Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
Sings off-key
oh Yzek, you’re a creep
You’re a weirdo
What the hell are you doing here?
You don’t belong here
RE: Yzek
I cannot promise I won’t be back
Goddammit, Yzek. How can you flounce if you even ADMIT you’ll probably be back like a bad sequel? Why do you even feel compelled to talk on the one site everyone has asked you to leave? It’s not like there’s only five websites on the Internet.
And I’ll probably learn a lot again about: how terrible am, who I’m defending (or even supporting) – just because I don’t 100% agree with someone here.
Dude, you’re defending a spambot. A SPAMBOT. I’m not mocking you because you disagree with me, but because you’re defending a goddamn SPAMBOT.
That admission he’s been reading here for years makes me wonder if Yzek is a sock. His brand of incompetent English is familiar.
They all blur together after a while, Kittehs.
Oh look, another “nonconformist”. That’s so fuckin’ CUTE.
True, true.
Kittehs, he could be. I’m not really up to date on anything past last October when I started lurking…
… but his English is very incompetent. I’m terrible at grammar, and I love run on sentences. I even love strewing paragraphs with random and unnecessary commas!
Yzek, I know you’ve run away; however:
Did he totally miss how I disagreed with at least one person about chunky versus smooth peanut butter? Because we disagreed, and I don’t feel I’ve been adequately taught a lot about how terrible I am for liking smooth peanut butter.
I’m sure he’ll be back. Not because he’s a Terminator or built like Ahnie or anything, but simply because silly trolls — sorry, “nonconformists” — never manage to stick their flounces. Ever, ever, EVER.
::sniffs:: Oh, peanut butter differences. Trivial, I say, trivial! What about the Vegemite? Now there’s the real test of nonconformism. (Conformist if you’re an Ozite who likes it, nonconformist if you’re anyone else who does.)
What perplexes me is how much they’re stretching the term ‘nonconformist.’
I don’t go to football sites to talk about how much I hate football because I’m a troll, guys! It’s just that I’m a NONCONFORMIST, and anyone who finds my behavior annoying is a FOOTBALL CONFORMIST SHEEP.
Hell, these guys stretch the word NO to mean YES, so it’s no wonder they can stretch other words to mean things they don’t.
Look! Football conformist sheep!
http://youtu.be/xc-_ikei6-o
Really. It’s like they really do think feminism has made of society (or at least of this and other sites) a hive mind. The fact that we can and do disagree often on various points goes completely unnoticed, because that would spoil the nice tidy theory that feminism = CONFORMITY.
Well, we are the Feminist Borg …
No, no, THAT‘s the Feminist Borg! We’re Manboobz, totally different!
(ssssh, you’ll blow our cover!)
I’m thinking Yzek is defending the spambot out of professional courtesy. Either ze is not a native English speaker or ze would fail a Turing test.
Also, regarding partner age difference – my first husband was four years older than me, current husband is four years younger. In neither case did/has the discrepancy been a factor. Although I was once assumed to be much older than I was during my first marriage because of the assumption that white gay men with Asian partners are always older.
::dies::
Brave nonconformists.
If Yzek is indeed a spambot, he’s a lot better than the trollbots I got.
Yes, I used to get spambots who’d try to troll me. Usually by saying, “You are stupid and nothing you say makes sense FREE NIKES VIAGRA MONEY MONEY MONEY”
LOL at the sheep!
@contrapangaloss
That’s okay, I’m here to tune up the hivemind and fix this glitch.
Chunky peanut butter is good. Smooth peanut butter is awful. You will assimilate. Resistance is futile.
(I’m mixxing up my pop culture references, but w/e.)
The whole “I’m a nonconformist! I’m a brave free-thinker! I’m not politically correct!” thing is so immature. Particularly when the person stating this holds opinions that fall in line with established societal prejudices.
LBT:
Negging spambots? That’s frightening.
I don’t know if anyone’s covered this yet, but in response to the original post, I wonder if the guy who wrote this cheat program thing is this guy:
http://captainawkward.com/2012/07/12/296-how-do-i-start-to-date-a-counter-intuitive-primer/
Since at one point in the thread, if you scroll way WAY down, I think he mentions the idea of writing a program to “hack” OKCupid like this.
(Wait, no, because this McKinlay guy is in school, and the letter-writer/guy in the thread allegedly wasn’t. Unless he went back or something. Still, it was kind of a cool theory.)
The age given is wrong by about a decade and he says he’s never had a date whereas spambotdude had at least one previous relationship. Given the number of males into maths in the world (i.e. lots and lots and lots and lots), I would say it’s probable than more than one has had issues not getting dates with a dating site.
Vegemite vs. marmite: both are equally awful. I’m an equal opportunity rejector. 🙂
Having dating issues, there’s an app for that: http://www.insidemobileapps.com/2014/02/04/flirt-planet-and-the-gamification-of-dating-apps/
Not to mention these gems mentioned today on Cracked – http://www.cracked.com/quick-fixes/4-creepy-dating-apps-that-actually-exist/