Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
Another interesting question: When was the last time you gave blood, Hector?
Also, Grumpy Cat, I must confess that I am entirely uninterested what might make you upset. If taking part in an adult conversation makes you upset, go back to the playpen and let actual adults converse.
Your kidneys, Hector. Why do you still have 2? Leftwingfox already offered to collect the one you don’t need, and put it to good use. Why are you so selfish? It’s like you want people to die.
I have a bathtub and a fridge that makes ice.
Ooh, and a brand new knife set!
And a sawzall!
KIDNEY PARTY AT MY PLACE!!
I’m a bit anaemic at the moment, I need some of Hector’s blood.
Off to get some iced coffee. If Hector hasn’t offered at least a kidney by the time I get back I’m going to go ahead and assume that he’s both a hypocrite and a murderer.
Charity begins at home, Hector.
And yet, forcing someone to undergo an invasive and unnecessary medical procedure against their will in order to force that person into carry a pregnancy to term agains their will is not ignorant or malicious or selfish.
Again, how can you face yourself in the mirror, Hector? I’m genuinely curious. Being such a morally reprehensible asshole and all.
Nice how you skipped over where I actually said *why* specifically it makes me upset Hector. My sister’s “personal whims” had nothing to do with it, nor did mine. Fuck off. I guess it’s selfish of me to love my family.
Anyway, I should have stuck to my original decision to be done with you. Well, now I am.
The difference, Cassandra, is that the whole reason the unborn baby exists is because of the mother’s choices.
I did not bring any of those kidney patients into existence or cause their kidneys to fail.
Hector’s selective responses are pretty typical of pro-lifers.
Topics he will respond to:
-Whether a fetus is a human being
-Why women’s opinions don’t matter
-How bodily autonomy is just “convenience”
Topics he won’t respond to:
-Why he supports measures that don’t actually reduce abortion rates
-Why he doesn’t support measures that do actually reduce abortion rates
-Whether he’s willing to have his organs harvested
-Why he’s acting like he’s having a conversation when he already said nobody else is allowed to participate
Hector doesn’t need both corneas, either. Ze could spare some skin for allogenic skin grafts, too.
So you do actually only care about punishing women for their choices, and you don’t care about preserving life (or at least you consider your own personal convenience much more important than preserving life). Good to know.
Hector, since you have such strong views on who should and who should not be allowed in a civilized discussion, I am going to ask you to make a case for why you should be allowed to take place in the discussion here despite behaving in a rather uncivilized manner to the regulars here. I will be the only one seeing your comments until you make such a case.
I’m in favor of not banning this one, but only responding to him with increasingly graphic descriptions of how we’re going to cut him up and distribute his body parts to people who need them more.
He poses more questions, not realizing they contradict his views. “and ‘what are my duties to the common good’, and ‘what does the moral law require of me’.”
The common good? You mean the one where they are lots of children in foster care because they either weren’t wanted, or couldn’t be cared for? That common good? The one where adding to that burden, in sheer economic terms, would be immoral? And if economics can’t have moral weight, then how about the burden having another child in foster care places on the children already their? Or did you forget that this isn’t just “*poof* here’s a new baby! It has no needs of any sort, you can forget it exists now”?
What does moral law require? How’s “not bringing a child into the world who isn’t wanted” sound?
Oh and how do you feel about the death penalty?
Oh goody, Hector’s using the “a child is a punishment for a woman having sex” argument.
Hector, I hope you don’t jerk off, think of all those potential people you’re killing! Every sperm is sacred.
Yeah, because exercising bodily autonomy is a matter of “personal whims.” Fucking creep. No one gets to use anyone’s body without their consent, even if it’s a fetus (which, by the way, is not a person). The fact that abortion involves the death of the fetus has nothing to do with the acceptance of killing children and everything to do with the fact that there is no other way to stop a pregnancy that has already occurred. And whether the pregnant person chose to be pregnant is irrelevant because you can revoke consent at any time.
On a lighter note, he’s implied that if you were, say, the CEO of a fast-food company that sells high-cholesterol foods, then you would be required to donate organs to anyone who had organ failure due to eating your food.
Phillip Morris owes a lot of people a lot of lungs.
Where are all these virgin pregnancies coming from? Heckle doesn’t seem to believe that someone who’s a sperm producer was involved in this “choice”.
And throats, and eyes, and …
Also, yay for putting Heckle on moderation. May he never emerge from it.
Here was Hector’s argument for why I should let him post here:
You must be a lot of fun at parties.
Let me show you the door.