Today, some farm fresh misogyny, straight from the virtual pages of MGTOWforums.com, in the form of a sprawling rant on the blackhearted nature of the female of the species by a fellow known only as Hamish. I have taken the liberty of condensing the rant somewhat, and of breaking up Hamish’s walls of text into shorter paragraphs. The original director’s cut of his comment can be found here.
[T]he prettier a woman is on the outside, the blacker her heart is on the inside. Underneath that pretty exterior does indeed lurk a monster. That women are driven by their highly fickle “feelings” rather than by logic is the scariest and most dangerous part about them.
[W]omen are so fickle that they vacillate between wanting Nick the nice guy who will be nice and romantic to them one day and wanting Tommy the thug who will treat her like absolute crap the next day. Indeed sometimes they want both these things at the same time …
What cupcake wants is a composite male, the ingredients of which are a blend of The Rock, Matt Damon, Donald Trump, Justin Timberlake, Hugh Jackman, Mike Tyson, David Bowie, Tony Montana, Ronaldo and Michael Buble …
With women being so irrational, so utterly unreasonable and unrealistic in their demands, it is absolutely inevitable that … there will come a point where she will feel dissatisfied with her date/her fuck buddy/her boyfriend/her fiance/her husband, whatever. And remember what a women feels is her hamster, logic doesn’t get a look in.
For men morality is largely a logical, learned thing – ten commandments, thou shalt not steal/kill, whatever. But for a woman what she feels is the be all and end all … And if that means fucking over and grinding into the dust good, decent men … purely on account that she no longer feels entirely satisfied with him, then so be it – how she feels must prevail above all other factors. …
[A]nd what’s more many women seem to be thoroughly enjoy crushing such men too – the more decent and genuine a guy is, the more pleasure they take in crushing him.
The reason for this is women … see niceness and decency as a sign of weakness and they begin to look down on that male with utter contempt. ….
This explains why it’s always the nicest guys that women fuck over the worst – and why they take great pleasure in doing so and in twisting the knife. To onlooking men this kind of stuff looks like a horrible, unjustifiable act of black hearted pitilessness – but to women, it’s nothing … .
This illogical thinking and intrinsic fickleness on the part of women winds up in women becoming capricious, merciless tyrants. But of course to be tyrants women have to have power – sure they always had the power of the pussy, but much more sinisterly women are now armed to the teeth and dangerous – armed by the law/the state that is …
Women have the state/big government backing them up to the hilt at every turn – to the extent that women now have the power at their fingertips to destroy or at least seriously mess up/disrupt the life of any man they’re sexually involved with – and … many women … can’t … resist abusing this power. And not only to mess up men’s lives and defame their character … but of course to loot men too – often of their entire net worth.
The madness of all this is that the state has placed all this power in the hands of beings who are intrinsically fickle and capricious by nature. So having been armed by the state, women are now not only fickle and capricious, worse than that they have now upgraded to fickle and capricious tyrants, who have a licence from the state to ruin men’s lives on a whim.
Having been so armed by the state, women are now akin to the capricious psychopath boss at work, who fires people just because he’s in a bad mood, or the capricious psychopath dictator, who has citizens locked up or killed on a whim.
In the case of the psycho boss or the dictator, they behave in this manner because (1) they have the power to do it (2) they can do it without any comeback to them and (3) they get off on it.
And this is exactly the dynamics involved when women fuck over men – women fuck over men because they have the power to do it (or more accurately the state has bestowed that power on them), they can do it without any comeback to them or negative consequences for them and they also do it because they just damned well get a sadistic kick from doing do.
So yes, underneath those physically appealing pretty girls (and indeed in many less physically appealing girls too) does indeed lurk an evil monster – one that is armed, dangerous, and utterly pitiless.
And … scene!
The truly weird thing about this rant is that, as some Man Boobz old timers may recall, the Hamish who wrote this rant is not the first MGTOW named Hamish I’ve written about on this blog. But the last one wasn’t actually real: he was a character who appeared, in cartoon form, in the dreams of a Man Boobz reader. As she wrote in an email to me,
after a day of reading a particularly large amount of your posts, I had a strange dream about this guy who sits on a train and describes some STDs he caught in great (and terrifying) detail to whoever is silly enough to listen. His goal is to dissuade other men from making the same mistake he did — having sex with women. Because to “Hamish the Lover” … all women are dirty and evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Now this mysterious dream lover Hamish has a namesake on MGTOWforums.com, writing long rants on how … all women are evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Kind of creepy, eh?
