I’m back from a brief vacation in Migraineland, and thinking about the ways in which Men’s Rights Activists love to appropriate the language of feminism and other progressive movements, usually in ways that are face-palmingly ass-backwards.
Take this recent discussion on the Men’s Rights subreddit of the dire threat of “fake gamer girls” invading the “male space” of gaming. The generically named guywithaccount sets up the discussion with this post:
Now, there is a teensy bit of gold in this pile of bullshit: the notion of a “safe space,” where oppressed people can come forward and discuss their issues without fear of being talked over or shut down by those outside their group — who have more power in the world and who may not have their best interests at heart (or who may just be Blabby McBlabbypants types).
But there are a couple of giant problems with this notion when it comes to gamer dudes declaring gaming a “safe space” for men. The first is that, despite lingering resentments over being “snubbed” in high school or wherever — evident in the OP and in comments throughout the discussion — these guys are not actually an oppressed people by any measure that really matters.
Indeed, many of them — as tech dudes in a male-dominated tech world — are in fact in fairly privileged positions. For them to claim they need a “safe space” to protect themselves from the evils of “fake gamer girls” is a bit like Klan members claiming they need a “safe space” to protect themselves from blacks, Jews and Catholics. (Which is more or less what Klan members have argued over the years, albeit in less PC language.) No, I’m not claiming that all MRAs are the equivalent of hood-wearing Klan members. Only some of them are.
The second problem with the “game world as safe space for men” aregument is that YOU CAN’T JUST DECLARE BIG CHUNKS OF THE WORLD TO BELONG TO MEN. Yes, men dominate the gaming world in sheer numbers, both as game-makers and game-players. (While women make up nearly half of all game players — 47% — men tend to dominate the “serious” games that many geek dudes claim are the only ones that really count.) But gaming doesn’t “belong” to men any more than, say, novel-reading “belongs” to women — even though surveys suggest that women make up a staggering 80% of the fiction market in much of the English-speaking world.
Yep, that’s right: Women dominate “noveling” much more dramatically than men dominate gaming. Yet you don’t find women denouncing “fake noveler boys” or declaring that the male brain isn’t wired to understand the subtleties of written fiction.
No, in fact men are actively welcomed into book clubs. And my best friend, a woman, has spent much of the 18 or so years or our friendship trying to get me to read this novel or that novel, though over the years she’s only succeeded in getting me to read maybe one or two of her suggestions, which were pretty good, I have to admit. (I do plan to read some of the others, really.)
If you’re a socially awkward guy and want a safe space to discuss that, find a therapist, find a support group. Don’t pick on women gamers and pretend this is somehow your right because you’re oppressed as a socially awkward guy.
Anyway, here are some other dumb comments from the Reddit thread. YetAnotherCommenter warns feminists that they may lose some powerful allies if they continue acting so feministy.
Speaking of nerds who can’t get laid — which we weren’t but which these guys keep bringing up (and identifying themselves as) again and again — guia7ri seems to harbor some lingering resentments from high school, and who better to take that out on than attractive geeky women?
Hey MRAs, if you wonder why feminists sometimes describe MRAs as bitter men who hate women because they can’t get laid, it’s because MRAs like gui7ri so often EXPLICITLY DECLARE THEMSELVES BITTER MEN WHO HATE WOMEN BECAUSE THEY CAN’T GET LAID.
Meanwhile Byuku blames it all on evil feminists pretending to be geeks in order to make trouble. Because that’s what feminists do.
That’s how they get you!
EDIT: Added a sentence to temper and clarify my assertion that men “dominate” gaming.
@argenti aertheri
plague rat fan system? Are we posting pictures of rats? Oh well, that’s how I’ll interpret it.
BIRTHDAY RAAATTTSSS!!!!!!! :3
@hellkell
So that’s what he said in his icky comment I didn’t bother reading >:( seconding banhammer, if I didn’t already.
re:good
Oh, basement cat, you’re still around?
@cloudiah
oh, we did? 🙁
And I’m sure fatherless households have nothing whatsoever to do with fathers abandoning their children and choosing to be absent. /sarcasm
Of course, 70% of divorces are initiated by women (the vast majority of divorces don’t involve abuse nor infidelity). Peterson actually addresses this question quite well in the following article and the quote below is quite telling:
http://www.wnd.com/2007/06/42117/
According to a 1994 study of 500 women in Redbook Magazine, “only eleven percent of mothers value their husband’s input when it comes to handling problems with their children.”
I think that we can expand on this and show that most wives today don’t value their husbands. Here is more:
According to popular myth, men leave because they’re irresponsible and don’t care about their families. Yes, there’s a very small segment of the male population who are guilty of this, but for most American men this is not the case.
