Categories
a voice for men citation needed Dean Esmay evil women grandiosity gynocracy imaginary backwards land imaginary oppression mansplaining men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA oppressed men racism that's completely wrong the c-word the sound of his own voice whaaaaa?

5 Arguments Least Likely To Convince A Young Woman That A Voice for Men Isn’t a Misogynistic Hate Site

Hi, girls! Dean Esmay reaches out to the youth of America
Hey ladies! Dean Esmay reaches out to the young women of America

Not that long ago, an 18-year-old student named Carly, appalled by the rampant misogyny on display at A Voice for Men, sent a critical but thoughtful email to a number of the men associated with the site challenging them to rise above their hatred of women.

AVFM “Managing Editor” Dean Esmay decided to take her email as an opportunity to reach out to all the Carlys out there in the world in an attempt to win them over to AVFM’s peculiar brand of “human rights activism,” penning what he called an

open letter … not just to you, but to any young woman who has an open mind and is willing to be challenged on her prejudices.

Naturally, given that Men’s Rights Activists are some of the most verbose douchebags in history, it was long as hell — some 3000 words. But Esmay’s diplomatically worded attempt at outreach didn’t go quite as well as he might have hoped. Carly responded with a note saying that his open letter had merely

reinforced everything I believe. It seems we are at a stalemate, you will never agree with me, and I will never agree with you.

So where might poor Dean Esmay might have gone wrong in his attempt to win Carly’s heart and mind?

Let’s start here, with 5 Arguments Least Likely To Convince A Young Woman That A Voice for Men Isn’t a Woman-Hating Piece of Shit Hate Site, in the form of direct quotes from The Esmay himself. Since Esmay is so long-winded, I’ve highlighted some of my favorite bits in bold.

1)“[Y]ou’re 18, and so, not to put too fine a point on it, you are still a young skull full of mush.

2)[M]en have few to no voices speaking about issues that are specific to men, or defending men as a group, in this society. Until very recently in history men never have had such a voice. Because pretty much all civilizations for the last few thousand years have prioritized the needs and desires of women over those of men. For hundreds, even thousands, of years.

3)If you believe men have silenced women for thousands of years … you believe something that just not true.Furthermore, if you believe that, what you have to believe is that Asian men have been oppressing Asian women for thousands of years, black men have been oppressing black women for thousands of years, European men, Australasian men, and so on, have all been oppressing their women for thousands of years. And those weak women could do nothing about it. So what you believe here isn’t just wrong, it’s racist.

4)For most of history, being female was a privilege. It carried certain special rights that only applied to women, and special responsibilities that only applied to women, and through most of history, being male was a burden, a burden which carried certain rights that only applied to men, and those rights were there mostly so they could discharge their duties to women properly.”

5) “[Y]ou may occasionally see angry remarks or articles on this site. What I would hope you would do with that, when you do see it, is contemplate that there is a difference between righteous anger at real injustice, and what you seem to have misinterpreted as hate.

The funniest thing about Esmay’s “open letter” is that this bizarre crackpottery, easily seen through by anyone with any knowledge of history or sociology or, hell, the real world,  is his attempt to sound as reasonable as possible. He’s reined in the wild conspiratorial ranting he often indulges in when arguing with ideological foes; he’s avoided the misogynistic slurs (cunt, bitch, whore) favored by other AVFMers like Paul Elam and Diana Davison. And this is the best he can manage.

The Men’s “Human Rights” Movement isn’t ready for its close-up. And I suspect that it never will be.

EDITED TO ADD: A commenter has pointed out another quote I should have included as well. So here is BONUS EXTRA LEAST CONVINCING DEAN ESMAY ARGUMENT NUMBER SIX:

6) “The truth is, the most privileged class of people in the whole wide world are young women living in places like the US, UK, Canada, etc.–and if you want to be treated like an equal, you should not flinch or cry like a little girl if someone tells you that.

How dare you accuse us of sexism, you spoiled little girl!

296 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
vaiyt
10 years ago

A privileged white girl (I assume Carly’s white, with about 90% certainty) telling people of color how their culture works is the height of arrogance and is an implicit and inescapable racial prejudice.

Holy unwarranted assumptions, Batman!

kittehserf
10 years ago

Bowel movements are more useful than MRAs.

