Christian J., the blogger behind What Men Are Saying About Women and the inventor of the infamous MRA two-dot ellipsis, has always been an open racist as well as a misogynist, letting drop horrific comments from time to time on why he thinks black women are the worst kind of women in the world.
But today he’s sort of outdone himself with a post titled Why Black Women are More Repulsive than any Other..
Christian lays out his thesis statement in his first sentence:
I have made no effort to hide my disgust about black females as they do really deserve every criticism they get.
What follows is a largely incoherent stream-of consciousness rant unencumbered by logic or the correct use of language.
Christian starts off by attacking “black “Lesbian” females” and “Oprah “Find the Victim” Winfrey,” whom he describes as a
selfish, self-serving, anti-male bigot and organiser of female only schools in Africa. A true racist bigot in every sense of the word.
Yes, the author of “Why Black Women are More Repulsive than any Other..” did just call Oprah a racist bigot.
Apparently immune to irony, Christian J continues:
The facts about black women is even more horrendous than one could even assume. They developed themselves as being so arrogant and self-serving, that even black men avoid them like the plague. …
The fact that they have constantly hit out against black men as being either gays or hoods or in jail, leaving them pregnant (that’s a favourite with women, always blame someone else for one’s own stupidity) and refusing to man up when required. They vilified black men at every opportunity. …
The black man’s response was huge. They enjoyed handing their oversized asses back to them in popular songs like rap and other genres.
You will no doubt have noticed by now that Christian J. does not seem to understand what words mean or how language works, exactly.
They reduced the black female down to the levels they could understand and they also stated in no uncertain terms, what black females could do with themselves while they went off and picked females from other races to replace those high and mighty, self-elevated edifices and phoenixes.
Edifices? Phoenixes? Is he just pulling random words out of the dictionary now?
Poetic justice and it was the appropriate feedback they required to put them back in the box where they originally came from and hopefully teach them some level of humility.
The … box … they came from? What the fuck is he even talking about here?
That did not work of course as their ego now had grown even bigger that they themselves could no longer control. …
So what is the problem with these black females ?
They’re surrounded by assholes like you?
So what should that gif say? “You’re forgetting about racism” is long and bulky.
From a dude who told us Fla. is a bastion of non-misogyny? Florida, where gunning down a black kid is ok, but firing a warning shot at an abusive partner is a crime?
You’ve got me confused with someone else.
That perhaps the greater likelihood of upward mobility/social stability to be found with a non-black partner; because of things like disproportionate arrest/conviction/sentencing rates for the same offenses?
Of course, the high level of bad boy/thug love among black women contradicts this enormously. You see, you do the same thing that the black female IR activists do, that is promote the idea that there are loads of high quality black women with nothing but low life black men to choose from, instead of realizing that for every black man with a ghetto mentality, there is a similar black woman.
If it was a case of black women having to seek white men in order to get upwardly mobile men, then they would simply start dating a bunch of white men. But you actually don’t have that. You have a bunch of racially specific misandrous women using the idea of interracial dating as a means to attack and demean a group of men in order to satisfy their pugnacious desires.
And interestingly enough, you defended female hypergamy.
Hypergamy, much like misandry, DOESN’T EXIST, you twit.
*hangs head in shame and transmutes into a fish* that’s it, I refuse to share a species with fools like this. If anyone needs me, try waving a pipette of brine shrimp at me, I may come investigate.
Seriously, you would think a person would be ashamed to be this stupid and all around awful.
Hypergamy, much like misandry, DOESN’T EXIST, you twit
http://www.landofangels.de/py1/buss-barnes-1986.pdf
I’m not surprised that doesn’t say what you think it does.
1) that’s 30 years old
2) sample size unacceptably small
3) you fail at even skimming as things like personality (top 3 factors), religion (4th factor), and domestic // child related traits top or nearly top professional status. And even within that category, college is the preferred status, versus professional degree, family background and earning potential
3b) if you’ll skip to table 5 you’ll see that the top 8 desired traits are all personality // domestic, except from men really wanting attractive partners. And that one is of college students so no shit Sherlock they want college educated partners, that ain’t marrying up!
@Good: And your complaint is that they’re satisfying their own pugnacious desires rather than your pugnacious ones? Or is it that they HAVE desires in the first place that don’t revolve around you?