The dreamer also sent me a picture of Hamish the Lover as he had appeared in her dream. Here he is again.
He looks like a bit of a charming rogue. Too bad he’s an asshole.
Just checked Typhon Blue’s YouTube channel, and I hope this is a joke:
=S Another MRA who’s a fan of David Icke.
Holy crap. Couldn’t watch the whole video but what I did was jaw dropping. She doesn’t argue that child brides aren’t a thing, but apparently this particular case is fabricated because an activist shed light on it? And of course she plays the “What about the boys?” card when she isn’t even sure if child grooms are a thing in Yemen.
AllyS:
I’m pretty sure she’s being sarcastic, but she and most MRAs seem to believe in a feminist conspiracy of some kind so it’s still pretty silly
I like the sophisticated eyebrows, thick variety. They look positively scornful! 😀
You mean to tell me the harassment Anita’s received already isn’t punishment enough for these guys? What am I saying? Of course it isn’t. Because she won’t back down and”get back in the kitchen.” Assholes.
Coffeeyum:
Exactly! so by her logic I should just be super skeptical or just disregard whatever MRAs shed light to as well because they have an investment in their ideology. The thing is, this wasn’t even on some feminist website, it was on Reuters.
Children being married off is disgusting whether they are boys or girls, however I’d like to know if boys are being married off to adult women like girls are being married off to adult men. Somehow I’m very skeptical.
Dammit I really wanted to actually participate in the thread today but I actually have a thing to go to tonight, take care all!
I like the mysterious thick.
http://www.dailystar.com.lb/News/Middle-East/2013/Sep-17/231652-yemen-denies-child-bride-death-on-wedding-night.ashx#axzz2fBhTFWXa
http://deadspin.com/5914355/how-women-throw-themselves-at-pro-athletes-and-vice-versa-a-publicist-explains
Have fun! Or at least don’t die of boredom!
oh one last thing re: Anita
I’ve been following this pretty closely, and its become quite clear that they don’t just want to offer a counter argument to her videos, they just want her to shut up and disappear. With youtube videos with titles called “how do we stop Anita Sarkeesian” and the like, it’s very clear they want…*gasp* to censor her.
No freeze peach for feminists apparently.
Oh look, he’s gone full meltdown and resorted to random links.
Coffeeyum — love the nym! And have you had a
Welcome Package?
And since I cause confusion, call me Argenti and use gender neutral pronouns — ze // zir — and ignore Good, he goes away when we stop paying attention.
Quackers, the tone of that petition is sort of hilariously entitled. Lots of “we DEMAND” the right to be heard on an equal basis type of stuff.
Good, you cannot seem to find a legitimate, well-sourced piece of information even when you spend hours looking. As an information professional, I give you an F. Deadspin? Seriously?
Hello! I’ve posted on two other topics before but I was lazy (more like nervous) and didn’t keep up with replies so I’m not sure if I’ve received one before. Thank you! And I’ll try not to put a ze where there should be a zir and vice virsa. I’m new to gender-neutral pronouns so I don’t mean to cause any offense.:)
Does that make me a tantalizing Devil’s food cupcake then? 😛
Mmm, Devil’s food cake…
TyphonBlue didn’t cite her “study” which claims that boys are married off at the same rate as girls. And proceeds to say there are gaping holes in a Reuters article. I find that very amusing.
TyphonBlue, you get an F in critical thinking.
Good has quite the knack for finding the most terrible sources possible.
Good = ?
(Sorry, I don’t know everybody yet.)
I call red velvet! But would that mean I’m ovulating 24/7/365?
coffeeyum – if you’re ovulating 24/7, at least you won’t get periods anymore? 😛
True, but sex wouldn’t be an option for me either. I’d be worrying too much that my contraceptive was faulty.
Good is the Least Interesting Man in the World.
Alice — go back a page, Good is the idiot dropping the links without comment.
Coffeeyum — “I’m new to gender-neutral pronouns so I don’t mean to cause any offense” — no worries, as long as it seems like a good faith error I’m forgiving.
He/she => ze, him/her => zir, his/hers => zir’s
I drop the i in zie since they pronounce the same, but don’t really give a shit if you use it.
grumpycatisagirl- LMAO! I happen to be wearing a grumpy cat shirt atm. It’s pink. Is pink code for anything? I haven’t finished the handbook yet.
Argenti – Thanks! It ought to be easy to remember since ze rhymes with he and she.