Categories
a woman is always to blame alpha males antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? attention seeking creepy dark enlightenment evil women irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny no games for girls no girls allowed oppressed white men playing the victim post contains sarcasm reactionary bullshit red pill women in tech YouTube

A proposed new anti-Anita Sarkeesian "documentary" promises to give voice to the loudest "silent majority" the world has ever known

I don’t usually post raw videos from the insufferable assholes I write about on this site because, well, they’re insufferable assholes, and listening to them smugly opine about shit they’re completely ignorant about is generally about as entertaining as, you know, GirlWritesWhat videos. (I know, that’s a bit circular, but I really couldn’t come up with anything more insufferable than that.)

Anyhoo, I’ve broken my rule and posted this video because the two guys who made this video — the would-be filmmaking duo of jordanowen42 and Davis Aurini — are so over-the-top in their insufferable assholism that it’s actually kind of perversely charming.

You see, these two woman-hating YouTube blabbers — the first a belligerent doofus whose apartment is nearly as unkempt as mine, the other a sort of PUA version of Anton LaVey — are pitching what they claim will be an important new documentary exposing the evil “Social Justice Warrior” agenda of evil women and traitor men like Anita Sarkeesian, Zoe Quinn, and, well, I can’t remember the names of any of the men. It’s called The Sarkeesian Effect. And they want your money to fund it.

Their promised “feature-length documentary” will be a powerful work of investigative journalism that will give a voice to the voiceless — to the “silent majority” of, well, angry white dudes who spend whatever time they don’t spend playing video games posting obnoxious and abusive comments about Anita Sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn to YouTube and Reddit and eleven zillion other websites that cater to them.

In other words, this is the loudest “silent majority” I’ve ever run across.

But these are guys who love to pretend that their bold thoughts are being silenced, and PUA Anton LaVey Davis Aurini happily panders to their persecution complex:

Don’t let these people silence us. Your contribution will be a defiant strike against the degeneration and corruption that is going on in this world.

The word “degeneration” helps remind us that Aurini considers himself a part of the neo-Nazi-lite “Dark Enlightenment.”

Anyway, they argue that you should send them lots of money, because PUA Anton LaVey’s suits can’t be cheap you’ll be striking a blow for every dude who’s ever called Anita Sarkeesian a “whore” in a YouTube comment. Well, they don’t literally put it that way, but, you know, come on. That’s what they mean.

And hey, who wouldn’t trust this dude with their hard-earned cash?

Send me your money! Heh heh heh heh heh.
Send me your money! Heh heh heh heh heh.

I found this video hilarious from start to finish. Stick with it at least until, a little after 6 minutes in, PUA Anton LaVey Aurini lights up his second cigarette, showing what a devil-may-care attitude he has by mumbling his lines with a cigarette in his mouth as he fiddles with his lighter.

Yep, that’s the kind of quality investigative  journalism you can expect from these two.

319 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Listen, I didn’t SAY they made any arguments

Again, thanks for conceding here.

David isn’t refuting anything because there’s nothing to fucking refute. These are two whiny dudebros trying to peddle some off-the-wall conspiracy theory about how Anita Sarkeesian and “social justice warriors” are trying to destroy vide games (or…something. I’m not quite sure what dastadly plot Sarkeesian and SJW’s are supposedly trying to pull here). And trying to actually argue that Sarkeesian’s critics have been “silenced.” That’s not something you need to argue against. It’s ridiculous. It’s something you mock the shit out of.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Troll flounced and left us with a gif of a scantily clad woman with physics defying jiggling, bouncing boobs. This completely proves that Anita Sarkeesian was wrong and there is no misogyny in video games. Because ManLogic TM.

M. Shiranui
10 years ago

Why do I even bother?
[image removed -EmilyGoddess]

vaiyt
vaiyt
10 years ago

How have they been “raving misogynists”? By virtue of being against Anita?

The simple fact that they want to spend an inordinate amount of money making a counter-feature to her videos as if they were something SO special that warranted it, already speaks volumes.

The truth is, Anita isn’t saying anything other people haven’t said, or being particularly deep or radical in her views. As far as feminism goes, her videos are outright sedate, and her merit is just to present lots of information (THAT WAS ALREADY THERE) in one place, in an easy to digest format. Yet the raging brigade has been treating her like Satan incarnate, making Tropes vs. Women out to be some kind of feminist atomic bomb. It’s ridiculous.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Jeez. When you flounce, that means you leave. Not a difficult concept.

blahlistic (@blahlistic)

Listen, I didn’t SAY they made any arguments (not literally at least, although you guys seem to have trouble understanding that)….The whole arguments thing was just something I threw in there because I was in the moment, and exactly thinking about what I was saying. I may not have worded it correctly, and the message may have been somewhat muddled. I said something I didn’t mean/believe in…

…Freedom of speech in action. Can I help you get your foot out of your mouth, sir?

