Categories
a woman is always to blame advocacy of violence antifeminism evil single moms evil women hypergamy mansplaining men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny PUA reactionary bullshit red pill violence vox day

Vox Day: The Taliban’s shooting of Malala Yousafzai may have been “perfectly rational and scientifically justifiable.”

Malala Yousafzai, survivor
Malala Yousafzai, survivor

Vox Day, the reactionary fantasy author and pickup guru who was recently expelled from the Science Fiction & Fantasy Writers of America , has convinced himself that education for women leads to “demographic implosion” because uppity educated women don’t have enough babies.

Indeed, Vox — real name, Theodore Beale — is convinced that education for women is such a bad thing that he actually thinks that “the Taliban may not, in fact, be the stupid ones with regards to this particular matter.”

By this he means not only that they’re right to keep girls out of schools, but that they’re also probably justified in shooting teenage girls for the terrible crime of speaking up publicly in favor of education for girls like themselves.

No, really:

[I]n light of the strong correlation between female education and demographic decline, a purely empirical perspective on Malala Yousafzai, the poster girl for global female education, may indicate that the Taliban’s attempt to silence her was perfectly rational and scientifically justifiable.

It’s quite telling that it is the “shooting-girls-in-the-head” issue that turns Beale — a right-wing evangelical Christian — into something of a fan of the Taliban.

299 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
cloudiah
11 years ago

NO TRUE STRAW MAN!!!

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Don’t like, mostly. I’ll eat some shellfish if the sauce is ginger based, and I don’t mind crab but think it’s too much effort.

You have a point about the bug thing though. The first time I saw a crawfish I thought it was some kind of giant mutated roach.

jinxmchue
11 years ago

“And now the NO TRUE RACIST argument arrives.”

You’re obviously a racist. Any denials of that conclusion will clearly be nothing more than “the NO TRUE RACIST argument.”

I’m a black man, though I look white. Any denials of that conclusion will cause you to be guilty of “the NO TRUE BLACK MAN argument.”

Incidentally, regarding the “No True Scotsman” fallacy… you’re doing it wrong.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Aw, look, it attempted a burn. Bless it’s little heart.

jinxmchue
11 years ago

Cue the “NO TRUE FALLACY argument.”

jinxmchue
11 years ago

The puerility you all display is profound, but nonetheless pretty disappointing. I expected better, particularly given your initial responses.

inurashii
inurashii
11 years ago

“Yo if we’re all a bunch of lying joke hypocrites and we don’t understand anything, why are you even here?”

It amuses me to watch ignorant, hateful buffoons dig themselves into very deep holes that they can’t escape.

Eyyy we got something in common. I’m glad we’re all amused, then.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Why won’t people argue with me? It’s what I live for!

(Meltdown officially commenced quite a while back. Although to be fair, this one was already a bit melted upon arrival.)

Enkidum
Enkidum
11 years ago

Well, just to keep it puerile, what you’re saying is fucking stupid. You (and whatever silly cult you belong to) don’t get to be the arbiter of what counts as Christian or not.

For the record, there have been a couple of other responses to you that aren’t just making fun of you. Freemage made the definitive one, which I notice you’ve ignored completely:

“jinxmchue: Trinitarians are all Nicene Creed Christians. But the creed didn’t come about until hundreds of years AFTER the events alleged in the Gospels. (Find me a description of the Holy Ghost in the Gospels, by the by. Hell, find me a direct reference to the Trinity as such.) Anyone who interprets the Gospels in a different fashion, which many of the fragmented cults at the time did, is still a Christian; they’re just not a Nicenean Christian.”

opheliamonarch
11 years ago

I’m so loving this lurk. 🙂

I bought popcorn and:

http://youtu.be/RP4abiHdQpc

It’s a metaphor! The baby is me, the No True Troll is the paper. 🙂

katz
11 years ago

(Confidential to katz: Should we start the countdown?)

Doesn’t have to be a countdown. It can be a wager.

$500 and a penguin in Spanx on half an hour.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I’m still not sure why zie expects us to care about whatever little inter-group squabbles various Christian denominations are having.

sparky
sparky
11 years ago

Aww, ze thinks referring to a person of color as a “half-savage” and not fully human and not civilized and blaming people of color for the decline Detroit, science fiction [aside: science fiction is declining? News to me, genre seems quite healthy], culture and society isn’t racist.

