The Man Boobz Pledge Drive continues! If you haven’t already, please consider clicking the little button below and sending some bucks my way.
Thanks! (And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:
So over on A Voice for Men, young Jason Gregory seems faintly jealous that young women who put up dating profiles online tend to get flooded with messages — and the occasional dick pic — from horny guys.
F]ree cock is everywhere. Men give it away like it’s worthless. … I doubt that it is unusual at all for a woman to get 300 messages in her inbox from men who are desperate for female affection, approval, and sex. There is no doubt in my mind that men send “dick-pics” and clamor, bother, and sometimes harass women for their affections and attentions.
But Jason feels no sympathy for young women who put up profiles hoping to meet some nice young fellow who’s also into Sherlock and Neil Gaiman and Indian food and instead get messages from guys who introduce themselves by expressing a desire to ejaculate in their hair.
No, Jason is angry because he’s convinced all these offers of “free cock” only serve to make the women of the world into snooty-stuck stuck-up so-and-sos who think they’re all that and a folder full of dick pics.
All you men who give it away, all you do is reinforce the entitlement mentality of women who believe that their being present is plenty. You reinforce the idea that women don’t owe anything to the relationship—that they deserve a free-ride of cocks and that they don’t even have to break a sweat.
Jason, I should add, means this last bit literally. He’s resentful that when he allegedly engages in the act of coitus he has to do all the work while his alleged partners allegedly lie there like inflatable love-dolls.
Anyhoo,.Jason has a plan to take these stuck-up ladies down a peg or two: A cock strike.
Yep, he wants men to start saying “no” to women who are interested in them, just to see how they like it. But he doesn’t want them to just say no. He wants them to be giant dicks about it.
Try telling a girl no. Tell her, after she makes it clear that she wants your cock, that you’re not interested in giving it to her. Tell her that she isn’t interesting, that her soul is dog-shit and that she has nothing to offer other than boobs and booty, that she is a piece of shit and a total failure as a human being, that you don’t find her attractive and that she isn’t even good enough to be a cum-bucket. Tell her that she is never going to be any good at sucking cock and that she needs to stop pretending that she is doing any favors and learn to compensate for her inadequacies by becoming “kinky.” Tell her that her vapid life of shoes and pop-culture and materialism are soulless pursuits of dog-shit. Watch what happens. If you Jez-ladies wanna know what “hostile” means, see this rejected woman.
Emphasis mine.
A Voice for Men, you may recall, sees itself as leading the most important civil rights movement of the 21st century. I am sure Jason Gregory’s post here will be remembered alongside Martin Luther King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail as a classic in civil rights literature.
EDIT: I added a couple more “allegedlys” to a sentence I thought needed them.
That’s so weird. “My favorite hobby is trying to piss women off in bars by flirting with them and then not fucking them”. Because you just enjoying annoying random women in public places? OK then, dude.
I just have to ask the genius who wrote this: if women are swimming in available cock as you say, why would they care that yours isn’t?
I guess he thinks he’s going to start a revolution, but the thing is, how many men are willing to give up sex just to potentially make some women feel less confident in their ability to attract men? Not many, I’m guessing.
It’s like “modesty culture” and “purity culture” turned inside out. I mean…who’s even seen the phrase: “All you men who give it away” before?
You have to admit though, the reaction of the group of guys who’re doing just fine in a dating context to hearing about this plan would be hilarious to observe.
I’m sorry Im laughing again .
And yeah what does he mean “they can’t do shit” ? He’s under the umbrella of protection from friends and bar owner (who knew him ..yeah because his hobby was there) from her doing what shit ?
Another fantasy .
1 ?
To be clear, you compared a kink of mine to necrophilia. I realise shaming me wasn’t your intent, but usually you are supportive of not hurting other people while aiming at MRAs. So yeah, please don’t do that.
The Real Doll solution is more about lesser evils to me. At least the person fucking a Real Doll is not hurting a sapient being.
Great article, Jason.
You said it just the way it is.
Thanks for the repost and personal comments too, Manboobz.
@auggziliary: True, that.
