You may remember the embarrassing spectacle a couple of months back when Warren Farrell asked the readers of A Voice for Men to help him pick out a cover picture for a new ebook version of The Myth of Male Power, the 21-year-old crackpot bestseller that more or less provided the, er, intellectual foundation for today’s Men’s Rights movement.
It wasn’t just embarrassing because AVFM is a noxious hate site that regularly calls women c*nts and whores and helps to organize informal campaigns of harassment directed at individual women. It was also embarrassing because all three of the pictures were sexualized images focusing on specific female body parts. You can guess which three, and you’d be right: tits, ass, and vagina (the latter tastefully covered in a merkin made of moss).
Well, Farrell ended up rejecting all of these images in favor of … a different picture of a woman’s butt. Yep, the screenshot above features the actual cover of the recently released ebook version of The Myth of Male Power. (You can see it in its full sized-glory over on Amazon.)
The implicit message of the cover couldn’t be clearer: men may seem to run the world, but women can control and exploit them through the power of their sexuality. Male power is undercut by … butt power.
Am I reading too much into a cover image? Farrell doesn’t really believe this nonsense, does he?
Well, in the introduction to the ebook, Farrell writes:
In case you’re wondering, “genetic celebrity” is Farrell’s term of art for any attractive woman.
But golly, you say, the fact that a dude feels “powerless” because he can’t have sex with every woman with a nice butt that happens to wander across his field of vision doesn’t actually mean that men are powerless or that male power is a myth. Well, Farrell has an answer to this as well. And by “answer” I mean, well, whatever this is:
Got that? I’m not sure there’s anything there to get; it’s nothing more than hand-waving to distract attention from the nonsensical nature of his previous statements. In case any Men’s Rights activist ever brings Warren Farrell up as an example of a respectable, “academic” MRA, you may wish to point out that almost nothing Farrell writes ever actually makes any fucking sense.
In the book itself, Farrell repeatedly suggested that male power can be undone almost completely by the sexual power of women. In one oft-quoted passage, he wrote about the effect that a “secretary’s miniskirt power, cleavage power and flirtation power” allegedly has on their male bosses. (Myth of Male Power, p. 21)
While that statement has earned a certain notoriety for its sheer ridiculousness, Farrell went further elsewhere in the book, essentially arguing that men are as addicted to female “beauty” as drug addicts are to the drug of their choice — and as helpless.
“Sexually, of course, the sexes aren’t equal,” Farrell wrote. “[M]any men feel ‘under the influence the moment they see a beautiful woman.” (p. 320, emphasis in original.)
This sort of temporary “intoxication,” Farrell argued, leads men into shackling themselves to these temporarily sexy tyrants for the rest of their lives — thus agreeing to support them (he suggested implicitly) even after they get old and ugly. (p. 85.)
In Farrell’s original book, this “argument,” such as it is, was merely one of many that he thought undercut the alleged “myth of male power.” Now, with the butt on the cover, he’s put it front and center. Or, more precisely, rear and center.
Warren Farrell, you’re an ass, man.
Oh, awkward segue here, I just wanted to show off the cover to the new edition of my classic book, The Myth of Human Power.
It will soon be available for one million dollars in cash in unmarked bills, upon delivery of which I will sit down and write it for you. It will probably be pretty short and not very convincing.
Hey, Auntie Alias, good to see you here! I always enjoy your comments on RS (and doesn’t that turn into a misogynistic mess sometimes?)
Have a Welcome Package!
Thank you, kittehserf! I enjoy seeing your comments there, too. You have a way of getting right to the heart of matters.
Yes, every once in awhile it turns ugly on RS and it takes me by surprise. I haven’t seen any known men rightsers there, though. I wonder if they’ve all been banned.
Maybe this has been mentioned on another thread but did you know AVFM has changed to Disqus for commenting? It’ll be interesting to see how that turns out. One of the misters was whining about the unfairness of the upvotes being accessible to all and sundry.
Awww! ::blushes::
I was thinking more of how even the leftish commenters dump stupid misogynist slurs – like calling Bachmann et al b*tches and so on. The MRAs at least do get thoroughly stomped on when they turn up, which is fun. Lindsay usually rips ’em a new one. 😀
I didn’t know about AVfM. I never knowingly go to MRM sites, too toxic (and probably chockful of malware as well as malmisters). That’s priceless about them whining about upvotes, though. I’m still scratching my head about why Disqus has bumped the downvotes.
