Apparently hoping to gin up another flood of hate-traffic to his blog, the attention-seeking human stain whose name rhymes with Batt Gorney has posted what is essentially a how-to guide for would-be abusive boyfriends under the charming title “How to Crush a Girl’s Self-Esteem.”
“Gorney” has conveniently arranged his suggestions into a numbered list, so let’s proceed through them one by one. (If you’re triggered by explicit discussions of psychological and physical abuse, please stop reading now.)
Step one, in “Gorney’s” not-so-unique 6-step-plan: “Constantly make her feel inadequate.”
And how do you do that? Easy as pie.
Every time she does something for you, find out what she did wrong and remind her of it. If you can’t find any problems, make some up.
And try some mild gaslighting while you’re at it.
[Y]ou should always sound calm and collected, like you’re talking about the weather. Denigrating her in a neutral-but-firm fashion will trip her submissiveness circuitry, making her think about how she can better serve you. And every time she reaches the goalposts, you move them, forcing her to play an eternal game of catch-up.
Like the salesmen in Glengarry Glen Ross, you should Always Be Criticizing:
The concept is that if you criticize girls for minor mistakes, they’ll be less likely to commit major ones, as their mental energy is expended on dealing with your every complaint. For example, if you constantly critique the way she dresses, you won’t be arguing with her over whether she should get a tattoo or nose piercing to express her “individuality.”
In step 2, “Dominate her physically and sexually,”“Gorney” encourages his readers to violate their girlfriend’s personal and sexual boundaries at every chance.
Repeatedly violate her boundaries in small, petty ways, small enough that she’ll feel petty for complaining to you.
That’s right: abuse her strategically, and in such a way that she feels crazy for complaining about your abuse. “Gorney” is thinking like a true abuser.
For example, if you’re into anal sex and she’s not thrilled about it, the next time you take her from behind, stick your finger into her asshole. If she doesn’t like facials, cum in her hair instead. Lightly clasp your hand around her throat during sex like you’re going to choke her. (Do not actually choke her. That is dangerous.) Smack her on the behind when you’re out in public. The possibilities are endless.
The message you want to send her is simple: it’s not her body anymore.
This is all textbook abusive behavior.
“Gorney” follows this with a lovely bit of rationalization:
Most girls want you to dominate them anyway, but the rationalization hamster and their conscious minds prevent them from articulating this desire.
And then it’s back to more strategic abuse:
[I]f she lets you get away with minor violations of her boundaries, she’ll accede to your bigger demands later on, letting you mold her into the perfect plaything. If she doesn’t violently resist getting her anus fingered, a little more pressure and you’ll be full-on sodomizing her, grinning as she whimpers between each thrust.
Apparently the only sexual pleasure “Gorney” can imagine from anal sex is the pleasure he evidently gets from forcing women into it against their will.
Oh, and make sure you never give her the chance to say “no.”
Never ask her for anything, because asking is begging, and begging is contemptible.
Yep. Avoid the thorny issue of consent by never asking, and assuming that anything other than violent resistance is a “yes.”
Step 3 in “Gorney’s” program takes the creepiness into overdrive: “Isolate her from her friends and family.”
I don’t have much to say about this one; there’s a reason this is a favorite technique of cults and domestic abusers alike. Here’s Gorney’s take on it:
You need to be the primary emotional influence in her life, and you can’t do that if she’s leaning on anyone else for support. Gradually wean her from contact with anyone other than you.
What’s in it for you?
Not only will this increase her emotional dependence on you, it will make her more willing to please you; she’ll be less likely to wreck the relationship if she knows she’ll be all alone if it goes south.
For step 4, “Gorney” puts away the stick for a moment and pulls out a carrot, urging his readers to “Reward her at random intervals.”
But his emphasis is as much on the random as on the rewards; this is yet another gaslighting trick.
If you reward her every time she does good, she’ll see the pattern and use it to manipulate you. But if you reward her at random, her little hamster brain will run itself ragged trying to figure out your endgame.
Step 5 carries the slightly misleading title “Give her an emotional release.” In fact, what he suggests is that you physically “discipline” your girlfriend when she does “wrong” in your eyes.
By spanking a girl until she starts crying and sobbing, you give her an emotional release, turning her into a soppy puddle of goo and making her more inclined to serve you. As a friend of mine put it, all girls crave spankings; it’s their way of making up for Eve’s sin.
“Gorney” seems to be confusing consensual BDSM — which can bring bottoms or submissives intensely emotional releases — with domestic violence.
In step 6, “Gorney” tries to convince his readers — and himself — that it’s an abuser’s incredible sexual prowess, and not his manipulative abuse, that allows him to keep control over an abusive relationship.
You absolutely must have good cocksmanship if you want to ruin a girl’s self-esteem. Girls are enslaved to their vaginas as much as men are to their penises … Girls will do anything for a man who can fuck them good … .
Your dick is heroin, she’s the junkie and you’re the dealer.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
If you can make her cum on a regular basis, she’ll side with you over her parents, her friends, everyone.
Really? I hate to break it to you, dude, but “[m]aking her cum on a regular basis” is not really an extraordinary achievement, dude. It’s not a sign that you’re some sort of exceptional “cocksman” with a dick of pure heroin. It’s actually kind of, you know, basic? Expected? Also, most women can give themselves orgasms on a regular basis.
Additionally, don’t make her cum every time you have sex. Think like a dealer: you give the customer the pure stuff when you want to get them hooked, and when they’re addicted, you sell them shit that’s been cut with rat poison to increase your bottom line.
