!!
And I love the way he says yeah, sure, I’d fuck Jennifer Lopez. As if he has a choice. AS IF SHE’D FUCK HIM. As if she’s just waiting around for losers like him to judge her fuckability.
Those dramatic readings use text written by a MRA, but recorded by anti-MRAs, Fnoicby.
@cloudiah, ah that explains it. Entertaining either way!
@Misha,
“But why does he think this community would be interested in custody battles between heterosexual parents?Raising awareness of the rights of gay men and couples to be parents, awesome, no problems understanding that. But why does he think this community would be interested in custody battles between heterosexual parents?”
That part actually does make sense. Many gay parents are *in* custody battles with cross-gender co-parents.
@emilygoddess
Yes, exactly. He’s fantasising about rape.
@brooked, I enjoyed seeing those commenters slapping him down. 😀
@WWTH
I am so stealing this.
Leftwing fox,
“Cockney rhyming slang for “the clap”?”
Perhaps “a ruckus and flap”?
Marus_ said, of Feminists:
I have yet to debate an MRA and have it stay open, civil or rational on their end.
How about y’all?
They have their own version of reality .
You can’t really debate someone off on their own reality side-spur.
On the other thread a well known MRA blogger indicated that five minutes was the extent of an alpha males abilities. So that kinda mansplains it.
Sorry, not the thread but the post itself.
I read his comments on r/celebs, and now I know that there’s a subreddit called r/tinytits. I feel like they’re complimenting my people but also insulting us at the same time.
“I leave their hole feeling raw after minutes of intensive use.”
Because he thinks that “Wanna fuck, chickee?” is all the foreplay a woman could ever want or need.
And he has to go after lots of women because anyone unfortunate enough to fuck him once will never make that mistake again. (Why do they never get the idea that having slept with a lot of women might, just might, mean that none of them found you worth keeping?)
Same here. It always falls right away into condescension, sneering, and cunt-calling on their part.
I think that closest thing to an open, civil, and rational debate that I’ve seen an MRA conduct is one where he kept moving the goalposts and then, when he couldn’t move them any farther, started declaring his right to remain skeptical and “neutral,” no matter what evidence anyone offered against him.
We’re well into “you have a right to your own opinion, but you do not have a right to your own facts” territory at that point.
Couldn’t have said it better. It’s not the fault of everyone else that they are so fact averse. Opinions are opinions and you can have as many as you want until the cows come home. Facts ain’t nothing to fuck with. But they try. Very hard to fuck with facts to fit their opinions. Not very rational or logical, huh?
Nope, but they’ll applaud themselves for their rationality if they can refrain from insulting people or if anyone gets slightly “emotional” while explaining the facts or gets frustrated that the MRAs debating won’t listen to or even try to understand the opposing argument. Because clearly the “emotional” people must be wrong.
It’s not that women are too emotional, splainey dudes, it’s just that you’re really annoying.