Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
I love slip-on Dunlop Volleys, but where I normally buy them has stopped selling them. I emailed Dunlop and they told me to try ebay 🙁
RE: Kittehs
Admittedly, I do have some leather stuff that I got to form-fit to me by taking a hot shower in it. But that was thick, tough leather, and I had to oil it up pretty good afterward!
(It was a really nice dog collar I got off etsy. Unfortunately, I’ve outgrown it, either due to testosterone or weight gain, and I refuse to accept it because I’m so attached to the thing.)
I think the thing with warm leather is wtf happens if it cools while not being worn. The beeswax I picked up for my boots specifically says to heat the boots before applying it.
Re: Because apparently being skeevy isn’t a thing, it’s just something that our ladybrains all coincidentally agree on for no reason at all. True facts.
Sigh. No, this doesn’t follow. Because women on a feminist web site are unlikely to be representative of women *in general*.
This came up recently when I was discussing transvaginal ultrasound laws in Virginia, which I support. I suspect a lot of people here would find those sorts of laws ‘skeevey’ as well, and would mistakenly generalize their feelings to ‘women’. In fact, women are more likely than men to support the Virginia transvaginal ultrasound law (44% compared to 38%) and less likely to disapprove of them (which should, really, surprise no one: women are about as pro-life as men, in general).
Your experience says a lot about….your experience, and very little about what ‘women’ in general think.
As for the OK cupid guy, I don’t have any particular feelings about him, and I don’t support lying about yourself on a dating site.
Fuck off, rapist-enabler.
Re: Thinking back to all the young women I’ve known over the years, only 2 have been willing to date men more than 10 years older than them
This is why we need statistics, rather than personal anecdotes.
The best I’ve been able to find is the data on pregnancies in California in 2002. In that year about 1 out of 200 pregnancies among women 18-19 had a father between 40-62, about 2-3 had a father between 35-39, about 7 a father between 30-34, about 29 a father between 25-29, about 110 between 20-24, and about 42 between 18-19. So only a small minority (around 0.5% of 18-19 year old women date men over 40, but it’s not unheard of, and it certainly can be done. (There are more women with that preference than there are, for example, Hindus in this country). Of course, that doesn’t necessarily indicate only that number of women are *willing* to date much older; it could be that some women who are open to dating older men, or prefer it, end up dating men around their age because they encounter them more often. So, yes, probably a small minority, but not a totally trivial one.
Of course, I’m strongly opposed to ignoring anyone’s stated preferences on a dating site.
Damn straight I find those sorts of laws “skeevey.” And yes, my opinion about it is largely formed by my experience. As a woman.
I would assume any morally decent would support laws designed to discourage abortion, AllyS.
Perhaps you’re not particularly moraly decent, or maybe you’re just not intelligent enough to think through the implications of your positions. Either way, I’m quite sure you don’t belong in a civilized discussion.
GrumpyCat,
Around 44% of women don’t, so perhaps you should learn a lesson from them.
Shorter Hector: Legalizing a form of rape is okay so long as it prevents abortion!
This guy is just gross. I’m judging my time is best spent elsewhere. Bye Hector.
But god forbid those babies require financial support.
Something with no thoughts or feelings or investment in life inhabiting another’s body against their will – Hector’s ensuring the continued existence of that and it’s continued violation of another’s bodily autonomy. Good guy.
Brain bleach:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BL608WmNORc&w=560&h=315%5D
Let me see here, Hector, you think forcing a woman to have an invasive and medically unnecessary procedure in order to provide one more hoop for a woman to go through in order to get an abortion. You think you know more than the woman whose body you’re perfectly fine with imposing your will upon. You think you know better than the woman’s doctor which tests are medically necessary. You believe all this, yet Ally is the one who is not “morally decent.”
You don’t logic, do ya, Hector?
So, emotions on both sides of this debate aside, the obvious question is being ignored — do they actually have any effect on the abortion rate? I’m not find the original studies (of course, I’m also realizing that my ice cream cone earlier contained a lot more lactose than I thought, so me digging is going to have to wait!) but it looks like they don’t.
Which is, right there, all you need to know. A medical procedure with no medical bias, and no justification of ANY sort, is obviously not valid medicine.
Emotions back in the picture? Unwanted penetration of a vagina with no medical necessity? Rape.
Oh geez. I wondered why there was a flurry of posts on such an old article. To answer Argenti’s question. No. Ultrasounds do not convince women to change their minds. http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2014/01/09/ultrasound_viewing_before_an_abortion_a_new_study_finds_that_for_a_small.html?wpisrc=burger_bar
It turns out we have minds of our own and we can make important decisions on our own. Who’d have though it?
Sorry Hector, the transvaginal ultrasound is meant to punish women seeking abortions with state sanctioned rape.
Well, Hector is disgusting and obviously trolling, so I think I’ll spend the time I would have spent trying to convince him to be a decent person going to get some iced coffee instead.
An actual study! You rock!
I figured it’d make no difference to women (and other pregnant people) who had made their mind up that their were terminating, but I didn’t know how sure the average abortion seeking person is. Certainly looks like offering the ultrasound, and not pressing the issue, and certainly not requiring, would be as close to the “pro life” goal as they’re going to get. And a single polite offer doesn’t infringe on the pregnant person’s rights (interestingly, and why I’m not going gung-ho against offering, is that among the not-studies I found was a claim that it can actually solidify the decision to terminate)
In any case, forcing it = useless and medical rape, offering it has the same tiny effect without the rape part, so STFU about requiring it.
In essence, Hector’s saying he supports corrective rape when he’s in favour of transvaginal ultrasounds.
Banhammer?
Fuck off Hector. You and your sad boner don’t get a vote.
I saw that study when it came out and I found its conclusions interesting and useful. Hector (an interesting name given that it refers to talking to someone in a bullying way!), I imagine, would find that the study supports his view. If one person is hectored, delayed, intimidated and bullied into not having an abortion than I feel confident saying that he would consider that a victory, no matter the psychic cost to the vast number of people whose minds were not changed. Because who cares about the pain or distress caused to those people who stubbornly refuse to live their lives as you want them to do, right Hector?
OMG, you’re right! Hector’s parents were obviously psychic, and knew that one day their son would use the yet-to-be-created internet to lecture random women about what they should be doing with their ovaries in a rude, aggressive manner.
I wonder if he has the guts to do it in real life too? Probably not.
Perhaps he should remember what happened to Hector when he met Achilles.
Or maybe naming him that was simply the first step in the process of creating a being perfected for annoying people by being smug and sanctimonious!