Man Boobz is now We Hunted the Mammoth.
Don’t worry: nothing you knew and/or loved about the old Man Boobz, except the name, is going away. The blog will continue on much as it has. The old comments won’t vanish, and you won’t have to sign up again to post new ones. Your old links to manboobz.com should still work fine. (The new URL may take a little while to make its way around the world; let me know in the comments if you have trouble accessing the site.)
It’s just that, well, I got tired of the old name. I came up with it on the spur of the moment when I first started this blog. But it was kind of a dopey name. It was easily misunderstood, and gave people an easy excuse to dismiss the blog when it reported things that made them uncomfortable. I probably should have gotten rid of it a while ago.
But better late than never, huh?
I’ve given it a name that fits this blog (and its community of commenters) much better. The phrase “we hunted the mammoth” is a shortened version of “we hunted the mammoth to feed you,” which has become a catchphrase around these parts to describe a certain sort of self-important, self-deluding misogyny common amongst the people featured on this blog.
It comes from a quote I once posted from a dude who felt women weren’t sufficiently appreciative of what men had supposedly done for them over the ages. Here’s the full quote, in all of its glory:
We men built a nice safe world for you all the the coal-mines of death, roads, railroads, bridges and tall office buildings. Its $1,000,000 spent per death of a man on a large dangerous project on average now you can just 9-5 it and call it a day in air-conditioned and heated safety. Forget about the wars we died in and the sacrifices made just ignore history or is it now hersorty? You are accruing the benefits without ever having to pay the price you still don’t have to sign up for the draft and who will protect you? The Sex and the City girls will fight off the North Koreans with their Manolo Blahniks?
Men gave you this modern world now you take it for granted we hunted the mammoth to feed you we died in burning buildings and were gassed in the trenches but that was just for fun right?
How quick and conveniently you forget who made this possible.
We gave you Leonardo da Vinci, Dostoevsky, Tolstoy not to mention countless others, Jonas Salk saved half the world from death and you just piss on it all.
“We Hunted the Mammoth” is such a wonderful distillation of this entire clusterfuck of misogyny, entitlement and unwarranted self-importance – not to mention historical ignorance – that when I decided to rename the blog it was the obvious choice.
Even though it means a long URL and a bit of an explanation.
Ok, you may wonder, but what is this “New Misogyny” you mention in the banner? Isn’t the misogyny you write about just a bunch of tired old ideas lightly reheated?
Much of it is. But I’m using the phrase “New Misogyny” to refer specifically to the angry antifeminist backlash that has emerged like a boil on the ass of the internet over the last decade or so. These aren’t your traditional misogynists – the social conservatives and religious fundamentalists who make up much of the far right (and whom I’ve always ignored on this blog).
So let me give a basic definition — which will no doubt seem overly basic to anyone who’s been reading this blog for any length of time.
These are guys, mostly, who range in age from their teens to their fifties, who have embraced misogyny as an ideology, as a sort of symbolic solution to the frustrations in their lives – whether financial, social, or sexual.
Some of them identify as Men’s Rights Activists, trying to cast their peculiar struggle against what they see as the excesses of feminism and the advantages of women as a civil rights issue of sorts. Alongside those who explicitly label themselves MRAs we find a great number of antifeminist and antiwomen activists we might call Men’s Rights-adjacent – like those in the Skeptic and Atheist subcultures who still haven’t gotten over an offhand remark Skepchick founder Rebecca Watson made about a dude in an elevator a couple of years ago.
Others proclaim themselves Men Going Their Own Way (MGTOW), declaring a sort of independence from women – while spending much of their time on message boards talking endlessly about them.
Still others see themselves as Pickup Artists (PUA), or masters of “Game,” espousing elaborate “scientific” theories of male superiority while trading tips on how best to pressure or manipulate drunk women into bed.
This misogynistic wing of the PUA subculture has a considerable overlap with a subset of traditionalist and far-right blogs. Many of those in what has become known as “the manosphere” don’t simply embrace misogyny; they also proudly embrace “scientific” racism and other bigotries.
