Categories
antifeminism creep-shaming elliot rodger entitled babies entitlement hypocrisy irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misandry misogyny MRA post contains sarcasm reddit straw feminists the eternal solipsism of the MRA mind

Men's Rights Activists respond to the Elliot Rodger murders with a hearty "Nothing to see here! Move along!"

nothing-to-see-here
The We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive continues! If you haven’t already, please consider sending some bucks my way. (And don’t worry that the PayPal page says Man Boobz.) Thanks! And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.

If anyone was hoping – against their better judgement – that Men’s Rights activists would be inspired by the tragedy in Isla Vista to reconsider any of their beliefs, or even to reflect for a moment on the many striking similarities between passages in Elliot Rodger’s book-length manifesto and comments posted every day by MRAs and others in the manosphere, well, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you should not keep that hope alive.

It’s not that they’re not talking about the tragedy. A look through the top 100 posts in the Men’s Rights subreddit, the largest Men’s Rights forum online, reveals that roughly a third of them, including the top stickied post, relate in some way to Elliot Rodger’s rampage and the discussions that have come up online and in the media in its aftermath.

But the message of virtually all of these posts is: “Nothing to see here! Move along!” There are numerous posts expressing outrage that anyone would see any connection between Rodger’s toxic misogyny to the Men’s Rights movement; there are others mocking and attacking the #YesAllWomen hashtag; there’s even one suggesting that Rodger, who wrote about how he longed to watch all the women of the world starve to death in concentration camps, wasn’t actually a misogynist at all.

Take a look. One post, with more than 500 upvotes, complains:

Feminists highjack what should be a Mental Health issue.
Another post makes a strikingly similar complaint:

Feminists Hijack A Mass Murder To Boost Self-Esteem
One angry MRA asks:

Why am I being compared to a mentally ill, narcissistic, racist, misogynist, sociopathic serial killer?
Another wonders:

So at this point would it be worth it to look into a Defamation suit against those trying to link MRA's with the recent tragedy?

Sorry to break it to you, fella, but that’s not how defamation suits work. If it were, all of us who call ourselves feminists would be collecting millions of dollars from the Men’s Rights subreddit for all the patently untrue things you guys say about us every day of every week.

Still others make sure that everyone knows that Rodger hated men too – not that this has actually gone unnoticed in the media or in discussions of the tragedy.

Proof that Elliot Rodger Hates Men
Finally! The MSM acknowledges that Elliot Roger hated *MEN*

And then there’s this fellow, who seems to think that Rodger only hated men, and that his big problem with women was that he loved them too much:

Elliot Rodgers the Misandrist. (self.MensRights) submitted 13 hours ago by TheWhimsicalFox In listening to Elliot's videos, and reading some of his manifesto, I almost feel as if this guy really just hated men. It seems as if he put women on a pedestal and held such an adoration for them that he could not understand how the "beasts" (among other terms)/men got to date them. This is a totally new idea for me, I haven't really thought it through for longer than a minute or two. So that's why I'm taking it here. What do you guys think?
There are, it’s true, two posts that raise the issue of what might be done to prevent tragedies like this from happening in the future. One of them takes on the issue of “virgin shaming.” (Sure, I’m against that, and against slut shaming too. Odd that roughly 100% of the virgin shaming I’ve ever heard in my life has come from MRAs and other non-fans of this blog, even though — sorry to break it to you fellows — I’ve not been a virgin since the early Reagan administration.)

Meanwhile, the other “positive” suggestion  — the stickied top post, submitted by one of the forum’s moderators — is pretty transparently intended as a PR move – and an excuse to bash feminists.

Time to get positive. What would help alienated men? (self.MensRights) submitted 20 hours ago * by nicemod - stickied post The recent tragedy in California has focused attention on troubled young men. Attempts by feminists to associate our movement with violence have met with little success, but have drawn many curious people to see what we're about. We can take advantage of this by proposing positive, male-friendly solutions to such problems. Proposals by feminists, based on the false assumption that maleness is inherently bad, will not work. What will? How could society effectively address male problems such as Loneliness Mental illness Alienation from society Virgin shaming Creep shaming Depression Demonisation What other issues need to be looked at? Please discuss.
Yep, “creep shaming.” That’s the problem! Way to cut through all the bullshit and get to the heart of the matter! The problem isn’t that some men — well, a lot of men — think and act in predatory and entitled ways towards women. The problem is that sometimes when they do, women call them “creeps.”

The problem isn’t that the world’s creepiest and most entitled man just killed 6 innocent people, the problem is “creep shaming.”

After killing his roommates and a friend of theirs, Rodger attempted to get inside a sorority so he could massacre the women inside it. But he couldn’t get anyone to let him in. Probably because, well, whoever was nearest the door thought he looked a  bit, well, creepy.

“Creep-shaming” isn’t some insidious form of discrimination against awkward men. It’s a defense mechanism that women develop to protect them against predatory men. And in the case of the Isla Vista murders, I’m guessing that the willingness of women to go with their gut sense that Rodger was a creep literally saved lives.

But the mods of the Men’s Rights subreddit would rather moan about “creep shaming.” They would prefer that women lower their defenses against men like Elliot Rodger — because it hurts their feelings to sometimes get called a “creep.”

Guys, this is why people think Elliot Rodger was an MRA.

EDIT: I added more to the conclusion because I had more to say about creep shaming.

530 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Argenti: |_| 🙂

Davis, are you actually going to respond to anything anyone’s actually said?

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

The hell is with this petition?

Davis: no 1 curt you’re a virgin. We care that you’re a raging misogynist who’s defending other misogynists.