More fun, too.

radegunde
radegunde
10 years ago

“[M]en have few to no voices speaking about issues that are specific to men, or defending men as a group, in this society. Until very recently in history men never have had such a voice.”

wut

Parliament

The Army

The Church

Higher education (strictures on women attending university lifted within living memory)

Publishing

Philosophy

Yeeesh.

AK
AK
10 years ago

Well of course Carly is white. Women of color know their place and haven’t been tainted by feminism yet.
/sarcasm

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Ally, apparently Esmay doesn’t realize that black women were enslaved too.

*Trigger warning for rape*

Bonelady, IIRC Augustine said that women and girls who were raped are to blame because God wouldn’t let anyone who was pure and moral be raped. It was something along those lines. I can’t remember the exact wording. I’m not sure how that is prioritizing women.

Cat
Cat
10 years ago

” For most of history, being female was a privilege. It carried certain special rights that only applied to women, and special responsibilities that only applied to women, and through most of history, being male was a burden, a burden which carried certain rights that only applied to men, and those rights were there mostly so they could discharge their duties to women properly.” So… if men are burdened with their rights and there are many women that are burdened with their “privilege” why can’t we get a simple solution of this problem: Men are no more obligated to their burdening rights and women can give up their privilege together the “specific responsibilities”. And everyone will be happy finally. I believe that is what feminists proposed.

Kiwi girl
Kiwi girl
10 years ago

Colour me surprised that being female is a privilege. I don’t remember being asked what gender I wanted. 🙂

Fibinachi
10 years ago

“Patriarchy Theory” is racist at its core. Even more explicitly racist is the “Kyriarchy theory” which, if you haven’t heard of it, is just Patriarchy Theory dressed up to assign specific Privilege Values to each race.

But that doesn’t even begin to make sense.
That makes anti-sense.
Reading that made me understand less about MRA’s. The vast gap of things I thought they knew but, which, apparently, they don’t, just expanded. I… I don’t… I think that.. It’s not like I… aw. Aw my head. I just had the disconcerting experience of having my confusion compound in on itself.

Kyriarchy theory is racist.

Kyriarchy, a theoretical interpretation of relationships that boils down to “Most people participates in systems of interrelated submission / oppression / dominance” is racist.

I can’t… you can’t… You cannot make this up. This is a real person. Writing those actual words! In an attempt to communicate with an actual human being to answer an actual question that was actually posed.

ARGH MY HEAD. I’m going to go get drunk, and I may never become sober again!

kittehserf
10 years ago

Yes, it was such a privilege to have anything you owned become your husband’s on marriage. It was such a privilege to be deserted, try to make a living, then have him turn up and demand not only the children he’d walked out on (and he had automatic custody) but the money you’d earned. How privileged it was to be robbed, and hear in court the purse you’d made for yourself, and all its contents, be described as the property of Mr So-and-so. (It was such a case that started the actual victim of the crime on the campaign that led to the Married Woman’s Property Act in England.)

Yeah, being a thing that was the property of a man, for him to treat as he wished, was such a privilege.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

The race argument is truly something to behold.

Yep. Add “kriarchy,” “colonialism,” and oh, everything else to list of thing Dean knows jack about.

He’s what we talk about when we talk about “stupid.”

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

I guess I’m not as awake from my nap as I thought. Enjoy the tribute, Blockquote Monster.

AK
AK
10 years ago

Of course that’s privilege, kitteh. I mean, haven’t you ever had to balance a checkbook? Soooo hard. Far better to just turn all your finances and property over to a man and let him take care of it, I say!

AK
AK
10 years ago

Wait, what happened to my quote? I quoted the first sentence of your post up there. I guess the Blockquote Monster went all out on me since I have flaunted it for so long. 🙁

AK
AK
10 years ago

argh, triple post but I meant “flout” not “flaunt.” Brain/finger disconnect there apparently.

kittehserf
10 years ago

AK – the blockquote monster is probably pissy because there is a way to defeat it. Muahahahahaha!

Kiwi girl
Kiwi girl
10 years ago

Why would I be balancing a chequebook, as that money would be my partner’s and he wouldn’t tell me what he earned (but would give me an “allowance” out of which I would have to buy household items like food). All this was to ensure that I wouldn’t overspend his money on bon-bons or scented fucking candles.

pecunium
10 years ago

Augustine said the victim of a rape was blameless, and that this victim was still chaste (realising that chastity was a BIG deal in the wider world).

