Categories
a woman is always to blame bad boys beta males cupcake evil sexy ladies evil women hamstering men who should not ever be with women ever MGTOW misogyny nice guys oppressed men playing the victim pussy pass

Hamish the MGTOW: “Underneath those physically appealing pretty girls does indeed lurk an evil monster.”

So beautiful, so evil.
So beautiful, so evil.

Today, some farm fresh misogyny, straight from the virtual pages of MGTOWforums.com, in the form of a sprawling rant on the blackhearted nature of the female of the species by a fellow known only as Hamish. I have taken the liberty of condensing the rant somewhat, and of breaking up Hamish’s walls of text into shorter paragraphs. The original director’s cut of his comment can be found here.

[T]he prettier a woman is on the outside, the blacker her heart is on the inside. Underneath that pretty exterior does indeed lurk a monster. That women are driven by their highly fickle “feelings” rather than by logic is the scariest and most dangerous part about them.

[W]omen are so fickle that they vacillate between wanting Nick the nice guy who will be nice and romantic to them one day and wanting Tommy the thug who will treat her like absolute crap the next day. Indeed sometimes they want both these things at the same time …

What cupcake wants is a composite male, the ingredients of which are a blend of The Rock, Matt Damon, Donald Trump, Justin Timberlake, Hugh Jackman, Mike Tyson, David Bowie, Tony Montana, Ronaldo and Michael Buble …

With women being so irrational, so utterly unreasonable and unrealistic in their demands, it is absolutely inevitable that … there will come a point where she will feel dissatisfied with her date/her fuck buddy/her boyfriend/her fiance/her husband, whatever. And remember what a women feels is her hamster, logic doesn’t get a look in.

For men morality is largely a logical, learned thing – ten commandments, thou shalt not steal/kill, whatever. But for a woman what she feels is the be all and end all … And if that means fucking over and grinding into the dust good, decent men … purely on account that she no longer feels entirely satisfied with him, then so be it – how she feels must prevail above all other factors. …

[A]nd what’s more many women seem to be thoroughly enjoy crushing such men too – the more decent and genuine a guy is, the more pleasure they take in crushing him.

The reason for this is women … see niceness and decency as a sign of weakness and they begin to look down on that male with utter contempt. ….

This explains why it’s always the nicest guys that women fuck over the worst – and why they take great pleasure in doing so and in twisting the knife. To onlooking men this kind of stuff looks like a horrible, unjustifiable act of black hearted pitilessness – but to women, it’s nothing … .

This illogical thinking and intrinsic fickleness on the part of women winds up in women becoming capricious, merciless tyrants. But of course to be tyrants women have to have power – sure they always had the power of the pussy, but much more sinisterly women are now armed to the teeth and dangerous – armed by the law/the state that is …

Women have the state/big government backing them up to the hilt at every turn – to the extent that women now have the power at their fingertips to destroy or at least seriously mess up/disrupt the life of any man they’re sexually involved with – and … many women … can’t … resist abusing this power. And not only to mess up men’s lives and defame their character … but of course to loot men too – often of their entire net worth.

The madness of all this is that the state has placed all this power in the hands of beings who are intrinsically fickle and capricious by nature. So having been armed by the state, women are now not only fickle and capricious, worse than that they have now upgraded to fickle and capricious tyrants, who have a licence from the state to ruin men’s lives on a whim.

Having been so armed by the state, women are now akin to the capricious psychopath boss at work, who fires people just because he’s in a bad mood, or the capricious psychopath dictator, who has citizens locked up or killed on a whim.

In the case of the psycho boss or the dictator, they behave in this manner because (1) they have the power to do it (2) they can do it without any comeback to them and (3) they get off on it.

And this is exactly the dynamics involved when women fuck over men – women fuck over men because they have the power to do it (or more accurately the state has bestowed that power on them), they can do it without any comeback to them or negative consequences for them and they also do it because they just damned well get a sadistic kick from doing do.

So yes, underneath those physically appealing pretty girls (and indeed in many less physically appealing girls too) does indeed lurk an evil monster – one that is armed, dangerous, and utterly pitiless.

And … scene!

The truly weird thing about this rant is that, as some Man Boobz old timers may recall, the Hamish who wrote this rant is not the first MGTOW named Hamish I’ve written about on this blog. But the last one wasn’t actually real: he was a character who appeared, in cartoon form, in the dreams of a Man Boobz reader. As she wrote in an email to me,

after a day of reading a particularly large amount of your posts, I had a strange dream about this guy who sits on a train and describes some STDs he caught in great (and terrifying) detail to whoever is silly enough to listen. His goal is to dissuade other men from making the same mistake he did — having sex with women. Because to “Hamish the Lover” … all women are dirty and evil and should be avoided at all costs.

Now this mysterious dream lover Hamish has a namesake on MGTOWforums.com, writing long rants on how … all women are evil and should be avoided at all costs.

Kind of creepy, eh?

The dreamer also sent me a picture of Hamish the Lover as he had appeared in her dream. Here he is again.

He looks like a bit of a charming rogue. Too bad he’s an asshole.

305 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Greatest Good
11 years ago

Someone asked for the Greatest Good, so here I am.
Good, I read through those links you posted for a bit, and they were awful. I kept seeing things about how something is this way, so here’s a reason it must have evolved that way. Maybe you don’t realize this, but that’s pretty god-damn indicative that these articles are bullshit,and that the person writing them doesn’t know shit about evolution. That’s adaptationism, and there’s a reason that it doesn’t show up in any good scientific literature; because it’s so very wrong, and so very lazy. It’s basically what you say when you can’t be bothered actually testing your hypothesis, because you’re lazy, or you can’t actually test it. That shit fell out of favour in the 80’s and evolutionary science has become much better for it. Maybe the writers of these articles can catch up at some point. I could moan about it for a while, but I really can’t be bothered. Just know that you are wrong.
Also, wow, Hamish sounds like an arsehole, and I really hope his life is unfulfilling.

katz
11 years ago

So if we’re combining the best parts of different guys, I have one question: Do we get all their pets?

