Categories
men who should not ever be with imaginary women ever MRA narcissism no girls allowed sockpuppeting Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux's Secret Life as a Hot Babe Who Loves Stefan Molyneux

In the comments section to philosopher-douchebag Stefan Molyneux’s review of Frozen, a self-described “attractive young woman” posts a review of his hour-long review that is so effusively positive that it almost sounds like it was posted by the man himself.

Oh, wait: he did post it himself.

Screen Shot 2014-07-10 at Thu, [Jul 10], 14 1

Can this be real? I mean, it is real; I just went and got the screenshot. But is it really possible that Mr. M tried to sockpuppet in the comments to his own video, posing as his own biggest fan? Or did some worshipful young hottie sneak onto his laptop when he wasn’t looking and post the comment? What kind of “philosopher” does that? Did Jean-Paul Sartre send love letters to himself? Did Kierkegaard leave gushing messages on his own answering machine?

I think we can safely say “no,” at least to the latter, given that Mr. K died in 1855.

But what the hell, Stefan? I eagerly await your two-hour video explaining this one.

Also, if you could explain why my cell phone keeps randomly beeping, that would be great too. It’s really annoying.

(Thanks to everyone who sent this to me.)

UPDATE: I figured out the problem with my cell phone! Oh, and I have also been told that Stef’s self-congratulatory comment was actually a repost of a comment from someone else. He wasn’t pretending to be a young hottie. He was posting a quote from a young hottie without indicating in any way that it was a quote from someone other than him. Good job! So I’ve changed “written” to “posted” in the text above.

Now, though, I’m wondering if that person also wrote the comment that Stef used to introduce his video:

Screen Shot 2014-07-10 at Thu, [Jul 10], 14 2

I mean, that has to be written by someone else, because what kind of arrogant douchenozzle would not only write about himself in the third person but also describe his own video as “must watch?” David Futrelle needs to know.

 

150 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
bunnybunny
bunnybunny
10 years ago

His Google+ account is difficult to navigate because he seems to repost his videos with selected comments over and over again. All of the comments sound just as ridiculous as this one. Hard to say if they’re coming from socks or not, though. MRAs kind of prove that actual people can buy into the stinkiest bullshit.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

Wait, am I not allowed to reject snowmen now? I’m not seeing how I would un-friendzone them, given that if we tried to get busy they would melt.

AFrederique
AFrederique
10 years ago

As much as is review is ridiculous, you can find a screenshot of the comment (http://imgur.com/jHR1Oqr), and this seems to be a real person, not a troll or someone posing as someone else. Sorry to derail the conversation, but I believe having our facts straight is the best way not to be criticised as throwing baseless accusations.

andrea harris
10 years ago

Afrederique, your link is either wrong or you realized your mistake and removed it. Zoinks!

breadandrosesblogger
10 years ago

^ You beat me to it. I was going to point out that the comment in question was made by someone else but it was actually buried in the YouTube comments section. However, in defense of everyone who thought Molyneux made the remark himself, he sure didn’t differentiate this from his own words by using, well, quotation marks, italics, bolding or really anything that would tip people off that those were not his words. He’s still an idiot who’s engaged in shameless self-promotion over an incredibly shitty analysis of Frozen — one that is probably only second in terms of craziness to Pastor Kevin Swason’s view that it promotes the “homosexual agenda” and will turn kids gay.

brooked
brooked
10 years ago

@ladyrainicorn
That’s the best joke I could come up with about the length of this… thing. Honestly I can’t believe anyone could watch Molyneux’s piss poor close reading of Frozen for a whole freaking hour. When I googled this stupid video I found a message board with an interminable post by Molyneux, presumably the video’s transcript, and a bunch of breathless super fans raving about it.

https://board.freedomainradio.com/topic/40223-the-truth-behind-“frozen”-by-stefan-molyneux/

In my heart of hearts I know these are real people rather than an army of sock-puppets, but why are people watching these things? Why are they doing this to themselves? WHY?

drashizu
drashizu
10 years ago

AFrederique, when I click that link I get a llama in a top hat and a “content not found” error.

breadandrosesblogger
10 years ago

Try this link:
http://imgur.com/jHR1Oqr

AFrederique
AFrederique
10 years ago

Thanks breadandrosesblogger, that’s the link I was trying to copy/paste, no idea why it didn’t worked. And I agree completely with CassandraKitty, this guy opinions on “attractive women with high self-esteem” almost seems to border a quite creepy resentment, which makes the apparent size of his fanbase an uncomfortable fact for me.

sadie6
10 years ago

I seen the screenshot and it doesn’t seem very real to me, could be wrong though.

