Man Boobz is now We Hunted the Mammoth.
Don’t worry: nothing you knew and/or loved about the old Man Boobz, except the name, is going away. The blog will continue on much as it has. The old comments won’t vanish, and you won’t have to sign up again to post new ones. Your old links to manboobz.com should still work fine. (The new URL may take a little while to make its way around the world; let me know in the comments if you have trouble accessing the site.)
It’s just that, well, I got tired of the old name. I came up with it on the spur of the moment when I first started this blog. But it was kind of a dopey name. It was easily misunderstood, and gave people an easy excuse to dismiss the blog when it reported things that made them uncomfortable. I probably should have gotten rid of it a while ago.
But better late than never, huh?
I’ve given it a name that fits this blog (and its community of commenters) much better. The phrase “we hunted the mammoth” is a shortened version of “we hunted the mammoth to feed you,” which has become a catchphrase around these parts to describe a certain sort of self-important, self-deluding misogyny common amongst the people featured on this blog.
It comes from a quote I once posted from a dude who felt women weren’t sufficiently appreciative of what men had supposedly done for them over the ages. Here’s the full quote, in all of its glory:
We men built a nice safe world for you all the the coal-mines of death, roads, railroads, bridges and tall office buildings. Its $1,000,000 spent per death of a man on a large dangerous project on average now you can just 9-5 it and call it a day in air-conditioned and heated safety. Forget about the wars we died in and the sacrifices made just ignore history or is it now hersorty? You are accruing the benefits without ever having to pay the price you still don’t have to sign up for the draft and who will protect you? The Sex and the City girls will fight off the North Koreans with their Manolo Blahniks?
Men gave you this modern world now you take it for granted we hunted the mammoth to feed you we died in burning buildings and were gassed in the trenches but that was just for fun right?
How quick and conveniently you forget who made this possible.
We gave you Leonardo da Vinci, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy not to mention countless others, Jonas Salk saved half the world from death and you just piss on it all.
“We Hunted the Mammoth” is such a wonderful distillation of this entire clusterfuck of misogyny, entitlement and unwarranted self-importance – not to mention historical ignorance – that when I decided to rename the blog it was the obvious choice.
Even though it means a long URL and a bit of an explanation.
Ok, you may wonder, but what is this “New Misogyny” you mention in the banner? Isn’t the misogyny you write about just a bunch of tired old ideas lightly reheated?
Much of it is. But I’m using the phrase “New Misogyny” to refer specifically to the angry antifeminist backlash that has emerged like a boil on the ass of the internet over the last decade or so. These aren’t your traditional misogynists – the social conservatives and religious fundamentalists who make up much of the far right (and whom I’ve always ignored on this blog).
So let me give a basic definition — which will no doubt seem overly basic to anyone who’s been reading this blog for any length of time.
These are guys, mostly, who range in age from their teens to their fifties, who have embraced misogyny as an ideology, as a sort of symbolic solution to the frustrations in their lives – whether financial, social, or sexual.
Some of them identify as Men’s Rights Activists, trying to cast their peculiar struggle against what they see as the excesses of feminism and the advantages of women as a civil rights issue of sorts. Alongside those who explicitly label themselves MRAs we find a great number of antifeminist and antiwomen activists we might call Men’s Rights-adjacent – like those in the Skeptic and Atheist subcultures who still haven’t gotten over an offhand remark Skepchick founder Rebecca Watson made about a dude in an elevator a couple of years ago.
Others proclaim themselves Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), declaring a sort of independence from women – while spending much of their time on message boards talking endlessly about them.
Still others see themselves as Pickup Artists (PUA), or masters of “Game,” espousing elaborate “scientific” theories of male superiority while trading tips on how best to pressure or manipulate drunk women into bed.
This misogynistic wing of the PUA subculture has a considerable overlap with a subset of traditionalist and far-right blogs. Many of those in what has become known as “the manosphere” don’t simply embrace misogyny; they also proudly embrace “scientific” racism and other bigotries.
Still, while some of the New Misogynists see themselves as conservatives, even “neo-reactionaries,” many identify themselves as libertarians or even as liberals. Theirs is a backlash that frames itself as a step forward.
So that’s the New Misogyny.
Like I said, none of this is going to sound altogether new to longtime readers of this site. But I think this helps to make a little bit clearer why I focus on the particular sorts of douchebags that I do.
And now, back to work.
@R. Tod Kelly.
There’s plenty of influential people who incorporated at least some MRA bullshit into their worldview. See: Richard Dawkins.
::barf::
I can’t stop laughing at leocigale’s picture. It is so awesome.
The banner looks great too.
On another note, it was very hard for me to explain to an atheist (white cis hetero male) friend why I hate Richard Dawkins. This happened only yesterday. Interesting to see him mentioned here right now….
ok, I don’t “hate” him. I just deeply dislike this person.
@pineapplecookies, could it be because he’s an arrogant, misogynist, racist, intellectual snob?
Does this mean the cock carousel pic is now gone?
