Today, some farm fresh misogyny, straight from the virtual pages of MGTOWforums.com, in the form of a sprawling rant on the blackhearted nature of the female of the species by a fellow known only as Hamish. I have taken the liberty of condensing the rant somewhat, and of breaking up Hamish’s walls of text into shorter paragraphs. The original director’s cut of his comment can be found here.
[T]he prettier a woman is on the outside, the blacker her heart is on the inside. Underneath that pretty exterior does indeed lurk a monster. That women are driven by their highly fickle “feelings” rather than by logic is the scariest and most dangerous part about them.
[W]omen are so fickle that they vacillate between wanting Nick the nice guy who will be nice and romantic to them one day and wanting Tommy the thug who will treat her like absolute crap the next day. Indeed sometimes they want both these things at the same time …
What cupcake wants is a composite male, the ingredients of which are a blend of The Rock, Matt Damon, Donald Trump, Justin Timberlake, Hugh Jackman, Mike Tyson, David Bowie, Tony Montana, Ronaldo and Michael Buble …
With women being so irrational, so utterly unreasonable and unrealistic in their demands, it is absolutely inevitable that … there will come a point where she will feel dissatisfied with her date/her fuck buddy/her boyfriend/her fiance/her husband, whatever. And remember what a women feels is her hamster, logic doesn’t get a look in.
For men morality is largely a logical, learned thing – ten commandments, thou shalt not steal/kill, whatever. But for a woman what she feels is the be all and end all … And if that means fucking over and grinding into the dust good, decent men … purely on account that she no longer feels entirely satisfied with him, then so be it – how she feels must prevail above all other factors. …
[A]nd what’s more many women seem to be thoroughly enjoy crushing such men too – the more decent and genuine a guy is, the more pleasure they take in crushing him.
The reason for this is women … see niceness and decency as a sign of weakness and they begin to look down on that male with utter contempt. ….
This explains why it’s always the nicest guys that women fuck over the worst – and why they take great pleasure in doing so and in twisting the knife. To onlooking men this kind of stuff looks like a horrible, unjustifiable act of black hearted pitilessness – but to women, it’s nothing … .
This illogical thinking and intrinsic fickleness on the part of women winds up in women becoming capricious, merciless tyrants. But of course to be tyrants women have to have power – sure they always had the power of the pussy, but much more sinisterly women are now armed to the teeth and dangerous – armed by the law/the state that is …
Women have the state/big government backing them up to the hilt at every turn – to the extent that women now have the power at their fingertips to destroy or at least seriously mess up/disrupt the life of any man they’re sexually involved with – and … many women … can’t … resist abusing this power. And not only to mess up men’s lives and defame their character … but of course to loot men too – often of their entire net worth.
The madness of all this is that the state has placed all this power in the hands of beings who are intrinsically fickle and capricious by nature. So having been armed by the state, women are now not only fickle and capricious, worse than that they have now upgraded to fickle and capricious tyrants, who have a licence from the state to ruin men’s lives on a whim.
Having been so armed by the state, women are now akin to the capricious psychopath boss at work, who fires people just because he’s in a bad mood, or the capricious psychopath dictator, who has citizens locked up or killed on a whim.
In the case of the psycho boss or the dictator, they behave in this manner because (1) they have the power to do it (2) they can do it without any comeback to them and (3) they get off on it.
And this is exactly the dynamics involved when women fuck over men – women fuck over men because they have the power to do it (or more accurately the state has bestowed that power on them), they can do it without any comeback to them or negative consequences for them and they also do it because they just damned well get a sadistic kick from doing do.
So yes, underneath those physically appealing pretty girls (and indeed in many less physically appealing girls too) does indeed lurk an evil monster – one that is armed, dangerous, and utterly pitiless.
And … scene!
The truly weird thing about this rant is that, as some Man Boobz old timers may recall, the Hamish who wrote this rant is not the first MGTOW named Hamish I’ve written about on this blog. But the last one wasn’t actually real: he was a character who appeared, in cartoon form, in the dreams of a Man Boobz reader. As she wrote in an email to me,
after a day of reading a particularly large amount of your posts, I had a strange dream about this guy who sits on a train and describes some STDs he caught in great (and terrifying) detail to whoever is silly enough to listen. His goal is to dissuade other men from making the same mistake he did — having sex with women. Because to “Hamish the Lover” … all women are dirty and evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Now this mysterious dream lover Hamish has a namesake on MGTOWforums.com, writing long rants on how … all women are evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Kind of creepy, eh?
