Apparently hoping to gin up another flood of hate-traffic to his blog, the attention-seeking human stain whose name rhymes with Batt Gorney has posted what is essentially a how-to guide for would-be abusive boyfriends under the charming title “How to Crush a Girl’s Self-Esteem.”
“Gorney” has conveniently arranged his suggestions into a numbered list, so let’s proceed through them one by one. (If you’re triggered by explicit discussions of psychological and physical abuse, please stop reading now.)
Step one, in “Gorney’s” not-so-unique 6-step-plan: “Constantly make her feel inadequate.”
And how do you do that? Easy as pie.
Every time she does something for you, find out what she did wrong and remind her of it. If you can’t find any problems, make some up.
And try some mild gaslighting while you’re at it.
[Y]ou should always sound calm and collected, like you’re talking about the weather. Denigrating her in a neutral-but-firm fashion will trip her submissiveness circuitry, making her think about how she can better serve you. And every time she reaches the goalposts, you move them, forcing her to play an eternal game of catch-up.
Like the salesmen in Glengarry Glen Ross, you should Always Be Criticizing:
The concept is that if you criticize girls for minor mistakes, they’ll be less likely to commit major ones, as their mental energy is expended on dealing with your every complaint. For example, if you constantly critique the way she dresses, you won’t be arguing with her over whether she should get a tattoo or nose piercing to express her “individuality.”
In step 2, “Dominate her physically and sexually,”“Gorney” encourages his readers to violate their girlfriend’s personal and sexual boundaries at every chance.
Repeatedly violate her boundaries in small, petty ways, small enough that she’ll feel petty for complaining to you.
That’s right: abuse her strategically, and in such a way that she feels crazy for complaining about your abuse. “Gorney” is thinking like a true abuser.
For example, if you’re into anal sex and she’s not thrilled about it, the next time you take her from behind, stick your finger into her asshole. If she doesn’t like facials, cum in her hair instead. Lightly clasp your hand around her throat during sex like you’re going to choke her. (Do not actually choke her. That is dangerous.) Smack her on the behind when you’re out in public. The possibilities are endless.
The message you want to send her is simple: it’s not her body anymore.
This is all textbook abusive behavior.
“Gorney” follows this with a lovely bit of rationalization:
Most girls want you to dominate them anyway, but the rationalization hamster and their conscious minds prevent them from articulating this desire.
And then it’s back to more strategic abuse:
[I]f she lets you get away with minor violations of her boundaries, she’ll accede to your bigger demands later on, letting you mold her into the perfect plaything. If she doesn’t violently resist getting her anus fingered, a little more pressure and you’ll be full-on sodomizing her, grinning as she whimpers between each thrust.
Apparently the only sexual pleasure “Gorney” can imagine from anal sex is the pleasure he evidently gets from forcing women into it against their will.
Oh, and make sure you never give her the chance to say “no.”
Never ask her for anything, because asking is begging, and begging is contemptible.
Yep. Avoid the thorny issue of consent by never asking, and assuming that anything other than violent resistance is a “yes.”
Step 3 in “Gorney’s” program takes the creepiness into overdrive: “Isolate her from her friends and family.”
I don’t have much to say about this one; there’s a reason this is a favorite technique of cults and domestic abusers alike. Here’s Gorney’s take on it:
You need to be the primary emotional influence in her life, and you can’t do that if she’s leaning on anyone else for support. Gradually wean her from contact with anyone other than you.
What’s in it for you?
Not only will this increase her emotional dependence on you, it will make her more willing to please you; she’ll be less likely to wreck the relationship if she knows she’ll be all alone if it goes south.
For step 4, “Gorney” puts away the stick for a moment and pulls out a carrot, urging his readers to “Reward her at random intervals.”
But his emphasis is as much on the random as on the rewards; this is yet another gaslighting trick.
If you reward her every time she does good, she’ll see the pattern and use it to manipulate you. But if you reward her at random, her little hamster brain will run itself ragged trying to figure out your endgame.
Step 5 carries the slightly misleading title “Give her an emotional release.” In fact, what he suggests is that you physically “discipline” your girlfriend when she does “wrong” in your eyes.
By spanking a girl until she starts crying and sobbing, you give her an emotional release, turning her into a soppy puddle of goo and making her more inclined to serve you. As a friend of mine put it, all girls crave spankings; it’s their way of making up for Eve’s sin.