If so, I choose Hugh Jackman and Peaches, Wil Wheaton and Marlowe, Seamus and Riley, Neil Gaiman and Lola (RIP Cabal), Lewis Hamilton and Roscoe, aaaand I suddenly realize I don’t know which celebrities own cats.

palmedfire
11 years ago

I always laugh at the whole “women want men who…” sort of arguments, because this woman right here wants none of that.

Then again, I’m a lesbian, so I’m either one of those horrible man-haters (no, I like men perfectly fine, I just don’t want to have sex with them), or I’m just doing it to turn men on (…endless laughter).

And then there’s the fact that what *people* are attracted to in the “Oh that person is hot” sort of way doesn’t always mesh up with what we’re attracted to in the “I wish a long term relationship with this person”. Most of my personal “OMG so hot!” list is made up of athletic, Japanese actresses who play male roles on stage. M’lady, who I’ve been with for over 12 years now is none of those things, but that doesn’t mean I love her any less.

Then again, I’m pretty sure *love* is a foreign concept to most of these types.

kittehserf
11 years ago

There are pages of celebrities with their cats, but I hardly know who any of these guys are … Bowie, Lennon, Gervais, Steve Martin, sure, but most of the younger ones I’ve never heard of.

kittehserf
11 years ago

Then again, I’m pretty sure *love* is a foreign concept to most of these types.

QFT!!!!1eleventyf!!

kittehserf
11 years ago

Well, well, we have a sad little hater necroing a year-old thread elsewhere. I am shocked, shocked I say. 😀

sarahlizhousespouse
11 years ago

I’m guessing he’s a drive-by in addition to necroing. That’s rudeness in addition to bad form.

Alice Sanguinaria
Alice Sanguinaria
11 years ago

Why the necro you hater? If this were a forum, the thread would have been locked. 😛

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@kittehs

Well, well, we have a sad little hater necroing a year-old thread elsewhere. I am shocked, shocked I say. 😀

Just drive by? Or did they manage to stick around? 😛 Cuz if they are sticking, I could stand to poke some trolls.

kittehserf
11 years ago

Could be a drive-by; there are only the two comments (still in the sidebar).

walterwarta
11 years ago

What’s the comic strip?

cloudiah
11 years ago

Hi Greatest Good! We called for you, and you arrived. Are you a lurker, or are you a regular who’s shape-shifting? 🙂

Greatest Good
11 years ago

I am a lurker. I figured I may as well comment at some point. Although I can’t contribute much to a conversation except for swearing at people, and insulting people without swearing. And maybe cats. I might be able to do cats on occasion.

mildlymagnificent
11 years ago

OK. I did it. I read the Pseudochology Today piece that not-so-good linked.

This jumped out at me.

Research has established that, generally speaking, women must choose between between two types of men: dads and cads. On the one hand, dads are typically more commitment-oriented, warm, faithful, and reliable. Yet they are usually less handsome, charismatic, and dominant than his caddish counterparts. On the other hand, cads are sexier, with their narrow eyes and strong jaws — but they also tend to be flashy and exploitatative of others.

So a dedicated father who’s not only a committed husband but also handsome and sexy is so rare as to be irrelevant. Who knew? Hugh Jackman doesn’t exist, and nor do any of those other good looking, long married, loving fathers.

Say it after me, girls and boys. Phrenology is not science.

katz
11 years ago

Mildlymagnificent, I would chide you for reading that tripe, but I’m not in a position to judge given my recent reading habits.

pecunium
11 years ago

In some ways about the same, in others the onager style people think of are harder. 1: they have to be strong enough to withstand both the torsional strength of the ropes, and 1a the impact of the arm.

2: They have much flatter trajectory, which means they need to be longer to get good hang time.

3: They need a much larger crew, and more metal working (or the pawls and ratchets).

Falconer: We give him a light coat of oil (keeps the “glitter” on).

cloudiah
11 years ago

A welcome package for Greatest Good, who is most welcome to swear, not swear, and have fun with kitties to hir heart’s content.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@Greatest Good

Welcome 😀 And swearing is all fine and dandy.

coffeeyum
coffeeyum
11 years ago

mildlymagnificent – Good catch! I completely overlooked that.

kittehserf
11 years ago

Greatest Good, welcome!

Hmm. Does a Hapsburg chin count as a strong jaw? I tend to think of strong jaws looking like they were drawn with a T square, and urgh urgh urgh no thank you.

Also, narrow eyes? Meaning long or almond-shaped, or squinty?

katz
11 years ago

I’m assuming narrow eyes meant the old eyes close together thing?

coffeeyum
coffeeyum
11 years ago

kitteh, I think they mean squinty because badass dudes spend a lot of time glaring. Trufax.

Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

Erfworld fans — the princes, aka the chins. Because gotta have a strong chin to lead!

And pecunium is talking about catapults and trebuchets I assume. Though I like my idea better, I have this thing about putting oil in natural bodies of water. The fishies don’t do oil (to the point one shouldn’t wash one’s hands with soap before sticking them in the tank)

katz
11 years ago

The fishies can’t do drastic pH changes either, which is the result of putting sodium in water.

katz
11 years ago

Solution: Use a pond where you can’t possibly harm any living organisms. Like this.

1 7 8 9 10 11 13