Is there no problem out there that can’t be solved by SCIENCE? Apparently not. Indeed, it has recently come to my attention that one heroic nerdy dude actually used MATH to get a girlfriend. No really, an actual girlfriend. As in, a living human female that he’s seen naked. (We can only presume.)
Wired magazine found the story so astonishing that they devoted an entire 3000 word feature to it.
The piece tells the tale of Chris McKinlay, then a grad student in mathematics at UCLA, who went searching for love on OKCupid, a dating site that uses daters’ answers to various questions, ranging from silly to profound, in order to calculate a “match score” that supposedly measures your compatibility with a potential date. But McKinlay wasn’t getting as many dates as he wanted.
So he decided to “reverse-engineer” OkCupid. As McKinlay — ever the romantic — explains on his own blog, he used his mathematical skillz to analyze the “high-dimensional user metadata in [the] putatively bipartite social graph structure [of] OkCupid,” and adjust his own profile accordingly.
Basically, he crunched a lot of numbers to figure out how the kinds of women he was most interested in — in particular one data “cluster dominated by women in their mid-twenties who looked like indie types, musicians and artists” — tended to answer questions. And then he fiddled with his own answers — and his choice of which questions to answer — so he would score higher match percentages with them. Ta da! Suddenly he had more matches.
He claims not to have answered any questions dishonestly, but as Wired notes “he let his computer figure out how much importance to assign each question, using a machine-learning algorithm called adaptive boosting to derive the best weightings.”
It doesn’t take a math degree to figure out that fudging your answers so they’re more like those of the women you’re targeting will make it look like you’re more like them. You can pull this same trick in real life by pretending to agree with everything a person says.
But you don’t have to be a psychologist to see that doing this kind of defeats the purpose of OKCupid’s match algorithms in the first place. You’re creating the illusion of chemistry where there may be none. Essentially, you’re cheating, but in a really self-defeating way.
And by focusing so intently on statistically crunchable data, he also ignored a lot of the more intangible “data” that the profiles provide if you actually sit down to read them. The numbers don’t reveal anything about a person’s verbal charm, or their sense of humor. They don’t tell you about the interesting little details of the person’s life.
As Katie Heaney notes in a Buzzfeed piece on McKinlay’s strange quest:
[M]uch of the language used in the story reflects a weird mathematician-pickup artist-hybrid view of women as mere data points … often quite literally: McKinlay refers to identity markers like ethnicity and religious beliefs as “all that crap”; his “survey data” is organized into a “single, solid gob”; unforeseen traits like tattoos and dog ownership are called “latent variables.” By viewing himself as a developer, and the women on OkCupid as subjects to be organized and “mined,” McKinlay places himself in a perceived greater place of power. Women are accessories he’s entitled to. Pickup artists do this too, calling women “targets” and places where they live and hang out “marketplaces.” It’s a spectrum, to be sure, but McKinlay’s worldview and the PUA worldview are two stops along it. Both seem to regard women as abstract prizes for clever wordplay or, as it may be, skilled coding. Neither seems particularly aware of, or concerned with, what happens after simply getting a woman to say yes.
And that’s where McKinlay’s system seems to have fallen down entirely. Though Wired is eager to present his “hacking” as a great success, it took McKinlay more than 90 dates — 87 of them first dates with no followup — before he found his current girlfriend.
In other words, his wondrous system produced a metric shit-ton of “false matches” and wasted a lot of people’s time, including his own.
And in the end it wasn’t his data crunching that brought his girlfriend to his door; as Wired notes, she found him on OKCupid after doing a “search for 6-foot guys with blue eyes near UCLA.” Happily for him, McKinlay already matched her preferences in these areas. In addition to appreciating his height and eye color and location in physical space, she apparently was also charmed by his cynical approach to OkCupid dating, so maybe they are a match made in heaven, if not in his data crunching techniques.
While McKinlay was going on first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date after first date, people I know have found wonderfully compatible matches — and long-term relationships — through OkCupid without having to date dozens of duds along the way.
How? Partly because OkCupid’s match algorithms led them to some interesting candidates. But mainly because they read profiles carefully and looked for compatibility in the words, not the numbers.
@Kim: I don’t agree: he changed “just a bit” (most important seems to be question selection) but he’s judged like someone who who put another person’s photo in profile. I consider his autopresentation no more no less deceiving as wearing your best clothes for a date.
Nice of you to let people know you’re an idiot, then. Thanks!
I used to be able to do the standing on a lower shelf thing, but I can’t manage to get up nowadays – it’s always the stuff in the freezer cabinets, and it’s not just high up but right at the back. There never is anyone tall around to help, so I borrow an umbrella from the display and use it to hook things out. Or rather, I did, ‘cos I’ve started shopping online and it’s a delight to not have to haul stuff home myself.
[talking about groceries = more interesting than troll displaying his lack of English comprehension]
Huh, never thought of the umbrella idea.
(Agreed. A conversation about watching paint dry would serve a similar purpose.)
I only thought of it ‘cos the brolly stand was right near the freezers. If I had my walking stick with me that would have worked, but I never took it (couldn’t use it pushing a jeep).