Somehow I don’t doubt that sex with guys like this would be a lot like taking drugs laced with rat poison.
[R]ationing out her orgasms at random will keep her on her toes trying to satisfy you.
Or send her off in search of someone who’s not such a complete asshole in bed?
“Gorney’s” advice is so over-the-top awful — it sometimes reads like he’s literally copied it from some textbook on domestic abuse — that it’s hard not to wonder if he just trolling. And to some degree, I’m sure he is. But he also clearly believes a lot of the shit he posts, and so I can only assume he believes, and possibly follows, at least some of his “advice” here.
This is a guy, after all, who admitted plainly to hitting a previous girlfriend, in a post in which he also declared that
Women should be terrorized by their men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than chimps.
Actually, that’s not true. In fact, there’s some research that suggests male chimps terrorize female chimps — and beat them with branches — to punish them for mating with other males. So men who abuse women are in fact the ones behaving like chimps.
Every time I think that the manosphere can’t sink any lower, something comes along and proves me wrong.
NOTE: I don’t want to give “Gorney” any traffic for his terrible post. But I also feel obligated to link to my source. So I have. I’ve just hidden the link randomly in the middle of the post.
Ah, coolies and anonymous, you’re already on top of it! I was too busy hunting down armadillo videos.
🙂
Thing is, given that what PUAs like Forney sell is how-to guides about sex, the fact that they don’t appear to actually have any idea of how women’s sexuality works is relevant. Which doesn’t necessarily tell us whether or not they’ve had sex, but it does tell us that if they have they weren’t paying any attention at all to how their partner experienced it.
Old reader:
Do you have personal knowledge about his experience, or lack thereof?
Because if you don’t have such direct knowledge from personal observation, the hypocrite is you,
More brain bleach. A classic!
“Thing is, given that what PUAs like Forney sell is how-to guides about sex, the fact that they don’t appear to actually have any idea of how women’s sexuality works is relevant. Which doesn’t necessarily tell us whether or not they’ve had sex, but it does tell us that if they have they weren’t paying any attention at all to how their partner experienced it.”
– Similar to Forney’s “Fat Shaming Week” back in October as well as the countless fat shaming blogs he has written prior and after.
Nice and comfy there under your bridge, are you?
It’s had extensions added.
And possibly a custom-designed sock cabinet.
The concept is that if you criticize girls for minor mistakes, they’ll be less likely to commit major ones, as their mental energy is expended on dealing with your every complaint.
I don’t know about anyone else, but when performing a task, I’m always far less likely to make a mistake if my mental energy has already been completely expended on something else. Logic!
I like sock monkeys, I wish they had used another term for sock-puppets… like… stubbie puppets or speedo puppets.
For those non-Kiwis and non-Australians, here are stubbies:
****WARNING***** once seen, stubbies cannot be unseen.
Yeah, wish that video had been set to preview on a different frame…
Just say no to crack.
Oh come on, that’s a bum steer.
“Show us your crack” became a “thing” for a particular company in NZ, to use in its advertising (tv and radio):
I wish ad companies could get away with stuff like that here but, alas, too many people would be offended and complain.
It could be worse, it could be a picture of our Prime Minister in Speedos. That’s another “once seen cannot be unseen”. D:
Holy f*cking shit. This is gonna ruin my entire day now. Thank you MRAs, you just made me realize the true and terrible aims of your “human rights” movement.
I don’t know how much experience Forney has had with women, and his piece is odious regardless. But I don’t think that he’s really the master manipulator that he’s portraying himself as; while he’s got the abuser’s logic down, his writing in this post doesn’t really have the ring of authenticity to it. I think it’s fantasy, fleshed out by reading about abuse. He wrote this piece to offend people, not because he does all this shit in his actual relationships (assuming he actually has any, which, for the sake of argument, let’s assume he does).
I don’t doubt that he’s an abusive asshole in real life; I just don’t think he’s some sort of svengali of abuse.
None of that makes this post of his any less awful, really. His fans on the blog are certainly taking his “advice” seriously.
Just because you can’t think of an intelligent comment, does not mean you get to make an ignorant one. Insane=/=evil or abusive.
NO MORE ABLEISM PLEASE AND THANK YOU.
http://media-cache-ec0.pinimg.com/736x/63/2c/55/632c5576b8eccec03f395bbd3e447920.jpg
Off the charts batshit insane? Idk, pretty sure my batshit insanity is more like all over the charts! (Seriously, mine are online and I was reviewing them and by all the gods PICK A DEPRESSION DIAGNOSIS — depression, other; bipolar, unspecified; other depressive disorder…it’s like they just open the DSM to that chapter and pick whatever page it opens to!)
I take that back. I may be a bag of mixed nuts, but batshit smells horrible!
Ah, but according to the Bat Conservation Trust, the barbastelle bat’s name means ‘star beard’, because of the white hairs that grow from its lips! Who couldn’t love an animal named ‘star beard’?
I like Honduran white bats
Oh I like bats, I just think their shit is one of the most offensive odors I’ve ever smelt. I’m torn between that and an outdoor garabage can full of diapers, in August (yes really, and I think the bats might be worse)
Well, there’s also truffle honey or whatever it was, but batshit is still worse. Even if Pecunium thinks the truffle shit is delicious.
Its interesting how you guys lump MRAs and PUAs together when Paual Elam is openly critical of PUAs. Can I lump you guys in with Radfems who claim all vaginal intercourse to automatically be non-consentual?
Also, regarding Jonestown, the fact that predominantly women followed this maniac says a lot.