Not that long ago, an 18-year-old student named Carly, appalled by the rampant misogyny on display at A Voice for Men, sent a critical but thoughtful email to a number of the men associated with the site challenging them to rise above their hatred of women.
AVFM “Managing Editor” Dean Esmay decided to take her email as an opportunity to reach out to all the Carlys out there in the world in an attempt to win them over to AVFM’s peculiar brand of “human rights activism,” penning what he called an
open letter … not just to you, but to any young woman who has an open mind and is willing to be challenged on her prejudices.
Naturally, given that Men’s Rights Activists are some of the most verbose douchebags in history, it was long as hell — some 3000 words. But Esmay’s diplomatically worded attempt at outreach didn’t go quite as well as he might have hoped. Carly responded with a note saying that his open letter had merely
reinforced everything I believe. It seems we are at a stalemate, you will never agree with me, and I will never agree with you.
So where might poor Dean Esmay might have gone wrong in his attempt to win Carly’s heart and mind?
Let’s start here, with 5 Arguments Least Likely To Convince A Young Woman That A Voice for Men Isn’t a Woman-Hating Piece of Shit Hate Site, in the form of direct quotes from The Esmay himself. Since Esmay is so long-winded, I’ve highlighted some of my favorite bits in bold.
1)“[Y]ou’re 18, and so, not to put too fine a point on it, you are still a young skull full of mush.”
2) “[M]en have few to no voices speaking about issues that are specific to men, or defending men as a group, in this society. Until very recently in history men never have had such a voice. Because pretty much all civilizations for the last few thousand years have prioritized the needs and desires of women over those of men. For hundreds, even thousands, of years.
3)“If you believe men have silenced women for thousands of years … you believe something that just not true. … Furthermore, if you believe that, what you have to believe is that Asian men have been oppressing Asian women for thousands of years, black men have been oppressing black women for thousands of years, European men, Australasian men, and so on, have all been oppressing their women for thousands of years. And those weak women could do nothing about it. So what you believe here isn’t just wrong, it’s racist.”
4) “For most of history, being female was a privilege. It carried certain special rights that only applied to women, and special responsibilities that only applied to women, and through most of history, being male was a burden, a burden which carried certain rights that only applied to men, and those rights were there mostly so they could discharge their duties to women properly.”
5) “[Y]ou may occasionally see angry remarks or articles on this site. What I would hope you would do with that, when you do see it, is contemplate that there is a difference between righteous anger at real injustice, and what you seem to have misinterpreted as hate.”
The funniest thing about Esmay’s “open letter” is that this bizarre crackpottery, easily seen through by anyone with any knowledge of history or sociology or, hell, the real world, is his attempt to sound as reasonable as possible. He’s reined in the wild conspiratorial ranting he often indulges in when arguing with ideological foes; he’s avoided the misogynistic slurs (cunt, bitch, whore) favored by other AVFMers like Paul Elam and Diana Davison. And this is the best he can manage.
The Men’s “Human Rights” Movement isn’t ready for its close-up. And I suspect that it never will be.
EDITED TO ADD: A commenter has pointed out another quote I should have included as well. So here is BONUS EXTRA LEAST CONVINCING DEAN ESMAY ARGUMENT NUMBER SIX:
6) “The truth is, the most privileged class of people in the whole wide world are young women living in places like the US, UK, Canada, etc.–and if you want to be treated like an equal, you should not flinch or cry like a little girl if someone tells you that.“
How dare you accuse us of sexism, you spoiled little girl!
Holy unwarranted assumptions, Batman!
More fun, too.
“[M]en have few to no voices speaking about issues that are specific to men, or defending men as a group, in this society. Until very recently in history men never have had such a voice.”
wut
Parliament
The Army
The Church
Higher education (strictures on women attending university lifted within living memory)
Publishing
Philosophy
Yeeesh.
Well of course Carly is white. Women of color know their place and haven’t been tainted by feminism yet.
/sarcasm
Ally, apparently Esmay doesn’t realize that black women were enslaved too.
*Trigger warning for rape*
Bonelady, IIRC Augustine said that women and girls who were raped are to blame because God wouldn’t let anyone who was pure and moral be raped. It was something along those lines. I can’t remember the exact wording. I’m not sure how that is prioritizing women.
” For most of history, being female was a privilege. It carried certain special rights that only applied to women, and special responsibilities that only applied to women, and through most of history, being male was a burden, a burden which carried certain rights that only applied to men, and those rights were there mostly so they could discharge their duties to women properly.” So… if men are burdened with their rights and there are many women that are burdened with their “privilege” why can’t we get a simple solution of this problem: Men are no more obligated to their burdening rights and women can give up their privilege together the “specific responsibilities”. And everyone will be happy finally. I believe that is what feminists proposed.
