Hey, everybody!
So you remember that post a couple of days ago, that one in which I quoted Jason Gregory’s most peculiar dating advice for angry men? You know, the one in which he suggested that men rebuff women who are interested in them with a long and rather nasty assortment of misogynistic insults? You know, like these:
Tell her that she isn’t interesting, that her soul is dog-shit and that she has nothing to offer other than boobs and booty, that she is a piece of shit and a total failure as a human being, that you don’t find her attractive and that she isn’t even good enough to be a cum-bucket.
And he went on like that for several more sentences. You can read the whole quote in my original piece, or in his original post on A Voice for Men.
Well, it turns out I totally misinterpreted Jason Gregory’s post, according to an unbiased and neutral outside observer named Jason Gregory, no relation to the original Jason Gregory, who’s written a post about it on his blog.
Hold on, I’m being told that this second Jason Gregory is in fact also the first Jason Gregory.
Anyway, according to Jason Gregory, even though Jason Gregory did explicitly tell men to “tell her … that her soul is dog-shit” he didn’t really mean to tell men to “tell her … that her soul is dog-shit.”
No, he only hypothetically meant this. He was just trying to suggest was how mean the ladies are when they turn down men.
What he was really trying to express, he now says, was that
men need to learn self-respect and to value their selves in totality—including the importance of valuing their sexuality.
Pretty weird how that came out in the original post as
Tell her that she isn’t interesting, that her soul is dog-shit and that she has nothing to offer other than boobs and booty, that she is a piece of shit and a total failure as a human being, that you don’t find her attractive and that she isn’t even good enough to be a cum-bucket.
But, he insists, his aim was really quite noble. As he explains now, he wasn’t just trying to stand up for the dignity of men — he was trying to protect women from having their inboxes filled with dick-pics.
I wrote that men should stop giving away cock like it’s worthless. Perhaps if men valued their sexuality, they’d be less inclined to inundate women with emails, messages, and pick-up lines. Perhaps if men actually valued their sexuality, the ladies at Jezebel wouldn’t be so inclined to complain about all the free-cock oppression. Perhaps if men actually valued their sexuality, men wouldn’t degrade themselves by harassing, begging, and inundating women with dick pics and pleas for their attention and affection.
Indeed, he went on to argue, it was not he who was the real misogynist, but me. J’Accuse!
This might seem a hard case to make, what with the whole “tell her … her soul is dog-shit” bit and numerous other remarks in his original post, like, for example, his description of women who actually enjoy sex:
You may be able to find a few coked-up girls who really get into it—the kind of girls who end up with sweaty hair, mascara, and cum dripping down their cheeks, but those girls usually have emotional disorders and are simply trying to bury their emotional problems in various sorts of drug induced escapes.
And who can forget his suggestion that men make their dates “pay for a juicy sirloin to replace all the jizzed-out protein” they cause to be jizzed out?
But apparently I am the true misogynist because I ran my post making fun of him during my pledge drive. Which makes me a “misogyny pimp.”
This is where the mocking of misogyny becomes misogyny. He doesn’t care about the women who bother to read his blog. Though he may have a few days in which he invites women and other commenters to share and cry about their troubles, any good pimp knows the importance of faking like he cares. Any good pimp knows how to manipulate the emotions of “his bitches.” …
[H]e doesn’t care about why men are sending dick pics and bombarding women with emails and messages through online dating services. He’s not looking for solutions to these problems. He’s not saying that men who do such things may lack self-respect because the value of male sexuality is often viewed as less-than-worthless in our culture.
Wait, what? I don’t care enough about men who harass women so I’m a misogynist?
Exploiting women is a form of misogyny … In this way, Boobz has more in common with an abusive pimp than he has with any heroic slayer of misogyny. Boobz is the misogyny that he mocks. Boobz is a misogyny-pimp.
QED, I guess. Apparently quoting misogynists, mocking misogynists, discussing misogyny, taking notice of misogyny in any way … makes one a misogynist. At least according to a guy who apparently thinks that the only women who really “get into” sex are “coked-up girls” with “emotional disorders” and “cum dripping down their cheeks.”
You’ll notice that last line in Jason’s quote links to a video; that link is from him. It’s a clip from the film Bad Santa. As Jason makes a point of mentioning several times, that’s where he got the “your soul is dog shit” line.
But if you watch the clip you’ll notice one thing about that line, in its original context in the film — it’s not surrounded by a paragraph full of vile misogynistic abuse. Nope, that stuff is all Jason Gregory.
LOL I was thinking more like they’d been through a mincer, or were really sunburnt, but something just bizarre and humiliating would work!
Googly eyes!
you ask and you shall receive(may not be suitable for work):
http://ugc-01.cafemomstatic.com/gen/constrain/500/500/85/2010/03/29/16/6z/29/poudkdm5gkxmjt.jpg?imageId=18421481
http://img0.etsystatic.com/000/0/5128397/il_570xN.204419548.jpg
other outfits:
http://funkydowntown.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dapper-dick-dress-5.jpg
http://funkydowntown.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dapper-dick-dress-4.jpg
http://funkydowntown.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dapper-dick-dress-3.jpg
http://funkydowntown.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/dapper-dick-dress-2.jpg
Whoop, better save those for looking at tonight, then!
last one:
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_AYwY74fDryU/STagFE6FgtI/AAAAAAAALcE/2dxcTr84Ayk/s400/cock+penis+sweater.jpg
@leftwingfox
According to urban dictionary ‘googly eye sex’ is actually a thing.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=googly%20eye%20sex
The things you can learn on the internets never ceases to amuse.
AAAAAAAAAAAH no I’m not looking at that!
It’s ok, it’s just the definition – no pictures. (couldn’t find any quickly)
Thank Ceiling Cat for that. Just thinking about the term’s bad enough.
I wonder how these losers would like to get their dickpics back … photoshopped?
Me and hubby used to look at the m4m section of Craigslist and then I’d use MSpaint to give them little happy faces and clever sayings and personalities.
This is why “Dick the Mennonite” is a thing in my head, by the way.
Neuroticbeagle: I’m hoping that this is a case of people Making Shit Up online, and not a case of Quantum fetish mechanics. (SFW)
Eh, I know that his somewhat late but in the GTO manga and anime, the main character Onizuka is NOT in his late ’20’s, he’s only 22 and newly graduated from college. And it is no wonder you would hate it, it’s BY A STRAIGHT MAN, FOR STRAIGHT MEN.
I AM A STRAIGHT MAN AND I DO NOT PREY ON 14 YEAR OLD GIRLS THANK YOU VERY MUCH why do you think I would find this guy representational
And “only 22 and newly graduated from college” IS NOT HELPING.
That dickshopping session must have been something else.
::ignores Mejas claiming that straight men perv on teenage girls because that would be MISANDRY::
“Dick the Mennonite” should have his own comic.