Today, some farm fresh misogyny, straight from the virtual pages of MGTOWforums.com, in the form of a sprawling rant on the blackhearted nature of the female of the species by a fellow known only as Hamish. I have taken the liberty of condensing the rant somewhat, and of breaking up Hamish’s walls of text into shorter paragraphs. The original director’s cut of his comment can be found here.
[T]he prettier a woman is on the outside, the blacker her heart is on the inside. Underneath that pretty exterior does indeed lurk a monster. That women are driven by their highly fickle “feelings” rather than by logic is the scariest and most dangerous part about them.
[W]omen are so fickle that they vacillate between wanting Nick the nice guy who will be nice and romantic to them one day and wanting Tommy the thug who will treat her like absolute crap the next day. Indeed sometimes they want both these things at the same time …
What cupcake wants is a composite male, the ingredients of which are a blend of The Rock, Matt Damon, Donald Trump, Justin Timberlake, Hugh Jackman, Mike Tyson, David Bowie, Tony Montana, Ronaldo and Michael Buble …
With women being so irrational, so utterly unreasonable and unrealistic in their demands, it is absolutely inevitable that … there will come a point where she will feel dissatisfied with her date/her fuck buddy/her boyfriend/her fiance/her husband, whatever. And remember what a women feels is her hamster, logic doesn’t get a look in.
For men morality is largely a logical, learned thing – ten commandments, thou shalt not steal/kill, whatever. But for a woman what she feels is the be all and end all … And if that means fucking over and grinding into the dust good, decent men … purely on account that she no longer feels entirely satisfied with him, then so be it – how she feels must prevail above all other factors. …
[A]nd what’s more many women seem to be thoroughly enjoy crushing such men too – the more decent and genuine a guy is, the more pleasure they take in crushing him.
The reason for this is women … see niceness and decency as a sign of weakness and they begin to look down on that male with utter contempt. ….
This explains why it’s always the nicest guys that women fuck over the worst – and why they take great pleasure in doing so and in twisting the knife. To onlooking men this kind of stuff looks like a horrible, unjustifiable act of black hearted pitilessness – but to women, it’s nothing … .
This illogical thinking and intrinsic fickleness on the part of women winds up in women becoming capricious, merciless tyrants. But of course to be tyrants women have to have power – sure they always had the power of the pussy, but much more sinisterly women are now armed to the teeth and dangerous – armed by the law/the state that is …
Women have the state/big government backing them up to the hilt at every turn – to the extent that women now have the power at their fingertips to destroy or at least seriously mess up/disrupt the life of any man they’re sexually involved with – and … many women … can’t … resist abusing this power. And not only to mess up men’s lives and defame their character … but of course to loot men too – often of their entire net worth.
The madness of all this is that the state has placed all this power in the hands of beings who are intrinsically fickle and capricious by nature. So having been armed by the state, women are now not only fickle and capricious, worse than that they have now upgraded to fickle and capricious tyrants, who have a licence from the state to ruin men’s lives on a whim.
Having been so armed by the state, women are now akin to the capricious psychopath boss at work, who fires people just because he’s in a bad mood, or the capricious psychopath dictator, who has citizens locked up or killed on a whim.
In the case of the psycho boss or the dictator, they behave in this manner because (1) they have the power to do it (2) they can do it without any comeback to them and (3) they get off on it.
And this is exactly the dynamics involved when women fuck over men – women fuck over men because they have the power to do it (or more accurately the state has bestowed that power on them), they can do it without any comeback to them or negative consequences for them and they also do it because they just damned well get a sadistic kick from doing do.
So yes, underneath those physically appealing pretty girls (and indeed in many less physically appealing girls too) does indeed lurk an evil monster – one that is armed, dangerous, and utterly pitiless.
And … scene!
The truly weird thing about this rant is that, as some Man Boobz old timers may recall, the Hamish who wrote this rant is not the first MGTOW named Hamish I’ve written about on this blog. But the last one wasn’t actually real: he was a character who appeared, in cartoon form, in the dreams of a Man Boobz reader. As she wrote in an email to me,
after a day of reading a particularly large amount of your posts, I had a strange dream about this guy who sits on a train and describes some STDs he caught in great (and terrifying) detail to whoever is silly enough to listen. His goal is to dissuade other men from making the same mistake he did — having sex with women. Because to “Hamish the Lover” … all women are dirty and evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Now this mysterious dream lover Hamish has a namesake on MGTOWforums.com, writing long rants on how … all women are evil and should be avoided at all costs.
