Categories
a voice for men alpha males antifeminism domestic violence entitlement excusing abuse incoherent rage men created civilization men invented everything men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny MRA paul elam post contains sarcasm reactionary bullshit red pill violence

Is War Machine, the mixed martial arts fighter accused of brutally beating his ex, a Men's Rights Activist?

The "hero" the Men's Rights movement deserves?
The “hero” the Men’s Rights movement deserves?

If the Men’s Rights movement is looking for a celebrity endorser, I think I’ve found just the guy for them: the mixed martial arts fighter, and erstwhile porn actor, War Machine, currently sitting in jail on charges of brutally beating and attempting to kill his ex-girlfriend, porn star Christy Mack.

Men’s Rights activists should be able to look past these criminal charges; after all, as they remind us all the time, women are forever falsely accusing innocent men of all sorts of terrible things.

And in so many ways War Machine is perfect for them. An MMA fighter, he’s already only one letter away from being an MRA. A misogynistic asshole with rage issues, he’ll have no trouble fitting in with the Men’s Rights crowd. And, especialy important for a movement that has a lot of trouble getting any good PR, he’s a bit more comfortable on camera than the Paul Elams and Dean Esmays of the world, with experience on television  (on the reality show The Ultimate Fighter: Team Hughes vs. Team Serra), and in seven films (albeit pornographic ones).

Best of all: he’ll need no ideological education from what A Voice for Men likes to call Fuck Shit Up University. War Machine – real name Jonathan Koppenhaver – is already an outspoken proponent of many of the Men’s Rights Movement’s core beliefs.

Consider these selections from a little Men’s Rights manifesto War Machine wrote a few years ago during a previous stint behind bars, serving time for felony assault after two bloody bar fights. His rant, which a friend posted to the internet, would fit right in with the sort of stuff we’ve seen regularly posted on the Men’s Rights subreddit, or The Spearhead, or A Voice for Men. I’ve bolded some of the Men’s Rightsiest bits:

The oppression of MEN is worse than oppression of Jews in Nazi germany, worse than the slavery of Blacks in early America…

There has always been the oppressor and always the oppressed. Before, it was blatant … NOW the oppressor has learned to disguise his evil. You can see man, but you can not see MEN. How easy it is to oppress a minority that is invisible to the eye! How genius of the oppressor! And what a better target too! …

Men challenge injustice from Government, MEN fight for their Constitutional rights, that are slowly being taken away every year. …

And they don’t just oppress us by making more laws and taking away more freedom, they are far more clever than that! Ask yourself what your REAL dream was?? If you gave up on this dream, why? Because of the brainwashing of the Government, that’s why! They taught you to “play it safe.” They told us a responsible man has ONE wife, a house, good credit, good job, and kids. How are you supposed to chase your dreams while maintaining all of that!?

Men are supposed to take risks and be aggressive! What accomplishments have ever come of a man scared to risk it all!? None!? Where would the world be? Still ‘flat!’ Still ‘Earth at the center of the universe!’

If any of you have your Men’s Rights Bingo cards out, I’m guessing you might already be close to scoring a bingo. We’ve got a comparison to slavery that could have come straight from the pages of A Voice for Men, a marriage-is-death-to-male-dreams rant that could have been borrowed from any MGTOW forum, and an evo-psych-esque argument that men are the true risk-takers and the world’s real innovators.

And I don’t think War Machine would have much trouble with Paul Elam’s “Bash a Violent Bitch Month,” either.

[I]t’s Christmas day and I’m laying in my bunk wondering “Why in the hell do American men get married!?” … If your wife is being a bitch you can’t slap her, if your wife is yelling at you, God forbid you yell back … Next thing you know it will be illegal to fuck your wife! LMAO! Maybe then, MEN in this country will get the fucking hint and MOVE! This country forces you to be a bitch!

