Is there something about Men’s Rights Activists that renders them utterly incapable of designing posters that aren’t embarrassingly ugly and offputting?
Posters designed by MRAs are so routinely godawful it’s hard not to wonder if there is something inherent about them or their ideas that prevents them from seeing what a complete mess they’re making when they put together something like the poster above, which I recently found amongst a whole collection of similarly terrible posters at the website What Men Are Saying About Women.
In the case of Christian J, the WMASAW poster-designer, there is clearly something more than bad ideas at work here, but I do think the bad ideas of the Men’s Rights movement are a large part of the reason why MRAs can’t design posters to save their lives. Their posters are muddled messes because their ideology is a muddled mess.
Effective political posters are effective in large part because they convey a clear message in an arresting way. But the Men’s Rights movement doesn’t have a clear message. In some cases that’s because MRAs are trying to disguise their misogyny in order to try to appeal to a wider audience. It’s hard to get away with direct expressions of hate if you want to treat you as the “human rights movement” you keep insisting you are.
But in many other cases — as is the case with most of the posters featured in Christian J’s collection — MRA posters are muddled because their peculiar logic really only makes sense to those who already hate women to begin with. Who else would agree with the “argument” of this poster, which seems to be that we shouldn’t give respect to women because some women get drunk and other women … pose with silly expressions on their faces for stock photos?
Meanwhile, in this antifeminist poster, Christian J. offers little more than free-associational word salad, mixing accusations against feminists (“Hating Men is part of the agenda”) with simple assertions cataloging his own dislike of them (“no one likes a feminist”).
He also has posters attacking feminists Gloria Steinem and Hanna Rosin; tellingly, neither of them offer any specific evidence of wrongdoing on the part of either one. I wonder is Christian has read anything Rosin has written beyond the title to her book “The End of Men.”
And if you haven’t yet gotten your full dose of hate, he’s got a few posters attacking Lena Dunham for being … fat. And because Vogue did some rather minimal photoshopping to the pictures of her it ran in a recent profile.
And, well, I don’t even know what this is supposed to be.
Frankly, the more widely spread these posters are, the better. Because their ugliness reveals a lot about the ugly ideology of the MRA that made them.
Has anyone notice that woman jaw is unhinged…she should seek medical help, pronto. All of those poster are just gibberish to me, my two year old niece is more coherent.
tinyorc – LOL wasn’t ClipArt the pits? So twee and folksy.
That “you have to respect women” one, wow. You can tell he just did a couple of Google Image searches and slapped it all together. Sometimes women make funny faces, get mad, or pose for stupid stock photos, oh no! And the woman holding a knife won’t make sense to anyone not familiar with their claims about DV rates, since pretty much no one else thinks women murder men all the time.
I’ve probably spent more time thinking about this poster than he did.
kittehserf, I love the kitty with the overalls, it speaks to me.
emilygoddess, I try not to dig to deep…I’ll give myself a headache with all the contradictions…complete and utter mess of words.
http://i1245.photobucket.com/albums/gg595/capnben1/Untitled2_zpsd2f2ddb1.png
No, no, no. I can’t. No.
MRAs — good design is when there’s nothing left to TAKE AWAY, not nothing left to add!
@Emilygoddess: The woman holding a knife represents making brownies. As in “want respect? Make brownies for teh menz”.
…Now I want brownies. Or a nanaimo bar.
Kitty speaks with the power!
How ya been, justabrowngirl? 🙂
Kittehsert, lol memorize by his/her poised. I’m good…you know what they said when it rains it pours, but things are looking up. Thanks for asking. How you doing?
Sir Bodsworth, excellent work! I also went back through the rest of your posters. Very impressive collection. Extremely authentic looking.
My thoughts on the posters:
The posters don’t even convey anything, beyond general misogyny and anti-feminism. How can they expect people to take these seriously? The shit Lyndon LaRouche supporters hand out on campuses make more sense than this. At least I can tell what the point they are trying to get across is and the posters usually aren’t horrible crowded eye-sores. :
justabrowngirl – I’m good! 🙂
@Sir Bodsworth Rugglesby III: Okay, that timecube poster was utterly brilliant. All the others were great as well, but the timecube one really conveys the inanity of their BS best. XD
On first (careless) reading, I genuinely thought David had made all of those posters to make fun of MRAs terrible poster-making skills.
And yay, Bodsy’s making posters! It’s a grand day!
And the Kate Winslet one? “NO Father = NO Children” — WTF?
There’s a rather … strange comment been left on this thread.
http://manboobz.com/2014/02/18/mens-rights-redditor-going-to-a-strip-club-as-a-guy-must-be-like-going-to-a-regular-nightclub-as-a-girl/
@ cloudiah
Is that a threat that if the children aren’t handed over to the dad in the divorce he’s going to kill them, or just that he’s going to kidnap them? Or, this being an MRA idea, that he’s going to go back in time and not have sex with the mother, thus destroying the space/time continuum and TAKE THAT FEMINISM (and also everyone will be dead, but whatevs, at least there’s no more feminism)?
The greatest female strength and the greatest male weakness – lies between the legs.
I am amused that they take the “Boys are stupid, throw rocks at them” thing seriously. When I was a teenager that was printed on lots of tshirts etc. at Hot Topic (official feminist hivemind clothing provider?) along with bunnies that had phrases like “You stink” or “I hate you, go away now”. Stuff like that. It is similar to little boys saying “girls have cooties”. I don’t expect those boys to grow up into misogynists unless they never quite learn that cooties aren’t real.
cloudiah, the sad thing is someone actually took their time and made this.
So women aren’t worthy of respect because some of them sometimes get drunk and silly? What about men? They get drunk and silly sometimes. Are they not respectable?
Aw, thanks folks!
kittehserf, What a wall of text that person dropped! All evo psych arguments sound exactly the same. Why do they even bother? They should develop a shorthand. Something like “I DECLARE EVO PSYCH!” We all know what it means.
Of course they think the wall of text makes them sound intelligent and important so it probably isn’t happening.
If I add 1000 words and lots of adjectives it makes my argument seem more credible, right?