“Gorney” seems to be confusing consensual BDSM — which can bring bottoms or submissives intensely emotional releases — with domestic violence.
In step 6, “Gorney” tries to convince his readers — and himself — that it’s an abuser’s incredible sexual prowess, and not his manipulative abuse, that allows him to keep control over an abusive relationship.
You absolutely must have good cocksmanship if you want to ruin a girl’s self-esteem. Girls are enslaved to their vaginas as much as men are to their penises … Girls will do anything for a man who can fuck them good … .
Your dick is heroin, she’s the junkie and you’re the dealer.
Yeah, keep telling yourself that.
If you can make her cum on a regular basis, she’ll side with you over her parents, her friends, everyone.
Really? I hate to break it to you, dude, but “[m]aking her cum on a regular basis” is not really an extraordinary achievement, dude. It’s not a sign that you’re some sort of exceptional “cocksman” with a dick of pure heroin. It’s actually kind of, you know, basic? Expected? Also, most women can give themselves orgasms on a regular basis.
Additionally, don’t make her cum every time you have sex. Think like a dealer: you give the customer the pure stuff when you want to get them hooked, and when they’re addicted, you sell them shit that’s been cut with rat poison to increase your bottom line.
Somehow I don’t doubt that sex with guys like this would be a lot like taking drugs laced with rat poison.
[R]ationing out her orgasms at random will keep her on her toes trying to satisfy you.
Or send her off in search of someone who’s not such a complete asshole in bed?
“Gorney’s” advice is so over-the-top awful — it sometimes reads like he’s literally copied it from some textbook on domestic abuse — that it’s hard not to wonder if he just trolling. And to some degree, I’m sure he is. But he also clearly believes a lot of the shit he posts, and so I can only assume he believes, and possibly follows, at least some of his “advice” here.
This is a guy, after all, who admitted plainly to hitting a previous girlfriend, in a post in which he also declared that
Women should be terrorized by their men; it’s the only thing that makes them behave better than chimps.
Actually, that’s not true. In fact, there’s some research that suggests male chimps terrorize female chimps — and beat them with branches — to punish them for mating with other males. So men who abuse women are in fact the ones behaving like chimps.
Every time I think that the manosphere can’t sink any lower, something comes along and proves me wrong.
NOTE: I don’t want to give “Gorney” any traffic for his terrible post. But I also feel obligated to link to my source. So I have. I’ve just hidden the link randomly in the middle of the post.
Liar. You said women react favourably to abuse. Unless you’re really, really crap at writing English, “favourably to the abuser” is not what that means.
“Probably.”
Congratulations, you’ve just shown in one word that you’re a misogynist, not that I had any doubt anyway.
You’re an idiot. This conversation is over.
Sam, fuck off with your abuse apologia.
buttboy, why don’t you run on back home to Reddit and whine to all the misters about how mean we are here?
Favorably is the same as positively. If a guys treats you a certain way and you begin to desire him more, you have responded favorably.
NEWSFLASH***NEWSFLASH***NEWSFLASH***NEWSFLASH***NEWSFLASH
Manipulative assholes are really good at manipulating some people.
#ThingsThatAreNewsToHardlyAnybodyReally
Promise?
::does happy dance::
Triple-post to add more brain bleach:
Why don’t both you abuse apologists just run along?
I’m dumbfounded as hell over here. Yes, manipulation works because… it’s manipulation. Tactics have been developed over the span of human history to take advantage of chinks in the armor of human psychology and by now those tactics are pretty slick. Works on men too dude. I’m not sure what slimy garbage you’re trying to imply, don’t wanna know.
@kittyserf – Yes, I am an Aussie, for my sins! Currently in a permanent cultural cringe about our great and glorious leader…
Oh gods yes, me too. I can’t listen to the news any more, I just want to heave a brick through the set. I think I’ve reached the point of loathing Abbott and his crew even more than I did Howard, and that’s saying something.
Sam: ” I discussed bow many women respond and many respond in ways favorable to the manipulator”
You said generally, actually, which is not factually correct by any evaluation. I’m not sure what you’re getting at – could you explain? Which women do you mean, specifically?
I know there was a trigger warning, and.. Honestly? I should have payed it heed. Maybe it wasn’t a ‘real’ trigger, but I find myself barely articulate. I want to strangle this guy, Violently.