Davis
Davis
10 years ago

@ treehugger.

I can be around women, and ignore them. It’s a state of mind.

pinkfluffyunicrone
10 years ago

So much love for you all right now.

Shiraz
Shiraz
10 years ago

Who the hell called you gay? Also, we love gay men here, defensive posture not necessary.

Are you homophobic?

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

At least Davis is aware on some level that he’s spewing stupidity.

Ken L.
Ken L.
10 years ago

@Quackers

Your right,
There are so many factor that make misogyny so much harder to not see or hear.one factor I think that makes it so is that unlike say racism where a bigot can say “I don’t like (insert ethnic group) but another ethnic group is okay.” Misogyny can not be deflected if you hate woman, you hate woman. so misogynist tend to be quite in a situation where they can be identified. Also unlike say KKK members who seem to enjoy parading around, which causes the public at large to see them and say “yeah this guys are evil”. Misogynist (other then places like AVFM) really don’t get together in large enough numbers for people to have the same reaction to them as other hate groups.

Davis
Davis
10 years ago

MRA is full of stupidity, but classifying them as terrorist group is beyond stupid.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

I am 38 years old and I never had sex. Just because a guy no longer wants to deal with women doesn’t make him gay.

Wut?

I never said you were. My point was that everyone can’t go avoiding the gender they’re attracted to do just because they’ve been hurt by members of that gender. It’s physically not possible. What about bisexual people who have been rejected by both men and women? Do they have to go live in a cabin alone in the wilderness somewhere?

You have serious reading comprehension issues.

Shiraz
Shiraz
10 years ago

Can someone remind me why AVFM is endorsing the petition again?

J.J
J.J
10 years ago

Davis, if you haven’t taken the hint and fucked off, do so now.
You’re a misogynist and an ass and you’re not even good at it. You’re just annoying.
Everyone else is right. You can’t just search private property without a warrant or even probable cause, and you can’t commit someone who isn’t, for example, openly suicidal or homicidal. So, you don’t know what you’re talking about.

Also, you assume all women act as a hivemind or something, which is ridiculous. Women don’t hate socially awkward men. Most women do, however, hate assholes. Which you are. Maybe you could try to improve yourself or actually go your own way, because no one feels like dealing with you as you are. And no one has said you’re gay, Seriously, do you listen to yourself? I’m assuming no, because anyone with an ounce of self awareness would be too ashamed to keep this up.
Go away.

Argenti Aertheri
Argenti Aertheri
10 years ago

Shiraz — call me a cynic but my guess is that when it fails they’ll use that as “proof” that the MRM isn’t a hate group.

Sparky — thanks!

“What about bisexual people who have been rejected by both men and women? Do they have to go live in a cabin alone in the wilderness somewhere?”

Does it have internet?

Ken L.
Ken L.
10 years ago

@Shiraz

It’s the old any publicity is good publicity gambit.

Davis
Davis
10 years ago

JJ is mad.

You cannot control me on this site.

Your problem is that you want to bash men and women who do not submit to feminism. You’re too scared to take your complaints directly to these MRA shit stains. You’re just as pathetic as the MRA bums.

Davis
Davis
10 years ago

Everyone has the right to shut people out of their lives.

contrapangloss
10 years ago

Hi, Davis the construction worker gun salesman! Did you jump threads?

Hi, everyone else! I’m just here for a moment. The Tardis needed to refuel, and Cardiff’s rift is being… Persnickety.

Anyone want a jelly-baby?

hookergal
hookergal
10 years ago

I’m nominating Davis for “tool of the week” for his sheer ignorance & trying to tell us he hates women but comes onto a feminist forum anyway. THE IRONY. Hahaha

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

Davis: Fuck off and leave. You are not original or all that bright.

There’s one person here who can control you. He wields a mean ban hammer. I’m sure you’ll meet eventually.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Your problem is that you want to bash men and women who do not submit to feminism.

Prove it, Davis. Quote someone who bashed men and/or non-feminist women.

BTW, you ever gonna answer my question? Do you really think black women are worse than the KKK? Is that what you were trying to say? Do you really think that black women have done more damage than the KKK? Do you know how sexist and racist that is?

hookergal
hookergal
10 years ago

The self capitulation of @Davis is also something to be marvelled at. If only my arguments were so flimsy, that they’d blow over when someone with COPD tried breathing on them.

hookergal
hookergal
10 years ago

@Davis “you cannot control me”

BAHAHAHAHA

katz
10 years ago

Davis, you avoid women at the supermarket, where they’re just going to bag your goddamn groceries, and then actively seek them out and talk to them online. Methinks you may not be acting as logically as you think you are.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

You cannot control me on this site.

Gasp! We have an internet badass on our hands!

If David comes back online and confirms you are sock, you will be banned.

Even if you are not a sock, chances are you will eventually commit a bannable offense.

We aren’t terribly afraid of you.

emilygoddess
emilygoddess
10 years ago

The deputies could looked around his apartment.

Not without probable cause, no. 4th Amendment and all that.

FYI, Elliot killed more men than women.

OMG THIS IS TOTALLY NEW INFORMATION THAT TOTALLY CANCELS OUT HIS EXPRESSLY STATED MOTIVE AND PLANS!

What’s wrong with cutting off contact with people who do not like you?

Nothing is wrong with that. What’s wrong is your belief that 3 billion people don’t like you, and basing this assumption on the fact that they happen to share a gender.

You have serious reading comprehension issues.

Well, there’s not much light in his rectum!

pinkfluffyunicrone
10 years ago

I’m getting the giggles over the unanimously supportive comments section in Roosh’s new article.

1 3 4 5 6 7 22