NOBODY HAVE SEX! Aside from the extinction of the species, what could possibly go wrong?
@ Bostonian
Yeah, and I support their existence for that reason. Still find it disturbing to watch some of the documentaries about the owners, though, especially the guys who have lots of them and keep them stacked around their home naked, or the guys who rant online about how much better than real women they are because they can’t say no.
I’m picturing some random guy about to walk out of a pub with a woman at the end of the night, and some other guy walking up to him and saying “don’t do it! stop giving women the satisfaction of thinking they can get cock whenever they want it! fight the power!” and the first guy being like, um, what?
Kim, I apologise.
The guys who creep me out the most are the ones who want robots that are aware to be sex slaves.
That is too horrifying for me to contemplate.
Bostonian – yes, those guys are appalling.
Nice talking with you, see ya, is pretty much exactly what almost everyone says after the pool shooting or darts league or whatever at the local watering hole. The “flash of rage” response instead of the old fashioned see ya is a new thing I guess the youngsters added recently. Or maybe, just maybe, the MRA made it up.
@kittehserf – I’m curious if you would feel the same way if they made a robotic sex doll for women, meaning a male-shaped bot/doll that was anatomically correct and women embraced using them rather than having sex with real men?
I realize this is mostly hypothetical.
I also do not get why there aren’t male versions (actually no, I know why, the weird double standard that says women only want sex for connection and babies and never want just sex despite the mountains of evidence to the contrary) and why every single time a futurist or scifi story depicts sexbots they’re always women created for het/bi men, particularly when you consider that women using mechanical aids to orgasm has been going on for well over a century and has very little social stigma, compared to the stigma against men who use Real Dolls, and that so many women report being unable to orgasm during sex and men finishing too soon, PLUS the whole “a sexbot would never be a threat to you and would never demand that you make it a sandwich” thing.
Actually I got curious and looked into this once, and male-looking Real Doll equivalents exist, it’s just that women don’t seem to be interested in buying them in significant numbers.
Yes its a fantasy .
Normally when I go somewhere like a party or gathering and I end up talking to someone a lot while there .When Its time to go I say “bye nice talking to you .” I think the “flash of rage” is a hallucination induced by his fantasy that the whole time the woman was standing there jonesing for his “cock” ..So he walks away laughing like “gotcha ” and she never gives him a second thought.
drst – it’d give me a touch of the wibblies for the uncanny valley reasons and so on, but without the fear of misogyny affecting the user’s relations with people. That’s a major part of it for me: it’s the disgusting MRAs that Kim mentioned (and I apologise again, Kim, for hurting you) and the whole misogyny question plus the rest of it. That may be very sexist on my part, I guess. 🙁
::snicker:: I missed that bit and can just imagine MRAs screaming that it’s misandry and the bots should be programmed to demand sammiches.
OT: hey, any Illinois manboobzers, did you know you’ve all been exorcised? Bishop Thomas John Paprocki is quite upset about this whole marriage equality thing, it seems.
What a pity his name isn’t John Thomas Paprocki. 😛
This guy kind of reminds me of that scene from Happiness. The Jon Lovitz character wasn’t supposed to be aspirational guys.
Some people fetishize shoes. I think doll fetishists are just that, people with fetishes. I know that, but the dolls do sort of look like dead women to me and that does give me some heebie-jeebies. Then again, dildos that come in realistic flesh tones have a squickiness about them to me too. Make it rainbow colors and give it sparkles or something. Just don’t make it look like a real disembodied penis because that makes me think of a real disembodied penis and that is a turn off. That’s just my own personal hang up. No judgement to flesh tone dildo havers or sex doll enthusiasts.
Thank goodness none of us are required to get each other’s approval before we like something, because that rainbow sparkle thing probably just made some people reading say, “Ew”.
As to doxxing: This is my name.
http://imgace.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/how-about-a-tall-glass-of-i-dont-give-a-fuck.jpg
http://images5.fanpop.com/image/photos/31500000/Haters-gonna-hate-once-upon-a-time-31571443-500-200.gif