Still, while some of the New Misogynists see themselves as conservatives, even “neo-reactionaries,” many identify themselves as libertarians or even as liberals. Theirs is a backlash that frames itself as a step forward.
So that’s the New Misogyny.
Like I said, none of this is going to sound altogether new to longtime readers of this site. But I think this helps to make a little bit clearer why I focus on the particular sorts of douchebags that I do.
And now, back to work.
Oooooo! Ahhhhhh!
Nice choices on the artwork!
They coulda left some mammoth around, they were cool-looking animals. Thanks for inventing land mines and killing off all the furry elephants, you jerks.
Congratulations on the new name!
I was reading the previous thread, and refreshed at least once after the change without noticing anything.
Very nice choice and explanation thereof. It does a much better job of mocking these jokers, many of whom would poop in their pants at the idea of actually having to do the sort of yucky,primitive grunt work they exalt.
Snickers.
Nice work!
Excellent! Looks great.
Please don’t tar all social conservatives with the same brush.; we don’t all think the same things But I really do like this site so far (I’m a woman, btw). I recently went on a kick about reading about PUA culture. Ugggggh.
I think we should start referring to your targets as the “mammothsphere”, for consistency’s sake. Or for punnery’s sake. Either way.
Did we decide on our new group name yet? I like “mammoth eaters”, myself, but it’s pretty long.
This looks awesome. Congratulations on the new name and look! I like the short rundown of what wehuntedthemammoth.com is all about, since so many people (trolls) seem to misunderstand the purpose of this blog. Probably on purpose.
The only criticism I have is that you chose a way too fancy outfit for your most recent dip into the unsanitary place known as the manosphere. Seriously, couldn’t you at least have removed the suit jacket? Cleaning the stains will be a pain. Tsk, tsk.
In other words, great choice for a comic panel.
That cartoon at the end is perfect. And I love the banner and leocigale’s drawing so much.
I like the change and your reasons why. Look forward to reading more posts.
“The mammothsphere” is a great phrase.
I like ‘the mammothshpere’ too.
“We gave you Tolstoy.” Someone alert his mother. And his wife, who would be listed as a coauthor today.
Yay! I love all of it.
Hee-hee. Nifty.
I think leocigale’s dragging should be used whenever these guys use the whole “men hunted the mammoth/created civilization/invented all the things” thing.
emilygoddess:
I was wondering this, too!
I’d be more impressed with “we gave you (fill in name here)” but they neglected a few names. By their logic men also gave us Hitler, Pol Pot, Stalin and that dude that parks in the handicapped spaces “because he’s in a hurry”. I’ll get around to being appreciative and grateful. . .about half past never.
That should be “leocigale’s drawing,” not “leocigale’s dragging.”
Hi everyone! I’m finally delurking. I’ve been reading Manboobz for more than a year (I participated in Argenti’s questionnaire) but I suppose now is the time to delurk. I love the new name. 🙂
Goddammit, you can’t change group names on DA (and they make you pay money to change usernames). Should I make a new group and migrate everything or should we stick with the old one?
Anti-feminists really show off their anti-women side when they ignorantly brag about all the things men have done. It’s pure chauvinism. They leave out female accompliments and how it was other men — politicians and religious leaders — that sent young men to die for selfish reasons. And sometimes those young men raped and slaughtered females on the opposing side.
I wasn’t around for the mammoth hunting boy wonder so I feel the need to comment on my favorite part.
I admire Jonas Salk and polio is awful, but I’m pretty sure it would not have killed half the world. Does half the half the world mean all living things? Or was he just talking about humans?
WWTH: Human beings are the only species in the world, just like The USA is the only country in the world, so of course he was only talking about human beings. /sarcasm
I’m wondering what it is women are supposedly pissing on. Half the world? Jonas Salk? Polio? The way that sentence is written it’s not clear at all.
Nice, I like the new name. It never bothered me *that* much, but I always was a bit annoyed at the old one. It just kind of smacked of hypocritical gender/body policing.
Mammoths, on the other hand, are great. 🙂