People try to satisfy their own desires. It doesn’t matter if they’re men, women, black, white, whatever. So, sorry bro, black women don’t exist to fulfill the desires of white or black men, they exist because they’re people. Whether or not you think their desires are “pugnacious” is irrelevent.
Good: Of course, the high level of bad boy/thug love among black women contradicts this enormously. You see, you do the same thing that the black female IR activists do, that is promote the idea that there are loads of high quality black women with nothing but low life black men to choose from, instead of realizing that for every black man with a ghetto mentality, there is a similar black woman.
Wrong again you ignorant nitwit.
I don’t hold with the idea of, “high quality” people. What I see is a society that punishes black people for being black. Marrying a non-black person obviates some of that (for both men and women, but moreso for men… that would be the racist aspects of patriarchy stepping in; black men are worth less than white men, and so the tendency for women, of all colors, to discount them is higher: Again, you don’t understand racism all that well).
Of course, the high level of bad boy/thug love among black women contradicts this enormously.
That, right there, is you being a racist. It’s not, “thug love”, it’s love. It just happens that to be a black male is to be seen, by and large, as a thug. It’s to have an abnormally high risk of being arrested for piddly shit, and getting a long sentence (ergo reinforcing the “thug” aspect of it. Recall Rodney King, beaten half to death because he didn’t pull over fast enough).
And interestingly enough, you defended female hypergamy.
Defended? I don’t think so. I explained a social pressure which makes it more likely. Show me where I said this was a desirable thing? I’d say the careful reader would have noted a tone of disgust at this being the social environment blacks in America have to deal with.
You don’t seem to be that reader.
“Good”? More like “Racist”
@Ally S: Or “Incomprehensible”. I can’t understand what the hell he’s trying to say most of the time.
That, right there, is you being a racist. It’s not, “thug love”, it’s love. It just happens that to be a black male is to be seen, by and large, as a thug.
Well, that’s mighty racist of you. I don’t equate “thug” with “black male” as you do. Sorry, there is a large number of black males who successfully show themselves to not be thugs. These very black males are all too often overlooked in favor of playas, thugs, bad boys, etc. When the women who chase these kinds of men are used and abused, they then base their views on ALL black men based on these men. They claim a shortage of black men, when in fact, there is a shortage of responsible men who give them the bad boy gina tingle that they desire.
Ah, we’re back to the idea that it’s unfair for women to be allowed to choose their partners based on who they’re attracted to again. Funny how it always circles back to that primal sense of outrage.
Not this shit again V_V
I find their disgust at the idea of women getting horny so funny. They make arousal sound like something you should go to the pharmacy and get a soothing ointment for.
That’s right, Good, it’s all about the tingles, and don’t you forget it. Stop pouting because no one wants to be with your stupid racist self.
Yes, women get to choose who they are attracted to, sucks for you, don’t it?
The vagina tingles, but not for you. Too bad, so sad.
Do not ask for whom the gina tingles. It ain’t you, bub.
@Good: Please, spare us the “women like bad boys” argument. Again, people have desires, they are going to try to fulfill them. If you aren’t the object of those desires, the appropriate response is not to try to patronizingly suggest that you are a better person than they/their lover(s) are, or childishly suggest that they don’t know what they want.
It all comes down to the fact that you’re sad because women are allowed to pursue their own desires, and they have choices other than you. Don’t pretend it matters to you whether or not these women’s choices were ultimately good for them or not.
The gina tingle is the stamen of misandry.
Good: Well, that’s mighty racist of you. I don’t equate “thug” with “black male” as you do.
Again you are being wilfully obtuse. You are the one saying black women are “thug lovers” when they aren’t hating on black men and chasing after white money.
I said assholes like you call black men thugs (you did), and black women shallow money grubbers and “thug-lovers” (you did).
I am beginning to think you do know more about racism than I do; from the inside.
I’m glad that stamen quote has staying power.
Hey Good? Go review your study, or my bullet points. Namely the part where MEN are the ones who’re choosy about appearance, or rather, whatever the penis equivilant of “gina tingles” is. I guess men date whoever gets it up? No, that doesn’t work, that’s just a colloquialism, not shaming language. Hm…I know! Men makes decisions based on ‘nad vibes (aka what makes their gonads vibrate)
I think ‘nad vibes should henceforth become part of the regular lexicon here. Perfect!