What Austine had to say about rape

Augustine argues that sanctity depends on the will (1.16). Thus ‘not even when the body is violated is it [sanctity] lost’ (1.18). Augustine takes the argument even further and argues that even the body remains holy if the will remains holy: ‘so long as the soul keeps this firmness of purpose which sanctifies even the body, the violence done by another’s lust makes no impression on this bodily sanctity, which is preserved intact by one’s own persistent continence’ (1.18). I should note that Augustine is here discussing ‘sanctity’ of body, not bodily integrity. He is entirely consistent in saying that rape is a sin against a woman’s body; he denies that the rapist’s sin can touch the holiness of the victim’s body or mind. Augustine takes it as a given that the woman does not consent to her rape, but he is arguing against those who do not take that as a given.

So why then does Augustine bring up Lucretia? Lucretia is an example of a classical Roman woman who both was raped and committed suicide, and thus she is a locus classicus for both Christians and pagans. Professor Burrus writes that Augustine ’suggests (while acknowledging that only Lucretia herself could have known this) that Lucretia must have been “so enticed by her own desire that she consented to the act’. But Professor Burrus has inexplicably left off the question mark from Augustine’s rhetorical question. What Augustine really says is this: ‘What shall we call her? An adulteress, or chaste? There is no question which she was. Not more happily than truly did a declaimer say of this sad occurrence: “Here was a marvel: there were two, and only one committed adultery.” Most forcibly and truly spoken’ (1.19). Indeed, Augustine is unequivocal in his claim that Lucretia bore no blame whatsoever for the rape.

But Augustine still has to deal with the question of suicide. So Augustine finds fault with Lucretia for committing suicide, not for being raped[emphasis added].

What Augustine said was Lucretia’s error was to commit suicide when she was blameless, because the pagans were blaming Christian women for not feeling so ashamed at being raped that they felt the need to commit suicide (which also removed one of the ways rape was used as a social control of women).

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Pecunium, perhaps I was thinking of someone else. Maybe it was Thomas Aquinas. I mix the two up sometimes.

kemmazie
kemmazie
10 years ago

I don’t get why MRAs feel like they never have to provide any evidence whatsoever for what they say. If anyone disagrees with them, the disagreer had better have citations up the wazoo, but they expect people to believe their baseless assertions just because they said so. It’s asinine.

yama
10 years ago

MRAs are a bowel movement. Or at least the result of one.

House Mouse Queen
10 years ago

I enjoy reading all of your comments. I lol so hard when y’all tear apart MRA ‘bricks of logic.’

@david: I was wondering if Carly was going to answer that long diatribe of Dean poop. I read his wackofesto when he published it and it actually made my brain into mush. I love how he’s trying to act all paternal while spewing the same tired old misogyny.

Oh and pure mouseling!
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tOsj5KV8kI&w=560&h=315%5D

titianblue
titianblue
10 years ago

What’s particularly sad are the comments at the end of his article telling him how wonderful it is. Dear gods, has noone on AVfM any grasp of good writing?

weirwoodtreehugger
10 years ago

Only 28.4% percent of speaking roles in 2012 movies went to women. Poor men are so underrepresented with only 71.6% Women are supposed to be seen and not heard. Everyone knows that!
http://business.time.com/2014/02/19/9-depressing-facts-from-the-latest-women-in-media-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+time%2Fbusiness+TIME%3A+Top+Business+Stories

kittehserf
10 years ago

I’m laughing so hard at that mouseling I’m getting strange looks from Mum and the kitties! Seen that vid once before, and it’s just as funny the second time. You go, mousey!

titianblue
titianblue
10 years ago

And my favourite part of the article:

You did not specify where you got the statistics either; we have multiple articles and pages where you can find statistics. You may want to look at this page, which is a few years old and needs a bit of updating, but, we stand by the substance of that page and we would have to ask you which stats on it you took issue with before commenting further. But I hope you also stop by our Wiki page of primary references, which contains considerably more information which will probably surprise you even more. (We are still looking for volunteers to help update that wiki as it happens, and you and others are welcome to help improve it.)

Shorter Dean:

Here are our stats. They’re out of date and wrong but we can’t be arsed to correct them.
Wiki is true and the greatest. Here’s our Wiki page. We can’t be arsed to update that either. Please update it for us.