Is there no end to the ways in which women oppress the men of the world? Over on A Voice for Men, Clint Carpentier reports – and I use that term loosely – on a heretofore overlooked form of anti-male oppression: the abuse of fathers in delivery rooms by women who are at that moment literally in the stirrups giving birth.
Yep, we’re talking about women who use 12 hours of labor as a convenient excuse to yell at, and sometimes scratch and bite, their husbands and boyfriends. Apparently, there’s an epidemic of women in labor cruelly attacking men from the comfort and safety of the delivery table.
Carpentier starts off his post by making clear that giving birth isn’t really the big freaking deal all the ladies think it is, anyway:
Giving birth is an amazing feat of zero skill, and it still amazes me. It amazes me that this is the epitome, the pinnacle, the supposed female trump card to all male accomplishments. A man lands on the moon with analogue technology and proves Galileo’s theory of air resistance, but never mind that, another woman gave birth, just as well as any other female animal on the planet. A man creates life in a petri-dish, but never mind that, some broad stole his sperm and created life herself.
Anyway, I’m not knocking the dangers of labor, men know all about the dangers of labor; there really ought to be a better word for giving birth.
And whatever alleged pain women undergo during so-called “labor” apparently pales in insignificance to the pain men suffer from being in their presence in the delivery room. Carpentier has managed to avoid this terrible fate himself – his wife went the c-section route, no biggie – but he has heard tales that would make your skin crawl:
I have … heard stories, have … seen the scratches and bite marks, on the fathers who braved the maternity ward. And these same brave men praise the bravery of the mothers of their children. They proudly display scars the mothers-to-be inflicted upon them during the ordeal.
I’m hoping these scars are only from fingernails and that mothers-to-be aren’t sneaking shivs into the delivery room.
Oh, also, sometimes women in labor yell really loudly:
Sometimes a father will reminisce amusingly about how he’d been temporarily deafened when she had screamed right in his ear for waxing sympathetically over her tribulations.
And apparently it’s only men who are the targets for this scratching and biting and yelling:
I hear these stories only from men. I know, men aren’t the only people comforting these women during birth; some women don’t have a man at the time. But what I don’t hear, are these stories from the female nurses, friends, mothers, sisters, etc, who are there to console and coach these single mothers-to-be. Why is it, I’m only hearing accounts of weathering physical abuse and injury from the fathers?
I don’t know, dude. Do you hang out with female nurses on a regular basis? Do you spend as much time drinking beer and shooting the shit with your wife’s female friends as you do with your own?
You see, if I am correct, and it is only fathers who suffer this abuse, then delivery of such injury is selective. I can see no call for it.
Really? First of all, you haven’t shown that this is abuse and not simply an accident. Second, how many of these female friends, mothers, sisters, what have you, were actually in the delivery room? Because that seems like an important variable to take into consideration before jumping to conclusions based on a dataset of some-dudes-allegedly-told-you-something-once.
In fact, fathers-to-be should avoid the maternity ward altogether, as they are obviously not welcome.
Really again? You imagine an epidemic of anti-male violence by women giving birth based on a couple of stories and a rather half-assed deduction you’ve made from it, and therefore conclude that 1) men should miss out on the birth of their children and 2) shouldn’t be there to comfort their wives as best they can during labor.
If birthing is license to mistreat, abuse, or injure a father in the witness of medical professionals, then what deterrent exists, preventing continued abuse in private? And for that matter, what indication is there that she doesn’t abuse him already?
Woah. Let’s just back up a little here. First of all, dude, you haven’t proven that “abuse of fathers” by women on the delivery table is actually a thing. You’ve offered only a few vague anecdotes – and these anecdotes don’t even make clear whether or not the alleged “ delivery of … injury” – gotta love that evasive wording – was deliberate.
Given the stress and pain of labor, it’s easy to imagine how a woman giving birth might accidentally scratch someone. Maybe the mother in question was holding onto her husband’s hand for support and dug her fingernails in a little too hard and left a mark. Maybe she flailed her arm backwards and accidentally scratched his face. We don’t know, because not only do you offer zero real evidence for any of your claims, but your second-hand stories don’t offer enough detail to know what was going on.
If endangering your own life once or twice provides license to abuse a man, what does that say about our society. Particularly when he endangers his own life as a matter of routine to support you?