Most fathers don’t want to leave their children. They love their kids and want to be engaged in every aspect of their lives. Men hurt and feel pain when they cannot be with their kids. To suggest otherwise is not only insulting to men, it’s a bold-faced lie.
Society routinely degrades fathers. Men are typically depicted by Hollywood as inadequate and useless beings who are nothing more than comedic props.
*snip*
In my work as a minister and counselor over the past 17 years, I’ve talked with countless couples and have noticed that women are angry and men don’t know how to deal with this anger. Everyone can see that “mom” has issues; the father knows it; the kids know it too. The mistake they make is reacting to this anger with their own anger and fear. The resulting inner pain causes men to overreact, and literally shift into a “fight or flight” response.
To avoid the inner and outer conflict, a man will leave his wife (or girlfriend) and his children.
Many women I counsel with and have interviewed on my radio and TV shows are quick to point out everything their man is doing wrong, but it’s rare to find one who will honestly admit that she’s screwed up the kids or that she’s driving her mate crazy.
You know what’s more fascinating than Good? All the white cat hair on the back of my chair at work. My kitty has never even been to my workplace.
Ratties in hats! So cute!
My cats’ hairs travel with me too.
Here’s something else cat-hair-related that is more interesting than Good. My two cats are sisters, from the same litter, and are both striped tabbies — but the texture of their fur is so different that I can tell them apart even when it’s dark.
Kitty-hair teleportation is an oft-reported, poorly-understood phenomenon.
Also – socks in the dryer. Why is it always only one of them that vanishes?
Goddammit, we got rid of Asher and now Good is shitting in the thread? Dude, you didn’t even have the decency to go to one of the maaaaany rape threads.
Also, speaking as a male survivor of sexual abuse, I can’t shake the feeling that you don’t actually give a shit about me, so much as giving out feminist GOTCHAs.
Cloudiah, the differences in texture in your cat’s hair is indeed way more compelling than anything Good says. Does one of your cats have short hair and the other long? Or are the texture differences more subtle than that?
Another thing more fascinating than Good: the fact that someone at my work who claims to know a lot about web development thinks that secure websites need to log off users automatically when the close the tab or go to another website.
@Ally S
As someone who knows 0 about web development I have no idea if that is bad/good/ignorant thing, so forgive me while any potential computer talks go straight over my head.
re: cat hair
I don’t have cats, but I do have guinea pigs, and they always seem to leave a little layer of hair on my clothes when cuddling them. Their hair, too, is more interesting than Good.
I too have a more interesting thing to talk about than Good! Which is that now that I’ve uploaded all my Wealthathon stories, it’s bonus sketch time! I’m letting my readers duke it out in a poll; feel free to take part! (Even if you don’t have an LJ, leave me a comment and I’ll handle the results-crunching.)
lol, you’re right. Sorry about coming off as possibly presumptuous towards others.
@Ally S
Didn’t sound presumptuous to me. ::shrugs::
Un-Good: According to a [14 year old] [report*] of [a non-representative sample] in [a magazine] {as reported by an unreliable site run by misogynist reactionaries and racists}.
FTFY
*which report isn’t actually cited: The only places I found it referred to on google were all quoting this opinion piece from World Net Daily.
Triple Plus Ungood
LBT: If you don’t end up drawing the dragon in the plaid skirt, I may have to draw that myself.
Better than good: I have a headache, feel sort of “bleah” and have to go to work.
(If I didn’t know better I’d say I feel a bit hungover, but I didn’t do any drinking yesterday. It’s just being one of those days).
When Good finally goes into moderation I think somebody needs to make the obvious joke. I’m saying this because I might not be there for it.
srsly tho Good your fact citations are about on par with did-you-kno.tumblr.com
@Inurashii
Now I feel really slow because I don’t know what the obvious joke is. Also a sign I will not be the one to make it.
We should all post this when Good goes into moderation:
Um, ignore that. I seriously borked that up. I meant this .
RE: katz
LBT: If you don’t end up drawing the dragon in the plaid skirt, I may have to draw that myself.
So far your prompt is actually in the lead! And I always welcome fanart; if you do draw hipster!dragon, I’d love to put it up as a fanart illustration. (With credit and linkback, of course.)
@grumpycat, They are both short-haired cats, but Hazel’s fur is noticeably coarser than Buster’s. Hazel doesn’t really like to be petted, whereas Buster is a cuddlebunny.
@LBT, I agree with katz. 😀
Because the Eater of Socks has a very small stomach. But I can’t help you with airline food. Blech.