Categories
antifeminism boner rage dozens of upvotes evil women mansplaining men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA none dare call it conspiracy penises pig ignorance racism reddit the enigma that is ladies the eternal solipsism of the MRA mind

Women are lying when they say they want more dicks on TV, Men’s Rights Redditors explain

Artist Louise Bourgeois also pretended to like dongs.
Artist Louise Bourgeois also pretended to like dongs.

So for some reason the fellas on the Men’s Rights subreddit are discussing an article by Australian newspaper columnist Clementine Ford in which she expresses her desire to see more dongs on television.

As she notes, there are plenty of boobs on display on HBO shows like Game of Thrones, yet “rarely are we treated to the visual smorgasbord of a well stocked meat platter. ” Ford is sick of it.  “So bring on the parade of wangs, willies and woodies!” she demands. “I’m fond of a wand and I’m not ashamed to say it.”

I’m not terribly familiar with the writings of Clementine Ford, but evidently she’s not big on subtlety.

Anyway, the fellas in the Men’s Rights subreddit aren’t having any of it. Nuh uh. They ain’t buying it, ladies! You may write columns about how you want more wang on TV. You may talk about it with your friends. You may have gigantic collections of peen pics hidden away on your hard drive.

But the MRAs of Reddit know better. It’s all some devious feminist ploy, as Steampunk_Moustache helpfully explains.

Steampunk_Moustache 1 point 5 hours ago (2|1)  It's rather funny seeing feminists pretend they want to see penises just so that they can make this (weak) argument, isn't it?  Women don't want to look at dicks. Women don't get turned on by the sight of dicks.  Do you know who gets turned on by the sight of dicks? Ironically, straight men.

Huh. That took an odd twist at the end there.

But it’s our old friend Giegerwasright who provides the real answer, in the form of a wall-o-mansplainin’ so giant that I had to shrink the text to even screencap it.

giegerwasright 27 points 10 hours ago (31|4)  OK, my negroes. I'm going to lay this out for you. Because the women in this article and the writer of this article... they aren't interested at all in the male form. Not a single bit. They're just being spoiled brat children (as usual) stomping their feet and nasally sneering "what about you! what about you!" They're just looking for something to whinge about and make demands of (as usual) that they never really have any interest in making use of.  How may women in visual arts profess an adoration for the male form? Can you name a single female visual artist who has expressed her passion for that male form through her art in a manner that is sublime? I can't. I can easily fine male visual artists who do so. Michelangelo's David is a pretty classic example. Everything by Caravaggio stands out quite beautifully. Mapplethorpe's photos of men show a passion for the male form, a passion that ultimately killed him, that I have never in my life seen expressed in a single woman's work. Never. Women don't appreciate or even like the male form very much. They like what it gets them.  You're just as likely to find men who express that adoration for the female form as you will the male. I'd start with Mona Lisa, but I find that painting to be rather reserved and dispassionate. Take a look at the work of John Singer Sargent. Picasso expressed adoration for the female form both in and out of his cubist works. Monet, Manet, Van Gogh, to Man Ray and Helmut Newton. On and on and on is a list of male artists with a visceral and obsessive adoration for the female form.  And female artists? What do they like? Nearly unilaterally, they seem to prefer the female form as well. They are not driven by the same compulsion for the opposite sex that so many male artists seem to experience. They just aren't interested. What did Frida Khalo paint? Herself. Georgia O'Keefe? her vagina. Cindy Sherman? More women. Even pop photographers are more interested in the female form. Look at the work of Bunny Yeager. Women as artists are only concerned with their own form.  The only interest that women have in the male form is it's utility and as fodder for humor. "tee hee! a penis! tee hee!". These women aren't requesting "cocks". They don't want "dicks". They aren't raging for "erections". They want "dongs". Fodder for jokes. Remember when Ensler came out with the Vagina Monologues? We all know it here. The play waxed poetic about the beauty and versimilitude of the female organ. What did men get that year? That year, the penis got "Puppetry of the Penis". A joke. A ridicule. A parlour trick. A fucking carnival act.  So, when women clench their fists and bawl with quivering lower lip "Why dere is no dongz on da tee vee!?!?" I have to respond "Because you don't fucking want them. That's why."

Huh.

So why exactly are women pretending to be interested in seeing more penises on television? So they can point at them and laugh?

