Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
Eeeurgh, that guy on the Flirt app looks like Roosh’s happy cousin ::pukes::
/gasp Kim, you exposed my source!
cassandrakitty:
gaslight
That word, I do not think it means what you think it means.
Buttboy, you are not the one to be criticizing other people’s usage.
(Protip: it doesn’t mean trying to convince someone of something in an argument).
What comment are you even talking about, butt?
Also, when you try to be all internet hepcat, you kind of … fail.
Butthead, your problem is that you do not think at all.
Well, buttboy, that had absolutely nothing to do with anything anyone was talking about in this thread.
They never really do Go Their Own Way…
@ buttboy
I saw the comment you are referencing waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back a couple of pages in the comments. Way to be current.
Anyhoo, in context, the word in question and the reference to your behavior were all relevant and correct.
Protip: Gaslighting does not mean ‘lighting one’s farts on fire’.
Ah, my apologies, “gaslight” was used, about three pages back.
Nope, buttboy, cassandrakitty used the word correctly.
^^^ As I said, the word does not refer to an argument.
So no, you’re wrong, and kind of an idiot.
Actually, yes, it can. And does.
Just for fun, why don’t you tell us what you think the term “gaslight” means, in this context?
RE: sparky
Negging spambots? That’s frightening.
It was BIZARRE. I was like, great, even the spambots are douchey now. I guess it was to make them realistic or something.
RE: buttboy69
So no, you’re wrong, and kind of an idiot.
*feeds your own comment back to you*
This is what cassandrakitty said*:
There is no incorrect usage here. She is simply pointing out that, if you’re going to gaslight us later, it’s not going to work.
*I am so tempted to say “This is what CassandraSaid” but that would be cheesy as hell.
-_-; You really are willfully obtuse aren’t you?
From the Wiki page:
“The term “gaslighting” has been used colloquially since at least the 1970s to describe efforts to manipulate someone’s sense of reality.”
So it may have originated as a term referencing mental abuse, but has since before you were born been used in other contexts, including debate/argument tactics.
Oh please, auggziliary. Like any troll has ever stuck the damn flounce.
I wish buttboil would. He might explode, and that’d be fun.
Your ongoing obsession with something I said days ago is a bit creepy, dude. I guess that comment really stung, huh?
Moving on to more interesting part of the conversation, re spambots. Does anyone know if that’s what the deal is with the “Hi, I am looking for a girlfriend” stuff on Skype? If so, wtf is the goal? The random messages never contain links to anything, so I was thinking more that maybe they were trying to gather info for some other sort of scam? I remain baffled by the whole thing, and it’s happened multiple times. If someone knows what’s up, please splain.
@cassandra
I’ve had messages like that on various platforms. Sometimes I engaged out of curiosity. Based on my experiences, I’d think it’s just a case of “give a man a way to randomly message women hoping someone will reply, then he will” regardless of nationality or language.
But how do you even find women specifically on Skype? Maybe I just suck at using it, but I can’t see how you’d find the user profiles you’d want to target. Which is why I thought maybe it was the new version of an email scam.
I’ve had a few weird messages on Skype of the “you’re interesting and I’d like to be in your contacts” variety. No idea what that’s about, I just block them immediately.
Your ongoing obsession with something I said days ago is a bit creepy, dude. I guess that comment really stung, huh?
More like I haven’t visited since then, and I’m just now getting caught up. Not all of us monitor this site on an hourly basis.
Yep another fail. You’re really not very good at the snide insult thing, just don’t have the talent for it.
@ Kittehs
I block them too, I was just curious what was going on. If they are trying to use it as a dating service, that’s pretty funny. Still don’t know how they find the profiles, though.