The narcissistic racist pickup artist guru who goes by the ridiculous nickname Heartiste is a bit of an excitable fellow.
What’s got his man-panties in a bunch at the moment is an article on Slate noting that a small number of family therapists have begun to suggest that an affair might not mean the end of a marriage — and that in some cases a mature discussion of the raw feelings exposed by the discovery of an affair might possibly lead instead to a — gasp! — stronger marriage.
This isn’t exactly a revolutionary insight, and the therapists aren’t exactly urging married couples to all sign up to attend the next Polyamory Meetup in their town. But Heartiste is outraged. Though the word “feminism” isn’t uttered a single time in the Slate article, he has decided that it is proof of “The Feminist Push To Sanction Female Infidelity.” As he explains, in his typically overheated prose:
What feminists are attempting to do here is nothing short of legitimize the biologically innate female imperative to fuck alpha males during ovulation and extract resources from beta males during infertile periods of the monthly cycle.
You might think this is just some weird misogynistic crap he’s cooked up, but he DID say “biologically innate female imperative,” so it must be SCIENCE.
CH predicted it: Feminists and various “health professionals” would agitate to normalize the “alpha fux, beta bux” female mating strategy. As society becomes ever more feminized and emasculated, expect to see more of these rancid ideas percolate in mainstream discussion, as the pro-female directive and anti-male directive reach their demonic apotheoses.
Yes, he did indeed just say “their demonic apotheoses.” Heartiste is a bit of a drama king.
You might say, “Well, this means men can be unfaithful without consequence, too!” Oh, ye of precious naivete. Men won’t be let off the hook. The divorce industrial and family court complexes are rigged against the interests of men, and getting more rigged by the day. An army of leftoids fed on the swill of legalese will barely break a sweat holding the contradictory beliefs that women cheat for good reasons and men cheat because they’re oppressive patriarchs.
Eventually, with the help of dazzling sophistry, the law will be twisted to such a warped geometry that the people will come to accept injustice as fairness and lies as truth.
I think what he just said is that women will be allowed to get away with cheating, but men won’t.
Heartiste then goes on to suggest, naturally, that while female infidelity is inherently EEEEEEVIIL , male infidelity is no big deal, because reasons.
And then he just completely buries his head up his reactionary ass:
Feminism is the sick, wheezing spawn of its parent ideology, equalism, the belief in a magical flying spaghetti monster that imbues all humans with equal ability and equal worth, interchangeable flesh cogs that can as easily master astrophysics as lawn care given the right dose of self-esteem boosting pablum.
Oh, he’s not done yet:
Whatever the self-professed noble intentions of their advocates, these ideologies are as wicked and destructive as any genocidal revolutions that have come before them.
Yep, a couple of therapists saying “hey, maybe couples can work through affairs and come out better for it” is the equivalant of Auschwitz.
This is why CH, a citadel firm, guarded by sentries of ancient woods, illuminating a path to enlightenment, will never cease in its mission to utterly crush evil, sick ideologies like feminism so totally that there is no space for even the ashes of its immolation to gather in a stiff wind.
I think he must be drunk. “Sentries of ancient woods?” Are elves guarding his condo?
He ends with this final fantasy:
Feminism’s proponents will suffer endless ridicule should they choose to fight, or they will retreat from the public square to lick their wounds in the comfort of their silent seething thoughts. And, if the spoils of victory are rich indeed, some will self-deliver to release the pain.
Why do so many right-wingers write like this? Do they actually think this pompous nonsense makes them sound smart? I guess they must.
Well, back to my silent seething thoughts. And perhaps a light snack.
nitram,
” I did this one time when I was on fertility drugs and the hormones fucked me up emotionally”
I hope it gets better, but were you donating eggs? I’ve been thinking about that and have heard some people have become depressed when you mix birth control pill and fertility drugs to increase ovulation.
kittehs – OWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. O_O
alice,
” Sentencing someone to read the Bible, or to attend church for the next ten years? ”
Agreed. Perhaps if it were a Jew or a Muslim they’d require them to read the Quran or Torah? But I agree there’s something very wrong with that, also how would they even know the person had read the Bible/holy book? You could just lie. How would you feel if it was a response to a hate crime, ie someone picks on a Jew and physically assaults them because of their religion, could requirement to read their respective holy book be advocating tolerance or would it be shoving tolerance down their throat?
Moma Sita – I’m an atheist, so to me, it’s even MORE offensive. UGH.
Alice –
It wasn’t me, miss! It was Bina said that about stapling and folding! ::lip trembles::
kittehs – STILL! OWWWWWWWWWWW.
