Today, some farm fresh misogyny, straight from the virtual pages of MGTOWforums.com, in the form of a sprawling rant on the blackhearted nature of the female of the species by a fellow known only as Hamish. I have taken the liberty of condensing the rant somewhat, and of breaking up Hamish’s walls of text into shorter paragraphs. The original director’s cut of his comment can be found here.
[T]he prettier a woman is on the outside, the blacker her heart is on the inside. Underneath that pretty exterior does indeed lurk a monster. That women are driven by their highly fickle “feelings” rather than by logic is the scariest and most dangerous part about them.
[W]omen are so fickle that they vacillate between wanting Nick the nice guy who will be nice and romantic to them one day and wanting Tommy the thug who will treat her like absolute crap the next day. Indeed sometimes they want both these things at the same time …
What cupcake wants is a composite male, the ingredients of which are a blend of The Rock, Matt Damon, Donald Trump, Justin Timberlake, Hugh Jackman, Mike Tyson, David Bowie, Tony Montana, Ronaldo and Michael Buble …
With women being so irrational, so utterly unreasonable and unrealistic in their demands, it is absolutely inevitable that … there will come a point where she will feel dissatisfied with her date/her fuck buddy/her boyfriend/her fiance/her husband, whatever. And remember what a women feels is her hamster, logic doesn’t get a look in.
For men morality is largely a logical, learned thing – ten commandments, thou shalt not steal/kill, whatever. But for a woman what she feels is the be all and end all … And if that means fucking over and grinding into the dust good, decent men … purely on account that she no longer feels entirely satisfied with him, then so be it – how she feels must prevail above all other factors. …
[A]nd what’s more many women seem to be thoroughly enjoy crushing such men too – the more decent and genuine a guy is, the more pleasure they take in crushing him.
The reason for this is women … see niceness and decency as a sign of weakness and they begin to look down on that male with utter contempt. ….
This explains why it’s always the nicest guys that women fuck over the worst – and why they take great pleasure in doing so and in twisting the knife. To onlooking men this kind of stuff looks like a horrible, unjustifiable act of black hearted pitilessness – but to women, it’s nothing … .
This illogical thinking and intrinsic fickleness on the part of women winds up in women becoming capricious, merciless tyrants. But of course to be tyrants women have to have power – sure they always had the power of the pussy, but much more sinisterly women are now armed to the teeth and dangerous – armed by the law/the state that is …
Women have the state/big government backing them up to the hilt at every turn – to the extent that women now have the power at their fingertips to destroy or at least seriously mess up/disrupt the life of any man they’re sexually involved with – and … many women … can’t … resist abusing this power. And not only to mess up men’s lives and defame their character … but of course to loot men too – often of their entire net worth.
The madness of all this is that the state has placed all this power in the hands of beings who are intrinsically fickle and capricious by nature. So having been armed by the state, women are now not only fickle and capricious, worse than that they have now upgraded to fickle and capricious tyrants, who have a licence from the state to ruin men’s lives on a whim.
Having been so armed by the state, women are now akin to the capricious psychopath boss at work, who fires people just because he’s in a bad mood, or the capricious psychopath dictator, who has citizens locked up or killed on a whim.
In the case of the psycho boss or the dictator, they behave in this manner because (1) they have the power to do it (2) they can do it without any comeback to them and (3) they get off on it.
And this is exactly the dynamics involved when women fuck over men – women fuck over men because they have the power to do it (or more accurately the state has bestowed that power on them), they can do it without any comeback to them or negative consequences for them and they also do it because they just damned well get a sadistic kick from doing do.
So yes, underneath those physically appealing pretty girls (and indeed in many less physically appealing girls too) does indeed lurk an evil monster – one that is armed, dangerous, and utterly pitiless.
And … scene!
