Categories
antifeminism creep-shaming elliot rodger entitled babies entitlement hypocrisy irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misandry misogyny MRA post contains sarcasm reddit straw feminists the eternal solipsism of the MRA mind

Men's Rights Activists respond to the Elliot Rodger murders with a hearty "Nothing to see here! Move along!"

nothing-to-see-here
The We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive continues! If you haven’t already, please consider sending some bucks my way. (And don’t worry that the PayPal page says Man Boobz.) Thanks! And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.

If anyone was hoping – against their better judgement – that Men’s Rights activists would be inspired by the tragedy in Isla Vista to reconsider any of their beliefs, or even to reflect for a moment on the many striking similarities between passages in Elliot Rodger’s book-length manifesto and comments posted every day by MRAs and others in the manosphere, well, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you should not keep that hope alive.

It’s not that they’re not talking about the tragedy. A look through the top 100 posts in the Men’s Rights subreddit, the largest Men’s Rights forum online, reveals that roughly a third of them, including the top stickied post, relate in some way to Elliot Rodger’s rampage and the discussions that have come up online and in the media in its aftermath.

But the message of virtually all of these posts is: “Nothing to see here! Move along!” There are numerous posts expressing outrage that anyone would see any connection between Rodger’s toxic misogyny to the Men’s Rights movement; there are others mocking and attacking the #YesAllWomen hashtag; there’s even one suggesting that Rodger, who wrote about how he longed to watch all the women of the world starve to death in concentration camps, wasn’t actually a misogynist at all.

Take a look. One post, with more than 500 upvotes, complains:

Feminists highjack what should be a Mental Health issue.
Another post makes a strikingly similar complaint:

Feminists Hijack A Mass Murder To Boost Self-Esteem
One angry MRA asks:

Why am I being compared to a mentally ill, narcissistic, racist, misogynist, sociopathic serial killer?
Another wonders:

So at this point would it be worth it to look into a Defamation suit against those trying to link MRA's with the recent tragedy?

Sorry to break it to you, fella, but that’s not how defamation suits work. If it were, all of us who call ourselves feminists would be collecting millions of dollars from the Men’s Rights subreddit for all the patently untrue things you guys say about us every day of every week.

Still others make sure that everyone knows that Rodger hated men too – not that this has actually gone unnoticed in the media or in discussions of the tragedy.

Proof that Elliot Rodger Hates Men
Finally! The MSM acknowledges that Elliot Roger hated *MEN*

And then there’s this fellow, who seems to think that Rodger only hated men, and that his big problem with women was that he loved them too much:

Elliot Rodgers the Misandrist. (self.MensRights) submitted 13 hours ago by TheWhimsicalFox In listening to Elliot's videos, and reading some of his manifesto, I almost feel as if this guy really just hated men. It seems as if he put women on a pedestal and held such an adoration for them that he could not understand how the "beasts" (among other terms)/men got to date them. This is a totally new idea for me, I haven't really thought it through for longer than a minute or two. So that's why I'm taking it here. What do you guys think?
There are, it’s true, two posts that raise the issue of what might be done to prevent tragedies like this from happening in the future. One of them takes on the issue of “virgin shaming.” (Sure, I’m against that, and against slut shaming too. Odd that roughly 100% of the virgin shaming I’ve ever heard in my life has come from MRAs and other non-fans of this blog, even though — sorry to break it to you fellows — I’ve not been a virgin since the early Reagan administration.)

Meanwhile, the other “positive” suggestion  — the stickied top post, submitted by one of the forum’s moderators — is pretty transparently intended as a PR move – and an excuse to bash feminists.

Time to get positive. What would help alienated men? (self.MensRights) submitted 20 hours ago * by nicemod - stickied post The recent tragedy in California has focused attention on troubled young men. Attempts by feminists to associate our movement with violence have met with little success, but have drawn many curious people to see what we're about. We can take advantage of this by proposing positive, male-friendly solutions to such problems. Proposals by feminists, based on the false assumption that maleness is inherently bad, will not work. What will? How could society effectively address male problems such as Loneliness Mental illness Alienation from society Virgin shaming Creep shaming Depression Demonisation What other issues need to be looked at? Please discuss.
Yep, “creep shaming.” That’s the problem! Way to cut through all the bullshit and get to the heart of the matter! The problem isn’t that some men — well, a lot of men — think and act in predatory and entitled ways towards women. The problem is that sometimes when they do, women call them “creeps.”

The problem isn’t that the world’s creepiest and most entitled man just killed 6 innocent people, the problem is “creep shaming.”

After killing his roommates and a friend of theirs, Rodger attempted to get inside a sorority so he could massacre the women inside it. But he couldn’t get anyone to let him in. Probably because, well, whoever was nearest the door thought he looked a  bit, well, creepy.

“Creep-shaming” isn’t some insidious form of discrimination against awkward men. It’s a defense mechanism that women develop to protect them against predatory men. And in the case of the Isla Vista murders, I’m guessing that the willingness of women to go with their gut sense that Rodger was a creep literally saved lives.

But the mods of the Men’s Rights subreddit would rather moan about “creep shaming.” They would prefer that women lower their defenses against men like Elliot Rodger — because it hurts their feelings to sometimes get called a “creep.”

Guys, this is why people think Elliot Rodger was an MRA.

EDIT: I added more to the conclusion because I had more to say about creep shaming.

530 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
weirwoodtreehugger
weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

I WILL NEVER COMMENT ON WWTM AGAIN WHICH IS WHY..

OH WAIT..