In another online posting, War Machine touched on another Men’s Rights hobbyhorse, the notion that the justice system is stacked against men:

[L]ook at the prisons, they are FULL of MEN, not women. Are men “evil” and women not? Or do the laws target and attempt to restrict NATURAL MEN’S BEHAVIOR? How many of the HEROES in American history would avoid prison if they lived today? Davey Crockett? Thomas Jefferson? David Bowie? General Grant & General Lee? Shit, George Washington. … Laws target MEN and men’s behavior. Women want to bitch and cry about their rights and equality… LMAO! MEN are the ones locked away like animals, while women run free!

Someone might have to explain to War Machine that David Bowie is not actually a famous American HERO but a famously androgynous British musician who once recorded an album called “Heroes.” (Mr. Machine may be thinking of James Bowie, a well-known 19th century American frontiersman and slave trader, and the guy the Bowie Knife is named after.)

But other than that, he seems ready to go.

There is, of course, that whole attempted murder charge to deal with.

It’s true the Men’s Rights Movement has had few problems in the past rallying behind men with histories of violence. But War Machine might be a harder sell as a Men’s Rights hero. His alleged attack on Mack left her with a cracked rib, a ruptured liver, numerous broken bones, missing teeth and her eyes swollen shut.  (See here for photos of her injuries; obviously this link is NSFW and could be triggering.)

While Mr. Machine denies attacking Mack, he joked to a TV host last year that if she were to leave him “I would just kill her” and get a tattoo saying “Rest In Peace” above the tattoo of her name he has on his neck.

And several hours after allegedly trying to murder her, War Machine tweeted this lovely message about his ex:

https://twitter.com/WarMachine170/statuses/497663075831787521

War Machine does seem to be at a low point in his life. Even aside from the charges he faces, and the time he seems likely to serve, his career in porn is almost certainly over. The “Alpha Male” clothing line he helped start wants nothing to do with him. Nobody but the prison system seems to want this guy.

In other words: Men’s Rights activists, this is your chance! War Machine may not be the, er, hero you want. But he’s certainly the hero you deserve.

 

 

1.5K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
blahlistic (@blahlistic)

I believe there’s room to praise multiple deities-jeebus, bootsy, ceiling cat, etc.
I liked Dawkins’ books that I’ve read so far, but Dawkins himself is a twerp.

gilshalos
10 years ago

*eyes that photo*
OK, that was posted as another link…

Nova
Nova
10 years ago

MMA is not responsible for this. The only one who holds culpability is the asshole who beat her.

GrumpyOldNurse
GrumpyOldNurse
10 years ago

Do you suppose we could sic the Daleks on the Dawkingsbot? That’s one fight to the death that I would pay to see!

Auntie Alias
Auntie Alias
10 years ago

Every time Dawkins says something awful I wonder how many other atheists are sitting there feeling like they’re at a wedding and that one embarrassing uncle that every family seems to have has just made a pass at all 5 bridesmaids, threw up on the flowers and then passed out face-down in the punchbowl.

Not if the pro-Dawkins commenters on Raw Story are any indication. They’re blatantly lying about what he said. “He didn’t tell anyone what to do!” Um, yes, he did and then he passed moral judgment on those who wouldn’t abort.

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

MMA is culpable in the way that martial arts dojos who continue to train guys who get into fights are culpable.

contrapangloss
10 years ago

With Dawkins, the more surprising day would be the one in which he doesn’t taste his own toes.

Sad admission: High school me idolized Dawkin’s a bit, because I was only reading the sciencey books and hadn’t started seriously delving into both peer reveiwed papers and Dawkin’s non-biology nonsense. Then I got to college, and started spending more time on the internet and more time with journals… and his social nastiness left a bad aftertaste.

Dawkins, please try to go a month without having a peanut butter and toe-jam sandwich for lunch. Please?

redpoppy
redpoppy
10 years ago

The Furrinati Pantheon (Trademark pending) will have room for thousands of kitty gods!

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

@contrapangloss: some of Dawkins’ biology stuff is nonsense too. He played fast and loose with some references, so that studies he cited as evidence for some things actually showed the opposite results to how he was using them.

So I don’t trust his biology either.