@Yzek
He didn’t change at all. He changed his compatibility rating significantly with a significant number of women. Enough that suddenly a large number of women wanted to go on dates with him that otherwise wouldn’t have. I don’t think you understand what significant means.
Yep, cos wearing your best clothes is totally the same as lying. It’s like a disguise, really. Yep, completely the same thing, no difference there. /rollseyes
I do like how dumbass implied that wearing nice clothes is inauthentic. That perfectly fitted jacket is a lie! The truth is, I dunno, sweatpants?
@Kim
So I would rather ask: is this OKCupid measure actually doing the job and worthy of users’ confidence or rather behaves like in “butterfly effect” systems?
@yzek
… *silently judging you*
@kiwi girl
We probably just agree because of the hivemind. Any other possible explanation might require men to acknowledge their own creepy behavior 😉
@kittehs
It’s like that peanut butter my mom bought when we were broke that was really cheap, but also had this impossible-to-identify icky quality that made it all taste bad.
@yzek
Man, it’s the morning, so I can’t articulate shit here: but piss off, you skeevy loser. Nobody cares about how you consider his “autopresentation”.
@titanblue
‘corse it is. My best clothes will even let me blend in with my surroundings. I can see how it confuses some men!
*Pictures Marie, in exquisitely tailored camoflage, invisible besides the foliage plants in a posh restaurant*
@titanblue
Yes, that’s exactly how it happens! XD
Speaking of online dating, can anyone explain how shit like this keeps appearing on my Skype?
Is this some sort of “I am a Nigerian prince and I would like you to manage my money for me, all I need is your banking info” thing, or are there seriously people trying to use Skype as a dating app? And if so, how, and why?
Here is how the matching algorithm works. https://www.okcupid.com/help/match-percentages
By butterfly effect I assume you mean that small changes can make a big difference, but reading the explanation, it’s pretty obvious it can’t. They take into account someone who fluke matches you on a couple of questions.
How how well it works is not relevant to whether he’s creepy to deliberately subvert it.
From what I see, finding a group of questions which are considered important by potential partners can be used to improve your overall compatibility score without any kind of lying about oneself. For someone who has a goal of finding a partner; it should be important to care about what possible partners consider important – unless of course you follow “just be yourself” philosophy.
Y.
Wait, when Yzek says “wearing your best clothes” does he mean “following people you find attractive around without their knowledge, taking note of some commonalities among the people your stalkees tend to check out the most, and then stealing one of those people’s outfit?” Because if that is what Yzek means, we are being totally unfair here. His metaphor is perfect.
Did Yzek miss the part where the dude in the article was lying about himself? Cuz, zie seemed to have missed that bit… -.-
“From what I see, finding a group of questions which are considered important by potential partners can be used to improve your overall compatibility score without any kind of lying about oneself.”
We’re talking about an actual person who used an actual bot to data mine actual profiles of women to know which answers to give in order to forge a false compatibility score. Don’t muddle the discussion with hypotheticals.
Except that the hacker clearly doesn’t care about the things his possible partners care about.
Yes, he wants to know what they care about but not so that he can see if those are things worth caring about or see whether the potential partners are people he would like as people. Nope, he wants to know what they care about so so he can pretend to care about the same things in order to get dates with them.
The fact that you can’t see the difference says a lot about you. And the things it says – they ain’t good, laddie.
“Except that the hacker clearly doesn’t care about the things his possible partners care about.”
Or chooses answers from scope he is (or at least thinks so) capable of changing his current traits for someone he’s attracted to. People who do not benefit from wonderful online cybernetic matchmaker do that often.
Yzek, why is this the hill you choose to die on? Why are you so invested in justifying the behaviour of this manipulative dishonest privacy-invading ass-wipe?
And why do you choose to do so in such gobbledy-gook?
Because if women are allowed to draw this boundary (don’t lie about yourself on dating sites, don’t use bots to get around screening) then what other boundaries might society allow women to draw?
And situation in which women draw boundaries and some part of society backs them up is a hill that these guys are willing to die on.
PS, Yzek, running a wholesale algorithm to change your answers to get dates from a target demographic =/= trying to see your gf/bf’s point of view. You do realise that, right?
Yes, and that’s why the relationship always goes downhill when the other person realizes they’re dating a phony.
But hey, gaming the system works great!
RE: yzek
So, women who chosed that man for a date did not have an agency?
What makes you think the stupid message SUCCEEDED? Also, if it’s a grown man going after a teenage child, that’s not a woman. That’s a child.
RE: yzek
I don’t agree: he changed “just a bit” (most important seems to be question selection) but he’s judged like someone who who put another person’s photo in profile. I consider his autopresentation no more no less deceiving as wearing your best clothes for a date.
Dude. He spam-botted and violated the OkCupid TOS. He spammed tons of people who thought they were responding to a human being. What the hell is your deal, are you a staunch defender of the FREE VIAGRA emails you get too? Do you just get a thrill every time you get a random piece of mail trying to get you to buy a new credit card? Would you WANT to date the creator of that shit, who has been sending it specifically with the intent of getting into your pants?
What is it WITH these creepers who’re like, “BUT SPAMMING IS JUST LIKE WEARING A NICE HAT”?