I’ve learned a lot about myself in the process of writing this blog. For example, this week, I learned that I’m a “vile, subhuman thing” who “like licking sh*t of feminist’s shoes” and “just wants every man cuckolded.” Also, I have some interesting and specific tastes in porn that even I was unaware of.
I learned all of these things from the always reliable purveyors of accurate and unbiased information in the Men’s Rights subreddit, in a thread ostensibly devoted to my coverage of the recent events in Toronto, but which ended up being more devoted to my various alleged failings and my alleged preferences in the porn realm.
Let’s take a look!
Here’s a man who is evidently also a pig suggesting that I am a man who is also a slug:
But ThePigmanAgain was too late! For I was able to steal EIGHTEEN WHOLE TRAFFICS from the Men’s Rights subreddit that day before the moderators removed this thread from the subreddit, lest any more unwary Men’s Rightsers wander into my evil internet lair where they might find writing critical of the men’s rights movement and its farcical attempts at activism.
Evidently Alisdair isn’t one of those who actually clicked on the link to my post in the thread, because he apparently believes that my post was a do-it-yourself guide to cuckolding other men, or perhaps a guide to getting cuckolded. I’m not sure..
And then there’s JayBopara, a MHRA warrior who seems a bit obsessed with what he for some reason believes are my preferences, porn-wise:
![JayBopara [S] -2 points 4 days ago (5|7) This guy David Futrelle like licking sh*t of feminist's shoes, so this sort of article was predictable. My understanding is he also likes mangina porn. This guy Futrelle is the pits, and the sad thing is, there are so many pathetic manginas exactly like him out there. With so many manginas, I doubt the MHRM will gain too much traction. But here's hoping. permalink source save give gold hide child comments [–]Dronelisk 2 points 3 days ago (6|4) ok fine no need to insult the author lest we fall into the same category as feminists and their ad hominem logical fallacies. wait did I just do that too? permalink source save parent give gold [–]JayBopara [S] 2 points 3 days ago (4|2) The reason I said those remarks was somewhere I read, and some places he posted he indicated a liking for mangina porn. Therefore I don't believe I've made an ad hominem attack. It appears from my research there is a link with people who are political manginas and those who like mangina pornography.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/maginaporn1.png?resize=539%2C368&ssl=1)
These comments of his raise a few questions for me.
1) Where exactly is he allegedly reading about my alleged preferences in porn? The MakeStuffUpAboutDavidFutrelleWiki?
2) What on earth is “mangina porn,” anyway?
Asked this very question in the thread itself, Jay has this answer:
![JayBopara [S] 2 points 3 days ago (2|0) Mangina porn = femdom porn. Sorry if you guys didn't understand that. Porn which often is not about sex, as it is about women debasing, humiliating and violently abusing men. Apparently manginas get off on this porn. Mangina porn has nothing to do with transexuals or anything like that. Man·gi·na -noun- 1. A women-firster. 2. A pussy-worshipper. 3. A male who behaves or acts toward men in an overly aggressive way once feminist Maxims are questioned.](https://i0.wp.com/www.wehuntedthemammoth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/manginaporn2.png?resize=539%2C163&ssl=1)
Ah.
Dude, hate to break it to you, but I’m pretty sure that you’re the only person in the universe who calls that “mangina porn.”
Also, despite the similarities in the first three letters of the words, and the involvement of women in each, there is no real connection between “feminism” and “femdom.” One is a social and political movement; the other is a kink.
Anyway, this is how the HUMAN RIGHTS MOVEMENT FOR MEN AND BOYS OF THE 21ST CENTURY deals with its critics.
Well, its male critics anyway. It treats its female critics much, much worse.
See, I knew there was a reason I liked the crowd here so much.
Me five… was tempted to say, but I thought I’d get funny looks. :3
Me six or seven or nine or thirteen or whatever.
Yep, me too. It just makes so much more sense!
Manboobz: come for the mockery, stay for the perverts. 🙂
Me five.
Me six. Or seven. Whatever we’re up to by now.
Truly, you are my people.
Behold, Mangina Kaiju Porn! http://kbspangler.files.wordpress.com/2013/10/manginakaijutumblr.jpg
(It was drawn on a whim by the artist/writer of A Girl and Her Fed, following a Twitter conversation by John Scalzi and Seanan McGuire.)
It’s just occurred to me that this might’ve been posted in one of the previous threads already, if someone else saw it, but I didn’t see it here, and it seems appropriate.
We are the infinite perverts of manboobz. Flee, or prepare the brain bleach.
I actually had to read “woman firster” several times to notice the R. I find it hilarious that we all made the same mistake.
I saw it as woman firster the first time.
But now I wish I hadn’t.
Definitely read that as woman-fister, too. Clearly our link to the Feminist Hive Mind is working well today, sisters (and, iunno, man-sisters?)
I saw “firster” the first time too. What the hell is a firster?
“It appears from my research there is a link with people who are political manginas and those who like mangina porn.” I would love to be a fly on the wall when the IRB discussed that particular research proposal. Because, yeah, dude totally did the original research and didn’t just pull it out of his ass.
Come on now, the word is shown to you above, quite clearly! We are manlings! You have sisters and manlings, we have brothers and mistresses, for we are woman-fisters and put you first in all things as it should be – as it must be!
*triumphantly subservient pose*
*awards Athywren a cookie*
I have to point out that if you’re in a subservient pose you probably shouldn’t be the one doing the fisting.
I read it as woman fisting too.
But can you eat a cookie in a subservient pose?
And count me number eleventy-whatever for reading “women-fisters.” I just assumed I hadn’t had enough caffeine today.
Freemage, it was, I definitely was thinking of that!
Is it possible that so many of us read “fister” says something about our (collective) taste in porn?
I for one actually do not like fisting porn at all. Just not to my taste, personally. But then, I am getting less and less enamored with porn in general as time goes by (though admittedly this is largely related to my increasing inability to deal with the process of sifting through porn titles).
In my case it says more about what I’d have assumed MRAs might like, and was therefore surprised that they apparently didn’t.
Mangina porn = femdom porn
You mean like the porn The Amazing Atheist watches?
I, too, read “fister.” Anyway this is maybe TMI, but here I go…
This shaming of men who are into fem-dom is pretty disgusting. I enjoy some fem-dom myself, and the man I have been starting to practice it with would have never, ever, EVER told me he was into it if I hadn’t brought it up first (and no, lurkers, I didn’t ask him to do it or pressure him into it, I just mentioned it one night and his eyes lit up and he told me how hot it was). So many men with this kink are already ashamed of it, the last people they need shaming them further is are the so-called men’s rights advocates/activists.
Not that I’m fucking surprised or anything. Ugh, what jackasses.