Trolls say the darndest things.

inurashii
inurashii
11 years ago

Also, the age-old classic: “Calling a racist a racist is racist” and “Being a minority means that I can say who is not racist”

katz
11 years ago

People, I give you the NO TRUE CHRISTIAN argument. I’ve rarely seen it unfold in real time. I feel like I’m making a nature documentary, and should be speaking in very hushed tones.

Oh, I’ve seen it all the damn time.

Back when I was at a Reformed church in the days of yore, they were planning a missions trip to the Philippines, and I was like “Dude, the Philippines are way more Christianized than the US” (~92% to ~75%, according to the CIA world factbook) and they were like “Well they say they’re Christians but really they’re just practicing their ancient Pagan religions under the guise of Christianity” and I was like “Yeah, that’s pretty racist.”

(I don’t go there anymore.)

cloudiah
11 years ago

NO TRUE PUERILITY! + NO TRUE PAGANISM! (Now 50% off if purchased together.)

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

NO TRUE CRUSTACEANS! At least not in my lunch, please.

cloudiah
11 years ago

NO TRUE MANGRY MELTDOWN!!!

inurashii
inurashii
11 years ago

“No, I’m not angry, I’m snide, you hypocritical puerile no true joke racist. This vein popping out of my forehead is a snide vein.”

katz
11 years ago

You have to be drowning in hubris to make that sort of argument; you have to actually believe that you and your sect are in charge of deciding who does or doesn’t belong in a group of more than a billion people. It has to never occur to you that other groups might have their own opinions and might well consider you to not be a real Christian, nor to wonder who wins if two groups each say that the other is heretical, nor even to question whether the other group would even care if you think they count or not.

And then there’s that word “cult.” There are legit uses for this word based on rigorous definitions, but when you start throwing it around like “This group denies the divinity of Christ! They’re a cult!”, then you’re just using it as a way to immediately delegitimize them so you can shun and ignore them.

Z
Z
11 years ago

Jinxmchue? That Jinxmchue?

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Conservapedia:Jinxmchue

Note the “GLENN BECK CRY-BABY AWARD FOR PUERILITY”. 🙂

vaiyt
11 years ago

“Aww, ze thinks referring to a person of color as a “half-savage” and not fully human and not civilized and blaming people of color for the decline Detroit, science fiction [aside: science fiction is declining? News to me, genre seems quite healthy], culture and society isn’t racist.”

Don’tcha know, black people are the true racists.

Howard Bannister
11 years ago

Hold on, back up.

The claim was that Vox Day isn’t an Evangelical.

He is a self-described Evangelical.

Ah, but trolly mctrollerson points out, that doesn’t agree with several large groups of evangelicals self-description of a True Evangelical.

Well, no shit, sherlock. I’ll happily stipulate that he doesn’t belong to your One Twue Church. And, furthermore, has serious problems with their doctrine.

But he still belongs to a movement. That movement is, in a broad sense, describable.

You can quibble about whether he’s a true christian all day long, and I don’t fucking care.

But he belongs to a movement, a tradition, and that’s completely undeniable.

And he’s a racist. That’s also undeniable. He espouses racist beliefs. While saying he’s not racist, but that’s standard.

These are NOT COMPLICATED THOUGHTS.

Learn to nuance, mmmmkay?

emilygoddess
emilygoddess
11 years ago

@Freemage it turns out the Holy Spirit is mentioned in the Bible. Per Wikipedia:

Two examples appear in the New Testament: 2 Corinthians 13:14 and Matthew 28:19. The context of 2 Corinthians 13:14 (verse 13 in the Vulgate), which is the close of a letter, suggests the church’s conjunction of the Father, Son and Holy Spirit may have originated as a doxological formula; while the context of Matthew 28:19, the Great Commission, shows that the verbal conjunction of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit was used early on as a baptismal formula.

I followed the links and didn’t find any direct claim that these beings are all the same being, though.

But yeah, non-trinitarianism isn’t exactly new. Like most of the doctrines codified by early church councils, the Trinity was only made an issue in the first place because there were people who didn’t accept it. And if you’re one of the many Christians who don’t recognize the infallible authority of a bunch of 4th-century dudes who appointed themselves the arbiters of Christianity, you aren’t bound by Nicene doctrine.

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

Since he’s not a white supremacist both by his own admission and by undeniable facts about him, I wonder why you wish to continue to lie about it. Personally, I don’t care for him or his beliefs. I don’t read his blog, his articles, or his books. I just don’t like it when people like you lie in order to try to smear individuals and, by proxy, larger groups.

Jinxy: you’re clearly a no-talent assclown. If you don’t care for him, don’t read his shit, and admit you know nothing, why in the fuck are you here?