The Man Boobz Pledge Drive continues! If you haven’t already, please consider clicking the little button below and sending some bucks my way.
Thanks! (And thanks again to all who’ve already donated.) Now back to our regularly scheduled programming:
So over on A Voice for Men, young Jason Gregory seems faintly jealous that young women who put up dating profiles online tend to get flooded with messages — and the occasional dick pic — from horny guys.
F]ree cock is everywhere. Men give it away like it’s worthless. … I doubt that it is unusual at all for a woman to get 300 messages in her inbox from men who are desperate for female affection, approval, and sex. There is no doubt in my mind that men send “dick-pics” and clamor, bother, and sometimes harass women for their affections and attentions.
But Jason feels no sympathy for young women who put up profiles hoping to meet some nice young fellow who’s also into Sherlock and Neil Gaiman and Indian food and instead get messages from guys who introduce themselves by expressing a desire to ejaculate in their hair.
No, Jason is angry because he’s convinced all these offers of “free cock” only serve to make the women of the world into snooty-stuck stuck-up so-and-sos who think they’re all that and a folder full of dick pics.
All you men who give it away, all you do is reinforce the entitlement mentality of women who believe that their being present is plenty. You reinforce the idea that women don’t owe anything to the relationship—that they deserve a free-ride of cocks and that they don’t even have to break a sweat.
Jason, I should add, means this last bit literally. He’s resentful that when he allegedly engages in the act of coitus he has to do all the work while his alleged partners allegedly lie there like inflatable love-dolls.
Anyhoo,.Jason has a plan to take these stuck-up ladies down a peg or two: A cock strike.
Yep, he wants men to start saying “no” to women who are interested in them, just to see how they like it. But he doesn’t want them to just say no. He wants them to be giant dicks about it.
Try telling a girl no. Tell her, after she makes it clear that she wants your cock, that you’re not interested in giving it to her. Tell her that she isn’t interesting, that her soul is dog-shit and that she has nothing to offer other than boobs and booty, that she is a piece of shit and a total failure as a human being, that you don’t find her attractive and that she isn’t even good enough to be a cum-bucket. Tell her that she is never going to be any good at sucking cock and that she needs to stop pretending that she is doing any favors and learn to compensate for her inadequacies by becoming “kinky.” Tell her that her vapid life of shoes and pop-culture and materialism are soulless pursuits of dog-shit. Watch what happens. If you Jez-ladies wanna know what “hostile” means, see this rejected woman.
Emphasis mine.
A Voice for Men, you may recall, sees itself as leading the most important civil rights movement of the 21st century. I am sure Jason Gregory’s post here will be remembered alongside Martin Luther King’s Letter from a Birmingham Jail as a classic in civil rights literature.
EDIT: I added a couple more “allegedlys” to a sentence I thought needed them.
I hope for his sake he doesn’t try this plan on anyone who writes for a living.
Angry dude – YOUR SOUL IS DOG SHIT
Amused writer – Is that supposed to be a metaphor? Because it’s terrible. Now, let’s talk about the rest of your message. I have my red pen right here.
Dog shit has its uses … dogs need to excrete, after all, and it does help fertilise soil, I guess.
Does this dude have any uses (other than the point-and-laugh variety)? ::scratches head:: I can’t think of any at present.
David – shouldn’t that be alleged inflatable love dolls? 😉
I’m ready to start a charity to provide all these guys with Real Dolls if they’ll agree to leave women alone forever as soon as their receive their doll.
They, not their. Need more coffee.
cassandrakitty, he is validating my mistrust of dating site…I have heard horror stories from friends.
Did I tell you about the guy who sent me a long, detailed fantasy about how he was going to draw me, and at first I would only be comfortable letting him do so in public and fully clothed, but as I got to know him better I’d feel so safe that we’d progress to private spaces, and then nudes, and then eventually we’d become lovers, because I was born to be his muse? Yeah, dating sites are just awesome for women.
Maybe it’s all a cunning plan to get *other* guys to do this, so more ladies for him. Like how women trick others into cutting their hair short.
