You may remember the embarrassing spectacle a couple of months back when Warren Farrell asked the readers of A Voice for Men to help him pick out a cover picture for a new ebook version of The Myth of Male Power, the 21-year-old crackpot bestseller that more or less provided the, er, intellectual foundation for today’s Men’s Rights movement.
It wasn’t just embarrassing because AVFM is a noxious hate site that regularly calls women c*nts and whores and helps to organize informal campaigns of harassment directed at individual women. It was also embarrassing because all three of the pictures were sexualized images focusing on specific female body parts. You can guess which three, and you’d be right: tits, ass, and vagina (the latter tastefully covered in a merkin made of moss).
Well, Farrell ended up rejecting all of these images in favor of … a different picture of a woman’s butt. Yep, the screenshot above features the actual cover of the recently released ebook version of The Myth of Male Power. (You can see it in its full sized-glory over on Amazon.)
The implicit message of the cover couldn’t be clearer: men may seem to run the world, but women can control and exploit them through the power of their sexuality. Male power is undercut by … butt power.
Am I reading too much into a cover image? Farrell doesn’t really believe this nonsense, does he?
Well, in the introduction to the ebook, Farrell writes:
In case you’re wondering, “genetic celebrity” is Farrell’s term of art for any attractive woman.
But golly, you say, the fact that a dude feels “powerless” because he can’t have sex with every woman with a nice butt that happens to wander across his field of vision doesn’t actually mean that men are powerless or that male power is a myth. Well, Farrell has an answer to this as well. And by “answer” I mean, well, whatever this is:
Got that? I’m not sure there’s anything there to get; it’s nothing more than hand-waving to distract attention from the nonsensical nature of his previous statements. In case any Men’s Rights activist ever brings Warren Farrell up as an example of a respectable, “academic” MRA, you may wish to point out that almost nothing Farrell writes ever actually makes any fucking sense.
In the book itself, Farrell repeatedly suggested that male power can be undone almost completely by the sexual power of women. In one oft-quoted passage, he wrote about the effect that a “secretary’s miniskirt power, cleavage power and flirtation power” allegedly has on their male bosses. (Myth of Male Power, p. 21)
While that statement has earned a certain notoriety for its sheer ridiculousness, Farrell went further elsewhere in the book, essentially arguing that men are as addicted to female “beauty” as drug addicts are to the drug of their choice — and as helpless.
“Sexually, of course, the sexes aren’t equal,” Farrell wrote. “[M]any men feel ‘under the influence the moment they see a beautiful woman.” (p. 320, emphasis in original.)
This sort of temporary “intoxication,” Farrell argued, leads men into shackling themselves to these temporarily sexy tyrants for the rest of their lives — thus agreeing to support them (he suggested implicitly) even after they get old and ugly. (p. 85.)
In Farrell’s original book, this “argument,” such as it is, was merely one of many that he thought undercut the alleged “myth of male power.” Now, with the butt on the cover, he’s put it front and center. Or, more precisely, rear and center.
Warren Farrell, you’re an ass, man.
Oh, awkward segue here, I just wanted to show off the cover to the new edition of my classic book, The Myth of Human Power.
It will soon be available for one million dollars in cash in unmarked bills, upon delivery of which I will sit down and write it for you. It will probably be pretty short and not very convincing.
“Initiation”? Into what, the Skull and Bones? Dude’s talking out his ass here, and I don’t even know what he’s trying to say.
It’s really precious that WF doesn’t realize that the convention that men be the pursuers in romantic relationships with women being the passive recipient is actually patriarchy. I’m pretty sure feminists aren’t the ones who oppose women being the aggressor. He also somehow failed to notice that there are currently existing heterosexual relationships in which the woman made the first move.
Of course, MRAs hate women who are assertive because they aren’t “feminine” enough. I for one am shocked that there is hypocrisy in the MRM!
I remember the days when feminist ideology wasn’t a fascist hate group…
I remember the days when Blah was less relevant and provocative than last week’s hairballs.
How does that clip of Buffy the Vampire Slayer have anything to do with your opinion that feminism is a fascist hate group? Just because some people take issue with that particular plot line, doesn’t make them a hate group lol. It’s called criticism, it’s not a bad thing just because you disagree with the particular criticism.
It’s also quite off-topic, boring blah troll.
I remember the days where trolls tried to put up links that were vaguely relevant to the subject.