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

Has anyone tried to get Dawkins removed from Twitter for not abiding by community rules?

blahlistic (@blahlistic)

Nobody deserves a physical attack, and given his MMA fighter background, he would have known he was easily able to do terrible injuries to another person

One, the latter was what he was likely there to do.
Two,he really believes she belongs to him, and how dare she steal his property?

Gen
Gen
10 years ago

Fuck Dawkins. He’s a stain on the face of atheism. And FUCK this asshole here, who thought it okay to brutalize a woman because he saw her as his property. And FUCK all those shitstains on humanity who are engaging in victim blaming and denigrating sex workers. Seriously, FUCK THAT.

redpoppy
redpoppy
10 years ago

Does anyone remember that horrible abortion debacle? Trying to “reason logically” that if fetal pain was present, it would trump the woman’s right to choose. Or some such nonsense. He played fast and loose with some biology right there. Ignoring the most recent studies about “fetal pain” being bullshit. Yet he used it as an “argument.” Some great big smart-maker he is.

Nova
Nova
10 years ago

It’s a slippery slope. Once we blame MMA and associations involved in it, it opens the door to things like blaming a car dealership for selling a car to someone with a previous DUI, who gets wasted and kills someone. Or a dancer who dances for someone who later commits rape. Or… a lot of things.

I would like to see organizations sanction fighters who get in assault related trouble, but still don’t see them as culpable in this situation.

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

For someone who blames religion for making its followers into unquestioning drones, he really does need his own unquestioning drones as followers.

Lea
Lea
10 years ago

I wonder how many other atheists are sitting there feeling like they’re at a wedding and that one embarrassing uncle

Oh, if only he were the only one. It’s more like having the kind of relatives that cause you to decide not to having a wedding at all because in order to stomach their company you’d have to get so drunk you’d pass out in the punch bowl.

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

Nova: I disagree. You can hold him entirely accountable for his abuse, and hold MMA accountable for shaping and training him into a person who was more easily able to abuse.

People are the product of who they associate with. He’s a longtime misogynist arsehole, the MMA would have known (any of these sorts of organisations make it their business to know, in great detail, about the personal life of their employees/associates because PR) about his abusive tendencies, and yet they continued to retain him.

You can’t fix an environmental problem through dealing with people as though they are independent individuals.

Lea
Lea
10 years ago

redpoppy,
I’d forgotten that one.
I really, really dislike that man.

Auntie Alias
Auntie Alias
10 years ago

In other news, has anyone seen AVFM’s new mission statement? I hope David posts about that because I seriously need to rant about it.

redpoppy
redpoppy
10 years ago

Lea, me too. Ugh.

pallygirl
pallygirl
10 years ago

Re Twitter bans, am I right in reading this as meaning that you can only get people for sexism, racism, etc, if it’s directed at a single person or organisation – but if it’s directed generally (learn to think, etc) then it isn’t going against the Twitter rules? https://support.twitter.com/articles/20169997#

contrapangloss
10 years ago

@pallygirl, I’d noticed. That realization came with finally starting to read peer reviewed papers, and being really, really surprised.

College was a bit of a rude (but oh, so needed) wake-up call.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

Question – how common is steroid use in MMA? If it is tolerated then we can certainly hold them responsible for that.

My feeling about martial arts and people like this guy is that individual teachers should actively try to identify students with this sort of personality and kick them out of their classes. My old teacher kicked out a student who he just thought drank too much on the principle that it showed him to be “undisciplined”, so I don’t see any good reason for continuing to teach someone who you know or suspect is going to misuse the training you’re giving them.

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

My wife looked way hott and I can’t wait to terrorize her in 6 weeks!

“Terrorize”???

Yeah, I can’t imagine why she’s not his wife anymore.

PS: Cassandra, are there any Wen-Do classes being offered near you? It’s self-defence for women only, but it’s martial-arts based. I wish I could go again, but the nearest ones are probably being held in Toronto and Kingston, both of which are more than an hour’s train ride away. Wish I could have the Karate Kid’s luck and run into a wise, kind, BS-free “Mr. Miyagi” around here…

1 3 4 5 6 7 59