Seriously? I know Men’s Righsters love to complain about the fact that many more men than women die on the job – though this complaining never seems to lead to any actual activism on the issue of workplace safety – but the fact is that most men, in the US at least, DO NOT WORK DANGEROUS JOBS. They don’t endanger their own lives “as a matter of routine.” They don’t endanger their lives at all by going to work, at least not any more than women do.
MRAs love to give themselves credit for bravery because they share a gender with a small number of men who do in fact work dangerous jobs. But I’m guessing there are not a lot of lion tamers amongst the Men’s Rights crowd. Somehow I’m thinking that most of them have jobs that mostly involve sitting on their asses in rooms entirely devoid of lions.
Anyway, if the overwhelming majority of men don’t endanger their lives by going to work, they endanger it even less by “braving” the delivery room. Men face no actual physical threat from women who are literally flat on their back, their feet in stirrups, in the process of pushing an entire human being out through their vaginas.
But, hey, women do sometimes yell rude things during labor, so maybe it’s possible that a few of them do scratch or even bite their husbands, though the latter seems like it might be a tad difficult logistically. Some might even do so on purpose. If so, there would probably be some evidence of this somewhere online, right?
Well, I searched for a while using every combination of search words I could think of. I found an assortment of disturbing headlines about men attacking women in and around maternity wards: Guilty: man who punched and kicked pregnant girlfriend outside Poole Maternity Hospital; Man charged with assaulting pregnant girlfriend, staff in hospital maternity ward; Man Throws Meat Cleaver Into Maternity Ward.
I found disturbing statistics about pregnancy and domestic violence, which often begins or increases during pregnancy; according to one 2000 study, some 324,000 pregnant women are abused each year.
On a somewhat lighter note, I found women wondering if it was normal to have a really itchy stomach after giving birth, and another person wondering “why is my bitch digging so much after giving birth[?]” (Don’t worry; they were talking about a dog.)
Amidst all this – and many hundreds of other irrelevant results – I managed to find one example of a woman scratching a man during childbirth.
On a page in which she provided all the gory details of her 28 hours of labor – along with numerous pictures of her newborn – one new mother also posted a couple of pictures documenting the scratches she’d given her husband while in labor. (I’m not giving out the link because MRAs. )
Brace yourself. Here’s one of the pictures, with the father’s face partially blurred out:
If you look very carefully you can see four faint scratches on his forearm. The blogger isn’t a native English speaker, but as far as I can tell from what she wrote about it, she didn’t give these terrible scratches to him on purpose.
The horror!
Chiz! Curses! When was the last time I saw a Nigel Molesworth reference?
I confess that while in labor with my oldest son (22 years ago) I did sit up and smack the (yes he was male) doctor’s hand while proclaiming, “Anyone else can touch me except you!” However I claim self-defense as he had replaced his fingers with knife-blades, was reaching inside of me to claw my cervix open (to save the life of my baby, which we did)
kittehserf – ’twas indeed a Molesworth reference. mras are worse than skool prunes poo gosh most unsavory. i would rather here molesworth 2 pla fairy bells on the st custards piano.
My wife had some eccentric behaviors when in labor, including slapping one of my hands away while clinging tightly to the other, but amazing enough I was not seriously traumatized. I also didn’t let if bother me all that much because, you know, she was in labor.
These guys know that men aren’t FORCED to be in the delivery room, right? I hope these “men” as they style themselves never breed.
Accidental scratches are “violence”?
And are you by any chance suggesting that men are the only humans?
By the way, your penultimate line suggests that women, if you deem them to be human (oh thank you, kind sir!), have a right not to be harmed by their about-to-be-born infants and the fathers thereof.
Just, you know, food for thought.
My cat just kneaded my legs and it hurt. The violence that cats perpetrate against humans is unacceptable!
Garvan the skool sneke
LOOK AT WOT MRS CUPCAKE DID SIR SHE SCRATCHED MR CUPCAKE SIR IN CONTRAVENTION OF RULE 66 para (b)
Weren’t these dumbfucks just whining about a woman who didn’t want the father in the delivery room?
@mythago,
Yep. Really, everything they say is just a new exercise in hating women. That’s the only thing they’re consistent about and the only way their contradictions make any sense.
They probably expect her to give him a blowjob in gratitude for his presence. It’s not like it’s more than a minor inconvenience to her, but it takes up hours of his important time, and he’s endangering himself doing it.
