Christian J., the blogger behind What Men Are Saying About Women and the inventor of the infamous MRA two-dot ellipsis, has always been an open racist as well as a misogynist, letting drop horrific comments from time to time on why he thinks black women are the worst kind of women in the world.
But today he’s sort of outdone himself with a post titled Why Black Women are More Repulsive than any Other..
Christian lays out his thesis statement in his first sentence:
I have made no effort to hide my disgust about black females as they do really deserve every criticism they get.
What follows is a largely incoherent stream-of consciousness rant unencumbered by logic or the correct use of language.
Christian starts off by attacking “black “Lesbian” females” and “Oprah “Find the Victim” Winfrey,” whom he describes as a
selfish, self-serving, anti-male bigot and organiser of female only schools in Africa. A true racist bigot in every sense of the word.
Yes, the author of “Why Black Women are More Repulsive than any Other..” did just call Oprah a racist bigot.
Apparently immune to irony, Christian J continues:
The facts about black women is even more horrendous than one could even assume. They developed themselves as being so arrogant and self-serving, that even black men avoid them like the plague. …
The fact that they have constantly hit out against black men as being either gays or hoods or in jail, leaving them pregnant (that’s a favourite with women, always blame someone else for one’s own stupidity) and refusing to man up when required. They vilified black men at every opportunity. …
The black man’s response was huge. They enjoyed handing their oversized asses back to them in popular songs like rap and other genres.
You will no doubt have noticed by now that Christian J. does not seem to understand what words mean or how language works, exactly.
They reduced the black female down to the levels they could understand and they also stated in no uncertain terms, what black females could do with themselves while they went off and picked females from other races to replace those high and mighty, self-elevated edifices and phoenixes.
Edifices? Phoenixes? Is he just pulling random words out of the dictionary now?
Poetic justice and it was the appropriate feedback they required to put them back in the box where they originally came from and hopefully teach them some level of humility.
The … box … they came from? What the fuck is he even talking about here?
That did not work of course as their ego now had grown even bigger that they themselves could no longer control. …
So what is the problem with these black females ?
They’re surrounded by assholes like you?
Of course the great stumbling block for these men is that they don’t see women as anything but a collection of more-or-less interesting physical attributes arranged around the life-support system for various orifices. That we’re people never occurs to them, or they actively object to the idea. We’re inconveniences in the way of their orgasms.
@Nick
I kinda feel like you may have misread becausescience’s post. Your post seems to indicate that you think becausescience is saying that feminism is accused of trying to solve everyone’s problems (if I misread then ignore me), whereas becausescience is saying that feminism is the only social justice movement that gets demands to solve the problems of a group that it’s mission statement is not dedicated to (i.e. men).
IOW:
becausescience is saying that antifeminists keep claiming that feminism is obligated to address problems that men specifically face, and that to the best of zie’s knowledge, no other SJ movement sees demands to address problems of people that aren’t who they are working for
becausescience is not saying that feminists should not address problems that solely, or predominantly, affect men. Zie is saying that there is no obligation for feminism/feminists to address these problems in order to be a legitimate SJ movement, and that antifeminists are full of shit for claiming otherwise.
Mye selfie(iPhone camera, and it’s kinda large)
My turn!
Please ignore the strip light reflection, the lighting in here sucks at this hour (it’s great when the tanks are on, but I’m not waking the fish up for this)
Nice colours!
Irises are amazing when you get to look at them properly.
Selfeyes!
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g69/Estrella84Azul/IMG_1163_zpsfa2dd95e.jpg
http://i53.photobucket.com/albums/g69/Estrella84Azul/IMG_1162_zps5fa5f690.jpg
(Ignore the huge pores/acne). It’s hard to light one’s eyes for such a photo, but also, my eyes really are a very dark brown. I got a lot of compliments on them when I was a kid.
Thanks kitteh, yours are lovely too.
Continuing my backlog run of the holiday weekend posts…
I have this awful, horrible feeling that I know what he was going for when he wrote that black women need to go ‘back in the box’ they came from. Specifically, he’s a full-blown separatist who wants to ship black women back to Africa. (Note: the fact that he thinks all black women are descended directly from Africans, without any ties to Australia, Haiti, South America, or really anyplace else in the world, tells you everything you need to know about just how fucked in the head he is.)
This is fine and all, but you can find almost the exact same sentiments aired over at blackmenvent.com, by black men. All you have to do is secretly register on their site to see their message board so that you can target them the same as you do other anti-feminist/female critical sites.
