Categories
a woman is always to blame all about the menz antifeminism are these guys 12 years old? bullying creep-shaming dozens of upvotes entitled babies evil women facepalm female beep boop geek girls imaginary oppression men who should not ever be with women ever misogyny MRA no girls allowed oppressed men reddit straw feminists video games

Should gaming be a “safe space” for nerdy dudes who hate women? The Men’s Rights perspective

idiot-nerd-girl-reappropriated-05

I’m back from a brief vacation in Migraineland, and thinking about the ways in which Men’s Rights Activists love to appropriate the language of feminism and other progressive movements, usually in ways that are face-palmingly ass-backwards.

Take this recent discussion on the Men’s Rights subreddit of the dire threat of “fake gamer girls” invading the “male space” of gaming. The generically named guywithaccount sets up the discussion with this post:

I want to talk about "fake geek girls" (self.MensRights)  submitted 9 days ago by guywithaccount  For those of you who don't know about this, there's a bit of a controversy in what I'll call the geek community. Apparently, when women attend geek conventions (that is, those celebrating e.g. video games, comic books, sci-fi and fantasy), some men accuse them of being "fake geeks" or demanding that they prove their "geek cred" by correctly answering trivia questions made up on the spot.  Here's one article (of many) that talks about it: [1] http://bookviewcafe.com/blog/2013/08/08/the-fake-geek-girl-nonsense/  My concern for this issue is that, like anything else that involves gender, feminists and feminist sympathizers are attempting to dominate the discussion and frame the whole thing from a feminist and gynocentric perspective. The prevailing analysis might be summed up as "geek culture is deeply misogynistic, and the people complaining about fake geeks are just sad little losers who hate women."  IMO, the geek subculture has provided a somewhat-safe space for many men who have been snubbed by the rest of society, where they are not expected to prove their value to each other by carving notches in a bedpost or exemplifying traditional masculine traits. The increase in mainstream appeal and female participation over the past decade or so threatens the safety and exclusivity of this space, and the backlash from male geeks is a somewhat-predictable response to the invasion of their space.  Of course, there are few spaces just for men, and when someone tries to create or preserve one, they're accused of misogyny.  I suspect that some of you don't give a crap about any of this and see the whole thing as petty, but realize that it's not happening in a vacuum. I believe it's merely a symptom of the fact that men have almost no voice in gender discussions and their needs are routinely denied or ignored.
Now, there is a teensy bit of gold in this pile of bullshit: the notion of a “safe space,” where oppressed people can come forward and discuss their issues without fear of being talked over or shut down by those outside their group — who have more power in the world and who may not have their best interests at heart (or who may just be Blabby McBlabbypants types).

But there are a couple of giant problems with this notion when it comes to gamer dudes declaring gaming a “safe space” for men. The first is that, despite lingering resentments over being “snubbed” in high school or wherever — evident in the OP and in comments throughout the discussion — these guys are not actually an oppressed people by any measure that really matters.

Indeed, many of them — as tech dudes in a male-dominated tech world — are in fact in fairly privileged positions. For them to claim they need a “safe space” to protect themselves from the evils of “fake gamer girls” is a bit like Klan members claiming they need a “safe space” to protect themselves from blacks, Jews and Catholics. (Which is more or less what Klan members have argued over the years, albeit in less PC language.) No, I’m not claiming that all MRAs are the equivalent of hood-wearing Klan members. Only some of them are.

The second problem with the “game world as safe space for men” aregument is that YOU CAN’T JUST DECLARE BIG CHUNKS OF THE WORLD TO BELONG TO MEN. Yes, men dominate the gaming world in sheer numbers, both as game-makers and game-players. (While women make up nearly half of all game players — 47% — men tend to dominate the “serious” games that many geek dudes claim are the only ones that really count.) But gaming doesn’t “belong” to men any more than, say, novel-reading “belongs” to women — even though surveys suggest that women make up a staggering 80% of the fiction market in much of the English-speaking world.

Yep, that’s right: Women dominate “noveling” much more dramatically than men dominate gaming. Yet you don’t find women denouncing “fake noveler boys” or declaring that the male brain isn’t wired to understand the subtleties of written fiction.

No, in fact men are actively welcomed into book clubs.  And my best friend, a woman, has spent much of the 18 or so years or our friendship trying to get me to read this novel or that novel, though over the years she’s only succeeded in getting me to read maybe one or two of her suggestions, which were pretty good, I have to admit. (I do plan to read some of the others, really.)

If you’re a socially awkward guy and want a safe space to discuss that, find a therapist, find a support group. Don’t pick on women gamers and pretend this is somehow your right because you’re oppressed as a socially awkward guy.

Anyway, here are some other dumb comments from the Reddit thread. YetAnotherCommenter warns feminists that they may lose some powerful allies if they continue acting so feministy.