Ugh.. Its a knee jerk emotion on my part, but Its so very disgusting of him, even if it was 90% joke. This sort of abuse is horrible. And f he isn’t kidding, then he is horrible. And this is me of all people saying this, The kind of person who tries to look for some credit to give, even to the MRA.
I wonder. . . Is Sam’s JAQing off a variety of “women say they want sensitive, emotionally accessible men, but these b!t€he$ go for the good-looking bad boys, then come and cry on my shoulder when they get dumped”?
I’m. Just. Asking.
Summary of Sam: Why won’t women run after kind, sensitive, caring men like me who believe that abusers just can’t help themselves around all these silly females who DARE to have regular human vulnerabilities rather than superhuman psychological and emotional immunity (like the unfeeling robots I kinda suspect they are)! The audacity of them to tempt hapless abusers by being susceptible to abuse like everyone else is! The nerve! Call me!
‘Night, friends.
Most of what he wrote is correct and very useful for bringing a woman to heel. I figured this stuff out in High School, and had a high fashion model throwing herself at my feet for years.
If you want to utterly dominate a woman, his advice is spot on.
@Sam:
Apparently the large percentage of women being dead is due to the large percentage of folowerers who were WOC: see http://hellobeautiful.com/2013/11/20/jonestown-massacre-how-religion-kills-black-women/ and http://www.religiondispatches.org/archive/culture/7402/why_did_so_many_black_women_die_jonestown_at_35/
I dispute your 90% figure. 918 people died, of which 909 or 912 (sources differ) died in Jonestown. 276 were children, so taking the largest figure (912) which will make the children be the smallest percentage (so a conservative estimate), that represents 30% of the deaths. It it therefore mathematically impossible for 90% of the deaths to be “women”.
Fuck off.
While it pains me to defend some who uses an anti-gay slur as a handle and thinks tumblr is a good way to judge social movements, I do think David does have a bit of a “venomous tone” with Matt F. I don’t think you’re wrong about that. I think you’re wrong to assume that it has to be due to “personal history” (whatever that means). He loathes a loathesome guy, it’s not rocket science.
I can’t speak for David obviously, but I personally have a heightened reaction to alt right guys who champion white nationalism, I’m sorry, I mean “race realism”, as well as virulent misogyny. David has done everyone a favor by digging through this trash in order to identify where these two reactionary hate groups intersect.
Therefore, I think David’s harsh tone when discussing anyone who champions both “causes”, such as Heartiste and this asshole is deserved because, Holy Christ, they’re kings of multiple cesspools. The fact that Matt F does that AND “hilariously” champions domestic abuse, both physical and mental, all while being a 20-something dumbshit blogger who lacks knowledge about virtually everything means that calling him “an attention seeking human stain” is perhaps a bit too kind.
@marinaliteyears
Internet hugs from me, if you want them. and here is some brain bleach.
@shayla
Night.
Sam is confused. It is obvious to the meanest intelligence that if you did this shit on the first date there would not only not be a second date but the first one would be cut short.
That is not how it works. The start by testing boundaries to see how much abuse you are currently conditioned to tolerate by having grown up in this bizarre society.
Abusers are for the most part con men. They can’t keep up the charm offensive very long so they try to get an early commitment. The love at first sight, sweeping off the feet, version of romance so popular in fiction is replicated by the abuser in an effort to get that early commitment they need.
Wow, this is a particularly disgusting example of MRA slime. I just don’t *get* this kind of… whatever it is. Sure ain’t humor. Actively promoting abuse is so edgy and hilarious and doesn’t get anyone hurt ever, right.
Ugh. Here’s a bunny getting brushed so its fur can be spun into yarn.
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY5ccnuC2yE&w=420&h=315%5D
Drat. Let’s try that again.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IY5ccnuC2yE&w=420&h=315]
@Marie
Thanks. I needed that. You win all the Internet hugs from me.
@auggz, dunno, but wouldn’t surprise me as every cult I have heard of incorporates sexual abuse – particularly of women – into its modus operandi.
Darn the video of angora rabbits. Now I really really want one, having come back from the pet store a couple of hours ago with fish stuff, but drooling over the cute bunnies. I think my cats would be annoyed, and the bunny would have to live indoors. They live indoors too, but I think another creature vying for my attention would be too much for them.
The victim doesn’t so much want him more, but rather wants him to stop the abusive behavior. Because the abuser convinced you that you caused him to do and say those things to you.