Categories
a woman is always to blame all about the menz antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? bullying creep-shaming dozens of upvotes entitled babies evil women facepalm female beep boop geek girls imaginary oppression men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA no girls allowed oppressed men reddit straw feminists video games

Should gaming be a “safe space” for nerdy dudes who hate women? The Men’s Rights perspective

idiot-nerd-girl-reappropriated-05

I’m back from a brief vacation in Migraineland, and thinking about the ways in which Men’s Rights Activists love to appropriate the language of feminism and other progressive movements, usually in ways that are face-palmingly ass-backwards.

Take this recent discussion on the Men’s Rights subreddit of the dire threat of “fake gamer girls” invading the “male space” of gaming. The generically named guywithaccount sets up the discussion with this post:

I want to talk about "fake geek girls" (self.MensRights)  submitted 9 days ago by guywithaccount  For those of you who don't know about this, there's a bit of a controversy in what I'll call the geek community. Apparently, when women attend geek conventions (that is, those celebrating e.g. video games, comic books, sci-fi and fantasy), some men accuse them of being "fake geeks" or demanding that they prove their "geek cred" by correctly answering trivia questions made up on the spot.  Here's one article (of many) that talks about it: [1] http://bookviewcafe.com/blog/2013/08/08/the-fake-geek-girl-nonsense/  My concern for this issue is that, like anything else that involves gender, feminists and feminist sympathizers are attempting to dominate the discussion and frame the whole thing from a feminist and gynocentric perspective. The prevailing analysis might be summed up as "geek culture is deeply misogynistic, and the people complaining about fake geeks are just sad little losers who hate women."  IMO, the geek subculture has provided a somewhat-safe space for many men who have been snubbed by the rest of society, where they are not expected to prove their value to each other by carving notches in a bedpost or exemplifying traditional masculine traits. The increase in mainstream appeal and female participation over the past decade or so threatens the safety and exclusivity of this space, and the backlash from male geeks is a somewhat-predictable response to the invasion of their space.  Of course, there are few spaces just for men, and when someone tries to create or preserve one, they're accused of misogyny.  I suspect that some of you don't give a crap about any of this and see the whole thing as petty, but realize that it's not happening in a vacuum. I believe it's merely a symptom of the fact that men have almost no voice in gender discussions and their needs are routinely denied or ignored.
Now, there is a teensy bit of gold in this pile of bullshit: the notion of a “safe space,” where oppressed people can come forward and discuss their issues without fear of being talked over or shut down by those outside their group — who have more power in the world and who may not have their best interests at heart (or who may just be Blabby McBlabbypants types).

But there are a couple of giant problems with this notion when it comes to gamer dudes declaring gaming a “safe space” for men. The first is that, despite lingering resentments over being “snubbed” in high school or wherever — evident in the OP and in comments throughout the discussion — these guys are not actually an oppressed people by any measure that really matters.

Indeed, many of them — as tech dudes in a male-dominated tech world — are in fact in fairly privileged positions. For them to claim they need a “safe space” to protect themselves from the evils of “fake gamer girls” is a bit like Klan members claiming they need a “safe space” to protect themselves from blacks, Jews and Catholics. (Which is more or less what Klan members have argued over the years, albeit in less PC language.) No, I’m not claiming that all MRAs are the equivalent of hood-wearing Klan members. Only some of them are.

The second problem with the “game world as safe space for men” aregument is that YOU CAN’T JUST DECLARE BIG CHUNKS OF THE WORLD TO BELONG TO MEN. Yes, men dominate the gaming world in sheer numbers, both as game-makers and game-players. (While women make up nearly half of all game players — 47% — men tend to dominate the “serious” games that many geek dudes claim are the only ones that really count.) But gaming doesn’t “belong” to men any more than, say, novel-reading “belongs” to women — even though surveys suggest that women make up a staggering 80% of the fiction market in much of the English-speaking world.

Yep, that’s right: Women dominate “noveling” much more dramatically than men dominate gaming. Yet you don’t find women denouncing “fake noveler boys” or declaring that the male brain isn’t wired to understand the subtleties of written fiction.

No, in fact men are actively welcomed into book clubs.  And my best friend, a woman, has spent much of the 18 or so years or our friendship trying to get me to read this novel or that novel, though over the years she’s only succeeded in getting me to read maybe one or two of her suggestions, which were pretty good, I have to admit. (I do plan to read some of the others, really.)

If you’re a socially awkward guy and want a safe space to discuss that, find a therapist, find a support group. Don’t pick on women gamers and pretend this is somehow your right because you’re oppressed as a socially awkward guy.

Anyway, here are some other dumb comments from the Reddit thread. YetAnotherCommenter warns feminists that they may lose some powerful allies if they continue acting so feministy.