YetAnotherCommenter 18 points 9 days ago* (22|4)      Woman are assigned status for being nerds where men are not.  Men lose status for their nerdiness. Women gain it.  Some geek girls have admitted how being a female nerd grants you so much attention from men (Rebecca Watson did precisely this in an issue of a skeptic newsletter). They admit the fact that female-geekery conveys a certain level of privilege.  This is actually compounded by feminism because by being a geek (or faking it) a woman is seen as standing up to the "boys club" and thus gets a chorus of "You Go Girl!" cheerleading combined with the ability to acquire victim cred from "teh sexist menz are picking on me!"      Also, the way some pop-feminists go on about fake nerd girl shaming, it's like it's a second holocaust or something.  And then they shame all male nerds as misogynists who are bitter because they can't get laid. "Neckbeard" and "fedora" jokes and "you're just socially awkward and live in your mother's basement" are all derivatives of nerd shaming.  I know several geek girls (real geek girls, not fake ones). I support females who enjoy video games and comics etc. enjoying these hobbies. I also think it makes business sense for some comics and games to cater to this demographic (to varying degrees).  What I protest is how ideological feminists are basically attempting to "reformat" geek culture towards their own preferences, and I protest how they see geek culture (which is a product of the socially emasculated rejects of the gender system) as a bastion of "male privilege." I protest how they interpret the fact that things aren't always about them all the time as bigotry or hatred. You can fairly describe geek culture as androcentric (after all, it is predominantly male and formed from the basis of men's experiences), but this isn't the same as misogyny.  The fact is that if feminists truly wanted to undo the gender system, male nerds would be a fantastic reservoir of allies. Yet by casting us as oppressors and borderline-rapists and engaging in repeated attention-whoring behavior and exploiting female-nerd privilege and inflicting repeated guilt-trips upon us, they have destroyed any hope of this.
Speaking of nerds who can’t get laid — which we weren’t but which these guys keep bringing up (and identifying themselves as) again and again — guia7ri seems to harbor some lingering resentments from high school, and who better to take that out on than attractive geeky women?

guia7ri 4 points 9 days ago (7|3)  I think that the reason why it seems like mostly women (or why it's fake geek girls not just fake geeks) is because girls have all of the power in high school. The popular/attractive girls control who is "cool" and who isn't. But it never just ends there. The ones that get rejected by this group will be rejected by everyone else because they're trying to be accepted as "cool". The rejects end up being forced loners at best (unless they hang out with other misfits, but that can almost make things worse). So when the girls who were (or look like they would have been) responsible for the geeks being social outcasts and losers for being geeks, are now are getting into geek culture it ends up causing a controversy over the legitimacy of a girl's interests.  Even so I think the reason why it may actually be fake geek girls is because women (especially attractive and confident women) are seen as interesting or cool when they identify as a geek. If a man says he likes video games/comics/sci-fi books/movies it's typically seen as either normal or unmanly/childish. I don't think anyone would ever falsely something about themselves that would have negative connotations.

Hey MRAs, if you wonder why feminists sometimes describe MRAs as bitter men who hate women because they can’t get laid, it’s because MRAs like gui7ri so often EXPLICITLY DECLARE THEMSELVES BITTER MEN WHO HATE WOMEN BECAUSE THEY CAN’T GET LAID.

Meanwhile Byuku blames it all on evil feminists pretending to be geeks in order to make trouble. Because that’s what feminists do.

byuku 3 points 9 days ago (8|5)  My belief is that most of the complaining actually does come from fake geek girls. Think about it - have you ever met extremely hostile and unfriendly geeks? Especially around attractive women? Most geeks I've ever known have been treated like shit by society and thus have a really passive behaviour (they're quiet).  My hunch would be that a bunch of crazy feminist nutjobs walk into a convention, and some geek asks "Hey I notice XYZ on your shirt, who's your favourite character?"  Traditional geek girl responds politely. Fake geek girls say "WHAT? JUST BECAUSE I'M HERE DOESN'T MEAN YOU GET TO TEST ME!!!" and bitches about it to all hell all over the enerets.  And now we're here talking about it. That's how feminism dominates mainstream cultural discussion as it does.
That’s how they get you!

EDIT: Added a sentence to temper and clarify my assertion that men “dominate” gaming.

1.2K Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago

Did it owrk? Kitens?

http://instagram.com/p/dUZIPiF-13/

Howard Bannister
11 years ago

KITTENS!!!

kirbywarp
kirbywarp
11 years ago

@seranvali:

The “women are the gatekeepers of sex” comes from a bunch of cultural things, like wives punishing their husbands by witholding sex, or men asking women for sex and the woman saying “yes” or “no.” It’s all really asinine. In pretty much any situation where the agreement of two people is required for a thing to happen, the other person is going to look like the gatekeeper. (If I want the thing, I can’t get it unless the other person agrees too)

titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago

See, Twitter has a purpose. A twitter-friend told me about an IRL friend of hers who was a vet’s nurse. a local farmer had been gradually trapping all the feral cats on his farm, getting them neutered & then releasing them again. One female cat had a litter of 5 kittens before he could catch her. He brought the kittens in to the vets and asked them to put them all down. Vet nurse couldn’t do it so got them signed over to her & was trying to rehome them. All 5 solid black so she was really struggling to find homes. How could I resist? /smug

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@titanblue

So…did you take the kitties?

