Categories
a voice for men a woman is always to blame antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? boner rage boobs butts creepy drama kings evil sexy ladies evil women imaginary oppression infighting johntheother men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA paul elam playing the victim sexualization unsolicited penis updates vaginas warren farrell

The Power of Butt: MRA granddaddy Warren Farrell picks a new book cover, and can’t decide between tits, ass or vagina.

Men: Oppressed by butts?
Men: Oppressed by women’s butts?

Warren Farrell’s The Myth of Male Power, published twenty years ago, defined much of the agenda for what’s become the contemporary Men’s Rights movement. If you hear a Men’s Rights activist prattle on about “male disposability”or “death professions” or complain about draft registration (even though the draft itself has been dead for decades), you’ve got Farrell to thank, or blame.

So when Farrell decided to release a new ebook edition of his most famous book, it was perhaps not all that surprising that he decided to turn to the folks at A Voice for Men, probably the most influential Men’s Rights site around, for advice on a picture to use for a new cover.

But what was surprising was the pictures he asked the AVFMers to choose from, three sexually charged, and slightly NSFW, pics highlighting what Farrell evidently sees as the key female challenges to male power: their vaginas, tits and ass.

I’m not speaking metaphorically: one of the pictures shows a nude woman’s pelvic area, her vulva both highlighted and hidden by what is essentially a merkin made of moss; a second picture shows the ass of a young, topless woman in her underpants slaving over a hot stove, and the third shows a famous picture of Marilyn Monroe, also topless.

AVFM’s Paul Elam explained the, er, logic of these images:

Imagine the juxtaposition of the title, “Myth of Male Power” over one of these images. The cover alone will challenge the idea of male power in men and women alike on a gut level.

By “on a gut level” he apparently means “in men’s pants.”

You sort of have to see them to see how utterly tacky they are; here’s the one of the butt, which either Farrell or Elam helpfully captioned “Where’s the power?”

You can find the others on AVFM here; if you don’t want to give them the pageviews, you can find them here.

You couldn’t really ask for better symbols of the essential misogyny of the Men’s Rights movement today — or of its obsession with blaming women (and women’s sexuality in particular) for the restrictions on male power that so chafe the hides of MRAs. Farrell, in the past, generally avoided demonizing female sexuality quite so obviously and directly, but these days he’s apparently been spending too much time amongst the A Voice for Menners.

Farrell’s choices for potential covers also tell us a good deal about him as well; in the past he’s essentially been able to hide his crackpot pseudoscholarship behind a certain veneer or respectability — releasing his books through major publishing houses, touting his PhD — but here he seems to be falling to his natural level, amongst the self-publishers of crappy e-books with stock-photo covers.

While some AVFMers had other suggestions — perhaps a picture of the Wicked Witch? — most seemed to think that the pictures were perfect for his book. Tom Golden — along with most of the voters in the poll — preferred Marilyn and her tits:

Tom Golden says November 23, 2013 at 9:06 PM I think the point that Warren is trying to make is that simply the sight of a very attractive female puts most men into a mental position of subservience and blind willingness to be of service to her in whatever way he can. In essence he becomes a slave. How can men be in so much power when just the sight of a lightly clad young attractive woman throws them into such a state? I think any of the images accomplishes that task but I personally like #3 because when I see that image my awareness of my surrender to her power is palpable.

Others were more taken with the ass pic. Alek wrote:

alek says November 23, 2013 at 1:36 PM My choice (nr. 2) is losing heavily :( :D DDD I like 2 since its the most powerfully influential… The gist of the book “myth of male power” is that “oppression of women” is an interpretational myth – “poor wimminz had to stay in the kitchinz, while man goes outside and has a blast being all hero and shit” (i’m dumbing down female gender role to “kitchen” as representative of all oppression interpretational myths covered by Warren) This photo challenges that whole notion of the kitchen as an oppressive enviroment, while immediately and visually telling the viewer just how powerful she – the woman is, merely by seeing her silhouette, casual relaxed demeanor and posture projecting utter sexual power.

And Elam, while voting for the moss-encrusted vulva himself, was apparently also quite, er, affected by dat ass.  (Those with especially sensitive stomachs may wish to skip the following quote, as it contains an unsolicited update from his boner.)