How about “loathe”? “Intense dislike and disgust for” defines how I feel about Dawkins, fersure.
Let’s see: erasing women’s experience of harassment, assault, and rape, by comparing a situation with serious potential for those (being propositioned in a lift) with the irritation he feels when someone chews gum.
“Dear Muslima”. Double bingo: xenophobia, Islamophobia, probably out-and-out racism and the further erasure of Western women’s experience of misogyny because it’s not as bad as what those people do.
Erasure of victims of child abuse by saying a religious upbringing is sooooo much worse than “mild” sexual abuse (like he had! He shrugged it off! Because he’s a smartatheistwhitedude!)
I could go on, but shit, if your atheist friend needs it spelled out that much … 🙁
well the title change is a welcome change in my opinion. i read the site frequently because its funny, but i’ve never shared it with anybody else, as i did not feel at all comfortable, as a feminist, sharing a site that used the word boob as an insult, as where i live that word has changed meanings (for misogynist reasons, of course, since its original meaning is an unintelligent person) to mean a certain female body part. i’m as likely to want to hear that word used as an insult as i am to hear the c-word.
Yeah, I should have changed the name a long time ago.
Brittersweet, I’m going to try to figure out another way to feature that graphic prominently now that it’s not in the banner any more.
Mammothistas? Mammoth Nation? Mammopudlians? Children of the Wool?
Also, we’re going to need a good collective noun, eg “The troll was quickly driven back by an exaltation of Mammothians”.
I love the new look, and I think it’s definitely a good move on your part.
Borrowing from the novels by Jean M. Auel, how about the Mamutoi?
Hurrah for the overhaul! I especially love the 3D perspective of the banner lettering. That is really quite excellent and monumental.
Why not Mastodons (of the universe)?
For people of my vintage, and a bit younger, Mammotheers has a lot of appeal.
My brain is already humming with options for our very own version of the Mickey Mouse March song. With mumble something tusks mumble instead of “ears”.
Is there anyone aged, oh, let’s say 35-55 now who didn’t read those damn Jean M Auel books? I have to admit that I eventually got a bit tired of Ayla inventing all of the things.
As far as cavewomen named Ayla goes, I prefer the Chrono Trigger version. She’s much more of an ubermensch than the entire MRM combined to boot.
I liked the well-researched descriptions of prehistoric flora and fauna and the culture of the peoples. Not so much the rampant sex/rape scenes or of course the Mary Sue-ness of Ayla.
Come to think of it, it might have been more interesting for her to have just one great invention–say the spear-thrower, or the domestication of wolves–and for the story to explore all of its effects on human society.
I was maybe 9 when I first started reading those books? And even then I was going, um, can we maybe have a scene where two people have sex and they both wanted it and neither of them is a child being “initiated” every once in a while? Please?
Will the old RSS feed still work?
The “new misogyny” is also the one harassing, doxxing, sending rape and death threats to people, mostly women, who challenge their frail egos or sense of superiority. That is all behavior that needs a bright light focused on it.
Represent! I tried the first one but I didn’t get past the first chapter. All I remember is that the Neanderthals had to carry fire with them when they migrated because they couldn’t make it themselves.
Could little miss indigo-child Ayla have suplexed a Tyrannosaur? I think not!
@titianblue @kitteh: “loathe” is a good word. I did say all that and it did not sunk in. I thought I would have to draw it. I am starting to think that when some people admire someone, they get blind and defensive about that person too much. Alas, I believe my friend got it a little, but did not agree with me. I know it may sound arrogant on my part, but I wanted to give him a bibliography and say “read and call me afterwards”.
Vaiyt
I loved Ayla from Chrono Trigger. I love that game overall.
Karalora:
So much yes! I remember being really excited about equine domestication, but the timetable just doesn’t work out for everything to happen at once. At the rate it was going, I was half surprised she didn’t invent the longbow or steel-forging by the fifth book.
I definitely enjoyed the descriptions of cultures and nature. I got so annoyed at having to flip through pages really fast because of the Big Black Box of Things and Graphic Details of Which I Didn’t Need to Know.
Like Cassandrakitty, I was only about ten or so, reading them on my mom’s recommendation. Towards the end of book two (when caveman and cavewoman finally start … you know), I remember walking up to my mother and handing her the open book:
Apparently, she was way more enthralled the animal domestication, and hadn’t read them since she was in high school or college, or something.
I’m still sort of baffled that she actually handed it back.
LOL! My mom would have bookmarked those parts for me.
Hey hey all. You know how MRA’s love going on about how the manly mens are all sacrificing themselves for the womens when ships sink and that is misandry and male disposibility and whatnot?
I wonder how they can wrap their heads around this (CW: It’s talking about the Korean ferry disaster, which I know I found very upsetting to read about, so stay safe peeps): http://edition.cnn.com/2014/04/21/world/asia/young-sewol-crew-member/
A young woman helped save others on board the sinking ferry and lost her life in the process while the male captain fled to safety, leaving the passengers to their fates.
Answer that one MRA’s.