Categories
a voice for men a woman is always to blame all about the menz antifeminism boner rage crackpottery creepy evil wives evil women excusing abuse imaginary oppression it's science! lazy women eating bon bons marital rape marriage strike men created civilization men invented everything men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny MRA not-quite-explicit threats not-quite-plausible deniability only men pay taxes apparently oppressed men patriarchy playing the victim precious bodily fluids rape rape culture shit that never happened taking pleasure in women's pain women's jobs aren't real your time will come

A Voice for Men doubles down: how dishwashers, TV dinners, and marital rape laws are rendering women obsolete. Also, the apocalypse.

Not the apology that Clint Carpentier is looking for.
Not the apology that Clint Carpentier is looking for.

We met new A Voice for Men writer Clint Carpentier earlier this week, when we took a look at a recent post of his waxing nostalgic about the good old days before marital rape laws, when wives couldn’t say “no” to their husbands and expect the law to take this no any more seriously than a husband intent on rape.

In a second posting, he’s doubled down on the whole marital rape thing and incorporated into a vast and fantastical vision of the past and future of humankind that bears so little resemblance to reality that it’s worth quoting in detail as a sort of case study in Men Going Their Own Way delusions.

Carpentier, clearly a Man Going His Own Way From Reality, begins with a brief and erroneous survey of human prehistory that he seems to have picked up at the University of His Own Ass:

The concept of marriage is relatively new to the human species, but was based on the ancient contract emotionally agreed upon by our primitive ancestors when they discovered that due to their big brains, their offspring were born less mature by necessity than other, less intelligent species; this contract promoted the exchange of three C’s (cooking, cleaning, and copulation) from the female, and three P’s from the male (protection, provision, and progeny).

So not only is Carpentier returning to his notion that compulsory copulation is proper wifely duty, but he apparently thinks that the prehistoric “wife” sat around the cave all day eating neolithic bon bons while her husband marched off to hunt mammoths for her — or perhaps commuted by foot-powered car to his job as a Brontosaurus crane operator at Slate Rock and Gravel Company.

In fact, the notion that male hunters were the main providers in prehistoric society seems to have been little more than a projection of the patriarchal attitudes of older generations of anthropologists onto the past. As best as we can figure it today, prehistoric women were involved not only in extensive gathering but in hunting as well, probably providing the bulk of the calories in the prehistoric diet.

To Carpentier, apparently, it’s all gone to hell since our days in the caves. Today, he laments, “the legal system has been unabashedly twisting the ancient contract into something that amounts to slavery” for men, while giving women more benefits, including the ability to say no to sex, which Carpentier, as in his previous post, describes as a terrible hardship for men:

The responsibilities for women have been eliminated by technology and gender politics, while at the same time their contract benefits have  increased. On the whole what was once her responsibility, to copulate, has become whim and weapon. With a legal system in place which has been designed for her to exploit and abuse, it is becoming increasingly difficult to trust women enough to even associate with, never mind marry.

Yep, we’re now coming to the “I’m taking my ball and going home” part of Carpentier’s rant, a necessary part of any MGTOW manifesto worth its salt.

What women didn’t realize was that the very things which made their lives easier – be they appliances or conveniently boxed pre-made meals at the grocery store – simultaneously reduced the necessity for women.

Let’s let that sink in for a moment: because of washing machines and TV dinners, half of the human population is becoming obsolete.

Women have inadvertently been reduced to gestational incubators; everything else, men can take care of on their own.

But Carpentier is convinced that SCIENCE will soon find a way to create what he calls a “gestational beer keg” to enable men to make a little end-run around that traditional (cis) womanly function. All men will need is their eggs, and well, that won’t be a problem:

[M]ake no mistake, women will sell their eggs, and they’ll do it willingly, just as they sell their bodies … And with the advent of Vasagel, a male fertility inhibitor, which is safe, reversible, and lasts roughly ten years per shot, women will lose the stranglehold of procreation over men.

So, wait, do men want to be able to gestate babies in beer kegs, or do they want to avoid having kids altogether? To Carpentier it hardly seems to matter, as his main goal seems to be to say “I told you so” to women.

At this point Carpentier puts on his futurist cap and sets forth what he sees as two possible futures for humanity.

The first, and most obvious answer – and one I so dearly hope for – is women wake up, grow up, and take responsibility for their own life choices. Women are not children, and husbands are not their dads. A radical paradigm shift will have to happen before men begin to have trust in the ancient contract again. A burgeoning respect for the sex that created and continues to maintain the civilization women so blithely enjoy would be nice. Men have been working on it for five thousand years specifically for women. A little recognition would be appreciated.

WE HUNTED THE MAMMOTH TO FEED YOU!