..
..
..

weirwoodtreehugger
weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

I MEAN WHTM..

YOU FAKE FEMINISTS ARE MAKING ME MIX UP..MY OWN NAME..WITH YOUR SITES..NAME..

kittehserf
10 years ago

Pooooooooor little incels. Even online, they’re so repellent nobody of any gender wants ’em around.

cloudiah
cloudiah
10 years ago

I WILL NEVER COOK DINNER AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!

:: cooks dinner ::

[Next night]

JUST LIKE LAST NIGHT, I WILL NEVER COOK DINNER AGAIN!!!!!

:: cooks dinner ::

cloudiah
cloudiah
10 years ago

Maybe WWTM was the beginning of WWTMD (What Would The Mammoth Do)?

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

I have a song for Sheety.

Shame he’s the gross kind of undead that smells like rotting meat instead of the super sexy alpha bloodsucking kind. Woe, bitches only like vampires and constantly reject perfectly nice zombies who would only eat part of their brain if allowed to! Woe!

Lids
10 years ago

I rejected 3 zombies this week, it’s true. They were too beta for me. And they kept dropping hunks of flesh when they walked.

kittehserf
10 years ago

Is anyone else starting to think the real reason Sheety’s sheets are black is bed bug infestation?

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

When you’re a human skidmark, black sheets will help hide that.

emilygoddess
emilygoddess
10 years ago

Do their arguments sound anything like mine?

Hard to say, since no one here has the slightest idea what your argument even is.

kittehserf
10 years ago

When you’re a human skidmark, black sheets will help hide that.

I can see a market opportunity here for smeary brown sheets.

Shiraz
Shiraz
10 years ago

Bauhaus? Whoooooo!

Shiraz
Shiraz
10 years ago

Oh wait, new troll?
Do I want to bother to catch up or should I just be happy not knowing?

kittehserf
10 years ago

Eh, you’re not missing anything, unless you want an exercise in translating Troll to English. Most of his blather is just bizarre and unintelligible.

Shiraz
Shiraz
10 years ago

Well, I peeked a little, and yeah, nothing new, kitteh.
I caught the silly, smug, “Hey! Everyone is entitled to sex!” thing and I eyerolled.

Ally S
10 years ago

@Ally S Fuck off creep to you right back. Isn’t there someone else you should be telling that to?

No, I’m saying it to the right man – the man who says that everyone is entitled to sex. Fuck off creep to you once more.

kittehserf
10 years ago

I was looking at #YesAllWomen before and saw this link. I like these guys.

http://www.policymic.com/articles/90079/36-men-show-us-what-real-men-s-activists-look-like

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

Jeez, it’s to the point where I can’t tell if it’s the same duder over and over again, or if everyone coming over from PUAhate is just LITERALLY THE SAME DAMN PERSON.

I think… maybe we’ve… pinned the hivemind concept on the wrong group?

kittehserf
10 years ago

dustedeste – you mean blog herpes has finally found a full-time trolling occupation? O.o

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

@kittehs:

Nah, it’s more like… they’re pathetically indistinguishable from each other in their grossness, ideas, and pomposity? I’ve just been thinking about last night’s filth and his flipping out every time someone said he was Erin or any other troll. They all think they’re so special, so good at trolling, at hurting people, at being a total skidmark in the underpants of life, whatever – and they seem almost insulted when we don’t recognize their particular trademark brand of disgusting as different from all the others’ – but they’re pathetically indistinguishable to the point where we pretty much always assume that whoever’s trolling is just someone who’s been trolling, even if they’re not.

They think all women are the same, but I can tell all the women on here apart preeetty well; they, on the other hand? If David came on and told us that he’d managed to find out, through some sorcery, that 85% of our trolls were actually one troll, the only thing that would surprise me would be how one asshole managed to make that volume of comments.

Xanthë
10 years ago

Gees BLS is astonishingly incoherent; the conflation of entitlement to sex inevitably leading to the denial of bodily autonomy is a complete non sequitur. So here’s another song for him with a message he seems particularly loathe to receive – it’s in the six word chorus shouted by the crowd 😉
http://youtu.be/z87GJiNA7dE

cupisnique
cupisnique
10 years ago

If David came on and told us that he’d managed to find out, through some sorcery, that 85% of our trolls were actually one troll, the only thing that would surprise me would be how one asshole managed to make that volume of comments.

Yeah, Erin and Davis (i think it was him) seemed identical to me. (Also that made me laugh! ^)

kittehserf
10 years ago

Xanthe – I was the one pointing out to BLS that his “men are entitled to sex” means sooner or later, if they’re not denied their Nat’ral Rights, that a woman (because only het men count, yo) will be denied her autonomy because of it. It’s the same conversation in Pharyngula with that neuroguy twerp and his “people have a right to sex!” shit.

Nobody is entitled to sex, let alone having some Gahd-given constitutional RIGHT to it, because other people get to say no. I know the Mammotheers know this, but BLS’s inability to blockquote seems to have caused some confusion.

dustydeste – LOL that’s a more interesting point about the samey sameness of these trolls, isn’t it? They really do blend into one ugly mess of “always agree with me and fuck me on demand” in the end.

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

Yeah, it’s like, oh suuuuuure, feminism’s the hivemind. Riiiiiiiight.

(Not that I would ever speak against the hivemind. Surely not. I have no wish to be excommunicated and severed from the warm embrace of my sisters and all that is good and right. :P)

kittehserf
10 years ago

Speaking against the hivemind really means one is defying the Great Furred Ones, and for that, you will face … THIS!

1 16 17 18 19 20 22