So that’s the beginning to what has to be my favorite creepy convo I’ve seen posted to the Reddit CreepyPMs subreddit yet. I don’t want to SPOIL anything, but let’s just say that the pink lady in this conversation comes up with a rather unique way to send this dick-pic-posting male correspondent packing.
See here for the rest, and here for the Reddit thread. Oh, and don’t worry, you won’t have to look at his c*ck, or any other horrifying thing, and nothing else will be spoiled if you scroll down through all the pics. (You’ll get what I’m talking about in a second.)
It seems every social justice community has to have their Captain Contrarian.
titianblue: there’s nothing to apologize for, Nepenthe would’ve found something else to get angry about.
*wakes up, reviews last page*
Let me get this straight, people posted links saying the mentally ill are no more violent than anyone else, Nepenthe posted links saying otherwise, I confirmed the former said wtf they were claimed to say, but the latter had “only is substance is also present” all over them, Nepenthe got so angry zir partner made ze stop posting.
And I’m the unreasonable one who’s acting like a climate change denier or something?
How is that…? For the sake of my amusement, let’s pretend I was completely wrong, that still wouldn’t make Nepenthe’s apparently unhealthy anger about it justified. It’s not like I said that ze was inherently more dangerous than most people, when in reality that would only be true if ze was abusing drugs, and young men may still be more violent.
Ok, yes, on proper sleep this still looks ridiculous.
Aregnti: I got the impression that she wanted the mentally ill to be more violent. In a kind of “I’m not only the president of the Hairclub for Men, I’m a member” sort of way.
And I apologize for snark snapping, but her response to your good faith effort pissed me right off.
Hellkell — okay, that could explain why my “but, but, OTHER VARIABLES” got compared to climate change denialism (that graphic btw? Neither chart is wrong, one is a chart of yearly average, the other a standard regression — anyone looking at the stepped yearly averages and going “nope, not getting warmer” is an idiot)
And no worries, I was more wondering yesterday if I was taking it personally, having slept…nope, you were totally justified!
I guess I should get up, there’s a Furrinati overlord attacking something outside my door! (Probably either a pipe cleaner [idfk] or one of her new catnip toys…hopefully the former, it’s too damned early for her to be into the ‘nip!)
Has this happened before? I’m still kinda confused and feel like I missed something vital here.
Also, seeing as how these days, DID is expressly related to having an abuse history… yeah. Whatever.
(That said, I’ve been diagnosed with depression, anxiety, DID, and EDNOS, which is hilarious since the depression and anxiety were purely situational and now pretty much gone, I actually qualify under DDNOS due to comparatively minor memory issues, and augh what a mess. The only reason I GOT those damn diags in the first place was that it was pretty much required for disability, and ‘NOS’ syndromes apparently have a lower success rate.)
Interesting. It appears in a private conversation, some guy complements a lady and FIRST, expresses a desire to send a penis pic, then sends it ONLY after she responds with an expressed desire to receive the pic.and this makes this guy a creep deserving of retribution. Of course, if a woman had sent pics of her private parts under the same circumstances, she would be practicing sexual agency.
Feminism’s double standards are as prevalent as ever. “Creep shaming” – YES! “Slut shaming” – HELL NO!
You don’t sarcasm, do you, Sam?
You noticed she only typed the spoiler after she asked him to stop, and he didn’t? See, that’s the key right there: he was told she wasn’t interested in his dick, and he kept talking about it anyway.
RE: Sam
Of course, if a woman had sent pics of her private parts under the same circumstances, she would be practicing sexual agency.
You realize none of us actually believe that, right? You realize you’re arguing with someone who isn’t here, right?
Well, no, of course not. You’re SAM. You still haven’t even told me what you want a citation for yet! Seriously, Sam, how can I engage with you if you won’t tell me what citation you NEED?
RE: sparky
You don’t sarcasm, do you, Sam?
Sam doesn’t ANYTHING, sparky. Sam has proved to be denser than iron in the heart of a star, and about as easy to inform.
Sam: be a dear and fuck off. Failing that, grow a brain and get clever.
why Sam hasn’t been banned after his blatant rape apologia in one of the last threads he pooped in is a mystery.
I know! It’s not like Sam is even INTERESTING. He brings nothing to the table at all, and doesn’t compare to the trolls of yore.
Sparky
She threatened him with the spoiler after feigning interest. So clearly, she saw fault with him sending the pic after her expressed approval.
Sam: your comprehension skills are stunning, why don’t you take them elsewhere? We shouldn’t be the only recipients of your towering intellect.
Why, yes, Sam, that is part if what happened. She was being sarcastic when she said, “That would surely be a great picture.” He didn’t pick up on it, and sent a picture of his penis. So she changed th subject to Breaking Bad, then threatened to reveal the ending for sending her a dick pic, because she was not interested in his dick. He then apologized. She gave him. All was well. Until he brought his penis up again, “But what did you think of it?” It was at that point, after he had been told that his unsolicited dick pic was not welcome AND she had warned him, she sent the spoiler.
I can’t believe that you didn’t catch that. You didn’t actually read the conversation, did you?
RE: Sam
Do I have to make more bad penis puns at you? Shoo, shoo.
(Seriously, guys, dude’s like a block of wood. I’d rather debate with an inanimate object that this guy.)
“why Sam hasn’t been banned after his blatant rape apologia in one of the last threads he pooped in is a mystery.”
Does the dark lord know about it?
LBT — I know we already discussed this elsewhere, but I’m gonna answer here for anyone else who’s forgotten — Nepenthe had a little meltdown about treating otherkin as generally harmless, apparently that’s supporting their dellusions and something something unicorns!
Oh look, it snowed again, anyone want some snow? We have plenty to spare!
Do you remember which thread it was, hellkell? Sam’s so eye-glazingly boring I think I missed it.
Mind you his asking LBT for a citation about his own rape is banhammer stuff anyway, to me.
Assuming good intentions is always OK, I should think, as long as you’re not forcing other people to also do so.
I don’t remember a mental health incident before, but there’s been some weird stuff, such as the amusing yet baffling assertion that, if a poem is open to multiple interpretations, God must not exist.
Oh, Sam, Sam, Sam, you know that you give people with this name a bad reputation don’t you? I mean if you’re going to try to be a smartass at least try to put more work into it.
You try to get an “aha” moment in every thread that you post in and yet you are consistently handed your ass. Here’s a thought, don’t send someone a dick pic and they won’t ruin your favorite show for you. Don’t sleep with someone who is intoxicated and you won’t be accused of rape. Act like a decent human being and you won’t be called an asshat.
See not really that hard!
Kitteh’s: can’t remember the exact one, I think it was from the beginning of the month?
PSA — Nepenthe mocking otherkin
There’s actually a Really Good discussion of religion on that page btw.