I am about as red pill as men come I think. There has not been a woman that could sexually manipulate me in decades. But one look at that woman’s ass in image #2 and I feel every instinctive reproductive trigger trying to go off in my brain. It is not a feeling of power at all for me, but a feeling of something I might have to overcome in order to just self-preserve.

So there you have it: Two of the most influential figures in the Men’s Rights movement — indeed, arguably the two most influential figures — actually believe that men are oppressed by women’s butts.

Indeed, Elam is apparently so overwhelmed by the sight of an attractive ass that he considers it a literal threat to his life.

Adding to the creepiness factor here: Farrell is 70 years old, making him literally old enough to be grandfather of the model in her underpants. Elam is in his late 50s.

Now, the weird tackiness of the images Farrell chose for his book cover did not go entirely unnoticed at AVFM. There were critics — including, amazingly, AVFM’s own John Hembling, who was a little baffled by the idea of using a sexualized picture of a woman on the cover of Farrell’s book about men, and asked if Farrell was possibly trolling them.

One MRA blogger, Kevin Wayne, posted a link to his blog, where he excoriated all three choices as “Budweiser Ad rejects” and begged Farrell to try something else:

This is just going to backfire. Don’t we have enough issues of being branded as a bunch of no-necks wanting to take women back to the 1950’s?

Elam, while gentle in his handling of Hembling’s criticism, threw a fit over Wayne’s post, banning him from AVFM and bashing him — on AVFM and on Wayne’s own site — as a do-nothing newcomer to Men’s Rights who was too “borderline retarded” to  understand the profound deeper meaning behind  Farrell’s T&A pics.

Farrell himself seems to have been a a bit more willing to listen to the critics. Indeed, he’s asked AVFM’s readers to submit some more pictures to choose from. There will be a runoff between the winner of the first AVFM poll (Marilyn and her tits) several of the new pics.

So far there hasn’t exactly been a flood of submissions. They’ve included a painting of Diogenes, a painting of Lilith, a photo of a homeless man, and this:

Office_Bitch

Yeah, that’ll work great.

376 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
lana
lana
10 years ago

That grey bloke is killingly hilarious. I shall have to subscribe to him.

He’s a hoot Bina!

lana
lana
10 years ago

If you get down to the nitty gritty that’s what it is .These guys want to get laid and cant .They feel entitled. So they hate women .Its not about jobs or kids. Its about wanting to get laid and we have rape laws that they don’t like.And that women have choices besides having sex with a man for food.

So they are PISSED off! How we gonna get laid now! Can’t rape um ! Can’t buy um !(cuz that cost a lot + she make more than me!) …They are “defecting to Russia ” and “buying ” little girls from the Philipines.

Well ..desperate is is what desperate does. Ba bye..

Then they pretend women are saying “where have all the good men gone.” I don’t think so .The good men have someone if they want. Its more like ..why don’t the scum leave ?

Mnemosyne
Mnemosyne
10 years ago

Ah yes, putting a woman’s butt on the front cover totally screams “serious academic work.” /sarcasm

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

I would really love if these guys Went Their Own Damn Way, Already…preferably in silence and obscurity, no kvetching. And leaving the women and girls alone. ALL of them.

kittehserf
10 years ago

Seconded.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
10 years ago

Portestants are the religion that worships…port?

So, whose sock do we think Jammy is? And, given how dull he’s been so far, do we care?

kittehserf
10 years ago

The way he’s pretending he hasn’t been trolling, but is having a conversation, has a slimily familiar feel, but so many of them do that.

StarStorm
10 years ago

Portestants are the religion that worships…port?

And Frotestants are g0ys?

Tracy
Tracy
10 years ago

@Salacious:

I think that makes a lot of sense about Atheists, they don’t want to see their beliefs as socially constructed but coming from somewhere outside of themselves (reason, science, etc.).

