A Voice for Men's Attila Vinczer is trying to "dox" me. It's not going well for him so far.

Proof of David’s sordid rock n’ roll past.

Gasp! That must have been before he settled down as a distinguished academic. Attila Vinczer had that part correct, he was a full Professor of Lies – on the tenure track and everything!

@cordis, Link to that?

Also, GWW is currently debating with AMR here: http://www.reddit.com/r/debateAMR/comments/2at4xc/feminists_what_do_you_think_of_this_article_on/

It turns out that racist and anti-Semitic stereotypes were primarily stereotypes about men, and it’s some kind of misdirection to point out they were actually motivated by … racism and anti-Semitism. Also, those attacks on black and Jewish men were all about protecting black and Jewish women. You’ve got to read it.

Privacy: NOT a Men’s Right.

Good to know!

Is GWW seriously using the words “the Jews” and “the blacks” in that reddit post? Not just once, but multiple times?

….are you serious?

More from GWW:

You would have a point if I’d claimed that black women or Jewish women were not negatively stereotyped. I said nothing of the sort. What I said was that the stereotypes of black and Jewish men align with negative cultural perceptions of masculinity, not cultural perceptions of all blacks or all Jews (other than superficial things like big noses and big lips).
Oddly enough, I don’t see any of the black women in the links raping women (or men). Mostly, they are victims of stereotypes of women NOT being traditionally feminine–big nose, unmodest, ugly, hyper-sexual. Yet the men are portrayed as HYPER-masculine (at least in our age of “toxic masculinity”). They are, in modern parlance, the ultimate expression of not pathology, but maleness. Rapey and violent.
So. Black men are seen as hyper-sexual. And some black women are portrayed as such. Black men are seen as violent. And some black women are portrayed as such. Is this where you claim that calling a man a pussy is misogyny, because you’re telling him he’s like a woman? But telling a black woman that she’s evil because she’s like every black man that has ever been portrayed is… what? More misogyny?

This seems like a pretty good example of being not even wrong.

They look like sentences, but then you read them and they don’t make any sense.

More Girlwriteswhat:

If people in the Jim Crow South didn’t hate blacks and see them as an out-group, they’d have seen black and white men as equally rapey and violent. If Japan and America were not at war, the Japanese would have seen white men as not much more rapey and violent than Japanese men. If Hitler loved Jews, the rapiness and violence of Jewish men wouldn’t have been an issue for him to propagandize.

…and they are inviting this person to speak at Kennesaw State University?

GWW is trying to gain more head pats from the men in a primarily white, misogynist “movement” by trying to appropriate the suffering of non-whites and Jews for that misogynist movement while denying that non-white and Jewish women suffer and have suffered from racism and antisemitism?
>.<
Fetch me my bucket.

I guess we now know the answer to the question implied by GWW’s moniker. It’s bullshit. A metric fuck-tonne of bullshit.

I call horseman of Bad Hair Days!

I mean, this is why white men were so frequently the victims of lynching, and male Aryan Nazis were so frequently sent to concentration camps. Nothing to do with bigotry. Just the regular trials and tribulations of being men, on steroids.

This is so painful. My wonderful little brother is an Attila. Please don’t tar all Attilas with the same brush.

You will rue the day you made fun of my coin, David!

Nice to know where the 30k went