The dreamer also sent me a picture of Hamish the Lover as he had appeared in her dream. Here he is again.
He looks like a bit of a charming rogue. Too bad he’s an asshole.
Also, nice job citing a Pyschology Today article that contains no citations.
http://www.epjournal.net/articles/female-attraction-to-appetitive-aggressive-men-is-modulated-by-womens-menstrual-cycle-and-mens-vulnerability-to-traumatic-stress/
Love it when both Good and Greater Good are here at the same time. FIGHT. FIGHT. FIGHT!!!
I think we should just go with the Jailbreak the Patriarchy methodology here…
I always find it amazing how much more accurate that makes things.
Because men have no role in reproduction at all.
Oh and if it was not obvious /sarcasm.
I like the “Mysterious” eyebrow myself. It looks like something’s broken.
Hmm, my eyebrows are either thick sexy or thick sophisticated. Win!
True confession: I have never, ever plucked my eyebrows. Not even for guys with dark triad personalities.
Greater Good always seems to come in when Good just got told. Does anyone else smell socks? (And they aren’t mine, I just did laundry since GOING TO SEE PECUNIUM!!)
Likelihood of Greater Good and Good living 11km from one another?
I think we need to recruit trolls named Better and Best, too.
89% (100% – 11km)
As far as the eyebrows go, I am kind of hurt that none of the eyebrows look like my eyebrows! I mean, mine don’t really taper off or anything; they’re just sort of a uniform width throughout.
Possibly my face hairs are just stickin’ it to the patriarchy?
I stopped reading after “donald trump”. Who would want any qualities of him in anything?
So, in the last study Good posted, 66% of the women surveyed were students, and about 70% were unemployed. So they appear to have surveyed a bunch of younger, less-experienced women in college. Researchers can be so lazy — often they just survey their undergraduate students and pretend it’s a representative sample of society. Sloppy work.
Can any lurker reading this name xirself “Greatest Good?” Or alternatively, “Evil?”
Also, in all of the scenarios used to get the women to rank their attraction to the fictional dude in the study, he is described this way: “Wilko is a very friendly, caring and attractive young man.”
So again, not a “thug.”
Good, that study is full of shit. It defines appetitive aggression as “the intrinsic motivation to act violently even when not being threatened“, yet the context of the high-AA/low-trauma scenario is about defending others i.e. fighting against a threat:
I find it telling that most guys weren’t attracted to confident looking women.
I…no. Fondly recalling killing, even in war, is a bit off. (Relatedly, it’s a question you Do Not Ask)
I guess only talking to those close to you modifies the “are you bragging about killing someone” but that wording betrays a lack knowledge on how veterans actually talk about their time in war. (My grandfather, for example, words it as how they were attacked and did what they had to do…even what pride he shows is how fighting in the pacific freed men to fight Hitler [I am not Godwin’ing as I mean this literally])
this is OT, but remember the disgusting story of the Yemeni girl who died on her wedding night? well naturally, Typhon blue doubts it
We have to think critically about stories like this, but when MRAs scream about hypergamy or being screwed in court we have to believe them. Only feminists have an agenda, MRAs dont!
Not since I used that Febreze Trol-A-Way spray.
My (secondhand) understanding of my great-uncle’s service in the Pacific is that he refused to carry a weapon so they made him a medic, gave him a stretcher, and sent him out to haul Our Boys back to the beachheads.
I remember him as silent and withdrawn, and only part of that was him being near 90 and stone deaf.
Also in other ridiculous MRA “activism” news, there’s a petition now to hold Anita Sarkeesian accountable for her crimes of making videos and not being a real gamer or something lol
You just can’t make this shit up. I’m sure all those victims of prison rape are thankful for your efforts guys and snowflakes.
I pick Loki!
Manosphere: AHA!! you women and your bad boys dark triad blah blah blah
Fine, I pick Thor.
Manosphere: Pffffffft…you bitches, so shallow always wanting a muscled pretty boy jock with thunder powers
SIGH…ok, neither of them.
Manosphere: HOW DARE YOU DENY MEN YOUR LADY PARTS??? who do you think you are, a golden vagina?
Yeah, it’d probably go something like that.