YetAnotherCommenter 18 points 9 days ago* (22|4)      Woman are assigned status for being nerds where men are not.  Men lose status for their nerdiness. Women gain it.  Some geek girls have admitted how being a female nerd grants you so much attention from men (Rebecca Watson did precisely this in an issue of a skeptic newsletter). They admit the fact that female-geekery conveys a certain level of privilege.  This is actually compounded by feminism because by being a geek (or faking it) a woman is seen as standing up to the "boys club" and thus gets a chorus of "You Go Girl!" cheerleading combined with the ability to acquire victim cred from "teh sexist menz are picking on me!"      Also, the way some pop-feminists go on about fake nerd girl shaming, it's like it's a second holocaust or something.  And then they shame all male nerds as misogynists who are bitter because they can't get laid. "Neckbeard" and "fedora" jokes and "you're just socially awkward and live in your mother's basement" are all derivatives of nerd shaming.  I know several geek girls (real geek girls, not fake ones). I support females who enjoy video games and comics etc. enjoying these hobbies. I also think it makes business sense for some comics and games to cater to this demographic (to varying degrees).  What I protest is how ideological feminists are basically attempting to "reformat" geek culture towards their own preferences, and I protest how they see geek culture (which is a product of the socially emasculated rejects of the gender system) as a bastion of "male privilege." I protest how they interpret the fact that things aren't always about them all the time as bigotry or hatred. You can fairly describe geek culture as androcentric (after all, it is predominantly male and formed from the basis of men's experiences), but this isn't the same as misogyny.  The fact is that if feminists truly wanted to undo the gender system, male nerds would be a fantastic reservoir of allies. Yet by casting us as oppressors and borderline-rapists and engaging in repeated attention-whoring behavior and exploiting female-nerd privilege and inflicting repeated guilt-trips upon us, they have destroyed any hope of this.
Speaking of nerds who can’t get laid — which we weren’t but which these guys keep bringing up (and identifying themselves as) again and again — guia7ri seems to harbor some lingering resentments from high school, and who better to take that out on than attractive geeky women?

guia7ri 4 points 9 days ago (7|3)  I think that the reason why it seems like mostly women (or why it's fake geek girls not just fake geeks) is because girls have all of the power in high school. The popular/attractive girls control who is "cool" and who isn't. But it never just ends there. The ones that get rejected by this group will be rejected by everyone else because they're trying to be accepted as "cool". The rejects end up being forced loners at best (unless they hang out with other misfits, but that can almost make things worse). So when the girls who were (or look like they would have been) responsible for the geeks being social outcasts and losers for being geeks, are now are getting into geek culture it ends up causing a controversy over the legitimacy of a girl's interests.  Even so I think the reason why it may actually be fake geek girls is because women (especially attractive and confident women) are seen as interesting or cool when they identify as a geek. If a man says he likes video games/comics/sci-fi books/movies it's typically seen as either normal or unmanly/childish. I don't think anyone would ever falsely something about themselves that would have negative connotations.

Hey MRAs, if you wonder why feminists sometimes describe MRAs as bitter men who hate women because they can’t get laid, it’s because MRAs like gui7ri so often EXPLICITLY DECLARE THEMSELVES BITTER MEN WHO HATE WOMEN BECAUSE THEY CAN’T GET LAID.

Meanwhile Byuku blames it all on evil feminists pretending to be geeks in order to make trouble. Because that’s what feminists do.

byuku 3 points 9 days ago (8|5)  My belief is that most of the complaining actually does come from fake geek girls. Think about it - have you ever met extremely hostile and unfriendly geeks? Especially around attractive women? Most geeks I've ever known have been treated like shit by society and thus have a really passive behaviour (they're quiet).  My hunch would be that a bunch of crazy feminist nutjobs walk into a convention, and some geek asks "Hey I notice XYZ on your shirt, who's your favourite character?"  Traditional geek girl responds politely. Fake geek girls say "WHAT? JUST BECAUSE I'M HERE DOESN'T MEAN YOU GET TO TEST ME!!!" and bitches about it to all hell all over the enerets.  And now we're here talking about it. That's how feminism dominates mainstream cultural discussion as it does.
That’s how they get you!

EDIT: Added a sentence to temper and clarify my assertion that men “dominate” gaming.

1.2K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Falconer
11 years ago

They are both short-haired cats, but Hazel’s fur is noticeably coarser than Buster’s. Hazel doesn’t really like to be petted, whereas Buster is a cuddlebunny.

Well, that seems like it worked out just fine. The one that’s softer to pet is more enthusiastic about being petted.

I wonder if the coarse fur sensation puts Hazel off the pettins?

pecunium
11 years ago

Off to work, if there are any scraps (and I have any energy) I’ll play with them tonight, otherwise I shall see you after work tomorrow.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

RE: cloudiah

I’ll add your vote!

grumpycatisagirl
11 years ago

I vote for the dragon in the plaid skirt too.

katz
11 years ago

You don’t need an LJ to vote; anyway it didn’t require one for me.

talacaris
talacaris
11 years ago

Saw something about free will in here. Is it really controversial to deny the existence of free will?