If they do track down the guy in David’s photo (you know they’ll probably try) I bet they’ll try to convince him that he’s been horribly abused, despite how happy he looks in the picture.
It’s interesting to see how one of the men in the birthing simulator told his wife “Don’t talk to me right now” after 20 min of experiencing contractions, perhaps after 20 hours he could also yell something at her or scratch or squeeze her hand. Yup, he’s definately a hortible abuser and should be arrested, having your body ripped appart for hours is not an excuse to not smile and to tell rude things to the people around you.
Yeah, when my female kitten wanted to jump up on my lap and cuddle, scratching me in the process – I knew I was being oppressed…*
*Brought to you by…Sarcasm™
Female kittens are even more misandryish misandrists of misandry than male kittens.
Well-known fact.
Garvan, there are loads of examples where a degree of violence is socially and/or morally acceptable given the right circumstances. Accidents. Certain sports (implicit consent). Sex (with explicit consent, though light scratching etc. may not need this) Diminished responsibility. Law enforcement. Preventing greater harm.
Now you might have an argument why lashing out at a partner during childbirth does not belong in such a list, though I can’t think what it might be. But instead you claimed that violence is never acceptable which is clearly factually wrong. Want to try again?
@Kitteh: Seriously though, I do miss her – I never had a sweeter pet ..
I would like to have kids at some point and, when I do, getting scratched and yelled at during labor wouldn’t bother me. I wouldn’t take the profanity personally ’cause, hey, I get angry when I’m in pain too and I think scars look cool… 😀
Bunny trail: I wonder if a study has been done comparing pain tolerance between people who do and don’t swear–but rather than being assigned something random to chant, the person either does or doesn’t swear based on their own personality/convictions/upbringing/etc.
Personally, I was raised in a strict no-swearing environment (which may or may not be good, but wev, that’s water under the bridge which results in me naturally not swearing as an adult). I do yell when I’m in pain, but I don’t use swear words. I wonder what would happen if they let people yell whatever words they want, swearing or non-swearing. I imagine there is more pain release in angrily yelling a genuine, “FRIGGIN MONKEYBUTTS” than there is in chanting an assigned word, and I wonder if there’s even as much relief as a different person yelling a genuine swear.
Just something I’ve wondered ever since I saw the Mythbusters episode about this, and I’m curious if any of the more actually sciencey people among us might know. 😀
I should dig out my old photo of what Magnus the Monster did to my arm first time I tried patting him. Not just puncture marks, but bruises! An MRA would die of teh horror of being so mistreated.
Puncture marks I could understand, but bruises? Was Magnus a lion?
I’ve been a firefighter for nearly a decade, assuming some risks for the good of society. And for the most part I’m really proud of it, but it does irk me a little that these guys like to use my service to prove the innate servingness of dudes… because, a) there’s lots of dudes that could be doing this work but aren’t, b) there’s plenty of women doing the work too, guys.
Seriously, if a small number of men doing this work puts glory on all men… why don’t women gain the same?
Grr.
Misandry is so rife in our culture that when I fell of my bike this one time….a woman – no doubt a feminist – laughed!
I’m having mild fun imagining a woman trying to bite a man whilst giving birth. Unless he’s laying on top of her I’m not sure how that’s possible.
And actually, MRAs seem to go mad when a woman is praised for doing a dangerous job – be it police, fire fighting, army or whatever, “Oh, she’s not special! Look at all the men doing the same! All the poor men dying horrible in probably the safest and best working conditions we’ve ever had!”
The martyr complex needs to go.
Reality is misandry! MISAAAAANDRY!
Also, as others have said, intent kind of matters here. One may or may not find it morally acceptable to lash out at others in a moment of intense pain, but there’s a world of difference between that and deliberate abuse.
Yeah, it’d be interesting to know if the taboo element of swearing has something to do with its effect on the pain experience. It might be interesting to see what happens when people are assigned a word they find too offensive…
Yeah, it’d be interesting to know if the taboo element of swearing has something to do with its effect on the pain experience.
All my info comes second or third hand through media reports on the survey but I had understood that part of the study looked at something like that, in that habitual swearers found a lesser or a reducing effectiveness in swearing compared with those who sore infrequently.
It seems I am now a complete failure at blockquotes when on the work laptop! What am I doing wrong? Other than distracting myself while at work, I mean…