And then he says the first positive thing about women I’ve seen him say:

This isn’t about misogyny. This is about disillusionment; we love women, we love their flustered approach to parallel parking, we love it… lift something heavy, or get something high down, we love their sense of helplessness, even when we know they’re not.

That’s right: the only thing he likes about women is what he imagines to be their general incompetence and their possibly feigned “sense of helplessness.”

You know what I love about MGTOWers? Their endless troubles with the basics of grammar. Diagram that last “sentence” of his. I dare you!

In any case, in this scenario, the only way women will be able to get themselves back in the good graces of the men they have wronged by, I guess, not wanting to be raped by their husbands, is for them to admit they were wrong and ask gently for forgiveness:

Men might not be willing to accept the ancient contract back, but we have an amazing capacity to forgive a guilty smile, just meet us halfway, we can work this out.

If women don’t return to men, humbled and ashamed, Carpentier predicts a rather more dramatic future. That is to say: THE APOCALYPSE.

It will start slow, with stores refusing service to those who don’t have the mark of the beast tattooed on their foreheads.

Sorry, wrong apocalypse:

The second thing I can see happening is MGTOW’s becoming criminalized. And here’s how it will happen: it’ll start with a single’s tax, applicable only to men, specifically men who live underneath the tax bracket.

Yeah, this will happen shortly after Congress passes the Monkeys Flying Out of My Butt Revenue Enhancement Opportunity Act of 2014.

Oh, but the Revelations of Clint Carpentier are just getting started. After taxing all the single men, the evil gynocracy will go after their sperm:

If Vasagel can’t be quashed at the FDA level, it will become highly taxed, or just made outright illegal; it’s unlikely anyone with a criminal record, however slight, will be allowed to get a Vasagel injection, on the fear that the doctor may well lose his practicing license. You’ll watch as your fathers, uncles, brothers, friends, get picked up one by one, for what will boil down to not manning up and doing their duty as “men.”

Dude, NO ONE — not even your poor abused socks — WANTS YOUR PRECIOUS BODILY FLUIDS.

But in Carpentier’s mind the evil gyno-governmental conspiracy to steal men’s sperm and make them all into involuntary daddies will ultimately bring everything crashing down:

You’ll feel the first shocks, as the infrastructure fails to maintain itself under the strain of invisible workers who have been imprisoned. You’ll watch as convicts are forced into slave labor to sustain the infrastructure. You’ll feel the crunch as taxes increase, then increase again, because no government seems to understand that slaves and government workers cannot create GDP; without GDP, you have no tax base, without a tax base, you can’t maintain a government, and a large portion of women work for the government, whether directly or through welfare.

And then Carpentier pulls out his trump card:

And this is only if men are so kind as not to revolt.

Yep. It’s always the same old story with these guys: If you don’t listen up, ladies, the world you know will collapse, MEN will arise as one in fury at the women who destroyed the civilization they worked so hard to build, and a new MANLY MALE MANARCHY will put itself in charge.

And presumably the marital raping will begin in earnest again.

Once again, it all comes down to fury that women can say “no.”

318 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
R. A. Stark
10 years ago

There are some trees here, but I don’t see your forest: “Government workers cannot create GDP”. Dude, GDP=C+I+G+NX. That “G” stands for “Government”. >.<

Caitlin
10 years ago

I wish all of these guys would take their oh-so-precious spermies and go Galt already on some desert island and leave the rest of us alone.

Falconer
10 years ago

I just did a set of child support worksheets. The presumptive child support obligation for the father to pay to the mother was a whopping $7.00.

$7.

but MALE BC WOO YEAH SUCK IT LADEEZ

Bostonian
Bostonian
10 years ago

MRAs, people! Fucking evil dipshits, the lot of them.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

What did I just read? How did he go from marital rape to societal collapse? Why does he think there will be a tax levied solely on single men? Why wouldn’t someone with a criminal record be able to get Vasagel? And why the hell would “they” start rounding up “fathers, brothers, uncles and friends?”

No, no, none of this makes sense!

I do take a nasty little pleasure in his outrage that Vasagel may not be approved by the FDA. Hmm, I wonder what it’s like to have a government limit one’s reproductive choices. As I a woman I would obviously have no idea. /sarcasm

Falconer
10 years ago

@R. A. Stark: The argument that government money is somehow not stimulating has long been an argument of trickle-down economics.