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

I hate to break it to you guys, but the dragon’s actually wearing a plaid SHIRT.

…though I suppose that doesn’t necessarily EXCLUDE it from wearing a plaid skirt as well, now that I think about it…

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

So this dragon has really awful taste? That would be almost as bad as double denim.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

I will admit, if you guys can use the poll, that is easiest for me.

RE: talacaris

Is it really controversial to deny the existence of free will?

When it involves also claiming that science is philosophy, women have never worked outside the home, and men and women are irrevocably different and claiming otherwise will destroy society… yes. Yes it is.

katz
11 years ago

Oh, sorry, I totally misread that! I was imagining more of a 70’s dragon in a lot of earth tones. Obviously I’ll have to draw my version.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

RE: CassandraSays

So this dragon has really awful taste? That would be almost as bad as double denim.

Well, it IS a Hipster Dragon. Had it a mustache, it would likely wax it. And hey, I used to wear double denim!

Falconer
11 years ago

Well, I can at least now stop searching for the clip from Doctor Who where the Brigadier shows up in a kilt.

Because, you see, he’s the Doctor’s Dragon and he’s wearing a plaid skirt.

But now it’s a dragon in a plaid shirt, maybe I should start looking for REM pics.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

RE: katz

By all means! Sometimes the misread version is more entertaining than the original.

grumpycatisagirl
11 years ago

If I try to fill out the poll it asks me to log in first.

talacaris
talacaris
11 years ago

LBT: well the other claims are, i wouldnt say controversial, just wrong..

But to say that free will does not exist in a metaphysical sense, which is not to say it’s not a useful fiction, it can still be a good concept to use in ethics, law &c. Is that controversial?

cloudiah
11 years ago

Okay, I voted.

BTW, Eivind Berge and Judgy Bitch are having a discussion about rape on twitter that is exactly as terrible as you’d expect.

katz
11 years ago

Is it really controversial to deny the existence of free will?

Obviously it’s controversial in the sense that not everyone agrees about it, but I think you meant controversial in the more colloquial sense of “bad and worthy of shunning” (as in “the controversial new book about X”). And in that sense? Not really. I’m sure there are people here who believe in a strict view of determinism.

But the real issue is what conclusions you draw from your position. Waaaaay too often denying free will is just an excuse to allow bad behavior. Everything from “You can’t punish that murderer! There’s no free will so he had no choice!” to trolly’s nonsense about oppression and shit.

In his case, he was also a) trying to force his position about free will on the rest of us and b) using just plain stupid logic. “If you believe in free will, you have to not believe in evolution or biology or conditioning or anything!” Yeaaaaaah.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

RE: grumpycatisagirl

No worries; I’ll make a comment saying your vote and tally it in later.

RE: talacaris

I don’t think you understand the context of the conversation. People here would probably debate free will all the live long day, it’s just that this troll married that idea to a bunch of other fucked-up ideas and decided EVERYTHING was biology. He wasn’t arguing what you seem to think he was arguing.

My little sister is a strict determinist. But note I don’t think she’s a pain in my ass.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

Also, if the dragon is more serpentine, the boundaries between shirt, skirt, and dress are very fluid, if you think about it.

Falconer
11 years ago

But to say that free will does not exist in a metaphysical sense, which is not to say it’s not a useful fiction, it can still be a good concept to use in ethics, law &c. Is that controversial?

That’s a subject for someone who’s read more philosophy than I have, but what happened is that he claimed a right to kiss his wife (I really hope he doesn’t have one), Pecunium (I think) said that wasn’t a right because said alleged wife would have autonomy and it was her call who kissed her, and then Ash-hole went all, but what does it really mean??? by bringing up free will.

I thought he would probably slam free will because he was all, everything has a cause and that cause is Evolution therefore we are nothing more than biological impulses earlier in the thread.

katz
11 years ago

Short version: Go ahead and believe whatever you like about free will. Just don’t draw bullshit conclusions from it.

titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago

Now, either I can understand Kant but fail to understand a simple analogy or you are dishonest.

All evidence indicates you cannot understand Kant. Or a simple analogy. Or a false dichotomy. Or empathy, feminism, the English language, women, men …

So just fuck off, you willfully ignorant and hate-filled shitstain.

LBT
LBT
11 years ago

See, I don’t need to give Asher’s bull the dignity of thought, because my ten-year-old little sister has explained her version of no-free-will waaaaay better. In her mind, the universe is like a clockwork machine of infinite complexity, where every event triggers something else, but none of us know enough of the variables to be able to make sense out of it. Obviously, if someone WERE able to ever keep track of it all, they could see the future.

And see, she managed to discuss it without talking about morals being merely a matter of social timing.

chibigodzilla
11 years ago

Short version: Go ahead and believe whatever you like about free will. Just don’t draw bullshit conclusions from it.

What bothered me more was his insistence that his BS conclusion was the only possible conclusion

titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago
1 42 43 44 45 46 49