Categories
antifeminism creep-shaming elliot rodger entitled babies entitlement hypocrisy irony alert men who should not ever be with women ever misandry misogyny MRA post contains sarcasm reddit straw feminists the eternal solipsism of the MRA mind

Men's Rights Activists respond to the Elliot Rodger murders with a hearty "Nothing to see here! Move along!"

nothing-to-see-here
The We Hunted the Mammoth Pledge Drive continues! If you haven’t already, please consider sending some bucks my way. (And don’t worry that the PayPal page says Man Boobz.) Thanks! And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.

If anyone was hoping – against their better judgement – that Men’s Rights activists would be inspired by the tragedy in Isla Vista to reconsider any of their beliefs, or even to reflect for a moment on the many striking similarities between passages in Elliot Rodger’s book-length manifesto and comments posted every day by MRAs and others in the manosphere, well, I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but you should not keep that hope alive.

It’s not that they’re not talking about the tragedy. A look through the top 100 posts in the Men’s Rights subreddit, the largest Men’s Rights forum online, reveals that roughly a third of them, including the top stickied post, relate in some way to Elliot Rodger’s rampage and the discussions that have come up online and in the media in its aftermath.

But the message of virtually all of these posts is: “Nothing to see here! Move along!” There are numerous posts expressing outrage that anyone would see any connection between Rodger’s toxic misogyny to the Men’s Rights movement; there are others mocking and attacking the #YesAllWomen hashtag; there’s even one suggesting that Rodger, who wrote about how he longed to watch all the women of the world starve to death in concentration camps, wasn’t actually a misogynist at all.

Take a look. One post, with more than 500 upvotes, complains:

Feminists highjack what should be a Mental Health issue.
Another post makes a strikingly similar complaint:

Feminists Hijack A Mass Murder To Boost Self-Esteem
One angry MRA asks:

Why am I being compared to a mentally ill, narcissistic, racist, misogynist, sociopathic serial killer?
Another wonders:

So at this point would it be worth it to look into a Defamation suit against those trying to link MRA's with the recent tragedy?

Sorry to break it to you, fella, but that’s not how defamation suits work. If it were, all of us who call ourselves feminists would be collecting millions of dollars from the Men’s Rights subreddit for all the patently untrue things you guys say about us every day of every week.

Still others make sure that everyone knows that Rodger hated men too – not that this has actually gone unnoticed in the media or in discussions of the tragedy.

Proof that Elliot Rodger Hates Men
Finally! The MSM acknowledges that Elliot Roger hated *MEN*

And then there’s this fellow, who seems to think that Rodger only hated men, and that his big problem with women was that he loved them too much:

Elliot Rodgers the Misandrist. (self.MensRights) submitted 13 hours ago by TheWhimsicalFox In listening to Elliot's videos, and reading some of his manifesto, I almost feel as if this guy really just hated men. It seems as if he put women on a pedestal and held such an adoration for them that he could not understand how the "beasts" (among other terms)/men got to date them. This is a totally new idea for me, I haven't really thought it through for longer than a minute or two. So that's why I'm taking it here. What do you guys think?
There are, it’s true, two posts that raise the issue of what might be done to prevent tragedies like this from happening in the future. One of them takes on the issue of “virgin shaming.” (Sure, I’m against that, and against slut shaming too. Odd that roughly 100% of the virgin shaming I’ve ever heard in my life has come from MRAs and other non-fans of this blog, even though — sorry to break it to you fellows — I’ve not been a virgin since the early Reagan administration.)

Meanwhile, the other “positive” suggestion  — the stickied top post, submitted by one of the forum’s moderators — is pretty transparently intended as a PR move – and an excuse to bash feminists.

Time to get positive. What would help alienated men? (self.MensRights) submitted 20 hours ago * by nicemod - stickied post The recent tragedy in California has focused attention on troubled young men. Attempts by feminists to associate our movement with violence have met with little success, but have drawn many curious people to see what we're about. We can take advantage of this by proposing positive, male-friendly solutions to such problems. Proposals by feminists, based on the false assumption that maleness is inherently bad, will not work. What will? How could society effectively address male problems such as Loneliness Mental illness Alienation from society Virgin shaming Creep shaming Depression Demonisation What other issues need to be looked at? Please discuss.
Yep, “creep shaming.” That’s the problem! Way to cut through all the bullshit and get to the heart of the matter! The problem isn’t that some men — well, a lot of men — think and act in predatory and entitled ways towards women. The problem is that sometimes when they do, women call them “creeps.”

The problem isn’t that the world’s creepiest and most entitled man just killed 6 innocent people, the problem is “creep shaming.”

After killing his roommates and a friend of theirs, Rodger attempted to get inside a sorority so he could massacre the women inside it. But he couldn’t get anyone to let him in. Probably because, well, whoever was nearest the door thought he looked a  bit, well, creepy.

“Creep-shaming” isn’t some insidious form of discrimination against awkward men. It’s a defense mechanism that women develop to protect them against predatory men. And in the case of the Isla Vista murders, I’m guessing that the willingness of women to go with their gut sense that Rodger was a creep literally saved lives.

But the mods of the Men’s Rights subreddit would rather moan about “creep shaming.” They would prefer that women lower their defenses against men like Elliot Rodger — because it hurts their feelings to sometimes get called a “creep.”

