Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
Re: Something with no thoughts or feelings or investment in life inhabiting another’s body against their will – Hector’s ensuring the continued existence of that and it’s continued violation of another’s bodily autonomy
I know it’s fashionable to talk about ‘bodily autonomy’ right now, Marine. But the reality is that your so-called ‘bodily autonomy’, while it does not have *no* value, is surely utterly trivial compared to the life of the embryo. It’s a matter of relative priorities, and the life of the embryo must have priority over the ‘autonomy’ of the mother.
Re: You think you know more than the woman whose body you’re perfectly fine with imposing your will upon
Well, yes. Because the very fact that you think your ‘autonomy’ could justify murdering a child, is a good indication that you might lack the moral and intellectual maturity to make this sort of decision.
I don’t think that children should be trusted with decisions like what to eat for supper, and neither do I think morally immature people ought to be trusted with decisions over the lives and death of others.
Re: Damn straight I find those sorts of laws “skeevey.” And yes, my opinion about it is largely formed by my experience.
Nobody cares about your ‘experience’, Grumpy Cat. You need to learn how to form an opinion based on facts and logic, not on airy burblings about ‘my personal experience’.
And this where you are so very, very wrong.
It’s not a child, it’s a clump of cells that wouldn’t fit into a cokespoon.
Where are your facts and logic, asshole?
It’s interesting, as usual, to see how the pro-choice arguments all boil down to glorified selfishness: MY body, MY freedom, MY choice. We see very little discussion of ‘what are my obligations to my child’, and ‘what are my duties to the common good’, and ‘what does the moral law require of me’.
Reminds me a lot of a bunch of particularly disobedient third-graders, as I’ve remarked many times before.
Well, ladies, Hector has informed you that your bodily autonomy matters less than a fetus does. That settles that argument.
Meanwhile, everyone here has decided that Hector’s opinion is slightly less relevant than the buzzing sound that a fly makes when it’s trying to get out of a closed window and too stupid to figure out that the window is in fact closed. There’s a lesson in there, I think.
I’m glad you feel this way!
I’ll be over to harvest your organs shortly. You obviously don’t need both kidneys, and there are lives to save! I’m sure you won’t let a silly little thing like “bodily autonomy” prevent me from saving all those lives.
Hector’s smug tone is giving me a real whiff of sock: anyone else getting that?
You know, someone very close to me had to make a very painful decision to terminate a pregnancy. She very, very much wanted the baby. I wanted the baby in my life too.
So Hector can extra double millennium fuck off about “glorified selfishness.”
I’m sure Hector has some bone marrow that someone could make use of too, and he certainly has blood he could donate. Hop to it, Hector, there are lives waiting to be saved.
You know, I was actually going to write an answer, but then I realized that I could spend the time more productively scooping the litter box. Hector doesn’t think women are worthy of consideration as full human beings, actual people, with lives, needs, desires, and opinions of their own, so I’m perfectly happy to return the favor to him.
…So you’ve decided beforehand that anyone who doesn’t agree with you already isn’t allowed to participate in any discussions?
It’s efficient, I’ll give you that.
Re: And this where you are so very, very wrong
Sigh. No, Hellkell.
Size doesn’t determine whether a human being is a person or not. Nor does stage of development. And nor does location (inside the womb or out of it.)
I’ve emailed the Dark Lord.
Re: Well, ladies, Hector has informed you that your bodily autonomy matters less than a fetus does. That settles that argument.
Well, yes, obviously.
Preserving human life is more important than personal convenience.
Re: So you’ve decided beforehand that anyone who doesn’t agree with you already isn’t allowed to participate in any discussions?
I have never pretended to be a democrat, or to believe that all people’s opinions have equal value, Katz.
As the Latin proverb goes, ‘quod licet Jovi non licet bovi’, or: what is permitted to Jupiter (i.e. God) is not permitted to the cow.
So you are going to let leftwingfox harvest your organs, then?
In other words, “Yes.”
Next question: Why are you saying discussion-like things to a group of people you already decided aren’t allowed to have discussions?
“I’ve emailed the Dark Lord.”
Thank you kittehserf. I probably shouldn’t even be looking at this. People calling the right to a a safe abortion “selfish” tend to make me very very upset.
Hector sure is pissed off that women do have bodily autonomy.
What a morally bankrupt position to take. Hey Hector, how do you face yourself in the mirror in the morning? Or are you just so shameless you just don’t care?
Re: Hector doesn’t think women are worthy of consideration as full human beings, actual people, with lives, needs, desires, and opinions of their own
As usual, Bee, you make the mistake of generalizing *your* ‘experience’ to women as a whole.
I may not think that *you* are particularly deserving of a voice in the public square, but that says nothing about women as a whole.
Women are, as one might expect, about as likely to be pro-life as men.
Hector, if the procedure actually changed minds, you might actually have a point. Fetuses, blastocysts, and zygotes might be saved.
But, in every study I’ve looked at, the ultrasound did not change minds.
Thus, we have an invasive ‘punishment’ that doesn’t make any impact on the life of the fetus and has huge potential to harm the ‘would be mother’ emotionally, especially in the case of rape.
The states money would be WAY better spent on education in order to reduce unwanted pregnancies… If you truly care about reducing abortions.
Except it turns out you can’t have a conversation with “women as a whole.” Even if they did all agree, which they don’t, it would be logistically prohibitive. So if you want to actually discuss something, you’ll have to discuss it with one or several particular women, who will have particular opinions that may or may not be similar to the majority of other people.
Meanwhile, you don’t seem to have any compunctions about voicing your own opinions, whether or not they agree with men as a whole.
rE: I probably shouldn’t even be looking at this. People calling the right to a a safe abortion “selfish” tend to make me very very upset.
I don’t know how you would describe it other than ‘selfish’. You would like to put your personal whims over the life of your unborn child to live. Your ‘autonomy’ is trivial compared to the life of your child, even at the embryo stage.
The most charitable way to look at that you’re simply deeply ignorant, rather than malicious. But objectively, it is a quintessentially selfish position.
I don’t expect the laws to change anytime soon, but it is my hope that *someday* you will find it impossible to get an elective abortion, and that the law will crack down on you if you attempt to. One can hope, after all.
… Now that I’ve said that, if this thread is going to be way off topic anyway, can I donate some cute baby armadillos?
http://youtu.be/mtVSxk5PSpI