Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
I love it when people like Buttboy come here and say we’re not trying to understaaaand these dudes. What they fail to realize is that we understand all too well.
We should feel sorry for the manipulators and abusers because they don’t see their behaviour that way! Whaaaah the poor menz!
Count me out of the “we” in buttboil’s claims as well. I am not in the habit of lying about myself. If people don’t like me for who I am (and that’s a package deal, Mr K’s included) then that’s their bad luck. I’m not so interested in strangers that I’m going to tell porkies to impress them. Just the opposite, actually.
Aww, thanks, Howard. I rarely get called restrained. 😉
I just kinda enjoy, hellkell, how he acts like it’s all women thinking he’s a jerk and the men thinking he’s reasonable. Seriously, do I just not count or something? *sighs, shakes head sadly* You’d think an MRA would care about my opinion…
Kittehs: what’s the backstory of “tell porkies?” I’ve never heard that before, but I love it.
RE: hellkell
I assume it’s a shortening of old rhyming slang: pork pies = lies.
LBT: you’d think so, right?
Not to mention the totally unsympathetic man who wrote the blog post whose comments he’s whining about.
Hellkell – ooh, I know this one! Cockney rhyming slang. Porkie pie = lie.
hellkell – yup, LBT’s right, it’s that rhyming slang. 🙂
Quite a lot of old Oz slang is straight out of Cockney rhyming slang. Sadly it seems to be fading away.
I’m delighted that buttboy posted that last comment, btw. Why would anyone take anything he says in the future seriously after he’s admitted that he’s a habitual liar who thinks that’s the norm? He just shot himself in the foot in terms of future attempts to gaslight us and he’s too dumb to even realize it.
Kittehs & everyone: thanks for the answer.
Buttboy, if you try to use, “I have to lie about my basic beliefs and hobbies because I am so unlikeable my true self isn’t good enough,” as a way to garner sympathy… you’re doing it wrong. You’re trying to paint women’s standards as the problem, when it’s YOU delivering falsehoods or feeling so self-loathing you feel obligated to lie.
Either way, you’re telling us way more about YOU than women, buddy.
Oh, I forgot to add Alan Davies and Stephen Fry to men I like to look at. I also like to listen to them. The relevance here, is Cockney rhyming slang.
@buttboy
troll to english translation: men have a hard time getting dates on ok cupid. This is sad. Very sad. Women have an easy time getting dates on ok cupid. I know this because my ass told me so.
troll to engilsh translation: Yes, he’s denying his dates their preferences, but let me explain how this is okay, because I am a douchenozzle.
troll to english translation: I lie about my past, tastes, and skills. Me.
troll to english translation: I know he’s being manipulative, but why must you insult him? he’s just trying to get a date *whiny voice* give him a chaaannnccceee.
Troll to english translation: I know you just were talking about being stalked, harassed, sent death/rape threats, but I don’t care, because I have the perspective of a banana, so I will willfully ignore you.
Troll to english translation: playing devil’s advocate isn’t that hard.
::applauds Marie::
@kittehs
thank you :3
Futrelle, I’m requesting you delete my comments in this thread. Obviously it’s your blog and you can do whatever you want, but I’d appreciate it.
What, worried that people might quote this thread to underscore how dishonest you are next time you try to pull the disingenuous act?
No, I’m just not really interested in having a discussion in this sort of atmosphere.
So David should help you pretend the conversation never happened. Yep, you’re revealing things about yourself all over the place today.
Awww, buttboil doesn’t want people seeing he’s defended a(nother) lying skeeve who’s trying to manipulate women.
Wonder why that would be?
Run along, sonny. You’re not even an amusing troll.
It’s strange buttboy69. You say sensible things quite often, but then you try to get them to mean the opposite of what they actually mean. I suspect if you sat down and thought about it, you’d see what you were doing.
And when I was online dating – I went on dates with lots of guys. You know what else that means? Lots of guys were going on dates! Some of them even told me about all the other dates they were going on. In fact every single time a woman went on a date with a guy, a guy went on a date too! “Having a hard time online dating” is not a universal circumstance for all men.
@Kim
It’s not as if there’s an even ratio out there.
Between age discrepancies, attractiveness, homosexuality, and stuff, at different ages men and women will have different levels of success dating.