I remember when feminism wasn’t about fascism! It was this morning. Then feminism met Blah, and realized that, hey, if that’s what men are like then what’s the point being nice to them? And thus, feminism became all about oppressing men.
Your fault, dude. If feminists had never encountered you they’d all be combination mommy/sexbot angels who’d be only too happy to run around after men offering sandwiches and blowjobs, but you just had to ruin it, didn’t you?
Does this mean a book on the power of Blah is in the works?
I don’t think people in this community wants to understand Warren Farrel. The above disclaimer explains that just because someone feel powerlessness to another individual doesn’t automatically means that the person in such a position of power is out to exploit or intimidate them.
This is more of a criticism of male inadequacy then an off the rails attack on women. David Why can’t you see the simplicity of his argument?
kittey, ah yes, the slurs. I was sure surprised by all the hostility in the article about trigger warnings.
When I feel strong enough to visit AVFM I do just to get an idea of what they’re up to. I usually can’t wade through entire articles, though. The hatred and the lies are too much.
There was a statement on the Disqus site saying that doing away with downvotes was to foster a sense of community. Meh. It’s harder to gauge the amount of acceptance each comment has without both scores.
*I meant kitteh. Argh. Sorry!
@budmin, the issue I have with it is that Farrell is narrowing it down to sexual attraction (allegedly the loss of male power) and ignoring every other facet of life in which men hold power over women.
Kumbaya, assholes! Yeah, that’s going to work, especially with a commentariat as angry and dysfunctional as theirs.
@Auntie Alias the only definitive power that men have over women is through violence and that’s about as illegitimate a power base as one could imagine.
Yes, Budmin, we just don’t understaaaaaaaaand Farrell. It couldn’t possibly be that he’s foolish and wrong.
If it’s illegitimate then I guess it’s not real and we should stop talking about it.
(The stupid, it burns)
Why on earth would anyone want to understand Warren Farrell? He espouses some pretty vile garbage.
Oh, poor Warren…he’s not dumb or clear as mud or way too easily influenced by his own sad boner, he’s just MISUNDERSTOOD!
And yeah, violence is the only power men have over women. Uh-huh. And the church, the state, and the corporate sector don’t exist, and certainly aren’t male-dominated…uh-huh…surrrrrre.
@cassandrakitty illegitimate as in not sanctioned by the state, prosecutable by law and morally repugnant.
Well, it is useful to understand the motives of the people who want to do you harm, so in that sense, sure. The issue here isn’t that we don’t understand Farrell, it’s that we do, and misogynists don’t like it.
Wow, budmin, I didn’t think you could get any dumber, but you just managed it. Congratulations.
Are you kidding with this?
Men have more money, men are over represented on elected office and this is particularly true in higher, more powerful offices. A disproportionate number of men are movie directors and TV showrunners which means stories are told from a male perspective. Most corporate executives and board members are men, The list goes on and on. But sure, men are oppressed by fine asses.
Cassandrakitty, fair point. I’m just not sure I want to delve deeply into why he believes what he does. As far as understanding what he believes, I think we all do
@hellkell I’mguessing it might mean it’s frowned upon by society, unlike female sexual power.
Which is equally stupid.
Dumb troll is correct in a way, in that every social group that has systemic power over another group gained that power via violence in one way or another. The part that he’s not capable of grasping is that once the power structure has been established it’s no longer necessary to use violence to enforce it in every situation.
(But every member of a group that’s low in the power hierarchy knows very well that non-compliance can sometimes be punished by violence, and that the people in power might choose to exercise that option.)
Oh, my pothead reflexes…
“Another random Amazon reviewer: “The best book in human history.””
Were there books before human history? And how did he manage to write 506 fucking pages of this crap? Is the font size 22? Without actual research, he must be repeating himself a lot.
@weirwoodtreehugger what use is having your gender predominantly represented in government when they don’t represents your interest. Ask Christen Quinn and Hillary Clinton how they lost the womens vote to men and they’ll tell you that they were out campaigned buy men who offered women more security and entitlements.