Men's Rights Redditors try to call out misogyny, fail (BONUS BIGOTRY: The misogyny caller-outer posts to the White Rights subreddit)

MRA school would define toxic masculinity as the poisoning of the system when women don’t do what they’re supposed to.

If a woman doesn’t:

feed;
clean;
breed (when required);
have abortions (when required);
provide whatever sort of sex the man wants;
become invisible when she doesn’t sexually appeal to any given man;
provide sex to any man she gives a boner;
be faithful to the man who owns her;
bring in an income without losing any time she should be attending to the man;
raise the children (ditto);
hand over the children when the man chooses to leave;
make sure the children know their father is their parent and she is just their incubator and servant; and
do all this telepathically, so that the man doesn’t need to waste breath talking to her,

then she is failing him and creating toxic masculinity, in which it is impossible for a man to thrive as he would if women behaved correctly.

LBT – ah, apologies, I hadn’t read all the earlier comments.

New definition of waste of time: pairing youtube comments with benefit of the doubt. 🙁

RE: auggziliary

When in doubt, use what the person said they were. If Titica says she’s a trans woman, no asterisk, then no asterisk is necessary.

RE: Kittehs

Yeah, I have yet to see a Youtube comment where someone misgenders someone and takes it with good grace.

The article is a mere teaser for his 500 page study:

An Introduction to
The Tyranny of Ambiguity
being an account of the development of the system of behaviour analysis called
Procedural Analysis

The Tyranny of Ambiguity is a true narrative account of an in-depth study of Amsterdam society by an independent scientist. It is an at times amusing, at times searching adventure of discovery into human sexuality.

And, yes, when he says “in-depth study” he means a bitter middle-age man ruminating on his mostly failed attempts to pick up women in public. And, yes, his scientific breakthrough is actually an endless rant about females, including how they make males “neurotic” by giving “sex signals” and then withholding sex.

Signals include almost any physical movement, activity or tic, so avoiding eye contact and deliberately making eye contact are both signals. Also if a woman “jostles” into a man on a crowded train or “accidentally” drops something on the ground, she is signaling her attraction to a specific male observer. Science!

His “study” includes an epic hissy fit over F25D3 (remember she’s a “test study”):

MALE PRIORITY. Of course, another immediately obvious explanation for F25D3’s flitting off while I was still in mid-sentence exists. It is that my conversation was unbearably boring and F25D3 had withdrawn to escape the tedium, or there may have been some other defect in my presentation. By way of response I state explicitly here that:

[…]Compared to the utter trivia which seems to circulate in the minds of all but a tiny proportion of females, almost anything was an improvement. […]

[…]As a male I was a wealth creator rather than (as the female) a net consumer, and reasoned that as such my desires should have priority over those of females.[…]

The relatively safe and comfortable society from which females were now unreservedly taking benefit had been created by my male forebears, people like me, and their success demonstrated that my desires had more validity. The females were taking advantage of male efforts as blithely and unthinkingly as someone who believes that the blowing of a whistle is the power which sets a train in motion.

Whether by the medical research I had done, the organization I ran or by this study I was contributing in at least a small way to the advancement of humankind. Not only did this reinforce my conviction that my male desires should be honoured, in preference to those of females, but in addition I resented the pressure I was clearly under to indulge in dishonesty and trickery in order to fulfil my desires, especially since such dishonesty of thought, for example by selective perception and distortion of truth, was directly antagonistic to such advancement.

TL/DR: see MAMMOTHS, SLAIN BY MEN

And if his misogynist rage didn’t turn women off, his disgust over white women coupling with “non-occidental aliens” (especially “Negros”) and his rancid, bottomless hatred for Jews should repel all of humanity. I hope some Dutch women innocently suggested he check out the Anne Frank Museum while in Amsterdam, because that conversation would be very awkward at best.

Science fact!

I have a penis so I want ta doo it wit lots of females.

Lots of females want ta do it wit me cuz day have bajinas!

See ? I told ya!

I wonder what the Dutch for “Fuck off, creepy dude” is? Sounds like there’d be a market for tee shirts with that printed on them in Amsterdam.

Thus females tend to minimize large differences between the races

You mean women pay attention to details ?

Wow they are doomed. So are you because yo mama was a woman.

I would like a cookie. Also, I would like for creepy, racist men to stop making elaborate tables claiming my behavior while riding the bus demonstrates that I secretly want them to sex me.

Adorable cookies for cloudiah.

MALE PRIORITY. Of course, another immediately obvious explanation for F25D3′s flitting off while I was still in mid-sentence exists. It is that my conversation was unbearably boring and F25D3 had withdrawn to escape the tedium, or there may have been some other defect in my presentation.

No, dude, stop right there. You are one boring motherfucker.

Of course, if you’re going to go the “some other defect” route, may I suggest that you are one BIGOTED boring motherfucker?

I would guess that, other than the fact that his raging misogyny shows through no matter what he’s saying, there’s a distinct possibility that the “defect” in his presentation may be his face (or lack of good grooming, or other appearance related issue). Giving a perfect speech isn’t going to make a woman want to have sex with you if she finds you physically unappealing.

Which is of course misandry.

That whole way of framing things boils down to the idea that one sex can’t have what they want, so he’s decided that it should be women.

Hippo cookies? O_o