I’m pretty sure you’re talking about Asshole Atheists here, but just wanted to make sure that us quiet, just-happen-to-be-atheists aren’t being tarred with the same brush. 🙂 Or even the folk who are public and outspoken about it – most are not like this. Like how most men are not anything like the MRA.

franticcaps
franticcaps
10 years ago

@David – not sure that this sort of thing was what you were looking for, but it’s certainly rage-boner-related: some jackass at the Daily Caller wrote a column about how liberals want to arrest men for checking out women or something: http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/08/liberals-want-to-stop-men-from-checking-out-women/. It’s pretty breathtaking in its stupidity (apparently checking out women’s boobs is an inalienable right that evil liberals are trying to take away), but it’s written in response to a study on objectification, the abstract of which can be found at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11199-013-0316-x.

It was also discussed on this Tuesday’s Citizen Radio, starting from about 13 mins in.

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

David, to the best of my knowledge, those “power-of-butt compels me” types are reverting to the same impulse that make male baboons chase the female with the biggest, reddest ass. I honestly wonder if they aren’t the Missing Link…and if they are, why the hell isn’t he smarter than a fucking baboon?

Arctic Ape
Arctic Ape
10 years ago

Women’s butts oppress men both indirectly, socially and directly, literally.

Socially, because of their aforementioned superior tolerance of hard chairs, which makes women’s butts privileged compared to men’s butts and in matriarchal society stifles the social movement towards softer chairs.

Literally, because women are known to sometimes sit on a man’s lap while trading their sexual power to the man’s financial, political and cultural power – and while said man is sitting on a hard chair. Hence the idiom, “between a butt and a hard chair”.

chimisaur
chimisaur
10 years ago

Portestant (n) – too drunk to either actively believe or disbelieve in a higher power.

kittehserf
10 years ago

And Frotestants are g0ys?

Aaaaahhhhhh!

Tracy – I’d certainly limit that to AssholeAtheists, not least the ones who have the usual collection of bigotries – misogyny, racism, homophobia, trans*phobia and so on.

kittehserf
10 years ago

Portestant: believes in the power of Gout.

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

Gout is…well, an almighty pain in the arse, I imagine. Glad I don’t have it.

sparky
sparky
10 years ago

David: This is sort of tangential, but this book Idols of Perversity by Bram Dijkstra does get into the whole fear/loathing/desire regarding female sexuality. It’s a study of portrayal of women in Victorian artwork, so, y’know, not specifically related to “the power of butt compels you.” It deals with a range of topics, from woman’s sexuality and attempts to deny/control it; ideas that women are “evil” or “stupid” based on the brand new scientific breakthrough of evolutionary theory; and even Eschar girls (he calls them “nymphs with broken backs” by the way the woman’s body is contorted). And it’s an old book.


http://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/0195056523/ref=mp_s_a_1_1?qid=1386873778&sr=8-1&pi=SY200_QL40

kittehserf
10 years ago

Bina – yeah, it’s one hell of a painful thing to have. I know it’s not actually caused just by alcohol (Louis had it in his earthly days and he was anything but a drinker), but the port/prot God/gout link was irresistible.

Robert
Robert
10 years ago

My husband is taking medication for his gout, and he drinks very little alcohol. Meanwhile, I drink quite a bit, and no gout.

Regarding the Power of Butt – well, it’s been a big influence on MY life. Not women’s butts, though. The photo from the OP (kitchen shot) did exert a strange fascination for me – not quite “heterosexual panic”. Maybe it was the boy shorts.

kittehserf
10 years ago

“The power of butt” keeps making me think of Andy Griffiths’ books.

Bina
Bina
10 years ago

Yeah, I heard that gout is probably at least partly genetic. Some people are just naturally more susceptible to it, and certain foods (and alcohol) cause it to flare. I blame Henry the Eighth for the mental association most people have between gout and overeating/drinking.

kittehserf
10 years ago

I tend to think of eighteenth or nineteenth century men sitting with their feet bandaged and resting on footstools – like in one of Hogarth’s Marriage a la Mode series. The Wikli article on it’s intersting – it’s connected with diet (and was known as the rich man’s disease) as well as genetics, it’s a form of inflammatory arthritis, may be connected with sleep apnoea, and has increased in recent decades.

neuroticbeagle
10 years ago

@ kittehs
Beagles! There are beagles in that picture! 🙂