These guys want so badly to be cunning manipulators, but they’re missing both the cunning part and the interpersonal skills required to successfully manipulate people.
Does he really think women are going to be upset to miss out on the chance to have sex with him? Is his dick made of rainbows or something?
GillieMimosa, didn’t you know is (god gift to woman).
A cunning plan? Baldrick would never behave like this!
I can’t imagine the Real Doll plan would work, because the dolls would rebel.
SELF-DEFLATING INITIALISED
I do find Real Dolls a bit scary looking, personally. Never have understood how the uncanny valley effect doesn’t put people off, but I think I have a stronger than average reaction to that.
Maybe they think women try to trick each other with implausible and overcomplicated tricks because they try to trick each other with implausible and overcomplicated tricks.
You do have to wonder how much of the “women have an evil plan to make men do X by doing Y” stuff is projection.
It’s a valuable diagnostic tool. You can do all kinds of tests on it to find out what’s wrong with a sick doggie.
Also, it’s delicious food for flies.
This guy got his comeuppance back in the 1960s. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MJ5RKG2FqGo. Time travel!
I can’t imagine wanting to fuck anything that isn’t another person. Whether it’s a Real Doll, one of those AUGGH NO plush versions, or Roosh’s Walmart bargain basement inflatable doll, a thing that’s a pretence of being another person, but not alive, is just … yeah, it creeps me out as a fleshlight or whatever never could. (I know, I know, YMMV; this is my reaction.)
I just hope none of the dudes who complain about women being passive during sex don’t actually use sex dolls. It’d make me think 1) are you sure you’ve ever had sex with another person and 2) if you have, could it be you treated her like your doll, so duh, no wonder.
I really don’t buy the argument that a Real Doll is a sex toy in the same way a vibrator is. There’s something about a toy that’s designed to replicate a person, and that the user relates to as if it was a kind of pseudo-person, that’s just different.
Also works great when left anonymously on the doorstep of yer friendly neighborhood asshole, preferably in a burning paper bag.
Or so I’m told.
But women should be grateful for any and all attention from teh menz! (/sarcasm) Like this attention, for instance:
http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/world/a/21138484/search-for-woman-who-vanished-after-night-out/
I can nearly hear the MRAs screaming about creep-shaming.
Seriously though, I really genuinely hope this young woman is okay, and that she turns up safe and sound.
As for internet dating, I’ve mixed feelings on the subject. Yes, there are a lot of horrible, appalling, entitled men lurking out there on dating sites, but there are also men like my partner, who I met online five years ago. He’s a peach, a real keeper, (and actually introduced me to this site… mangina!!!!). My advice would be to check out a bunch of different sites before committing to one – some have better safeguards in place. The one I used, for instance, had the feature that anyone wanting to message you had to send a request first. This meant you could check their profile, see if they were remotely suitable before they got to send you any messages. I still got inappropriate messages (of course) but not as many as I would have without that feature in place. Overall, I found it a positive experience more than a negative.
Or say a fleshlight, that’s basically the penetrating vs penetrated version of a dildo. It’s not a replacement for a person in the same way a Real Doll is, and users to don’t do that “yeah well I don’t need you women because I can get a (toy) and she’s better than you anyway!” thing they do with Real Dolls. As far as I know nobody dresses up their fleshlight and sits it at the dinner table with them during meals.
Jeez I hope not! 😀
But yeah, the whole business of sex dolls gets a huge side-eye from me. It’s all very well the “oh poor lonely man” stuff, but this isn’t a child loving zir teddy bear or whatever toy, it’s a man who treats an inanimate object as a replacement for a human, and fucks it. It’s a whole lot further than the way humans routinely invest objects with personalities, imo. The idea that a guy could think a thing is a replacement for a living woman is worrying. The Real Dolls take it straight through the uncanny valley and into necrophilia territory, for me. (Emphasis on “for me”.)
Cassandra – I cannot explain to the other bus passengers why I laughed so loud.