I doubt that you will do this because you want to exclusively label MRA type thinking as coming from white males. But understand that black America is less “patriarchal” than any other demographic in America and is in worse shape. The gender wage gap between black men and black women is much smaller than for whites, the gender education gap is much wider, black women make up a larger percentage of black politicians than for women of other groups, studies show that black women are the only group of women who are preferred by employers over the men of their demographic, all of recent job gains in black America have come from black women, black women are overwhelmingly the heads of households in black America, etc. etc.
Below is how people like yourselves characterize black women:
http://kathmanduk2.wordpress.com/2008/12/24/from-the-archives-images-of-black-women-among-anglo-college-students/
Table II presents the 10 traits that students in the main survey most commonly selected when asked to characterize black women and the 12 traits they most commonly selected to characterize American women in general. (Three traits tied for tenth place.) As can be seen, the traits selected for American women in general are overwhelmingly positive, while the picture drawn of black women is far more negative. For example, 45% characterize women in general as intelligent but only 22% characterize black women this way. Similarly, American women in general, but not black women, are characterized as (among other things) sensitive, attractive, sophisticated, career-oriented, and independent, while black women are characterized as loud, aggressive, argumentative, stubborn, and bitchy.
Good: does being so wrong all the time hurt? It should.
We’ve had black MRAs here before. Nice try.
You don’t target sites composed predominantly of black men. On rare occasions, you may target a black follower/supporter of a white MRA. How about targeting blackmenvent.com or http://www.tiredblackman.com?
Louis’s selfeye. Bit blurry, I had to blow it up.
Good: why not get your own blog and target whomever you like? Whining that David isn’t “targeting” who you’d like him to so you don’t have to feel like the insecure, racist piece of shit you are just makes you look even dumber, as if such a thing were possible. Asshole.
We’re supposed to be surprised that you can find misogyny among men of color? Or that white college students can be racist?
Good, go away. You’re incapable of making a logical argument, and you’re not amusing. You’re just taking up pixels that could be put to better use by other commenters.
And another MRA completely misses the racism factor! Am I gonna need a new gif?
My selfeye. Wish I had a macro lens.
I know more about racism than you. Would you admit the misandry of black women? Even among white feminists, I never hear it said that white men are so terrible that you will begin dating only non-white men. Black women have actually made kicking black men to the curb and dating only non-black men a social movement. The direct and indirect influence of feminism has been a destructive force for the black community that has virtually destroyed the black family.
I see Good has abandoned the pretense of being reasonable.
Below is how people like yourselves characterize black women:
Unh hunh… citations please. You were the one saying that attacks needed to be particularised. Asserting that some other group you don’t like is a perfect parallel of our thinking is what you pretended was happening here.
That old “it’s ok when I do it” schtick ain’t gonna fly here, boyo.
Good: if misandry were a thing, I’d cop to it. Since it’s an imaginary idea made up by misogynistic jackholes, you’re shit out of luck. Story of your life, huh?
Simple economics plus racism has destroyed black communities longer and harder than feminism ever has, you dolt.
Fuck off and go learn something.
What’s he banging on about now?
Good’s butthurt that MRAs are overwhelmingly white and racist.
Good: I know more about racism than you.
Objection, assumes facts not in evidence.
Would you admit the misandry of black women?
Nope.
Even among white feminists, I never hear it said that white men are so terrible that you will begin dating only non-white men. Black women have actually made kicking black men to the curb and dating only non-black men a social movement.
You think that’s a side-effect of feminism, rather than the more direct effect of the racist aspects of society, and the limited future many black men face? That perhaps the greater likelihood of upward mobility/social stability to be found with a non-black partner; because of things like disproportionate arrest/conviction/sentencing rates for the same offenses?
That society punishes black women for being with black men, and rewards them for being with non-black men?
And then you tell us you know more about racial issues in the US?
From a dude who told us Fla. is a bastion of non-misogyny? Florida, where gunning down a black kid is ok, but firing a warning shot at an abusive partner is a crime?
Pull the other one, it’s got bells on it.
Shit.. sorry, ya’ll blend together. I confused you with Keegan. My mistake. I withdraw that you told us about florida being such a bastion, but leave it in as an example of your lack of comprehension on issues of race in the States.
So, just to be clear, Good thinks that feminism caused racism? That’s an…interesting theory.
No, feminism has destroyed black families. To Good, racism isn’t just for white folks.