Kind of creepy, eh?
The dreamer also sent me a picture of Hamish the Lover as he had appeared in her dream. Here he is again.
He looks like a bit of a charming rogue. Too bad he’s an asshole.
Pardonnez-moi, pour jeter la vache.
RUN AWAY!!!
And ok, trebuchet it is.
As for sweating, I think coating him in latex would get the desired result.
Titianblue: Keep in mind the ‘bad boy’ myth, coupled with usually subtexted racism. Mike Tyson, ear-biter extraordinaire, is meant to stand in for women’s alleged tendency to swoon over ‘thugs’.
Similarly, it can be safely assumed that the reason he included Donald Trump is that they believe all women are secretly gold-diggers, so of course they mention somebody with a lot of money. (While, curiously, missing both Bill Gates and the Koch brothers.)
Meanwhile, I’m pretty sure my wife’s composite would include me, Neil Gaiman and Johnny Depp. (Mine would consist of my wife, Gail Simone and Angelina Jolie. And probably Neil Gaiman, as well. Look, his voice cured one of my migraines. At that point, gender’s irrelevant.)
@freemage
It’s hard to see Tyson as a thug. He has the sweetest voice ever.
Mike Tyson? Why does he think any woman has a convicted rapist on her wishlist?
Why has Mike Tyson had two pretty wives since his rape conviction?
Spaghetti.
That’s the reason.
Oh look, Good can’t count past two.
Two women =/= all women. Obvious thing is obvious.
Donald Trump and Mike Tyson? What world are these fuckers living on?
Good: Big numbers and statistical anomalies. There’s a small percentage of people (of both genders) who are attracted to abusive personalities. Noting this is one thing. Painting it as a common trait among a major segment of humanity indicates that your head is in serious need of a good crowbar to get it dislodged from between your ass cheeks.
In no particular order: EA, Johnny Depp, Orlando Bloom a la Legolas, the girl at the violin store, FedEx kid, Reed (Matthew Grey Gubler), pecunium’s brain (come on, who wouldn’t want that brain?!)…someone of the decent sort with a massive aquarium…ex-FWB and my pharmacy student.
So, uh, mostly people I know. And, for that matter, brain crushes. *steals pecunium’s brain, runs off while evilly cackling…taints it with mangos* (I promise not to show up there with mangos, or a mango, just to get that bit of pedantry covered, plant(s) are another matter!)
“of
bothall genders”Otherwise spot on.
Woman at the violin store? I guess at pushing 30 I should stop referring to people my age by teenage // child terms (the FedEx kid is dubbed such by my mother, which makes sense given we’re about the same age)
Two women =/= all women. Obvious thing is obvious.
Of course that doesn’t count the mothers of his three of his eight children.
Still not all women genius. Freemage’s point is still entirely applicable.
And Good keeps digging with his ‘all women are like that’ stuff.
If we can use statistics like that, doesn’t that mean all men are gay too?
Up to 8 women still =/= all women.
What, did you flunk out of kindergarten or something?
Does Hamish realize how much of himself he’s exposed right here?
I wonder what his composite lady is.
Good must feel like being told how dumb he is today.
I like his outrage over the idea of a woman being attracted to more than one man. You fickle females! Thor or Loki–you have to pick!
Well, I think I know which word he recently learned. And the Ten Commandments? Those are his paragon of morality? Bleh.
I am so frustrated by rationing of reason to men and emotion to women, where women somehow get through life by magical “intuition”. Recently in my ancient philosophy course, I heard a woman explain that our logic course is easier for men, because they think more directly, whereas women tend to overthink (have scattered thoughts?). This was after mentioning how well she performed in the logic course. My mother does it as well, in spite of my protesting. I think, at this point, she dismisses it as my feminist spiel which is wrong and common sense is right. Blehhh.
Shock! Some females prefer Black Widow!!
Me reading this.
If anyone’s reading up on the ISS, let me know if you see my eyebrow, please.
dustydeste, let’s hope it doesn’t land over in one of David Willis’ strips. Eyebrows errwhere!
Sending dustydeste some replacement eyebrows.
Good, do you think all women are attracted to thugs? If so, make your case for that without resorting to anecdata. (This could be fun.)
The more I look at it, that eyebrow chart is fucking hilarious. And racist (“Exotic?”), but also hilarious.