Colour me surprised that being female is a privilege. I don’t remember being asked what gender I wanted. 🙂
But that doesn’t even begin to make sense.
That makes anti-sense.
Reading that made me understand less about MRA’s. The vast gap of things I thought they knew but, which, apparently, they don’t, just expanded. I… I don’t… I think that.. It’s not like I… aw. Aw my head. I just had the disconcerting experience of having my confusion compound in on itself.
Kyriarchy theory is racist.
Kyriarchy, a theoretical interpretation of relationships that boils down to “Most people participates in systems of interrelated submission / oppression / dominance” is racist.
I can’t… you can’t… You cannot make this up. This is a real person. Writing those actual words! In an attempt to communicate with an actual human being to answer an actual question that was actually posed.
ARGH MY HEAD. I’m going to go get drunk, and I may never become sober again!
Yes, it was such a privilege to have anything you owned become your husband’s on marriage. It was such a privilege to be deserted, try to make a living, then have him turn up and demand not only the children he’d walked out on (and he had automatic custody) but the money you’d earned. How privileged it was to be robbed, and hear in court the purse you’d made for yourself, and all its contents, be described as the property of Mr So-and-so. (It was such a case that started the actual victim of the crime on the campaign that led to the Married Woman’s Property Act in England.)
Yeah, being a thing that was the property of a man, for him to treat as he wished, was such a privilege.
I guess I’m not as awake from my nap as I thought. Enjoy the tribute, Blockquote Monster.
Of course that’s privilege, kitteh. I mean, haven’t you ever had to balance a checkbook? Soooo hard. Far better to just turn all your finances and property over to a man and let him take care of it, I say!
Wait, what happened to my quote? I quoted the first sentence of your post up there. I guess the Blockquote Monster went all out on me since I have flaunted it for so long. 🙁
argh, triple post but I meant “flout” not “flaunt.” Brain/finger disconnect there apparently.
AK – the blockquote monster is probably pissy because there is a way to defeat it. Muahahahahaha!
Why would I be balancing a chequebook, as that money would be my partner’s and he wouldn’t tell me what he earned (but would give me an “allowance” out of which I would have to buy household items like food). All this was to ensure that I wouldn’t overspend his money on bon-bons or scented fucking candles.
Augustine said the victim of a rape was blameless, and that this victim was still chaste (realising that chastity was a BIG deal in the wider world).
What Austine had to say about rape
What Augustine said was Lucretia’s error was to commit suicide when she was blameless, because the pagans were blaming Christian women for not feeling so ashamed at being raped that they felt the need to commit suicide (which also removed one of the ways rape was used as a social control of women).
Pecunium, perhaps I was thinking of someone else. Maybe it was Thomas Aquinas. I mix the two up sometimes.
I don’t get why MRAs feel like they never have to provide any evidence whatsoever for what they say. If anyone disagrees with them, the disagreer had better have citations up the wazoo, but they expect people to believe their baseless assertions just because they said so. It’s asinine.
MRAs are a bowel movement. Or at least the result of one.
I enjoy reading all of your comments. I lol so hard when y’all tear apart MRA ‘bricks of logic.’
@david: I was wondering if Carly was going to answer that long diatribe of Dean poop. I read his wackofesto when he published it and it actually made my brain into mush. I love how he’s trying to act all paternal while spewing the same tired old misogyny.
Oh and pure mouseling!
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tOsj5KV8kI&w=560&h=315%5D
What’s particularly sad are the comments at the end of his article telling him how wonderful it is. Dear gods, has noone on AVfM any grasp of good writing?
Only 28.4% percent of speaking roles in 2012 movies went to women. Poor men are so underrepresented with only 71.6% Women are supposed to be seen and not heard. Everyone knows that!
http://business.time.com/2014/02/19/9-depressing-facts-from-the-latest-women-in-media-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+time%2Fbusiness+TIME%3A+Top+Business+Stories
I’m laughing so hard at that mouseling I’m getting strange looks from Mum and the kitties! Seen that vid once before, and it’s just as funny the second time. You go, mousey!
And my favourite part of the article:
Shorter Dean:
Here are our stats. They’re out of date and wrong but we can’t be arsed to correct them.
Wiki is true and the greatest. Here’s our Wiki page. We can’t be arsed to update that either. Please update it for us.