So I’ve been reading a bit more in the Evo Psych literature — some of the alleged classics in the field that most Manospherians seem to have either read or absorbed by osmosis. I’m learning a lot about the dubious “science” underlying many of the Manosphere’s most cherished beliefs.
But I’m a little worried for my own intellectual safety, because I see so much clear evidence around me that reading too much Evo Psych can turn one’s brain to mush.
Consider the example of rmaxgenactivepua, the Evo-Psych-addled gentleman who writes the blog “Rejecting Modern Women: Pickup & Advanced NLP & Charisma Behaviourial Conversational Strategic Technologies.” Specifically, consider the recent post of his that asks the grammatically confusing question: “Is It Possible For Women To Be A Healthy Promiscous [sic] Woman?”
I’m just going to quote the whole damn thing because, yikes:
To definitively answer that question, is a woman biologically designed or hardwired to be promiscous
Are there any biological co-factors which support a womans ability to be promiscous?
A womans vagina is a massive breeding grounding for std’s, making it highly unsuitable & dangerous for sleeping with multiple men
Women have a highly short period of fertility. only 10 years of fertility, less if theyre in bad shape
Women have a limited amount of eggs
Plus women dont have the emotional blocking abilities of men
The real kicker is, women are only capable of having one mans child at a time
If women were meant to be polygamous, they’d be able to carry multiple children of multiple men
Making it ludicrous to assume women are polygamous, it’s laughably ridiculous to assume women are polygamous when theyre own biology isnt even capable of reproducing polygamously
Men on the other hand are designed from the ground up to impregnate millions of women, they reproduce over millions of sperm a day, & can impregnate 100′s of women
In fact one man, men are so efficient at reproducing with hundreds of women, one man could repopulate an entire civilisation if he wanted to, thanks to his production of millions of sperm
One woman on the other hand, couldnt populate her own ass, let alone a shoe box or a cat litter tray …
Proving a woman isnt anywhere near designed to be a slut, FACT
Well, yeah, I guess if you make up a rule that states women can’t have sex for pleasure with multiple partners unless they’re biologically capable of giving birth simultaneously to children sired by all these different partners, then women aren’t designed to be “sluts.”
Then again if you can simply make up your own rules like this, you can prove pretty much anything. If I decide that men can’t be polygamous unless they are simultaneously holding their breath underwater and on fire, I guess I’ve proved that men can’t be sluts either.
FACT!
Oh, and while it’s true that a cis man with healthy sperm could (in theory) repopulate an entire civilization, there are some women who are giving men a run for their money in this department.
Oh, and in Bremen, there are statues of them outside five veterinary practices; they were gifts. 🙂
D’awww! I want a book of Grimm stories!
I don’t think it can possibly get more moronic than that. I’m speechless. How does he manage to tie his shoes every morning. Wow. There’s just too much stupid in such a short quote to even know where to start. Let’s just hope he doesn’t contribute to the gene pool in any way. Wow.
Some of ’em are very Grim(m) I warn you! And they were the cleaned-up versions of the old tales.
Well, there’s one or two for their own unchecked privilege list . .
I got all the feels from that picture, kittehs; the Musicians of Bremen was one of my favorite stories as a wee little kid 😀
🙂
Here’s another cat vid, ‘cos I’ve been watching Sho Ko’s channel:
The Muppets did a very god adaptation of The Musicians of Bremen. I think it’s on YouTube.
Grimm’s Fairy Tales is in the public domain and on Porject Gutenberg. At least one of the copies has pictures, though not as nice as the one Kitteh linked.
http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search/?query=grimm%27s+fairy+Tales
Two random things —
1) “Get bored, wander off, get a cup of coffee with cinnamon vodka.” = WANT!!
2) …does her rectum look phallic to anyone else?
Whose rectum, Argenti? You’re playing Drop! That! Context! again. 😛
Oh my goodness, it does…
Kitteh — the image at the top of the page, I thought the context was kinda obvious this time, whoops!
Baileyrenee — oh good, it isn’t just me!
LOL not after we’d moved on to Grimm’s Fairy Tales and just had a link about them (sans pics)!
But yes, her rectum does look weirdly phallic thankyouforpointingthatout.
By discouraging women from sleeping around, MRAs are ensuring that they’ll not get laid even more often than they already don’t.
And yes, I also thought the ass in the illustration was, uh, “populated”..,
I’m currently taking a German Fairy Tales class, so I’ve had enough Grimms for at least a few months, thanks 😛
What’s an interesting coincidence is that my prof for that class focuses on evo psych in his research (the proper academic kind, although he still stretches his evidence a bit, IMO). He’s at least 50x more intelligent than Max “DanActive” Pua, though.
A woman having sex with multiple partners and getting pregnant from one of them means there are several men who have a decent chance of being the baby’s father, therefore each possible father has a fairly strong incentive to stick around and protect/nurture his possible offspring. I think that may have been the plot of “Three Men and a Baby”.
Also, why would anyone want to populate their own ass?
Redcap – Your prof in German fairy tales goes in for evo psych?
Augggghwarglenooooo
Nah, they knew who the father was (Ted Danson), they just all fell in love with the baby and realised they shouldn’t give her to drug dealers.
Be careful about that. Last Christmas I drank so much cinnamon vodka that I was literally falling-down drunk, something I hadn’t been since I was like 17 and drank hard liquor for the first time. It was just so tasty and went down so smooth but was still so strong, I totally lost track of how much I was drinking and then by the time I realized it I was so drunk more seemed like a good idea.
I’m serious, my husband literally had to carry me out of the party we were at which is embarrassing at any age but especially once you hit 30. 😉 I’m young enough I could get away with it with minimal ridicule but man, I will never touch cinnamon-flavored vodka again. This is my cautionary tale.
Of course if you’re not a dumbass like I was and actually pay attention to how much you’re pouring into your drink, you’ll probably be fine. 😉 I learned that I apparently rely way too much on taste to judge the strength of my drinks.
Buttercup Q. Skullpants, (cool nym!),
I had the same thought too, when it came through in my e-mail this morning, but props for describing this in such a way which directly relates to the OP! So much wrong there, so little time…
I feel you on the cinnamon vodka, AK. I can’t drink that stuff anymore, either, not after last summer’s brush with alcohol poisoning… Note: Back-to-back grad parties are a poor decision! Especially if there’s yet another one to go to the following evening…
Wait, that’s supposed to be an anatomical cross-section of a woman? I thought is was some kind of football play or something, what with all the random arrows going random places.
My weakness is rainbow sherbet flavored vodka. Mix equal parts that, orange juice, lemonade and cranberry juice (I found cranberry juice with raspberry, which makes it even better. It tastes just like a bowl of rainbow sherbet, way, way too smooth and yummy.
I died sparky, I died XD
But back on to the 10 years of fertility…nope, my mother gave birth in her 40s. Is it just me or do these guys have an unusual fascination with teen age girls?