The truly weird thing about this rant is that, as some Man Boobz old timers may recall, the Hamish who wrote this rant is not the first MGTOW named Hamish I’ve written about on this blog. But the last one wasn’t actually real: he was a character who appeared, in cartoon form, in the dreams of a Man Boobz reader. As she wrote in an email to me,
after a day of reading a particularly large amount of your posts, I had a strange dream about this guy who sits on a train and describes some STDs he caught in great (and terrifying) detail to whoever is silly enough to listen. His goal is to dissuade other men from making the same mistake he did — having sex with women. Because to “Hamish the Lover” … all women are dirty and evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Now this mysterious dream lover Hamish has a namesake on MGTOWforums.com, writing long rants on how … all women are evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Kind of creepy, eh?
The dreamer also sent me a picture of Hamish the Lover as he had appeared in her dream. Here he is again.
He looks like a bit of a charming rogue. Too bad he’s an asshole.
https://ujdigispace.uj.ac.za/handle/10210/3214
I could think of worse places to end up, Falconer! I think if my eyebrow ended up there, I’d just give it my blessings and leave it to live out its happy eyebrow life.
Also: Black Widow: YES, PLEASE. Not that Thor’s not tasty-lookin’ too, but really.
Right, sure, you’re still an ignorant pest, thanks for playing, Good.
Oh man, that eyebrow chart… What is thick eyebrows? Clearly they don’t know.
You want to try again, Good?
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20065652-10391704.html
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/head-games/201305/the-allure-aggressive-men
Ha ha. After being told 2 women =/= all women, Good links to a study that interviewed three women.
Seriously?
Ugh. Your critical thinking skills ain’t.
First, I want to know where Good went to school to learn that “making an argument” consists of just dropping URLs to random un-peer-reviewed research.
Good, stop dropping links you clearly haven’t read, you’re embarrassing yourself.
Just stop entirely and go away.
Lol, newssites, really, Good? You know that media outlets get the gist of scientific studies wrong the majority of the time, right? That scientific literacy is sadly not a prerequisite for reporting science news these days?
You might want to, y’know, cite an actual study rather than secondhand (if that) info.
Oh man, Good, that is a yawnfest.
Go away.
Seriously, you haven’t even stopped to think about what these studies are actually measuring, the socialization that goes into it, and what happens when you crosslink to studies in other cultures that find the opposite.
You’re just flailing wildly, citing studies you can’t even begin to understand.
dustydeste: even when Good does drop a study, it usually contradicts the “point” he was trying to make. Or it’s laughably outdated and not very well done.
Damn logic, it always plays second fiddle to feelings. If only more people used Logic and Reason™ and stopped using feelings, the world would be a more robotic place…
Figures, hellkell, since he’s just emotionally trying to prop up his predecided beliefs, rather than looking at things… logically… hehehe.
I was wondering when all this power got handed out, too. WHERE’S MINE YOU BASTARDS?
Hee, basically Good is flinging poo at this point. Not very logical of him at all.
What a pitiful sample size. Do you even know how to social science?
This is what you call a rigorous study? What the fuck? How does perception of body language prove that women are attracted to assholes? What variables were being controlled for?
Also, nice job citing a Pyschology Today article that contains no citations. It doesn’t even say what percentage of women preferred aggressive men.
A real evil genius would see the value in all three…
Good is ridiculous, but you can always count on him showing his ass. Every. Single. Time.
Let’s ignore him, and everyone pick their favorite (i.e most laughable) eyebrow style from that chart. I’m kind of amused by Mysterious.
If woman were truly honest with themselves and knew their equality in the USA they might also be responsible for their children and not hold the man financially responsible.
The only things I’d want out of that composite list genius boy made up are Trump’s cash and a paisley shirt Bowie had in the 70s. Other than that? Blech, no thanks. A guy might be eye candy (Clooney, Depp, Firth) but they’re not half the eye candy my bloke is as far as I’m concerned; him I can gaze at for hours. And nobody else is going to feel that way for the simple reason (Hamish, read this carefully, I’ll put it in little words) that women. are. not. the. same. person.
I mean the closest I could find in Google Scholar is that both men and women who possess “dark triad” personalities (i.e. narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism) have some degree of short-term “mating” success, but (a) that doesn’t correspond to long-term or even medium-term relationship success, and (b) it is likely because people with those characteristics are often skilled at manipulating other people.
But even that was buried under SO much evopsych nonsense.