The folding and the cutting and the stapling and the hole punching and the fitting and …
… I’m just going to claim a couple of these spare eyes to replace the ones I just burned out looking at Anniversary Room and Austrian Suite.
Let me know if I get a mismatched set, ’cause I can’t see very well.
It isn’t just offensive, it’s offensively stupid – the assumption seems to be that someone being forced to read the Bible (or anything else) is going to understand it, remember it and believe it. If the judge thinks someone’s going to be converted that way, zie’s kidding zirself.
Though I suppose it’s possible the judge hated having to read the thing as a kid and thought slapping the prisoner with Extreme Boredom would be appropriate …
Don’t remind me of that Austrian Suite, Falconer! I was trying to forget it!
Do the Leafs let you drive the Zamboni?
And YES to all the ACA talk. The Righties in the US have been screaming at the commies in their closets for so long I’m beginning to think they don’t actually know what communism is any more.
Specifically, as I understand it, Newt Gingrich’s plan (at least in the broad strokes), which he spun as a counter-proposal to Hillary Clinton’s health care reforms.
And yeah, maybe we weren’t going to get Single Payer, but couldn’t we have started from there in the bargaining? Nope, off the table. Out of the question.
I’m going to stop now or else I’ll ruin my day.
A close reading of the Book of Job? That could make you wish Lovecraft was right. While the Great Old Ones might blast your sanity and devour your soul, at least they won’t expect you to be grateful for the experience. A universe actually and factually ruled by the YHWH of the Tanakh is a terrifying place in which to live.
He’s also living 2,000 years give or take before Boudreaux’s Butt Paste.
lady mondegreen,
Much longer than 50 years.
Quakers,
I took the comments to be in a joking style, not serious.
Huh, I thought the judge was handing out punishment that was at least respectful of their respective religions. Is there evidence the judge was handing down this sentence because it was an attempt to convert them? Was it being given to people who weren’t Christian? Was this punishment even maintained or was it fought against in the higher courts?
alice,
I understand. I’m (liberal) religious but wholly support secularism and non-persecution of the non-religious. I was just wondering if the judge was making a non-Christians (whether Jews or atheists) read the Bible, so we don’t misinterpret it as a judge forcing non-Christians to read the Bible. I wholly disagree with a judge forcing someone to read the Bible-it sounds incredibly boneheaded. I’m sure the one who is being punished finds it too mundane to take to the higher courts, especially if they’re missing out on a worse punishment so this kind of thing perhaps is not challenged.
Moma Sita — doesn’t matter if it their religion because seperation of church and state.
I guess “guarded by sentries of ancient woods” refers to his garden gnomes, then.
It doesn’t work like that. The idea is, “If you’re a good Christian (of proper variety), we’ll let you away with hardly any punisment. The more you like going to church, the less you need punisment, so it works out perfectly. If this deal isn’t applicaple, we’ll just dole out a normal, formal punisment”
This is probably a small town and the judge knows the perp and their pastor and trusts them, as they are Proper Christians. Anyway, the pastor has a vested interest in enforcing this “punishment” while not being officially associated with the judicial system.
It would be deemed very much against First Amendment to force Christian religious haters to contemplate the humanity of their victims.
I just sat down and read the headline again and now all I can think is
YOU NEED MORE VESPENE GAS
Ugh, in order to read some of the stories in which a judge ordered a person to read the Bible as part or as punishment I found some really gross and disturbing imagery showing torture of people in Muslim majority lands (ie hand chopping, ect).
Of the one I found on businessinsider it said it was part of her punishment for drunk driving. What I found problematic about it was that the judge had some knowledge of her child abuse when someone set her on fire after pouring gasoline on her and told her to read Job. I think that was callous and heartless of this judge to try and make her feel like she was Job having bad things happen to her all for some sort of ‘good purpose,’ at the end. I don’t know, I’m not articulating it accurately but it just struck me as wrong.
“YOU NEED MORE VESPENE GAS”
Women are Zerg, Men are Protoss?
Umm, has this post been covered on here because HOLY SHIT!
http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/criminalizing-the-male-gaze-giving-female-narcissists-the-upper-hand/
The fucking nerve of this guy.
Oh wait, it was by judgeybitch
And she addresses this to the harassed, not the harasser.
The irony, it burns.
Don’t forget, auggz, AVfM gets to define satire, just like they get to define All The Words.
Judgybitch, what a total loser. ::smh::
Judgy Bitch lives up to her name, I see.
And if I fight off a rapist, will I be denying sex to a poor deserving socially awkward loser? Jeebus.