(ps I’m being a bad commenter, I only read the last page of this thread).

titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago

It’s definitely asinine,isn’t it,@kirbywarp. I am the gatekeeper of sex with me. Everyone is the gatekeeper of sex with themselves. /sigh

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

@ Marie

You’re not missing anything by skipping merrily past the troll droppings, trust me.

titianblue
titianblue
11 years ago

@marie I took two boy kittens. Beran is the fluffier, Brond the smoother coated. I am besotted.

Plus I helped convince another twitter-friend to take another 2. So waiting to hear if the remaining little laddie has found a home yet (the nurse said she might keep him herself if noone turned up for him).

If the picture didn’t work, I’ll have another go when I get home.

Howard Bannister
11 years ago

I tried to go back to the beginning and read them, but it got TEDIOUS.

I mean, I can read a 1200+ comment thread and enjoy myself when the argument is, yanno, one where all participants are engaging honestly. You can learn stuff in there! And some of that stuff will blow your mind!

But right about the time somebody starts in with the crap, it just gets so unreadable….

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@titan blue

D’awww. Yay for your kitties!

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

He could have just written “I’m so awesome” 500 times and saved himself and everyone else a lot of reading.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@howard bannister/ cassandra says

I swear the more people say about the troll the more curious I get! XD Do not tempt me!

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Hmm. Will you need help getting to sleep later? Maybe save it for then. Much better than counting sheep.

Asher
Asher
11 years ago

They prevent the collapse of society.

If “rights” are nothing more than the rules that keep society functioning then neither the movement to abolish slavery nor the gay marriage movement have anything to do with rights. Societies have existed with slavery and lack of gay marriage for most of human history.

Now, that is not to say that either movement is undesirable but by *your* definition of “rights” neither falls under it.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@cassandra says

Nah, I just woke up an hour or so ago XD

@Asher

If “rights” are nothing more than the rules that keep society functioning then neither the movement to abolish slavery nor the gay marriage movement have anything to do with rights.

Are you the troll? Either way, seems like you don’t actually know what rights are. PS don’t put it in scare quotes.

Asher
Asher
11 years ago

you familiar with this thing called “empathy”?

Funny you should mention this because it relates to the concept of Dunbar’s Number that I mentioned earlier. Human beings are able to interact, at most, on an integrated emotional level with, at most, a few hundred individuals in their entire lifetime. Interactions outside of that small circle require abstract rules of behavior that are not governed by emotion.

Rules governing behavior in large-scale societies have nothing to do with empathy. Empathy, as an emotion, is immediate and directly proximate. Moral philosophy that bases abstract notions of “right” on empathy are blatantly false.

Howard Bannister
11 years ago

Moral philosophy that bases abstract notions of “right” on empathy are blatantly false.

Ahhhhhhh… so nice of you to admit what has been obvious to the rest of us this whole time. 😛

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

Imagine about 10-15 teal deers just like that per page and you have the early part of this thread. I just skimmed it because my eyes were starting to glaze over.

Asher
Asher
11 years ago

the fact that you think it necessarily draws arbitrary lines is telling and says a lot about your understanding of modern psychology, however thorough it is.

What’s telling is that modern psychology *does* do this and when I point it out you don’t even bother to contest it but offer the intellectually dishonest response of “it’s telling”, implying that I’m “that sort of person”. Frankly, your behavior is what’s known as Orwellian; since I seem to have to spell everything out for the commenters, here, calling someone Orwellian is mainly a reference to the concept of thoughtcrime in the book 1984.

You are insinuating that I am engaging in thoughtcrime.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@Asher

you familiar with this thing called “empathy”?

Empathy, as an emotion, is immediate and directly proximate. Moral philosophy that bases abstract notions of “right” on empathy are blatantly false.

So the answer is no?

On the bright side now that trolly’s giving us some of his…wisdom…here I feel less need to go see what he was saying earlier.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

@Asher

Dude, 1) everyone knows who Orwell was (or at least lots of people here) 2) links to where people are “insinuating you’re engaging in thought crime”. B/c pointing out you are an ass=/= Thoughtcrime!

Howard Bannister
11 years ago

You are insinuating that I am engaging in thoughtcrime.

No, the insinuation is more ASSHOLE, but you just run with that.

Marie
Marie
11 years ago

Also, I”m going to have to re-read 1984, since trolls seem to love it so much.

CassandraSays
CassandraSays
11 years ago

1/10, several points deducted for trying too hard.

Howard Bannister
11 years ago

What’s telling is that modern psychology *does* do this

…um, see, this is pretty much a ‘no, U WRONG’ statement.

But with no proof behind it.

Then he moves on real quick to impugn the motivations of those questioning him to make sure you don’t stop to ask for proof.

This is a very deliberate shuffle and switch.

This is why you are a dishonest actor.

1 16 17 18 19 20 49