Guys, this is why people think Elliot Rodger was an MRA.

EDIT: I added more to the conclusion because I had more to say about creep shaming.

530 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

HEY ASSHOLE I TOLD YOU TO USE MY WHOLE NYM YOU FUCKING DISRESPECTFUL, PATHETIC SHITBAG.

katz
10 years ago

Wait, if Davis stopped being friends with women in 2007, and stopped being friends with women when he was 16, and he’s now, what, 38, does that mean he is a time traveler?

It’s almost like he’s actually 23.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

I’m really pissing you off, aren’t I, Davis.

Dance, troll, dance.

You’re just proving us right with every post, creep.

bbeaty
bbeaty
10 years ago

@cassanrdkitty, it’s not his fault. He’s “socially awkward.”

And besides women are so mean to him for no reason whatsoever.

J.J
J.J
10 years ago

Oh ho ho. Really? So because you don’t like what I have to say, I should be shot. Oh, yeah, you’re totally different from Elliot and the type of MRA who want to kill women who don’t sit down and shut up for them. You’re pathetic.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

This is really friggin’ funny. It’s like teasing a dog with a treat, except I like dogs and so I would feel bad about baiting one.

But it’s so accurate. My childhood cat used to tease our neighbor’s dog Billy, a sweet but hyper terrier mercilessly. Billy would be outside on a long leash because the yard didn’t have a fence. Whiskers would calmly sit just outside the reach of the leash. Poor dumb Billy would try to run at him, barking frantically and practically choking himself.

Davis reminds me a lot of Billy. Except Billy was cute, nice and fun. Davis is none of those things.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Remember, everyone, the MRM is really about men improving themselves and learning not to care about what women think about them.

contrapangloss
10 years ago

We have a melting troll on the thread!

I hadn’t even bought a canary yet. The old doctor assures me that trolls hate canaries. I suppose I shall save some coin, then, on cute little singing birds.

I’m going out on another mission! The council is still really ticked about the whole dark-lord thing. They are sending us to recruit the Wizard Derk. Apparently, he was once a most sucessful dark lord.

His flying pigs are just precious.

bbeaty
bbeaty
10 years ago

“Remember, everyone, the MRM is really about men improving themselves and learning not to care about what women think about them.”

And human rights. Don’t forget human rights.

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

I won’t lie; I’mma enjoy the descent of the banhammer on this one. He’s a right little prick. Can’t even keep his word, let alone keep his story straight.

Rage on, little asshole, rage on against the world. Your rage don’t mean a thing, in the end; and between the world and your rage, you’ll be devoured.

pecunium
10 years ago

How is that defending the shooter. If Elliot did what I did, he would have never ahot those people.

So you are like him. Good to know.

And saying that he shot people only because he didn’t “do what you did” means that you were like him, and since you are a decent guy he was, at heart, a decent guy.

So you are excusing him.

BTW, what do you think the Police ought to have done? Held him for 72 hours on a 5150 because they got a complaint? Seized his computer to search for bad things?

Tossed his place looking for a reason to haul him in (in the absence of a warrant, or any other sort of probably cause)?

Do elaborate.

hippodameia8527
hippodameia8527
10 years ago

Erin, I was pretty sure you’d come crawling back. You are beyond pathetic and accelerating.

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

Ooooh, Wizard Dirk! I think you might do better with one of his daughters, actually; I hear they’re pretty badass.

pecunium
10 years ago

Davis: What happened to people being held accountable for their own action?

Nothing. The MRM incites men to violence. One of their acolytes committed violence because he hated women. His justifications for his hatred were part and parcel of the general mantra of the MRM, and used MRA language.

We are, as a result, holding them accountable.

Just as you say we should.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Yeah, I do hope stupid creep isn’t upsetting anyone.

But really, man comes on thread about man killing people because he hates women. Man states he hates women, says he wish people on thread were shot.

Cheese and crackers.

It’s only a matter of time until the Banhammer Mammoth descends.

pecunium
10 years ago

Ah, then I can go to bed. Night all.

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

I’mma hit the sack, too; first day at the new job in the morning!

hippodameia8527
hippodameia8527
10 years ago

Thank you David!

pecunium
10 years ago

But really, man comes on thread about man killing people because he hates women. Man states he hates women, says he wish people on thread were shot.

Crap. I didn’t realise I was so close to right when I said that.

Apologies if it made anything worse for anyone.

contrapangloss
10 years ago

@Dustedeste

Zounds! You’re right. I’ll file an inquiry. The BPRD ordered some time turners in 2007, and the order came in one short.

I’d investigate myself, but I’m having some troubles with tourists. They’re convinced Derk is still Darklord. I forgot my zap penlight of forget-ness with K, so I’m having to be sneaky.

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Was he a sock David? He claimed to have been banned 8 times.

cassandrakitty
cassandrakitty
10 years ago

There’s something especially pathetic about coming back to a blog you’ve already been banned from 8 times. Get a new hobby, kid.

contrapangloss
10 years ago

Oh, too late! Thanks David!

I love the ban hammer, so much.

dustedeste
dustedeste
10 years ago

Ugh, tourists; I feel your pain there, contrapangloss 😛

1 9 10 11 12 13 22