Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
BWAHAHAHHA
He really does sound like classic Pell, this one.
Insulting the blog owner sure is a stupid thing for our “intellectual superior” to do.
Hahahaha, what a pompous dork. Finally he makes me laugh.
I hate, I mean I really hate, this whole “that baby is your punishment for being such a sl*t” thing that these people come up with. I also hate the “personal convenience” meme. Are their women who have elective abortions, sure (and even if they do I just don’t think it’s my business but that’s a point for a different discussion). But I always think back to the experience of my best college friend who, after three miscarriages, was so thrilled to finally have a pregnancy that made it into the second trimester and was nearly crushed when they found out that if she managed to deliver a live birth, it would live a couple of days at best and then in terrible agony, and endanger her life as well. She had an abortion to save her life and health so that she could take another shot at having a baby.
Thing is, we’ve done so much to increase knowledge and access to contraception so that the rate of unplanned pregnancies is going down, with a concomitant drop in abortions. Would I like that rate to be as close to zero as possible? Yes, absolutely. But there will always be a call for abortion. There will always be a need: we can’t unlearn medical science, and we (at least decent people) would always want to act if we can preserve the actual, real life in front of us, even if that means the end of a potential life. And given how tricky such situations are, the only reasonable hands in which to place the decision are those of the woman (whose life and health are at stake), guided by her family (if she chooses) and her doctor.
See, I take for granted that grown women do in fact have the ability to think for themselves and even if one makes a decision I would not agree with and could not live with, well, it’s a good thing I wouldn’t have to.
LMAO!
I’m kind of sad we can’t keep this one.
Hector’s morality isn’t all that moral and certainly isn’t superior.
Auggz — sort of. You’re right about the cis centric focus on saying only women gets pregnant, but The Surgery for trans men is a mastectomy, not a hysterectomy. The latter does occur, but not nearly as often as the former. Otoh, you’re not going to get pregnant on testosterone.
/friendly note about trans related medical stuffs
On topic, I had a not date with someone I met off OKC, a profile I made thanks to this post. We have another not date planned for Thursday. Guess what? Both our profiles are brutally honest!
Heckle’s just another one who’s anti-choice. Nothing to do with being pro-life, since I bet he’d shrug off deaths in childbirth, and he doesn’t give a shit about the future life of the actual human being involved. No, it’s women having choices at all that gets his sort.
Argenti – cool, was the not-date fun?
Also, “Bee”? Did you assume that because it was the last recognizable word in my ‘nym, that it was my last name?
Kittehs — lunch turned into a five hour conversation. So yes, yes it was. And Thursday afternoons the local natural history museum is free, so we’re going. And fuck being an adult, I’m playing in the exploration room!
Hey, one of our other trolls did that – using bizarre shortenings of people’s nyms. Always referred to CassandraSays (as she was then) as Says.
That’s a good sign, when one can talk that much on a first meeting!
Speaking of natural history museums, there’s an Attenborough show on here next Sunday where he’s in the Natural History Museum of London and they bring all the beasties to life with computer animation. Really looking forward to that.
Ah, so your real motive is to control women’s sexuality. Thanks for admitting that so openly, makes it so much easier to point and laugh.
BTW, this doesn’t let you off the hook for hypocrisy. Offer to donate a kidney or GTFO.
And I see that David has already taken care of the GTFO part.
Yep, the tell-tale is when they use the term you made the choice to have sex. Having sex by choice, and with a man other than them, means a woman must be punished.
Move along folks, nothing to see here.
The part that I’ve never been able to wrap my head around is how you can claim to care about children and at the same time view them as a punishment for misbehavior. How does that work?
It’s like the Republicans with their notion that everyone has to have children (well, everyone white) but their “family values” don’t extend to helping people house, clothe, feed and educate those children. Once the kids are born, they can go die in the gutter as far as the MRAs, Republicans and anti-choicers are concerned.
Note to “Marshal Tito”: If you’re going to try to post again on a website you’ve been banned from using a new name, a new IP address, and a new email, you should probably not use an email that contains the same name as the email you previously used when you were “Hector.”
I would think that as a super genius you would know this.
Marshal Tito? He should have called himself Ceaucescu, with his fondness for forced births.
He also suggested we should all be put in labor camps.
Sounds like Pell and DKM have been breeding.
Just out of curiosity, does anyone know if his stats about who supported the transvaginal ultrasound law in Virginia were true? I wondered where he got that from.
grumpycatisagirl:
The only thing I could find was this poll, which did find 44% of women approved of the mandatory transvaginal ultrasound bill and 49% disapproved.
http://www.quinnipiac.edu/institutes-and-centers/polling-institute/virginia/release-detail?ReleaseID=1722