@Blah, you want to maybe define ‘fascism’ for us? Because I don’t think you have a clue what it means. Pro-tip: fascism is not defined as “stuff Blah doesn’t like.”
Sadly, Viscaria, “stuff I don’t like” is a pretty common definition of “fascism”.
I’m a huge Buffy fan. Am I kicked out of feminism now? Please advise fellow manboobzers.
I, too, remember those days, because they happened within the last week.
As usual, the argument that “men turn into helpless puddles of easily bruised id
in the presence of an attractive woman” suggests that men are so weak and easily confused they shouldn’t be in charge of anything ever because they’re so flighty and unreliable.
And yet.
At the risk of taking this troll much more seriously than he deserves, I am going to explain why Selfless is not anti-feminist.
For one thing, feminists don’t advocating murdering every man who dumps or cheats on women. The fact that being a vengeance demon who specializes in punishing unfaithful men is shown as bad is not a pro-MRA anti-feminist message. It’s an anti bloody vengeance message.
For another thing, the troll completely missed the point of the episode. The point of the episode is plainly stated in the commentary track so there can be no doubt.
The point is that Anya never had an identity of her own. She always defined herself in relation to men. Hence the episode title; Selfless.
First her identity was defined by her lover Olaf, back before she became a vengeance demon. Then he cheated on her and she successfully performed a spell to get back at him and as a result was recruited by D’Hoffryn, the male head of the vengeance demons. Then she spent centuries defined by D’Hoffryn’s plan for her. After she lost her powers and became human, she was defined as Xander’s girlfriend and then fiancé. After he dumped her she expended all her energy being angry at him.
At the end of the episode, Anya realizes she had never truly defined herself and she finally realizes that is what she needs to do. A woman claiming her own identity rather than being defined by relationships to men is actually a very feminist.
Sorry, troll. You aren’t beat me in a Buffy related argument. You shouldn’t have even tried.
Weiwoodtreehugger: As a long time Buffy fan, BRAVO! YAY!
*Claps and Wolfwhistles*!
Silly troll won’t ruin International Women’s Day for me.
Happy International Women’s Day, everyone!
Happy International Women’s Day!
I am avoiding all triggers for a bit. Miss you all!
lkeke35, Thanks!
Blah,
That day is called “today” and it will still be the same way tomorrow. Gather up your bruised anti-feminist fee-fees and go play with your silly misogynist friends elsewhere before some woman’s butt comes out of nowhere and passively oppresses you by existing, but not existing expressly for your gratification.
Because the secretary can then MARRY the boss and spend all his money and then divorce him when he, I MEAN she gets bored and draw a hefty alimony payment. You know, like in that classic documentary of 21st century feminism: Mad Men.
Hi Shaun! And Happy International
Women’sMisandry Day to all!True. Well, in that case, let me just say that I think Blah is a Lamarkian mess of post-industrial behaviourism, with a strong impressionistic bent.
I know Emilygoddess touched on it, but I’m glad Buttercup Q Skullpants highlighted what I think is one of the main problems w/WF’s mess:
“She doesn’t have to worry about people feeling she deserves to be physically hurt, financially hurt, and/or emotionally humiliated”
Women face the possibility of a disgruntled would be suitor trying to hurt or humiliate her all the time. There are even some men who feel that rape and murder are justified by a ‘man with a broken heart’ (like that thread Alice? linked to the other day)
David Futrelle
LOL! I wonder if warren Farrell will actually take your book seriously.
I’m crawling out of lurkdom to thank you for your brilliant conclusion to this article, David. I melt every time I look at the fluffy one!
Can we talk about DW’s shitty cover design? There’s a thing called margins, you know. Contrast is also absent. Thin red text over thin white shapes = an unreadable mess. When I looked at the screenshot above, I saw “Myth Male Power.” (I was so hoping he’d go with Marilyn and get slapped with a copyright infringement lawsuit.)
Amazon reviews:
AVFM: “Warren Farrell is a modern day prophet and this book is pure gold.” (Gag!)
Random person: “This is not news. It wasn’t news when the first book was published, and it’s not news now. Don’t waste your money to stroke this misogynist’s ego.” (Yay!)
I remember the days when mascufascist trolls worked harder to make their stupid little points, and didn’t just dig up FICTIONAL TV SHOWS.
Another random Amazon reviewer: “The best book in human history.’
That’s one thing MRAs are good at. Laughable extreme hyperbole.