Women are such an enigma, especially if you just assume that nothing they ever say is true and that it’s all part of some weird plot to screw with men’s heads.

(H/t to r/againstmensrights for pointing me to geigerwasright’s lovely comment.)

410 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pecunium
11 years ago

He’s a dolt: He thinks it’s credible that 1: he’s never encountered “feminists” before the time he appeared on manboobz (i.e. in that period) and yet he’s got experience which is, “fairly wide in this matter”.

Unh hunh. He’s also picked up some idiolectical quirks which are native speaker angolphone; and that idiolect is that of internet contriarian. Amazing. All from arguing with feminist for a mere six months or so.

Feminism, better than using a Rosetta Stone.

Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

Well, you surely make him need a dictionary so maybe you are better than Rosetta 🙂 (yes, he’s a dolt, and seeing how I’m only half joking, I used to know some ASL, rectify the tense there?)

titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago

So we’re certain that the “reactionary” Asher is not the “reactionary” Brz, are we?

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

Brz: cool story, bro. Now fuck off.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I’m still trying to figure out what sort of odd personality defect would lead someone to spend a year trying to interact with a group of people who alternately ignore him and tell him to get lost.

kittehserf
11 years ago

Too cheap to pay for a domme?

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

RE: markb

Female pudenda I just barely tolerate.

Of all the terms, you choose that one?

the only thing that’s erotic is two or more svelte nymphs making tender, passionate love to each other.

Thank you for the update from your alien parasite, sir. Please leave now; I really could care less about your sexual preferences.

kittehserf
11 years ago

markb: cool story bro.

What is it with really obvious trolls today?

Ally S
11 years ago

It should be obvious to any right-thinking person that the only thing that’s erotic is two or more svelte nymphs making tender, passionate love to each other. Also, there should be spanking.

Thank you so much. All of us here were dying to hear about what gives you a boner.

(not)

kittehserf
11 years ago

This one sounds like Son of Meller.

Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

Either Poe or needs to never spank anyone. Ever.

And it’s established around here that if I say no masochism for you then you’re doing something Very Wring, right?

markb — coulda totally left that at “well I don’t looking at either other men’s penises nor vaginaes”

*cocks head* is that really the plural of vagina? Cuz that one is also Latin and seeing vaginae in print…I think it is first declension feminine…

Ah well, that’s as useful as the plural of noptopus (it’s a verb or singular noun, there is no plural, there, settled that! XD )

katz
11 years ago

He’s a nymphomaniac!

hellkell
hellkell
11 years ago

Thanks for the Boner Note, now run along, markb.

kittehserf
11 years ago

katz – GROAN

Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

Katz makes me go XD

katz
11 years ago

He’s not using “nymph” just to refer to young girls (ew) either. He’s actually only turned on by minor Greek nature spirits.

kittehserf
11 years ago

No wonder he finds penises gross, then. He’s probably only seen satyrs’, and ewww.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

But only if there are 2 nymphs and they’re fake-lesbian-ing it up in the most un-threatening manner possible.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

I was raised on Piers Anthony. Any use of the term ‘nymph’ in a sexy way just makes me D: like mad.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

For added context, Piers Anthony had a book series devoted to nymphs as brainless, souless, constantly horny and inhumanly beautiful women, where it was fairly usual for young men to chase them. There was also one book where a ‘nymphomaniac’ would kidnap and imprison nymphs after forcing them to marry him. (Of course, he also would have sex with them, but the fun part about nymphs is that they’re mindless, so they can’t NOT consent, by the book’s rules.) The book ends with him getting a hot demon wife, winning, and turning out to be Such A Nice Man.

kittehserf
11 years ago

Yeah, the fakeness of that scenario was the most obvious thing. “Paid to put on what some straight dudes seem to think lesbian sex is about” is the thing.

Pathetic’s the word that comes to mind for this sad little troll.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

I’m curious as to where this new batch of weaksauce trolls came from.

kittehserf
11 years ago

Must be spawning season.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

MRAL’s probably bored again.

Argenti Aertheri
11 years ago

Twice? Mr. Al was bored on the Roosh thread, so this probably isn’t him. Which leaves us at troll spawning season. Please bring in 50 Shades of Bears to eat them as they swim upstream.

1 11 12 13 14 15 17