Jarred H
10 years ago

@Auntie Alias: Interesting. I never realized “making high quality arguments” required so much money. And here, I thought it just required evidence and sound reasoning. As far as I know, both of those things tend to be free.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Unimpressive overly early flounce. 0/10

Failure to stick to flounce that doesn’t address anything we said brings that score down to
-2/10.

This troll is even more pathetic than Woody.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

Aww, he didn’t stick the landing. So sad.

Why do I even bother?

*shrug* Since you’ve decided not to leave, why don’t you tell us? Explain to us what a day in the life of Shiranui is like.

Auntie Alias
Auntie Alias
10 years ago

-1 for a pointless GIF.

@Jarred H

Smells like a scam or an impending disaster to me. These two aren’t exuding trustworthiness or professionalism. Nevertheless, I bet it would be a hoot to watch the train wreck if this promo is any indication of the final product.

Redcap
Redcap
10 years ago

Did anyone notice that they’re fundraising on Patreon? And that the payments go through per “each monthly update video on the making of [their] film”? So that they don’t even have to make the doc to get money, just upload poor-quality vlogs? There is some hardcore scamming going on here.

M. Shiranui
10 years ago

@kirbywarp
It’s awesome! Way more exciting than your pathetic life. I get to be the most gorgeous kunoichi in the world. I know Shiranui style ninjutsu, and go on exciting missions and compete in fighting tournaments and show my skills and my beauty off against the best fighters in the world! I’m currently off from all that, which is why I’m arguing with you assholes. But… sigh… none of that’s enough to make the love of my life notice me… I mean, I try and I try and I try, but its never enough for me to earn his affections. Sigh…

Bina
10 years ago

Oh look, Sheer Ennui is back.

And still as unentertaining as ever, jiggly-boobed cartoon creature notwithstanding.

Lee
Lee
10 years ago

Redcap: Indeed. This is the sort of thing that people would use Kickstarter or IndieGoGo for, but I get the feeling neither of those venues wanted them (and rightly so).

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@Shiranui:

Why does your beauty matter in ninjitsu tournaments? Kinda of a weird combination there… Especially in a martial arts style based on remaining subtle and un-noticed. Do the male combatants all have to be absurdly handsome as well?

Phoenician in a time of Romans
Phoenician in a time of Romans
10 years ago

Pabu: Oh oh, and Phoenician’s add on is a must!!!

YOU SAY THAT AS IF THERE WAS ANY POSSIBLE DOUBT!!! Just admit it, heathen, I am always, always wright!

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@Phoenician:

Phoenix wright, the best kind of wright!

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

I’m calling “cool story bro” on that last post. It sounds like the intro to a bad fan fic of some sort.

blahlistic (@blahlistic)

@kirbywarp
It’s awesome! Way more exciting than your pathetic life. I get to be the most gorgeous kunoichi in the world. I know Shiranui style ninjutsu, and go on exciting missions and compete in fighting tournaments and show my skills and my beauty off against the best fighters in the world! I’m currently off from all that, which is why I’m arguing with you assholes. But… sigh… none of that’s enough to make the love of my life notice me… I mean, I try and I try and I try, but its never enough for me to earn his affections. Sigh…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mai_Shiranui

…ok. Pull the other one, it has bells on.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

No one cares, M. Shirunai. No one cares.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

@blahlistic:

I’m just waiting to see if he’ll follow through or stay boring.

blahlistic (@blahlistic)

Yeah, I never liked the fighter-style games much, that’s why I would not have heard of this character.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

From the Wikipedia article:

The over-endowed, perpetually jiggling Mai has become not only a mascot for SNK’s King of Fighters series, but also for the whole company. Mai is an unapologetic sex symbol, with her low-cut blouse and loincloth barely covering her assets as she whips ass on whoever stands in her way. While some decry Mai’s ubiquitousness as pandering fan service, we’re more than happy to pick up the yearly iterations of the King of Fighters franchise just to get fresh hands on this fetching fighter.[117]

—UGO Team in 2008

So, a scantily-clad large-breasted female character whose major claim to take is “jiggling.” Nope, nothing sexist in video games. Nothing at all.

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
10 years ago

Heh, I don’t know the character or game, but since he’s just been posting gifs with that character, I figured they were the same. Didn’t know his user name matched the character name though.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

“Take” = “fame.”

Autocorrect has a serious grudge against me today.