Boeing et al. manage somehow to make a packet on BADWRONG money.

titianblue
titianblue
10 years ago

… In Dan Brown’s latest book, “The Mammoth Code”, Robert Langdon races against time and battles evil minions of the powerful Gynocracy as they strive to conceal humanity’s oldest secret – the ancient prehistoric contract coded into prehistoric cave paintings. Will Langdon survive to reveal the true meaning of “three C’s and three P’s” before the whims and weapons of the Gynocracy bring the Apocalypse? …

Andrew Johnston
10 years ago

Why does he think there will be a tax levied solely on single men?

Because that’s the only way his nightmare scenario works. A lot of bad dystopian fiction is based around plot points that are only there because the narrative would fall apart without them. The only difference between those authors and MGTOWs is that the latter all seem to believe that these scenarios are plausible.

Falconer
10 years ago

@sparky: I was a bit perplexed as to how male BC was supposed to be a humongous coup, but duh: it’s about denying women babies and thus, denying women precious bodily fluids money.

I bet you didn’t realize you only think babies are cute because they’re worth money to you, huh? That’s why you don’t see women marrying each other! Right?

WRONGTHINK!! (Seriously, though, way sweet and charming, much d’awww.)

Beethoven Is Grumpy Cat

MGTOWs are a perfect modern example of what Nietzsche would call ressentement. Seriously, the entirety of these guys’ fantasies revolves around getting revenge on women. It’s all about resentment to women and pulling women down to their level. Obvious, I know, but bears repeating.

MaudeLL
10 years ago

Seriously though, I hear Jeannie Boehner and Michelle McConnell want to criminalize migtaws.

AK
AK
10 years ago

I always appreciate it when they go off into one of their weird little apocalyptic fantasies. It just screams “DON’T TAKE ME SERIOUSLY!!!”

Falconer
10 years ago

Aha! We have discovered why the Soviet Union fell! They had all three Cs but only one P!

Falconer
10 years ago

Which were actually three Ss and an R! But who cares!

Andrew Johnston
10 years ago

Pieces like this are why I’ve always thought MGTOWs are weirdos even by the standards of their movement. Dude, if frozen meals and relentless masturbation are all you need to be fulfilled, then good on ya. No one is trying to take that away from you. But the fact that you have this urge to continually defend this concept against the zero people who oppose you? Well, the lady doth protest too much, methinks.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

Men might not be willing to accept the ancient contract back, but we have an amazing capacity to forgive a guilty smile, just meet us halfway, we can work this out.

So you don’t really want to go your own way, Clint?

No, Clint, we can’t work this out, you need to go already.

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

Shorter him: “Society will collapse unless you ladies keep playing dumb and let us rape you.”

Yeah, Clint, you let us know how that works out for you on the dating front.

PS: I don’t even have a driver’s licence, and I nailed parallel parking the first time I tried it. I’m really not sure how having a penis and testicles is supposed to figure into being able to do that.

hellkell
hellkell
10 years ago

And if men can do all the cooking, cleaning, etc., then they should just do it instead of sounding like a bunch of babies whining for mommy.

AK
AK
10 years ago

Also:

Why wouldn’t someone with a criminal record be able to get Vasagel?

I was wondering that too. If we were going to separate men with records vs. men without, I would have assumed it would be the other way around.

Unless this is a dystopian future version of their beloved “women only like bad boys” trope.

Chie Satonaka
Chie Satonaka
10 years ago

The second thing I can see happening is MGTOW’s becoming criminalized.

Dude, seriously, NO ONE GIVES A SHIT IF YOU DON’T GET MARRIED. In fact, you can thank feminism for fewer shits given regarding single people. It’s the social conservatives who wring their hands about how many single people there are, and that’s mostly dog whistle stuff about not enough white babies being born.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

Andrew Johnson: The idea that these guys actually believe that this a plausible scenario scares the crap out of me. It also makes them easy to mock. They must be a blast at family functions.

falconer: Shh. Don’t tell Carpentier about sperm banks. His head might explode.

Argenti Aertheri
10 years ago

Gotta say, before is even finish reading the post, the three Ps and Cs sound like he learned of the four Fs and wanted to sound smart. Little psych (and probably neurosci) thing, the limbic system is in charge of the four Fs — fighting, fleeing, feeding and fucking (you should see undergrad profs try to find a way to teach that without saying fuck!)

In any case, no, gender doesn’t work like that. And hello, that last F is not gender dependent (nor, for that matter, is fighting versus fleeing!)

Ironic…does screaming “I require spider assistance immediately” count as fighting or fleeing? (It was descending from my ceiling! My brother is currently bringing it outside)

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

Sterilize all the MGTOWs! It would be for the best. Really! The world is already too full of stupid people as it is.

cloudiah
10 years ago

Basically, he wants all of the benefits, but none of the liabilities, of old-fashioned patriarchy.

Isn’t that what they accuse feminists of wanting?

1 2 3 13