Morrigan
10 years ago

When I first saw this, I almost burst out laughing, but unfortunately:

It appears to be a re-post of a month-old comment from Lajune Mcmillian. Her account is almost three years old (Oct. 14, 2011) and has uploaded seven short videos for animation classes and plenty of activity, nothing to do with Molyneux.
http://imgur.com/bOhprlO

We can speculate that Mcmillian’s account was hacked, but…
It doesn’t make Molyneux any less reprehensible.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

It’s creepier because the audience for Frozen was children. What is he doing, trying to groom some 8 year olds to be his future wives?

Morrigan
10 years ago

Oh, AFrederique already commented about it. ~.~
Well, I used my own screenshot, if you don’t trust theirs.

Puddleglum
10 years ago

@brooked, thanks for the link, I tried reading the transcript but gave up when he announced that a) anything that isn’t physically real is irrational and b) magic in stories is *always* a metaphor for madness. The arglebargle is strong with this one. Unfortunately, his critical thinking and ability to cite is weak.

tinyorc
10 years ago

Are the misters deliberately acting up because they know David is supposed to be on semi-vacation?

AFrederique
AFrederique
10 years ago

@cassandrakitty
I wouldn’t be that surprised if his end goal was indeed to establish a libertarian harem with him at the center. Because let’s be honest here, a single mother is obviously inherently abusive, as is a women dating an asshole, even if she doesn’t perceive her partner as such. And because every non-Molyneux male is by definition an asshole that perpetuate the evil on this planet, the conclusion seems to be obvious.

emilygoddess - MOD
emilygoddess - MOD
10 years ago

*mod hat on* Breadandrosesblogger, would you mind not using “crazy” in a pejorative way? Thanks. *mod hat off*

brooked
brooked
10 years ago

@Puddeglum

I began to skim it in search of amusing quotes but had to tap out after few paragraphs, due to extreme boredom. His breathless fans should check out actual film criticism, if they’re impressed by this crap something like Film Quarterly would blow their minds.

breadandrosesblogger
10 years ago

@emilygoddess

Would “stupid” suffice?

ladyrainicorn517
ladyrainicorn517
10 years ago

@brooked

Ye gods, I was worried. But yes, it is… difficult to understand how anyone could listen to him for that long. What gives me comfort is that freaking Frozen is his, apparently, all-time most affecting film. I’m all for analyzing children’s films, but if he truly believes that none are more complex than Frozen, this is fourth-grade discourse at best.

nada
nada
10 years ago

Is the link still up?

katz
10 years ago

I can’t imagine anyone being such a brilliant media critic that it would be worth watching a 1-hour movie review. Anyone good at communicating knows how to be concise and there is simply a limit to how much non-redundant material there is to say about a movie. Generally I think 15 minutes tops for a movie review before it’s likely to have some padding.

Howard Bannister
10 years ago

1 hour?

That’s not a review. It’s a sermon.

Argenti Aertheri
10 years ago

Breadandrosesblogger — not a mod, but stupid is, with MRAs, a good go to word in general.

As for the OP, why does Molyneux care about a Disney movie in the first place? And why this one when Disney has plenty of ones adults have actually seen? Go critique one old enough that its target audience is now old enough to read your review >.<

Puddleglum
10 years ago

Okay, I tried scanning the transcript again. The reason it’s so long is that he apparently decided to deconstruct the entire movie scene by scene. [b]The entire movie[/b]. He goes through the song [i]Let it Go [/i]almost line by line.

I really regret the five minutes I spent scanning that sucker. I can’t imagine actually watching the video!

On the plus side, I finally downloaded the text formatting toolbar! (hope I used it correctly).